Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Comparison of the portion size and frequency of consumption of 156 foods across seven European countries: insights from the Food4ME study

Subjects

Abstract

There are no standardised serving/portion sizes defined for foods consumed in the European Union (EU). Typical serving sizes can deviate significantly from the 100 g/100 ml labelling specification required by the EU legislation. Where the nutritional value of a portion is specified, the portion size is determined by the manufacturers. Our objective was to investigate the potential for standardising portion sizes for specific foods, thereby ensuring complementarity across countries. We compared portion size for 156 food items measured using a food frequency questionnaire across the seven countries participating in the Food4me study. The probability of consuming a food and the frequency of consumption differed across countries for 93% and 58% of the foods, respectively. However, the individual country mean portion size differed from the average across countries in only 16% of comparisons. Thus, although dietary choices vary markedly across countries, there is much less variation in portion sizes. Our results highlight the potential for standardisation of portion sizes on nutrition labels in the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020 (A66/9). World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.

  2. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Forster H, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 2015; 10: 450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance. National Adult Nutrition Survey: summary [March 2011]. Summary Report on Food and Nutrient intakes, Physical Measurements, Physical Activity Patterns and Food Choice Motives, 2011. Available at: http://www.iuna.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/National-Adult-Nutrition-Survey-Summary-Report-March-2011.pdf (accessed 5 October 2015).

  4. Forster H, Fallaize R, Gallagher C, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C, Walsh MC et al. Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fallaize R, Forster H, Macready AL, Walsh MC, Mathers JC, Brennan L et al. Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Food Safety Authority of Ireland. A Research Study into Consumers’ Attitudes to Food Labelling. Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, 2009.

  7. Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D . Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 1496–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raats MM, Hieke S, Jola C, Hodgkins C, Kennedy J, Wills J . Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015; 69: 619–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Food4Me (KBBE.2010.2.3-02, Project no. 265494).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Kirwan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirwan, L., Walsh, M., Brennan, L. et al. Comparison of the portion size and frequency of consumption of 156 foods across seven European countries: insights from the Food4ME study. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 642–644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.227

Search

Quick links