Abstract
There are no standardised serving/portion sizes defined for foods consumed in the European Union (EU). Typical serving sizes can deviate significantly from the 100 g/100 ml labelling specification required by the EU legislation. Where the nutritional value of a portion is specified, the portion size is determined by the manufacturers. Our objective was to investigate the potential for standardising portion sizes for specific foods, thereby ensuring complementarity across countries. We compared portion size for 156 food items measured using a food frequency questionnaire across the seven countries participating in the Food4me study. The probability of consuming a food and the frequency of consumption differed across countries for 93% and 58% of the foods, respectively. However, the individual country mean portion size differed from the average across countries in only 16% of comparisons. Thus, although dietary choices vary markedly across countries, there is much less variation in portion sizes. Our results highlight the potential for standardisation of portion sizes on nutrition labels in the EU.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020 (A66/9). World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Forster H, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 2015; 10: 450.
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance. National Adult Nutrition Survey: summary [March 2011]. Summary Report on Food and Nutrient intakes, Physical Measurements, Physical Activity Patterns and Food Choice Motives, 2011. Available at: http://www.iuna.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/National-Adult-Nutrition-Survey-Summary-Report-March-2011.pdf (accessed 5 October 2015).
Forster H, Fallaize R, Gallagher C, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C, Walsh MC et al. Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e150.
Fallaize R, Forster H, Macready AL, Walsh MC, Mathers JC, Brennan L et al. Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e190.
Food Safety Authority of Ireland. A Research Study into Consumers’ Attitudes to Food Labelling. Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, 2009.
Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D . Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 1496–1506.
Raats MM, Hieke S, Jola C, Hodgkins C, Kennedy J, Wills J . Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015; 69: 619–625.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Food4Me (KBBE.2010.2.3-02, Project no. 265494).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirwan, L., Walsh, M., Brennan, L. et al. Comparison of the portion size and frequency of consumption of 156 foods across seven European countries: insights from the Food4ME study. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 642–644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.227
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.227