Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior

Journal of Perinatology volume 33, pages 636–641 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effects of parental presence and infant holding in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on neurobehavior at term equivalent.

Study Design:

Prospective cohort enrolled 81 infants born ⩽30 weeks gestation. Nurses tracked parent visitation, holding and skin-to-skin care throughout the NICU hospitalization. At term, the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale was administered. Associations between visitation, holding and early neurobehavior were determined using linear and logistic regression.

Result:

The mean hours per week of parent visitation was 21.33±20.88 (median=13.90; interquartile range 10.10 to 23.60). Infants were held an average of 2.29±1.47 days per week (median=2.00; interquartile range 1.20 to 3.10). Over the hospital stay, visitation hours decreased (P=0.01), while holding frequencies increased (P<0.001). More visitation was associated with better quality of movement (P=0.02), less arousal (P=0.01), less excitability (P=0.03), more lethargy (P=0.01) and more hypotonia (P<0.01). More holding was associated with improved quality of movement (P<0.01), less stress (P<0.01), less arousal (P=0.04) and less excitability (P<0.01).

Conclusion:

Infants of caregivers who were visited and held more often in the NICU had differences in early neurobehavior by term equivalent, which supports the need for and importance of early parenting in the NICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson P, Doyle LW Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289 (24): 3264–3272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Classification A, Surveys, Team T. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Final Draft, Full Version. Classification, Assessment, Surveys and Terminology Team. World Health Organization, 2001.

  3. Lindberg B, Öhrling K . Experiences of having a prematurely born infant from the perspective of mothers in northern Sweden. Int J Circumpolar Health 2008; 67 (5).

  4. Fanaroff AA, Kennell JH, Klaus MH . Follow-up of low birth weight infants: the predictive value of maternal visiting patterns. Pediatrics 1972; 49: 287–290.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Latva R, Lehtonen L, Salmelin R, Tamminen T . Visits by the family to the neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Pediatr (Stockholm) 2006; 96 (2): 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franck LS, Spencer C . Parent visiting and participation in infant caregiving activities in a neonatal unit. Birth 2003; 30 (1): 31–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reid M, Lloyd D, Campbell G, Murray K, Porter M . Scottish neonatal intensive care units; a study of staff and parental attitudes. Health Bull. (Melb.) 1995; 53 (5): 314.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenfield AG . Visiting in the intensive care nursery. Child Dev. 1980; 51: 939–941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeskind PS, Iacino R . Effects of maternal visitation to preterm infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Child Dev 1984; 55: 1887–1893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Latva R, Lehtonen L, Salmelin RK, Tamminen T . Visiting less than every day: a marker for later behavioral problems in Finnish preterm infants. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004; 158 (12): 1153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Örtenstrand A, Westrup B, Broström EB, Sarman I, Åkerström S, Brune T et al. The Stockholm Neonatal Family Centered Care Study: effects on length of stay and infant morbidity. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (2): e278–e285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newnham C, Inder T, Milgrom J . Measuring preterm cumulative stressors within the NICU: the neonatal infant stressor scale. Early Hum Dev 2009; 85 (9): 549–555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lester BM, Tronick EZ, LaGasse L, Seifer R, Bauer CR, Shankaran S et al. The maternal lifestyle study: effects of substance exposure during pregnancy on neurodevelopmental outcome in 1-month-old infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (6): 1182–1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cockburn F, Cooke R . The CRIB (Clinical Risk Index For Babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk. Lancet 1993; 342 (8865): 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrington KJ . The adverse neuro-developmental effects of postnatal steroids in the preterm infant: a systematic review of RCTs. BMC Pediatr 2001; 1 (1): 1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Franz AR, Pohlandt F, Bode H, Mihatsch WA, Sander S, Kron M et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (1): e101–e109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller SP, Ferriero DM, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Glidden DV, Partridge JC et al. Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 2005; 147 (5): 609–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonya J, Nelin LD . Factors associated with maternal visitation and participation in skin-to-skin care in an all referral level IIIc NICU. Acta Paediatr (Stockholm) 2012.

  19. Whitelaw A, Sleath K . Myth of the marsupial mother: home care of very low birth weight babies in Bogota, Colombia. Lancet 1985; 1 (8439): 1206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aucott S, Donohue PK, Atkins E, Allen MC . Neurodevelopmental care in the NICU. Mental Retard Dev Disabil Res 2002; 8 (4): 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boukydis CFZ, Bigsby R, Lester BM . Clinical use of the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (Supplement 2): 679–689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoare BJ, Imms C . Upper-limb injections of botulinum toxin-A in children with cerebral palsy: a critical review of the literature and clinical implications for occupational therapists. The Am J of Occup Ther 2004; 58 (4): 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson RE, Jones HE, Jasinski DR, Svikis DS, Haug NA, Jansson LM et al. Buprenorphine treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 63 (1): 97–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, Bann C, Lester B, Tronick E, Das A, Lagasse L et al. Neonatal neurobehavior predicts medical and behavioral outcome. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (1): e90–e98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tronick EZ, Olson K, Rosenberg R, Bohne L, Lu J, Lester BM . Normative neurobehavioral performance of healthy infants on the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (Supplement 2): 676–678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Institute of Health (ROI HD 057098), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

    L C Reynolds, M M Duncan & R G Pineda

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

    G C Smith, A Mathur, J Neil, T Inder & R G Pineda

  3. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

    J Neil & T Inder

  4. Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

    J Neil & T Inder

Authors
  1. L C Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M M Duncan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G C Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A Mathur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J Neil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T Inder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R G Pineda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L C Reynolds.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, L., Duncan, M., Smith, G. et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol 33, 636–641 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.4

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links