Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Conditioning

Effect of conditioning regimens on graft failure in myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis

Abstract

In myelofibrosis, the introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) preceding allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) resulted in lower transplant-related mortality rates compared with myeloablative conditioning. However, lowering the intensity of conditioning may increase the risk of graft failure in myelofibrosis, although hitherto this has not been indisputably proven. We here report the outcome of 53 patients who underwent allogeneic SCT with different conditioning regimens (RIC and non-myeloablative (NMA)) in three transplantation centers in the Netherlands. The cumulative incidence of graft failure within 60 days after SCT was high (28%), and this was primarily associated with the intensity of the conditioning regimen. Cumulative neutrophil engraftment at 60 days was lower in patients who received NMA conditioning compared with those who received RIC (56% vs 84%, P=0.03). Furthermore, of six patients who received a second transplantation after graft failure, the three patients with RIC regimens subsequently engrafted, whereas the three patients who received a second NMA regimen did not. This study indicates that in myelofibrosis, NMA regimens result in high engraftment failure rates. We propose the use of more intensive conditioning regimens, incorporating busulfan or melphalan.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLornan DP, Mead AJ, Jackson G, Harrison CN . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in 2012. Br J Haematol 2012; 157: 413–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abelsson J, Merup M, Birgegård G, WeisBjerrum O, Brinch L, Brune M et al. The outcome of allo-HSCT for 92 patients with myelofibrosis in the Nordic countries. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 380–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deeg HJ, Gooley TA, Flowers ME, Sale GE, Slattery JT, Anasetti C et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Blood 2003; 102: 3912–3918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditschkowski M, Elmaagacli AH, Trenschel R, Gromke T, Steckel NK, Koldehoff M et al. DIPSS scores, pre-transplant therapy and chronic GVHD determine outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Haematologica 2012; 97: 1574–1581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guardiola P, Anderson JE, Bandini G, Cervantes F, Runde V, Arcese W et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle, Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto del Midollo Osseo, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Collaborative Study. Blood 1999; 93: 2831–2838.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta V, Kroger N, Aschan J, Xu W, Leber B, Dalley C et al. A retrospective comparison of conventional intensity conditioning and reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 317–320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerbauy DM, Gooley TA, Sale GE, Flowers ME, Doney KC, Georges GE et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for idiopathic myelofibrosis, advanced polycythemiavera, and essential thrombocythemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 355–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patriarca F, Bacigalupo A, Sperotto A, Isola M, Soldano F, Bruno B et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: the 20-year experience of the GruppoItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO). Haematologica 2008; 93: 1514–1522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart WA, Pearce R, Kirkland KE, Bloor A, Thomson K, Apperley J et al. The role of allogeneic SCT in primary myelofibrosis: a British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 1587–1593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1628–1633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta V, Malone AK, Hari PN, Ahn KW, Hu ZH, Gale RP et al. Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a cohort analysis from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 89–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kröger N, Holler E, Kobbe G, Bornhauser M, Schwerdtfeger R, Baurmann H et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 2009; 114: 5264–5270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patriarca F, Bacigalupo A, Sperotto A, Isola M, Bruno B, Van Lint MT et al. Outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioninig regimen in patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis: the g.I.T.m.o. Experience. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2010; 2: e2010010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ballen KK, Shrestha S, Sobocinski KA, Zhang MJ, Bashey A, Bolwell BJ et al. Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 358–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robin M, Tabrizi R, Mohty M, Furst S, Michallet M, Bay JO et al. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report of the SocieteFrancaise de Greffe de Moelle et de TherapieCellulaire (SFGM-TC). Br J Haematol 2011; 152: 331–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Isola L, Price LS, Shore TB, Boyer M et al. MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 2014; 124: 1183–1191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Murata M, Nishida T, Taniguchi S, Ohashi K, Ogawa H, Fukuda T et al. Allogeneic transplantation for primary myelofibrosis with BM, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood: an analysis of the JSHCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: 355–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, Nivarthi H, Rumi E, Milosevic JD et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2379–2390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chi J, Nicolaou KA, Nicolaidou V, Koumas L, Mitsidou A, Pierides C et al. Calreticulin gene exon 9 frameshift mutations in patients with thrombocytosis. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1152–1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tefferi A, Thiele J, Orazi A, Kvasnicka HM, Barbui T, Hanson CA et al. Proposals and rationale for revision of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for polycythemiavera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis: recommendations from an ad hoc international expert panel. Blood 2007; 110: 1092–1097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 2010; 115: 1703–1708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bacigalupo A, Soraru M, Dominietto A, Pozzi S, Geroldi S, Van Lint MT et al. Allogeneic hemopoietic SCT for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a predictive transplant score based on transfusion requirement, spleen size and donor type. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 458–463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tefferi A, Barosi G, Mesa RA, Cervantes F, Deeg HJ, Reilly JT et al. International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). Blood 2006; 108: 1497–1503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zweegman S, Kessler FL, Celie JW, Janssen JJ, van den Born J, Schuurhuis GJ et al. Restoration of the human stem cell niche after stem cell transplantation. Blood 2009; 114: 5404–5406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dominici M, Rasini V, Bussolari R, Chen X, Hofmann TJ, Spano C et al. Restoration and reversible expansion of the osteoblastic hematopoietic stem cell niche after marrow radioablation. Blood 2009; 114: 2333–2343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Olsson R, Remberger M, Schaffer M, Berggren DM, Svahn BM, Mattsson J et al. Graft failure in the modern era of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 537–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kröger N, Zabelina T, Schieder H, Panse J, Ayuk F, Stute N et al. Pilot study of reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors in patients with myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 690–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alchalby H, Yunus DR, Zabelina T, Kobbe G, Holler E, Bornhäuser M et al. Risk models predicting survival after reduced-intensity transplantation for myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol 2012; 157: 75–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, Guglielmelli P, Martínez-Trillos A, Casetti I et al. Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis. Blood 2014; 124: 1062–1069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaekel N, Behre G, Behning A, Wickenhauser C, Lange T, Niederwieser D et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in patients pretreated with the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: 179–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We kindly thank the following persons for their work concerning the mutational analyses: L van de Corput (Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands), PJM Valk (Laboratory of Molecular diagnostics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), KGM Smolders and PA Merle (Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Slot.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slot, S., Smits, K., van de Donk, N. et al. Effect of conditioning regimens on graft failure in myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 50, 1424–1431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.172

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.172

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links