Abstract
Parasitism by endoparasitoid wasps changes the expression of various host genes, and alters host immune and developmental processes. However, it is not clearly understood how parasitism changes host gene expression in a whole genome scale. This study focused on an epigenetic control of Cotesia plutellae, an endoparasitoid wasp, against its host, Plutella xylostella. Two DNA methyltransferases (DNMT-1 and DNMT-2) are encoded in the genome of P. xylostella. In addition, methyl-binding domain proteins (MBDs) and DNA demethylation factor, ten-eleven translation protein (TET) are encoded. DNA methylation of P. xylostella genomic DNA was confirmed by restriction digestion with Gla I specific to 5-methylcytosine. DNA methylation intensity in parasitized (P) larvae was decreased compared to that in nonparasitized (NP) larvae, especially at late parasitic stage, at which expression levels of both DNMT-1 and DNMT-2 were also decreased. DNA demethylation of P. xylostella was confirmed in both NP and P larvae by restriction digestion with PvuRts1I recognizing 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine. Parasitism also suppressed expression levels of TET and MBDs. Treatment of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AZA) reduced DNA methylation intensity of NP larvae, causing suppression of hemocyte-spreading behavior and delay of immature development. RNA interference of DNMT-1 or DNMT-2 mimicked the adverse effects of AZA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Parasitism is a non-mutualistic symbiosis. Its success requires host regulation that is beneficial to parasites. Endoparasitoids including some braconid and ichneumonid wasps exhibit koinobiotic life, in which wasp larvae grow inside developing hosts1. These wasps can regulate hosts through significant immunosuppression to defend the attack of the host’s immune system and induce the delay of host development to allow endoparasitoid larvae to mature first2. To achieve various ranges of host regulation, massive changes in host gene expression levels occur as seen in different parasitic patterns induced by braconid or ichneumonid wasps3,4. Indeed, some parasitic factors derived from polydnaviruses symbiotic to endoparasitoids are transcriptional regulators, such as viral ankyrins (vankyrins) and viral histone H4 (vH4). Vankyrins are truncated variants of host inhibitor κB that plays a crucial role in inhibiting the activity of nuclear factor κB, a transcriptional factor5,6. Some vankyrins have been demonstrated to be able to inhibit host gene expression7. A vH4 has been identified in Cotesia plutellae bracovirus (CpBV). It has an extended N-terminal tail (38 amino acids containing 9 lysine residues) compared to host histone H48. vH4 joins host nucleosomes and alters host gene expression9. Thus, some parasitic factors can modulate host gene expression. However, it was not clearly understood how the massive changes in host gene expression occurred during parasitism.
Epigenetics deals with heritable changes in gene expression without change in DNA sequence. DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA expression are examples of epigenetic control of gene expression10. Environmental changes such as nutrients11, exposure to pesticides12, pathogens13, and climate change14 can influence epigenetic control. Especially, DNA methylation on a specific genome in response to environmental change is heritable by its de novo maintenance devices15. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are classified into three types (DNMT-1, DNMT-2, and DNMT-3), in which DNMT-2 is no longer considered as a DNA methylation agent due to its specificity to tRNA in vertebrates16,17. De novo DNA methylation is performed by DNMT-3, while the methylation state is maintained by catalytic activity of DNMT-1. In insects, DNMT-1 and DNMT-2 are well conserved whereas DNMT-3 is uncommon except some hymenopteran and hemipteran insects18. As reported in Drosophila, insect DNA methylation levels are much lower compared to those of vertebrates19. Unlike vertebrate genomic DNAs that are globally methylated, insect genomes are locally methylated in gene body probably to regulate the transcription and mRNA splicing of target genes20.
Endoparasitoid wasp C. plutellae parasitizes young larvae of the diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella21. Parasitized larvae exhibit significant alterations in immune response and development22. A proteomic analysis has indicated that more than 25% of host genes annotated into various categories of physiological functions are altered in gene expression after being parasitized3. In this study, we hypothesized that C. plutellae parasitism could alter host gene expression in an epigenetic mode by changing DNA methylation level in addition to manipulating the activities of host transcriptional factors. To test this hypothesis, DNA methylation was monitored in P. xylostella and the DNA methylation levels in parasitized (P) larvae were compared to those in nonparasitized (NP) larvae. Based on the presence of DNA methylation, DNA methylation/demethylation-associated genes were identified from P. xylostella genome and their expressions in both NP and P larvae were assessed. Finally, this study demonstrated the effect of down-regulation of DNA methylation on immune response and immature development of P. xylostella.
Results
DNA methylation on P. xylostella genome
To test any presence of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) on P. xylostella genome, its genomic DNA (gDNA) was digested with Gla I restriction enzyme to specifically cleave at 5-mC (Fig. 1A). Gla I cut gDNAs of both NP and P larvae of P. xylostella. A monoclonal antibody specific to 5-mC was used to measure the relative amounts of 5-mC on P. xylostella genomes (Fig. 1B). As expected, a vertebrate gDNA (a positive control) obtained from calf thymus possessed high amount of 5-mC, while yeast gDNA (a negative control) did not possess any 5-mC. The presence of 5-mC was found in different developmental stages of P. xylostella. The 5-mC levels were expressed as relative amounts compared to 5-mC level of the amount of calf thymus DNA (250 ng = 10 RPx, Fig. S1). There were significant differences in 5-mC levels among developmental stages. Egg had significantly (P < 0.05) more 5-mC level than other developmental stages. Among different body parts of larvae, the head region had higher (P < 0.05) levels of 5-mC than other body parts (Fig. 1C). The DNA methylation amounts of P. xylostella larvae were also compared among different insect species. The amount of 5-mC in P. xylostella gDNA was similar to that in other insects except honey bee which had the highest (P < 0.05) amount of DNA methylation (Fig. 1D).
Down-regulation of 5-mC level in P. xylostella gDNA by C. plutellae parasitism
Change in 5-mC levels was monitored during the development of P larvae to determine whether parasitism could influence host DNA methylation (Fig. 2). In P larvae, 5-mC level was transiently increased at 2 days after parasitization, but significantly decreased thereafter compared to the levels in NP larvae (Fig. 2A). In contrast, NP larvae did not show any difference during the larval stages corresponding to P larvae. 5-mC was observed in the nuclei of hemocytes of NP P. xylostella larvae (Fig. 2B). However, its intensity was clearly decreased in the hemocytes of P larvae. P larvae contained endoparasitoid eggs or larvae within the body. Parasitoid wasp eggs and larvae also possessed 5-mC in their genomes (Fig. S2). Parasitoid wasps also showed significant variations in 5-mC levels among developmental stages, in which the egg stage had the highest (P < 0.05) level. Thus, 5-mC amounts assessed in P larvae represented methylation amounts in both host and parasite.
Two different DNA methyltransferases (DNMT-1 and DNMT-2) of P. xylostella
From the genome database of P. xylostella, two DNMT genes (Px008220 and Px011175) were annotated. When these two DNMT genes were aligned with known DNMT genes, Px008220 and Px011175 were clustered with DNMT-1 and DNMT-2, respectively (Fig. 3A). Domain analysis indicated that Px008220, similar to human DNMT-1, possessed DNA methyltransferase 1-associated protein (DMAP), microtubule-interacting protein associated with TRAF3 (MIP-T3), replication foci targeting sequence (RFTS), zinc finger domain (CXXC), bromo-associated homology (BAH), and 5-mC-specific DNA methylase (DNA methylase) domain (Fig. 3B, Fig. S3). However, Px011175 contained only 5-mC-specific DNA methylase (DNA methylase) domain, similar to human DNMT-2. These indicate that P. xylostella possesses two DNMTs: PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2.
Expressions of PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2 were monitored in different tissues of late larvae of P. xylostella (Fig. 4A). All tested tissues expressed these two DNMTs. However, the expression patterns were different between the two DNMTs. PxDNMT1 in the gut or epidermis was expressed more than that in the hemocyte or fat body. In contrast, fat body exhibited the highest expression level of PxDNMT2. The expression levels of two DNMTs in NP and P larvae were compared (Fig. 4B). In NP larvae, the expression levels of the two DNMTs were not changed as larvae grew. However, in P larvae, the expression levels of both DNMTs were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased as larvae grew. The expression level of PxDNMT1 was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 4 days post parasitization, while that of PxDNMT2 was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 3 days post parasitization (Fig. 4C).
Influence of parasitism on expression of MBD genes of P. xylostella
5-mC can be recognized by specific recognition protein MBD that recruits and mediates chromatin remodeling to control gene expression23. Three MBD genes (PxMBD3, PxMBD4, and PxMBD5) were annotated in the DBM genome database (Fig. 5). These three PxMBDs share high sequence homologies with human MBDs (Fig. 5A). Especially, PxMBD4 was co-clustered with a canonical MBD protein, MeCP2, of human. In domain analysis, all three PxMBDs possess the characteristic MBD domain (Fig. 5B, Fig. S4).
Out of the three MBDs of P. xylostella, only PxMBD4 and PxMBD5 were analyzed for their expression levels in NP and P larvae of P. xylostella (Fig. 6) because the expression of PxMBD3 was not detected in our RT-PCR assay. All tested tissues expressed these two MBDs, in which fat body and epidermis exhibited higher expression levels of the two MBDs than hemocyte or gut (Fig. 6A). The expression levels of the two MBDs in NP and P larvae were compared (Fig. 6B). In NP larvae, the expression levels of the two MBDs were not changed during development. However, in P larvae, the expression levels of both MBDs were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased as larvae grew. Expression level of PxMBD4 in NP larvae was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 4 days post parasitization, while that of PxMBD5 was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 5 days post parasitization (Fig. 6C).
Influence of parasitism on DNA methylation-degrading enzyme (TET) of P. xylostella
Methylation levels on cytosine residues were modulated earlier than the down-regulation of DNMT expression, suggesting that there might be an expressional control in methylation-degrading enzyme before down-regulation of DNMT expression after parasitization. PvuRts1I is an enzyme that specifically digests 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Indeed, this restriction enzyme could digest both NP and P larvae genomic DNAs, supporting the presence of DNA methylation-degrading enzyme (Fig. 7A). From the P. xylostella genome database, Px000976 (PxTET1) and Px004714 (PxTET2) were annotated to be TET dioxygenase, a DNA methylation-degrading enzyme (Fig. 7B). Based on their predicted amino acid sequences, both PxTET1 and PxTET2 shared similar structures with human TET. They all possessed two characteristic domains of zinc finger CXXC (Zf-CXXC) and Tet_JBP (2-oxoglutarate and iron-dependent dioxygenase) containing HxD, Hxs, and Rx5a motifs (Fig. 7C).
The expression levels of both PxTETs were assessed in different tissues of P. xylostella larvae. Results are shown in Fig. 8A. All tissues exhibited marked expressions of the two TETs, in which hemocytes exhibited the lowest expression levels of both TETs. The expression levels of the two TETs in NP and P larvae were compared (Fig. 8B). In NP larvae, the expression levels of both TETs were not changed during larvae development. However, in P larvae, the expression levels of both TETs were significantly decreased as larvae grew. Expression level of PxTET1 was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 2 days post parasitization, while that of PxTET2 was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased at 5 days post parasitization (Fig. 8C).
Significance of 5-mC in P. xylostella genome in immune response and development
AZA, a specific inhibitor of cytosine methylation, was used to test the significance of 5-mC in immune response and developmental processes of P. xylostella. AZA treatment at 48 h significantly (P < 0.05) decreased 5-mC levels of P. xylostella gDNA in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 9A). In addition, AZA treatment significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed immune response based on hemocyte-spreading behavior (Fig. 9B). The AZA treatment also delayed the development of P. xylostella from larvae to pupae.
To confirm the results of AZA assay, both PxDNMT1 and DNMT2 expressions were suppressed by RNA interference (Fig. 10). Treatment with dsRNAs specific PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2 significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed the expression of PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2 expression, respectively, in the NP larvae of P. xylostella (Fig. 10A). Larvae treated with dsRNA specific to PxDNMT1 (Fig. 10B) or PxDNMT2 (Fig. 10C) exhibited immune response and development similar to larvae treated with AZA.
Discussion
DNA methylation is a way to transmit epigenetic information to the next generation. It is a covalent modification of DNA by adding methyl group mostly to cytosine at CpG sequence in animals with catalytic activities of DNMTs. Once methylated, the methylated sites can be recognized by 5-methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins (MBDs), which will recruit chromatin remodeling machineries to control gene expression24. DNA methylation can be changed by various environmental factors as described in Introduction section. This study demonstrated that a novel environmental factor could change DNA methylation with respect to parasite and host interaction, in which an endoparasitoid wasp, C. plutellae, suppressed DNMT expressions in order to alter host DNA methylation status to induce immunosuppression and delay developmental rate of host that are necessary for the development of immature endoparasitoid wasp.
Whole-genome methylation analyses in insects such as honeybee (Apis mellifera), silkworm moth (Bombyx mori), and parasitic wasp (Nasonia vitripennis) have shown that 5-mC is by far the most common form of programmed DNA modification25,26,27. This current study showed that P. xylostella genomic DNA was methylated. Two methods can be used to observe the DNA methylation of P. xylostella genome. A restriction enzyme, Gla I, can be used to digests XCGX with methylated cytosine28. Both NP and P genomic DNAs were susceptible to Gla I treatment. Slot blot assay using a monoclonal antibody specifically recognizing 5-mC showed positive reactions to both NP and P larval gDNAs. Densitometry analysis after slot blot assay indicated that the relative amounts of 5-mC on P. xylostella gDNAs were similar among different developmental stages, including eggs, larvae, and adults. It also showed that DNA methylation level of P. xylostella was much lower than that of a mammalian species, but was relatively similar among insects such as coleopteran, dipteran, and lepidopteran species except hymenopteran specie. About 4–5% of the cytosines are usually methylated on the entire chromosomes of vertebrates29, while only 0.5% or less of cytosine residues are methylated in Drosophila spp.19. This suggests that P. xylostella genome has methylated cytosines at around 0.5% among total cytosines. Most invertebrates have relatively low DNA methylation amounts in their genome. However, they exhibit the persistence of DNA methylation30,31. In contrast to genome-wide DNA methylation in vertebrates, DNA methylation in invertebrates is largely confined to genes and most of them are not in the intergenic regions32,33. Especially, DNA methylation on transposable and repetitive elements is almost nonexistent in insects34,35. These facts suggest that DNA methylation plays little role in suppressing the proliferation of transposable elements in insects, unlike vertebrates. Indeed, intragenic DNA methylation characteristic of insects is involved in gene expression through mRNA splicing36. Clearly, DNA methylation plays crucial roles in insect physiological processes. Gene-specific DNA methylation can mediate insecticide resistance by up-regulating esterase gene expression to increase detoxification in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae37. In the European honey bee, A. mellifera, DNA methylation controls alternative splicing of mRNAs in the fat body38. These results suggest that any alteration of DNA methylation may cause significant physiological alterations in P. xylostella.
Parasitism by C. plutellae suppressed DNMT gene expressions of P. xylostella. Two DNMT genes, PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2, were identified from P. xylostella genome. PxDNMT-1 is likely to play a role in maintaining DNA methylation status because it shares structural similarity with human DNMT-1. In contrast, PxDNMT2 is highly homologous to human DNMT-2. Thus, P. xylostella has two types of DNMT. However, it does not have DNMT-3. In insects, there are variations in retaining DNMT genes in their genome18. Hemipteran and hymenopteran species possess all three types of DNMT genes. In the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, two isoforms of DNMT1 and DNMT3 are encoded in its genome39. In addition, honey bee and other social hymenopteran insects possess both DNMTs that presumably perform maintenance of DNA methylation (DNMT-1) and de novo DNA methylation (DNMT-3)40,41. However, coleopteran and lepidopteran species possess only DNMT-1 and DNMT-2, but not DNMT-331. Furthermore, dipteran species do not have DNMT-1 or DNMT-3. They only have DNMT-219,42. Thus, lepidopteran species including P. xylostella analyzed in this study appear to lose DNMT-3, indicating that lepidopteran species may not form de novo DNA methylation during development in their life cycle. However, epigenetic control through DNA methylation plays a significant role in domestication of silkworm from a wild population, in which demethylation is associated with down-regulation of gene expression during domestication26. Furthermore, DNMT-1 of B. mori has been confirmed to have DNA methylation activity and its knockdown of gene expression will lead to decreased egg hatch26,43. This suggests that there must be de novo DNA methylation in B. mori. A structural prediction of DNMT-2 suggests that it may perform DNA methylation in cytosines of non-CpG sequences44. Thus, the two DNMTs encoded in P. xylostella may play roles in maintaining DNA methylation and de novo DNA methylation to epigenetically control gene expression. Thus, suppression of both PxDNMT1 and PxDNMT2 in P larvae would significantly alter the physiological processes of P. xylostella. In fact, down-regulation of DNMT gene expression resulted in decreased 5-mC contents in P. xylostella. Significant decrease of 5-mC levels in P larvae began at 3 days after parasitization. This appears to be well explained by significant decrease of PxDNMT2 expression in P larvae. However, there was a significant increase of 5-mC level in P larvae at 2 days after parasitization. This may be explained by changes in 5-mC levels in parasitoid egg or larvae within host P larvae. Assessment of 5-mC levels in different C. plutellae developmental stages showed that 5-mC levels were decreased with development (Fig. S2). Although P larvae at 2 days after parasitization had egg or larvae of parasitoid wasp, P larvae at 1 day after parasitization also had the parasitoid eggs that had the highest 5-mC level. Thus, the increase of 5-mC level in P larvae at 2 days after parasitization is not likely to be explained by the 5-mC of endoparasoids. Alternatively, such increase might be due to decreased degradation of DNA methylation by host metabolizing enzyme such as TET that can demethylate 5-mC by oxidation processes45. The expressional levels of both TET genes were decreased during parasitism. Interestingly, the expression level of PxTET1, but not PxTET2, began to decrease at 2 days after the parasitization. This suggests that the early increase of 5-mC level in the P larvae might be due to decreased 5-mC metabolism by TET under no change in expression levels of both DNMTs. However, any causal relationship between down-regulation of PxTET1 expression and increase of 5-mC level is yet clear until an activity of PxTET1 to catalyze demethylation of 5-mC is confirmed. The transient increase may be significant in terms of host defense because high methylation on host genome is not favored for parasitoid development (see below). Decrease of 5-mC levels is associated with physiological alterations such as immunosuppression and delay of larval development. AZA is a specific inhibitor of 5-mC in mammals46. AZA treatment significantly decreased 5-mC level in P. xylostella and altered its physiological processes. Similarly, RNAi of PxDNMT1 or PxDNMT2 resulted in significant physiological alterations. These results suggest that DNA methylation is required for normal physiological processes of P. xylostella. In addition, endoparasitoid wasp C. plutellae can alter host physiological processes through an epigenetic mode by suppressing DNMT expressions. DNA methylation is closely associated with insect development for cell growth and differentiation47. The best example is the royal jelly effect on queen development of A. mellifera, in which royal jelly contains a specific inhibitor to histone deacetylase (HDAC) that is linked to DNMT348. The HDAC inhibitor can reduce DNA methylation level to extend larval period. With respect to immunity, epigenetic control plays a crucial role in modulating gene expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). It has been reported that histone acetylation can promote AMP expression in the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella49. In Drosophila, DNMT-2 is required for efficient innate immune responses especially in antiviral defense by directly binding to viral RNAs with subsequent modification through RNA methylation50. Considering that C. plutellae depends on its symbiotic virus CpBV for successful parasitism, the parasitoid wasp should suppress PxDNMT2. The question is, which parasitic factor suppresses the expression of PxDNMTs? As explained in the Introduction, several CpBV genes can modulate host gene expression. Among these CpBV genes, vH4 might modulate host gene expressions by chromatin remodeling through direct joining to host nucleosomes9. This prediction needs to be explored in subsequent studies. Alternatively, down-regulation of DNA methylation in parasitized larvae of P. xylostella may be indirect due to alteration of host gene expression by various parasitic factors as demonstrated in another parasitoid wasp against P. xylostella4.
In summary, P. xylostella genome is methylated and its methylation levels can be modulated by its methylation and demethylation machineries. Environmental factor such as parasitism by C. plutellae can influence its host genome by altering DNA methylation through significant reduction in gene expression of both DNMT-1 and DNMT-2. The reduction of host DNA methylation might be accompanied by massive changes in gene expression. This epigenetic alteration of host gene expression would favor successful parasitism of C. plutellae.
Methods
Insects and parasitization
All procedures are described in Park and Kim51.
Bioinformatics for DNA methylation-associated genes
From a genome database of P. xylostella (www.iae.fafu.edu.cn/DBM) and NCBI-GenBank, the following genes were obtained: two DNA methyltransferase genes (DNMT-1, Px008220; DNMT-2, Px011175), three methyl-binding domain proteins (MBD-3, Px003962; MBD-4, XP_011549067.1; and MBD-5, Px004348), and two ten-eleven translation proteins (TET-1, Px000976; TET-2, Px004714). Predicted amino acid sequences of these P. xylostella genes were then compared to those of other genes obtained from GenBank (Table S1).
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA652 and ClustalW programs of DNASTAR (Version 5.01, Madison, WI, USA). Bootstrapping values to support branching were obtained with 500 repetitions. Protein domains of these genes were predicted using Pfam version 29.0 (http://pfam.xfam.org) provided by European Bioinformatics Institute.
RNA interference (RNAi)
Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) were prepared using a method described by Park and Kim51. For microinjection of dsRNA, each dsRNA was mixed with a cell transfection reagent (Metafectene PRO, Biontex, Planegg, Germany) in a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) and incubated at 25 °C for 20 min. As dsRNA control, dsRNA specific to a viral gene CpBV-ORF30251 was used. A hundred nL of dsRNA (250 ng) complex was injected into each hemocoel of early third instar larvae of P. xylostella and its effect on gene expression was quantified by RT-qPCR as described below.
Real time-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA extraction and cDNA preparation followed a method described in Park and Kim51. RT-qPCR was performed in 20 μL reaction volume consisting of 2× SYBR® Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Dojima Hama, Osaka, Japan), 5 μM of gene-specific forward and reverse primers (Table S2), and 50 ng of cDNA as template. As an endogenous control, RL32 gene was assessed along with test samples. PCR was performed at 95 °C for 5 min for initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles at 98 °C for 15 s, 54 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Melting curves were assessed to confirm unique PCR products. Relative quantification method53 was used to estimate mRNA expression levels. The experiment was independently replicated three times.
Analysis of DNA methylation using slot-blot apparatus
gDNAs were isolated from different developmental stages of P. xylostella larvae. DNA concentration and purity were determined with GeneQuant spectrophotometer and electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel, respectively. Two μg of gDNA was first denatured by heating at 100 °C for 10 min in a tube containing denaturing solution (0.4 M NaOH, 10 mM EDTA). The reaction was neutralized by adding equal volume of 2 mM ice cold ammonium acetate (pH 7.0). As positive and negative controls of DNA methylation, a calf thymus DNA (Sigma-Aldrich Korea, Seoul, Korea) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast DNA (Invitrogen, Seoul, Korea) were used, respectively. After denatured DNA samples were then passed through slot-blot apparatus (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the membranes were air-dried and exposed twice to a UV crosslinker (CL-1000, UVP, LLC, Upland, CA, USA) for each 30 sec. After blocking the membranes with 5% skimmed milk, membranes were incubated with primary antibody raised against 5-mC (Abcam, Seoul, Korea) at 1:1,000 dilution for 2 h. The bound primary antibody was captured with secondary antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich Korea) and visualized with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (Sigma-Aldrich Korea). For densitometry quantification of bands, the membranes were air-dried and images were captured with HP Scanjet 5470c scanner (Hewlett-Packard Company, Greeley, CO, USA). Band intensity was estimated using ImageJ 2.1.4.9 software (http://www.freewarefiles.com/downloads_counter.php?programid=53729). At every run, 250 ng of calf thymus DNA was loaded to normalize band intensity and calculate relative pixel (RPx) amounts, in which 25 ng of calf thymus DNA was set to be 1 RPx.
Restriction enzyme assay
Purified gDNA was digested with 4 units of Gla I (SibEnzyme, West Roxbury, MA, USA) at 30 °C for 16 h or 1 unit of PvuRts1I (Diagenode, Seraing, Belgium) at 32 °C for 2 h in a total volume of 50 μL. The resulting DNA was separated on 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
Analysis of DNA methylation using immunofluorescence assay
For fluorescence microscope observation, hemocytes were collected from 50 larvae of P. xylostella in anticoagulant buffer (ACB: 1.32% sodium citrate, 0.48% citric acid, and 1.47% dextrose, pH 4.5). The suspension was incubated on ice for 40 min and replaced with TC-100 insect cell culture medium (Hyclone, Daegu, Korea). The hemocyte suspension was transferred onto glass slide and incubated at 25 °C for 12 h in the dark. After washing once with 100 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at RT for 10 min and permeabilized with cold methanol (−20 °C) for 2 min. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with primary antibody against 5-mC (1:5,000 dilution) at RT for 1 h. After washing twice in PBS, secondary antibody-conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Sigma-Aldrich Korea) was added in 1:5,000 dilutions and incubated at RT for 1 h. Cells were washed twice in PBS and incubated with 4′,6-diamindino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Thermo Scientific, Meridian, Rockford, USA) at 1:1,000 dilution in PBS for 2 min. After washing twice with PBS, cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (DM 2500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at 400× magnification.
5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AZA) treatment
AZA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Korea and dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Amresco, Solon, Ohio, USA) to prepare 50 mg/mL stock solution. For microinjection, AZA was mixed with Metafectene PRO as described above. DMSO was used as control. At 24–48 h post injection, total gDNA was isolated from larvae to assess methylation levels using slot blot analysis. Other larvae treated with AZA were subjected to assessment of hemocyte-spreading behavior assay or developmental assessment (see below).
Hemocyte-spreading behavior assay
Hemolymph was collected in ACB from NP larvae of P. xylostella at 48 h after injection of AZA or dsRNA specific to PxDNMT1 or PxDNMT2. After centrifuging at 800× g for 3 min, the pellet was resuspended in equal volume of ice cold ACB solution and incubated on ice for 20 min. The suspension was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of TC100 insect cell culture medium. Fifty μL of hemocyte suspension was seeded onto 96 well culture plates and incubated at 25 °C for 40 min in the dark. Hemocyte-spreading behavior was observed under a phase contrast microscope (Olympus S730, Tokyo, Japan) by counting hemocytes exhibiting cytoplasmic extension such as filopodial growth and pseudopodial growth.
Developmental assay
NP larvae at L3D1 stage were microinjected with 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 μg of AZA and 250 ng of dsRNA specific to PxDNMT1 or PxDNMT2 as described above. Treated larvae were fed with cabbage leaves ad libitum and kept at 25 °C for growth. For pupal development assessment, time to pupation was measured by the elapsed time from L3D1 to pupation. Pupation was confirmed by pupal molting within cocoon. For adult emergence assessment, whole body escape from the pupal cuticle was considered as complete adult emergence. The number of adult emerged was counted. All bioassays used three replicates per treatment. For each replication, 30 larvae were used.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kumar, S. and Kim, Y. An endoparasitoid wasp influences host DNA methylation. Sci. Rep. 7, 43287; doi: 10.1038/srep43287 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Beckage, N. E., Thompson, S. A. & Federici, B. A. Parasites and pathogens of insects. Vol. 1. Parasites. Academic Press, NY, USA 364 (1993).
Vinson, S. B. & Iwantsch, G. F. Host regulation by insect parasitoids. Q. Rev. Biol. 55, 143–165 (1980).
Song, K. H., Jung, M. K., Eum, J. H., Hwang, I. C. & Han, S. S. Proteomic analysis of parasitized Plutella xylostella larvae plasma. J. Insect Physiol. 54, 1270–1280 (2008).
Etebari, K. et al. Deep sequencing-based transcriptome analysis of Plutella xylostella larvae parasitized by Diadegma semiclausum . BMC Genomics 12, 446 (2011).
Bae, S. & Kim, Y. IkB genes encoded in Cotesia plutellae bracovirus suppress an antiviral response and enhance baculovirus pathogenicity against the diamondback moth. Plutella xylostella. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 102, 79–87 (2009).
Bitra, K., Suderman, R. J. & Strand, M. R. Polydnavirus Ank proteins bind NF-κB homodimers and inhibit processing of Relish. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002722 (2012).
Magkrioti, C., Iatrou, K. & Labropoulou, V. Differential inhibition of BmRelish1-dependent transcription in lepidopteran cells by bracovirus ankyrin-repeat proteins. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41, 993–1002 (2011).
Gad, W. & Kim, Y. A viral histone H4 encoded by Cotesia plutellae bracovirus inhibits haemocyte-spreading behaviour of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella . J. Gen. Virol. 89, 931–938 (2008).
Hepat, R., Song, J. J., Lee, D. & Kim, Y. A viral histone h4 joins to eukaryotic nucleosomes and alters host gene expression. J. Virol. 87, 11223–11230 (2013).
Bonasio, R., Tu, S. & Reinberg, D. Molecular signals of epigenetic states. Science 330, 612–616 (2010).
Mazzio, E. A. & Soliman, K. F. Epigenetics and nutritional environmental signals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 54, 21–30 (2014).
Collotta, M., Bertazzi, P. A. & Bollati, V. Epigenetics and pesticides. Toxicology 307, 35–41 (2013).
Cheeseman, K. & Weitzman, J. B. Host-parasite interactions: an intimate epigenetic relationship. Cell Microbiol. 17, 1121–1132 (2015).
Bonduriansky, R., Crean, A. J. & Day, T. The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments. Evol. Appl. 5, 192–201 (2012).
Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16, 6–21 (2002).
Goll, M. G. et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science 311, 395–398 (2006).
Jurkowska, R. Z., Jurkowski, T. P. & Jeltsch, A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Chembiochem. 12, 206–222 (2011).
Glastad, K. M., Hunt, B. G., Yi, S. V. & Goodisman, M. DNA methylation in insects: on the brink of the epigenomic era. Insect Mol. Biol. 13, 117–123 (2011).
Marhold, J. et al. Conservation of DNA methylation in dipteran insects. Insect Mol. Biol. 13, 117–123 (2004).
Xiang, H. et al. Single base-resolution methylome of the silkworm reveals a sparse epigenomic map. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 516–520 (2010).
Bae, S. & Kim, Y. Host physiological changes due to parasitism of a braconid wasp, Cotesia plutellae, on diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella . Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A138, 39–44 (2004).
Ibrahim, A. M. & Kim, Y. Parasitism by Cotesia plutellae alters the hemocyte population and immunological function of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella . J. Insect Physiol. 52, 943–950 (2006).
Du, Q., Luu, P. L., Stirzaker, C. & Clark, S. J. Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins: readers of the epigenome. Epigenomics 7, 1051–1073 (2015).
Bogdanovic, O. & Veenstra, G. J. DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental recruitments and function. Chromosoma 118, 549–565 (2009).
Cingolani, P. et al. Intronic non-CG DNA hydroxymethylation and alternative mRNA splicing in honey bees. BMC Genomics 14, 666 (2013).
Xiang, H. et al. Comparative methylomics between domesticated and wild silkworms implies possible epigenetic influence on silkworm domestication. BMC Genomics 14, 646 (2013).
Beeler, S. M. et al. Whole-genome DNA methylation profile of the jewel wasp (Nasonia vitripennis). G34, 383–388 (2014).
Tarasova, G. V., Nayakshina, T. N. & Degtyarev, S. K. Substrate specificity of new methyl-directed DNA endonuclease GlaI. BMC Mol. Biol. 9, 7 (2008).
Gama-Sosa et al. Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 740, 212–219 (1983).
Suzuki, M. M., Kerr, A. R., De-Sousa, D. & Bird, A. CpG methylation is targeted to transcription units in an invertebrate genome. Genome Res. 17, 625–631 (2007).
Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P. & Zilberman, D. Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 328, 916–919 (2010).
Suzuki, M. M. & Bird, A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 465–476 (2008).
Feng, S., Jacobsen, S. E. & Reik, W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330, 622–627 (2010).
Regev, A., Lamb, M. & Jablonka, E. The role of DNA methylation in invertebrates: developmental regulation of genome defense? Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 880–891 (1998).
Schaefer, M. & Lyko, F. Lack of evidence for DNA methylation of invader4 retroelements in Drosophila and implications for Dnmt2-mediated epigenetic regulation. Nat. Genet. 42, 920–921 (2010).
Lyko, F. & Maleszka, R. Insects as innovative models for functional studies of DNA methylation. Trends Genet. 27, 127–131 (2011).
Field, L. M. Methylation and expression of amplified esterase genes in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Biochem J. 349, 863–868 (2000).
Li-Byarlay, H. et al. RNA interference knockdown of DNA methyltransferase 3 affects gene alternative splicing in the honey bee. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12750–12755 (2013).
Walsh, T. K. et al. A functional DNA methylation system in the pea aphid. Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Mol. Biol. 19, 215–228 (2010).
Wang, Y. et al. Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect. Science 314, 645–647 (2006).
Bonasio, R. et al. Genomic comparison of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator . Science 329, 1068–1071 (2010).
Hung, M. S. et al. Drosophila proteins related to vertebrate DNA (5-cytosine) methyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11940–11945 (1999).
Mitsudome, T. et al. Biochemical characterization of maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT-1 from silkworm, Bombyx mori . Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 58, 55–65 (2015).
Borsatti, F. & Mandrioli, M. The structure of insect DNA methyltransferase 2 (DNMT2) DNA binding domain is responsible for the non-CpG methylation in insect genomes. Caryologia 57, 305–311 (2004).
Bhutani, N., Burns, D. M. & Blau, H. M. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 146, 866–872 (2011).
Christman, J. K. 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 21, 5483–5495 (2002).
Mukherjee, K., Tuyman, R. M. & Vilcinskas, A. Insects as models to study the epigenetic basis of diseases. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 118, 69–78 (2015).
Kucharski, R., Maleszka, J., Foret, S. & Maleszka, R. Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 319, 1827–1830 (2008).
Mukherjee, K., Fischer, R. & Vilcinskas, A. Histone acetylation mediates epigenetic regulation of transcriptional reprogramming in insects during metamorphosis, wounding and infection. Front. Zool. 9, 25 (2012).
Durdevic, Z. et al. Efficient RNA virus control in Drosophila requires the RNA methyltransferase Dnmt 2. Sci. Rep. 14, 269–275 (2013).
Park, B. & Kim, Y. Transient transcription of a putative RNase containing BEN domain encoded in Cotesia plutellae bracovirus induces an immunosuppression of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella . J. Invertebr. Pathol. 105, 156–163 (2010).
Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 (2011).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a general researcher program (2013R1A1A2A10058197) funded by National Research Foundation of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.K. and Y.K. conceived, designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Kim, Y. An endoparasitoid wasp influences host DNA methylation. Sci Rep 7, 43287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43287
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43287
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.