We propose a design for broadband waveguide mode conversion based on gradient index metamaterials (GIMs). Numerical simulations demonstrate that the zeroth order of transverse magnetic mode or the first order of transverse electric mode (TM0/TE1) can be converted into the first order of transverse magnetic mode or the second order of transverse electric mode (TM1/TE2) for a broadband of frequencies. As an application, an asymmetric propagation is achieved by integrating zero index metamaterials inside the GIM waveguide.
Along with the rapid development of photonic integrated circuits, the mode control techniques including mode filtering, mode separation, and mode conversion become crucial for designs of integrated optical systems. Among these techniques, mode conversion plays a more fundamental role and thus received a considerable research interest1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. There have been several methods to achieve mode conversion. Usually, an excellent mode converter is characterized by large bandwidth, low loss and extinction ratio. For example, it has been suggested that an ultra-compact interferometer formed by nano-waveguides can function as mode converter by introducing an optical phase difference3. Such an ultracompact structure features low loss, but with polarization-dependence and narrow bandwidth as its shortage. In ref. 9, a similar geometry has been proposed for broadband mode conversion based on interference effect of light propagating through two differential dielectric waveguides. In both systems, the key is to recombine light after introducing a phase difference between two different channels. However, beam splitters at the beginning and at the end of such devices generally induce significant backscattering that reduces the efficiency of mode conversion. Suppressing the backscattering is therefore essential to improve the performance of interferential mode converters.
Nanostructured optical interfaces or metasurfaces have recently opened new avenues for manipulating light properties at interfaces10,11. In particular, metasurfaces based on gradient index metamaterials (GIMs) have been proposed to completely convert propagating waves into surface-like waves12. Waveguides with symmetric GIMs can convert the propagating mode (PM) gradually into surface-like mode (SM) with negligible scattering, achieving asymmetric propagation and waveguide cloaking for a broadband of frequencies independent of the polarization of the incident wave13,14. It is therefore desirable to utilize GIMs to design a waveguide structure for mode conversion with suppressed backscattering and high mode conversion efficiency. In this work, we will introduce asymmetric GIMs into the waveguide, and theoretically demonstrate that mode conversion between two lowest waveguide modes can be achieved for a broad bandwidth of frequencies and independent of incident polarizations.
Results and Discussion
The schematic diagram of the waveguide with asymmetric GIMs is shown in Fig. 1a. It is a one dimensional parallel-plate waveguide with two GIMs attached to its outer perfect electric conductor (PEC) walls. The index profiles of the two GIMs along x direction are different from each other and can be described as
where κ = 0.2 k0 (k0 is the wave vector in free space) is a predesigned momentum parameter, d = 1.5 mm is the thickness of the GIMs along y direction. The length of the waveguide is L = 240 mm, w = 22.5 mm is the distance between the two parallel GIMs. Furthermore, g1 and g2 are referred as the gradient factors of the upper and lower GIMs, respectively. We will show that the mode conversion effect can be tuned by adjusting the values of g1 and g2 as well as the working frequencies. The difference between g1 and g2 is crucial for mode conversion. A classical geometric optics interpretation will be introduced later. The mode conversion effect is actually due to the difference of the accumulated phases during the light propagation along the upper and lower GIMs. To depict the differences between the two GIMs, their index profiles are plotted in Fig. 1b (all are larger than unity). As long as the refractive index does not vary too quickly, the waveguide structure induces negligible backscattering. For this reason we set both gradient factors around unity. In view of this configuration, the index profiles of GIMs in ref. 14 is a special case with g1 = g2 = 1.
To visualize the mode conversion effect, we perform numerical simulations by using the COMSOL Multiphysics. Both TM and TE polarizations are investigated. For TM polarization, the TM0 mode with a frequency of 9.5 GHz is incident from the left port. When both upper and lower GIMs have the same gradient factor (g1 = g2, i.e. they are symmetric, which has been used for waveguide cloaking in ref. 14), the output waveguide mode keeps the same as the input waveguide mode (TM0), as shown in Fig. 1c. However, when the gradient factor of the upper GIM g1 is slightly modified and the other gradient factor g2is kept unchanged, mode conversion from TM0 to TM1 can be achieved. Figure 1d shows that, when g1 and g2 are set as 1.015 and 1, respectively, a nearly complete waveguide mode conversion is realized at a frequency of 9.5 GHz: the output mode turns into TM1 mode completely. For the case of TE polarization, similar results can be found. For example, in Fig. 1e, a TE1 mode with a frequency of 12 GHz is incident from left, when the upper GIM slab and lower GIM slab have the same gradient factor, the same TE1 mode will come out from the output port. However, when the gradient factor of the upper GIM slab g1 is tuned to 1.018 while the gradient factor of the lower GIM slab g2 remains to be unity, the output mode will be converted into a TE2 mode. It should be noted that due to the low gradient factors, there is little backscattering for the waveguide, unless certain Fano resonances of higher modes are excited15, which we will discuss in the Supplementary Information 1. These results clearly demonstrate that our device operates as a mode converter for both TM and TE polarizations. Note that we are using a perfect model with the same permittivity and permeability profiles, one can also get similar performance by replacing them with normal dielectric profiles (see Supplementary Information 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4).
In the frequency region considered in this work, only two lowest modes are supported in the output port of the waveguide. Therefore the output electromagnetic wave generally consists of two parts. For TM polarization, these are the magnetic fields H0 and H1 for the zeroth order and the first order of eigenmodes, respectively. That is,
For TE polarization, they are the electric fields E1 and E2 for the first order and the second order of eigenmodes, i.e.,
The coefficients α, α’, γ, and γ’ describe the amplitudes of these eigenmodes at the output port. Thus |α|2 and |γ|2 refer to the fraction of output TM0 or TE1 mode, which is closely related to the conversion efficiency. Generally, the conversion efficiency is defined as η = T·f, where T is the transmission of both modes, and f is the fraction of TM1 or TE2 mode, i.e., f = |α’|2/(|α|2 + |α’|2) or f = |γ’|2/(|γ|2 + |γ’|2).Thanks to the small gradient factors, the PM can be gradually transferred into SM with suppressed backscattering, indicating that the transmission in our waveguide system is mostly close to unity.
In the following, we show how to continuously tune output mode as function of the frequency by adjusting both gradient factors g1 and g2. In order to explore the parameter space through which mode conversion efficiently happens, the values of |α|2 and |γ|2 are numerically calculated for different variables, such as the gradient factors of GIMs and the working frequencies. Firstly, let us explore the case of TM polarization. Figure 2a shows the varying fraction of the output TM0 mode along with the varying gradient factors of the two GIM slabs, where the working frequency is fixed at 6 GHz. It is consistent with intuition that either changing g1 or g2 have the same effects, as clearly shown in Fig. 2a. The diagram is symmetric along the diagonal line. Two dash lines in the blue regions refer to the contour line of |α|2 equal to zero, i.e., there is no TM0 mode in the output port (all of them have been converted to TM1 mode). Moreover, we observed that the mode converter works over a broad range of frequencies. Figure 2b shows the relationship between the fraction of the output TM0 mode and the gradient factor of the lower GIM slab (g2) as well as the working frequencies by fixing g1 = 1. The diagram appears to be periodic along with the varying gradient factor of the lower GIM slab. Point A refers to the case mentioned in Fig. 1d, which indicated that the output mode has been converted into TM1 mode completely. As the frequency increases, the fraction of the output TM0 mode tends to change more slowly. In particular, when g2 is fixed at 1.015 or 0.985, and the working frequencies range from 9 GHz to 11.7 GHz, the fraction of output mode |α|2 tend to be a nearly-constant and close to zero, as revealed by the two white dash lines in Fig. 2b. Hence, the working frequencies have a 26% bandwidth (2.7 GHz). For details, we plot the transmission curve for g1 = 1.015, and g2 = 1 in Fig. 2c for a finer frequency resolution, where we find that indeed high transmission happens for a broad band of frequencies. One may extend the converting frequency to a higher value, however, it should be noted that higher order modes will be excited for both ports, which will influence the conversion efficiency and more physical scenarios should be taken into consideration.
As for TE polarization, similar effects are observed, but compared with TM0 mode, TE1 mode has higher working frequencies in the same waveguide structure. Therefore, we limit the gradient factors range from 0.97 to 1.03 and keep the working frequency range from 12 GHz to 16.8 GHz, ensuring that the output port can only support TE2 mode but no higher order modes. Figure 2d presents the relationships between the fraction of output TE1 mode and varying gradient factors of the two GIM slabs, which also appears to be periodic and symmetric. Point B refers to the case mentioned in Fig. 1f, which indicated that the output mode has been converted into TE2 mode completely. In order to explore whether such a mode converter works for a broadband of frequencies, we plot the fraction of output TE1 mode with varying working frequencies and the gradient factor of the lower GIM slab (g2) by fixing g1 = 1, as shown in Fig. 2e. For g2 = 0.99, we find that the fraction of output mode |γ|2 tends to be a nearly-constant and close to zero, as revealed by the white dash line. The working frequencies now range from 14 GHz to 16.8 GHz, showing an 18% bandwidth (2.8 GHz). We then plot the transmission from 14 GHz to 16.8 GHz for the case of g1 = 1 and g2 = 0.99 in Fig. 2f for a finer frequency resolution. Except for several weak dips, the transmission is high for a broadband of frequencies. Even for the frequencies of dips, the transmission is above 0.7; therefore the effect will not be compromised too much.
There are several special areas denoted by white dash circles in the diagram, which shows that there are some strong transmission dips. Such dips come from Fano resonances, which we will discuss in details in the Supplementary Information 1 (see Supplementary Figs 1–3). In spite of these special areas, broadband mode converter via GIMs without polarization limitation is still clearly verified.
Now, let’s examine the mechanism behind the proposed mode converter. As mentioned in ref. 13 and ref. 14, the GIM slabs can convert a PM to a SM with a nearly 100% efficiency, causing little scattering. This can be achieved because the band branch of TM0/TE1 mode goes below the light line as the refractive indexes of dielectrics of GIM slabs increase (see Fig. 2e,f of ref. 13). Here for the mode converter, similar physics happens. The only difference is that owing to the asymmetric gradient factors, there is a phase difference of surface modes in the upper and lower GIM slabs. For simplicity, the wave vector of SM (β) at a specific position of each GIM slab is approximately equal to the wave vector in a bulk media with a dielectric constant equal to that of each GIM slab at the position, which can be viewed as β = 2πf·n(x)/c. The changing of refractive index n gives rise to different wave vectors and consequently, different accumulated phases during light propagation in the upper and lower GIM slabs respectively. The accumulated phase difference between these two GIM slabs can be defined as . If θ equal to 2nπ (n = 0, 1, 2…), there is no phase accumulations between upper and lower GIM slabs, i.e. the output mode keep the same as the input mode (TM0 or TE1 mode). While if θ equal to (2n + 1)π (n = 0, 1, 2…), the optical field through the upper GIM has opposite sign relative to the optical field through the lower GIM. At this condition the output mode turn to the higher mode (TM1 or TE2 mode). Figure 3 represents the fraction of output mode (TM1 and TE2) and the phase difference θ as a function of g2 with a fixed g1 and fixed working frequency, or as a function of working frequency with g1 and g2.
In order to show the periodically changing fraction of output mode and the phase difference in the same figure, we limit the phase difference from 0 to 180 degree. Note that both TE and TM mode conversion can be explained with the same physical mechanism, we discuss TM polarization only and list the results of TE polarization without detailed explanations. As show in Fig. 3a, when there is no accumulated phase difference (i.e. θ equal to 0 degree), the fraction of the output TM1 mode keeps its minimum value thus no mode conversion occurs, while if the accumulated phase difference reach to its peak (i.e. θ equal to odd integer multiply of π), the fraction of output TM1 mode increased to unity, meaning that mode conversion is maximized. It should be emphasized that this explanation is applicable to the case that both gradient factors are around unity. Otherwise, the explanation may not function very well, as also revealed in Fig. 3a. When g2 equals to 0.95 or 1.05, the result is not so exact as that when g2 equals to unity. Regardless of it, both two parameters agree with each other very well with the varying gradient factor. It verifies our explanation that the changing of output mode is stemmed from the asymmetric GIM slabs, which can approximately explained by the accumulated phase difference between these two GIM slabs. The same phenomenon is found for TE polarization (see in Fig. 3c). We then fixed g1and g2, and plot the accumulated phase difference and the fraction of the output mode at different working frequencies in Fig. 3b (TM) and 3d (TE), for the broadband mode converter mentioned in Fig. 2c,f. We find that the fraction of the output mode coincides with the accumulated phase difference very well for a broadband of frequencies for both polarizations. This also explain why the mode converter can work in a broadband of frequencies. As both gradient factors are very close to unity, the accumulated phase differences will not deviate too much from π for the working frequencies. However, we should emphasize that the accumulated phase difference method is only approximately correct. When the distance between the two GIMs becomes smaller, the coupling effect will be stronger and the mode conversion will be compromised.
As an application, we combine the properties of our mode converter with those of a slab of zero index metamaterials (ZIMs) to achieve asymmetric propagation in a waveguide. ZIMs have many interesting properties. For example, they can be used to enhance the directive emission for an embedded source16, or to squeeze electromagnetic waves in a narrow waveguide with ZIMs17,18. In addition, total transmission and total reflection can be achieved by introducing defects in ZIMs19,20,21. Figure 4a,b schematically show the transverse momentum conservation for reflection and transmission at the interface air/ZIMs. The bigger circle represents the isofrequency curve in air while the smaller one denotes that in ZIMs. The red arrow in the bigger circle is at the critical incident angle, which is nearly horizontal. For the incident angle larger than the critical angle, the ray cannot transmit into ZIMs and has a total reflection at the interface. To be more precise, when the TM0 mode is incident on a ZIM surface, it will propagate through ZIMs as it was a transparent media with a zero reflection coefficient. While TM1 mode are totally reflected, as shown in Fig. 4b. Therefore, putting a ZIM block into the right port of our waveguide structure together with the asymmetric GIM slabs, we achieve asymmetric propagation for TM polarization. Simulations are performed to demonstrate the asymmetric propagation, the related parameters are set as follow: g1 = 1, g2 = 1.015, and working frequency is 9 GHz. As shown in Fig. 4c, when the TM0 mode with a frequency of 9 GHz is incident from the right port, it will first pass through the ZIM and then continue to propagate in the GIM waveguide, leaving the left port as a TM1 mode. However, when the TM0 is incident from the left port, it will first be converted into a TM1 mode after passing through the GIM part. Then it experiences total reflection after reaching the ZIM part, demonstrating asymmetric propagation as shown in Fig. 4d.
In this paper, we have proposed a broadband mode converter which consists of a waveguide with two slabs of gradient index metamaterials coated on its sides. We have studied numerically and analytically the efficiency of mode conversion from TM0/TE1 into TM1/TE2 as function of metamaterial gradient factors and working frequencies. In particular, we have shown that our device can maintain relatively high mode conversion over a broad range of frequencies due to the slowly varying refractive index profiles of gradient index metamaterials. We have explained, using simple arguments, that the accumulated phase difference caused by light propagation in the asymmetric GIMs controls waveguide mode conversion. In addition, we have proposed an interesting application of asymmetric TM propagation by introducing zero index metamaterials at one port of the GIM waveguide.
The field patterns in Fig. 1(c–f) and Fig. 4(c,d) and the transmissions in Fig. 2(c,e), as well as the calculated fraction of TE1 and TM0 in Fig. 3(a–d) were obtained by using the finite element solver COMSOL Multiphysics. Ports were set as boundary conditions of both sides of waveguides to obtain the transmission.
How to cite this article: Wang, H.X. et al. Broadband mode conversion via gradient index metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 6, 24529; doi: 10.1038/srep24529 (2016).
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China for Excellent Young Scientists (grant no. 61322504), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (grant no. 201217), and the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. P. G. is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement FLATLIGHT No 639109). J. H. J. thanks support from the start-up funding of Soochow University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/