This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Ten dos and don’ts of Character Strengths Research
International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology Open Access 26 March 2024
-
In Search of Conceptual Clarity About the Structure of Psychopathic Traits in Children: A Network-Based Proposal
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Open Access 18 January 2024
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 1 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $99.00 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Borsboom, D. et al. Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 58 (2021).
Neal, Z. P. et al. Annotated bibliography of critiques of psychometric network analysis. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ke6qn (2022).
Krueger, R. F., DeYoung, C. G. & Markon, K. E. Toward scientifically useful quantitative models of psychopathology: the importance of a comparative approach. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 163–164 (2010).
Asendorpf, J. B. What do the items and their associations refer to in a network approach to personality? Eur. J. Pers. 26, 432–433 (2012).
Bos, E. H. & Wanders, R. B. K. Group-level symptom networks in depression. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 411 (2016).
Bos, F. M. et al. Can we jump from cross-sectional to dynamic interpretations of networks? Implications for the network perspective in psychiatry. Psychother. Psychosom. 86, 175–177 (2017).
Forbes, M. K., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E. & Krueger, R. F. Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126, 969–988 (2017).
Steinley, D., Hoffman, M., Brusco, M. J. & Sher, K. J. A method for making inferences in network analysis: comment on Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017). J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126, 1000–1010 (2017).
Forbes, M. K., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E. & Krueger, R. F. Quantifying the reliability and replicability of psychopathology network characteristics. Multivariate Behav. Res. 56, 224–242 (2021).
Neal, Z. P. & Neal, J. W. Out of bounds? The boundary specification problem for centrality in psychological networks. Psychol. Methods https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000426 (2021).
Spiller, T. R. et al. On the validity of the centrality hypothesis in cross-sectional between-subject networks of psychopathology. BMC Med. 18, 297 (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.P.N. conceptualized the paper. Z.P.N., M.K.F. and J.W.N. drafted the proposal and first draft. All authors drafted and reviewed the final paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Methods Primers thanks Antonio Serpa-Barrientos for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neal, Z.P., Forbes, M.K., Neal, J.W. et al. Critiques of network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2, 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00177-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00177-9
This article is cited by
-
In Search of Conceptual Clarity About the Structure of Psychopathic Traits in Children: A Network-Based Proposal
Child Psychiatry & Human Development (2024)
-
Ten dos and don’ts of Character Strengths Research
International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology (2024)
-
Reply to ‘Critiques of network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science’
Nature Reviews Methods Primers (2022)