Abstract
Spontaneous symmetry breaking of a pair of vector temporal cavity solitons has been established as a paradigm to modulate optical frequency combs, and finds many applications in metrology, frequency standards, communications, and photonic devices. While this phenomenon has successfully been observed in Kerr ring resonators, the counterpart exploiting linear Fabry-Pérot cavities is still unexplored. Here, we consider field polarization properties and describe a vector comb generation through the spontaneous symmetry breaking of temporal cavity solitons within coherently driven, passive, Fabry-Pérot cavities with Kerr nonlinearity. Global coupling effects due to the interactions of counter-propagating light restrict the maximum number of soliton pairs within the cavity - even down to a single soliton pair - and force long range polarization conformity in trains of vector solitons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Commonly described as "Rulers for Light", optical frequency combs1,2,3,4 and their generation are topics with wide-reaching research interest. This interest is especially owed to their diverse application in metrology, optical communications5, and novel photonic devices3. They are used, for example, in high precision spectroscopy, optical atomic clocks, and navigation systems. One particular method for producing an optical frequency comb utilizes dissipative temporal cavity solitons (TCS) in optical micro-resonators.
We concern ourselves here not only with the generation of TCS but also with combining them with the phenomenon known as spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB). Broadly defined, SSB describes the situation when two or more properties of a system suddenly change from displaying an equal property or state (symmetric) to having these states becoming unequal (asymmetric) following an infinitely small change to some control parameter.
The SSB of light in Kerr resonators has seen a flurry of study and interest in the past half-decade, being predicted and observed for systems with counter-propagating light components6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, for orthogonally polarized light components16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23, and also very recently for a single system combining both counter-propagating light and two orthogonal polarization components together24, and systems containing multiple resonators25,26.
Although recent interest about TCS in Kerr resonators mainly focused on ring geometries, frequency combs based on TCS have also been found in Fabry-Pérot resonators (linear cavities)27,28,29. Figure 1 shows a basic schematic of this type of resonator, and this is the configuration of interest in this paper. One can see that it is comprised primarily of two highly reflective mirrors, which bounce light from the linearly polarized input light back and forth between them. Here we consider that the space between the mirrors is filled with a Kerr, or χ3, nonlinear medium.
Vector solitons, opposed to scalar solitons, refer to solitons involving two or more field components30. There has been great success in observing the SSB of a pair of vector TCS in Kerr ring resonators18,19, where the TCS have orthogonal polarizations, but similar phenomena in linear Fabry-Pérot cavities, Fig. 1, has remained unreported. This is despite recent separate experimental observations in Fabry-Pérot cavities of both the SSB of flat solutions16 and of scalar TCS28. Here we outline the SSB of a pair of vector TCS in Fabry-Pérot cavities.
Results and discussions
To model the intra-cavity, and slower, temporal dynamics of a field propagating in a Fabry-Pérot resonator with consideration for its polarization, Fig. 1, we derive, see the Methods section, a system of two coupled, generalized, Lugiato-Lefever Equations (LLEs)31 with fast-time averaged terms. Here we rewrite the final integro-partial differential equations from the Methods section for the complex amplitudes E± of the circularly polarized components
where Ein is the input pump in the circular basis32, θ the cavity detuning, η controls the type of dispersion (with its value ± 1 referring to normal or anomalous dispersion, respectively), t and τ are both temporal variables but on relative slow and fast time-scales, respectively33, and A and B control the strengths of self- and cross-phase modulation effects11,24. The terms with angled brackets, i.e., 〈f〉, represent the temporal averages of the encapsulated functions over a single resonator round-trip, and are defined by the following:
Comparing it with the equations of Cole et al.27,29, we see that the effects of the polarization components cause not only additional cross-phase modulation terms (and their averages) but also a further additional term, the final term of Eq. (1), which is caused by an energy exchange between the two circular components of each beam24,34. We note that, if so desired, one may transition Eq. (1) to the linear polarization basis through its manipulation around the substitution of \({E}_{\pm }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left({E}_{x}\pm i{E}_{y}\right)\). Note also that the main symmetry of Eq. (1) is the invariance under the exchange of the plus and minus indexes. We recognize the potential for further generalization and study of this system when taking into account higher order dispersion effects35,36,37,38,39, which could result in additional localized structures to those discussed here.
Homogeneous stationary states
The homogeneous (meaning here unchanging over the τ domain) and stationary (meaning here unchanging with t) solutions (HSS) to Eq. (1) are obtained by setting ∂E±/∂t and ∂2E±/∂τ2 both to zero. We may further make use of the fact that when a function f(τ) is homogeneous over τ its average over the τ domain is equal to its value at a single point—that is to say Eq. (2) becomes trivially f. Hence, under homogeneous and stationary conditions, and following suitable algebraic manipulation, Eq. (1) becomes
Equation (3) is identical in its mathematical form, although not physical meaning, to the homogeneous stationary states of two linearly polarized fields counter-propagating a Kerr ring resonator6,7,10,40, or of two orthogonally polarized fields co-propagating a Kerr ring resonator11,17,32. Due to its mathematical analogies to other such systems, Eq. (3) has been studied extensively, and we shall not repeat that analysis here.
We stress that SSB emerges as a property of Eq. (3). In this context, SSB describes the phenomena where the two circulating fields E± go from having symmetric intensities, ∣E+∣2 = ∣E−∣2, to having asymmetric intensities, ∣E+∣2 ≠ ∣E−∣2, upon an infinitely small change to input conditions (input conditions such as the input intensity ∣Ein∣2 or the cavity detuning, θ, for example). With Eq. (3) and its SSB largely explored elsewhere, we display, for the later benefit of the reader, in Fig. 2(a) & (b), examples of SSB in input intensity and cavity detuning scans for Eq. (3), respectively, for self- and cross-phase modulation values A = 2/3 and B = 4/3 – the values for silica glass fibers. These values give a very general B/A ratio11.
In the next section, we proceed to describe the stability of the homogeneous and stationary states and hence their susceptibility to oscillations following fast- and/or slow-time perturbations.
Linear stability analysis of homogeneous stationary states
To assess the system’s susceptibility to temporal perturbations, both on t and τ, we performed a linear stability analysis27 on the modal expansion of Eq. (1), see methods section. General mathematical methods to find instability thresholds in single polarization Fabry-Pérot resonators have recently been established41. Here, we linearized the modal equations around a homogeneous stationary solution E±HS with Un = E±HSδn,0 + δUn, which, without loss of generality, had its phases adjusted such that it is real. The index n is the modal number of the fast-time solution. We find that the four linear stability eigenvalues have the form
with
where
where
In Fig. 3, we display the HSS, Eq. (3), and their corresponding linear stability eigenvalues, Eq. (4) from the Methods section, over a cavity detuning scan of Eq. (3) for anomalous dispersion, k = 1.9, ∣Ein∣2 = 4, and A = 2/3 and B = 4/3.
Regarding solution stability, if the eigenvalues of Eq. (4) all have real parts less than zero, i.e., Re(λ) < 0, then the solution in question is stable, whereas if at least one eigenvalue has a real part greater than zero, then the solution is unstable. If the stability eigenvalues with real parts greater than zero and imaginary part different from zero occur when n = 0, then the solution will begin to oscillate over slow-time, if they occur when n ≠ 0 the solution will oscillate over fast-time (Turing patterns).
We discuss first the eigenvalues associated with the symmetric solution line of this plot. They confirm the instability of the middle branch of the tilted symmetric Lorentzian curve, and also that the upper branch of the same curve is unstable between the SSB bifurcations points as expected from previous work. Note, however, that the instability of the symmetric line extends even beyond the higher detuning value corresponding to the reverse SSB bifurcation owed to the unstable n ≠ 0 eigenvalues, resulting in symmetric Turing patterns. Similarly, the instability of the asymmetric solution line also extends beyond slow-time instabilities, again owed to the unstable n ≠ 0 eigenvalues resulting in asymmetric Turing patterns, since they remain unstable for detuning values larger than those where the n = 0 eigenvalues have stabilized.
Inhomogeneous solutions: patterns, temporal cavity solitons
Due to Eq. (1)’s susceptibility to instabilities on the fast-time, we further explored the inhomogeneous solutions of the system. In this section, we always use A = 2/3 and B = 4/3, and here analyze situations only for anomalous dispersion, η = −1, –situations related to normal dispersion, η = +1, will be discussed elsewhere. Figure 4 shows in panels (a)–(d) the variation in the field intensity profiles across the cavity as the cavity detuning is scanned, for a set input pump of ∣Ein∣2 = 4. We observe eight distinct regions of characteristic behaviors labeled in the figure as regions (1) – (8). The detuning scans begin with the field intensity profiles following the symmetric HSS line (region 1), before forming symmetric Turing patterns across τ (region 2), in agreement with the linear stability analysis. A characteristic example of these symmetric patterns is presented in Fig. 4e, its peaks grow in intensity as the cavity detuning is further increased. While these pattern states may be initially symmetric, this property later breaks spontaneously, resulting in a region of asymmetric patterns (region 3), with characteristics similar to that of Fig. 4f. Progressing further still across the cavity detuning scan, the pattern’s intensity profiles soon become unstable to chaotic oscillations (region 4), see the example in Fig. 4g, before finally reaching a detuning value where the pattern states naturally form vector soliton-pair structures (region 5), see Fig. 4h. One will note that initially the solitons in each of the field intensity profiles ∣E±∣2 are both asymmetric and breathing (region 5). In Fig. 4i, however, these asymmetric soliton pairs stop breathing and stabilize (region 6). The asymmetric soliton pairs eventually converge to symmetric profiles at the point starting region 7, as the example shows in Fig. 4j. Finally, in region 8, the soliton pairs die, and the field intensity profiles return to the HSS line.
Long-range talking of soliton pairs and their polarization conformity
In this section, we show that the angle-bracketed terms of Eq. (1) have fascinating repercussions on the system’s evolution. Although one of their effects has already been felt, the requirement to analyze separately the n = 0 stability eigenvalues, and their wider effects have remained somewhat hidden until this section. We have stated that, mathematically, these angled terms amount to an average of the field intensity profiles across the cavity, but owed to this they cause a global coupling across the cavity40. Related to the TCS pairs, these global coupling terms effectively mean that all the soliton pairs feel the impact of, and in turn influence, any others in the cavity.
One effect of this global communication, which was noted by Cole et al.27 for the single polarization case, is that the maximum number of solitons existing within the cavity at any given time can be controllably limited by one’s choice of system parameters. This ability could be extremely useful, for example, for applications that require robust temporal delays between subsequent soliton generations, such as for frequency combs. We show that this control on the maximum number of solitons present in the cavity is maintained for our vector soliton pairs.
Normally solitons in LLE systems, of the nature similar to those discussed in this manuscript, “sit” upon the bottom branch of the symmetric HSS, and hence naturally lose viability when the HSS bottom branch ends. However, as displayed in Fig. 5, and owed to the 〈f〉 terms, these soliton bases are in fact elevated above the HSS in our system. One can also see that these 〈f〉 terms further have the effect of raising the cavity detuning value at which the solitons gain viability. This is because the 〈f〉 terms cause an effective detuning in the system27,40, i.e., they actively alter the system’s resonance mismatch and hence the value of the light intensity in the soliton background. Further still, one notes that the more solitons present in the cavity, the more by which this detuning limit is raised. This increase in the cavity detuning value required to support additional solitons effectively limits the maximum soliton pair number supported at any one time, based upon the current cavity detuning value. In relation to Fig. 5, for example, at a cavity detuning of θ = 5.45, the system can only support a maximum of a single pair of vector solitons, with the system being unable to support even a single additional pair until well after θ = 5.5. This effect amounts to a system which can guarantee the generation of a maximum of a single vector soliton pair if so desired. Looking at the intensity profile of a single asymmetric soliton pair in the frequency domain, Fig. 6, we see the types of symmetry-broken frequency combs that can be produced utilizing this phenomenon.
We now move to the final effect of the angle-bracketed terms that will be discussed in this manuscript. The end result of this effect was already apparent in panels (h) and (i) of Fig. 4. One will note that the soliton pairs in these panels, both those breathing, and those that are stable, all share the same dominant polarization although generated autonomously. This result is particularly intriguing when compared with that for soliton pairs produced in a Kerr ring18,19, as opposed to a FP cavity, where there each asymmetric soliton pair’s dominant polarization was independent of that held by any other pair. This meant that provided those soliton pairs were sufficiently spaced apart from each other, they could behave and be addressed independently. The fact that we always observe all simultaneous asymmetric soliton pairs in our cavities sharing the same dominant polarization is due to the global coupling terms that facilitate long-range interactions between all soliton pairs existing within the cavity, terms not present in the Kerr ring system, in particular the final term of Eq. (1) caused by the energy exchange between the two circular components of each beam.
We find that the conformity of the soliton pairs to a globally dominant polarization is a strong and robust effect. We demonstrate this in Fig. 7. The main panel of the figure shows the slow-time evolution of a tracked point in the fast-time field intensity profiles, a point chosen to line up with the intensity maxima of one of the cavity soliton pairs. In panel (a) one sees the initial stable cavity condition made up of a train of four asymmetric soliton pairs, all sharing the same dominant polarization. This configuration is stable in the slow time. At time t = 25 we attempt to force non-conformity on the system. We do this by splicing the field intensity profiles and swapping the field roles of one of the soliton pairs such that in the swapped pair (third) the opposing polarization is now dominant. Allowing the system to continue to evolve after this attempt to force non-conformity shows how the system evolves back to a state where soliton pair polarization conformity appears once again. This behavior can have advantages in, for example, protecting communicated binary data encoded in the polarization of a chain of soliton pairs in noisy systems. The ability of the system to return to its original polarization dominance at conformity is limited in the way one would likely expect - if a minority of soliton pairs have the polarizations reversed, then the system conforms to the original dominant polarization. If, however, the majority of soliton pairs have their polarization reversed, then the system evolves to the new dominant-on-average polarization until that polarization is conformed to across the system. If exactly half of the soliton pairs have their polarization inverted, then the eventual conformed polarization is determined by random perturbations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the spontaneous symmetry breaking of a pair of vector temporal cavity solitons in Fabry-Pérot cavities with possible experimental realizations in fiber loop set-ups similar to those of ref. 18 but in a Fabry-Pérot configuration. Our investigation not only revealed the stability and dynamical behavior of these vector solitons in various parameter regimes but also uncovered useful phenomena arising from the global coupling terms in our derived model. We showed that the maximum number of soliton pairs in the cavity can be self-limited with important implications for frequency comb applications. Furthermore, we discovered that asymmetric soliton pairs in our system exhibit a conformity in their dominant polarization states, highlighting the effects on soliton pair behavior caused by the global coupling terms. These findings significantly expand our understanding of temporal cavity solitons and spontaneous symmetry breaking in Kerr cavities and may have extensions into studies around frequency combs from high order dispersion, thus opening up new avenues for further exploration and potential applications in optical metrology, pulse coding, optical communications and beyond.
Methods
The nonlinear interaction terms in our model are based on those of Pitois et al.34 where counter-propagation of polarization components is considered in an isotropic fiber. In this work, we add dispersion and consider the reflective boundary conditions, the input pump, and the cavity detuning and other losses, all of which are inherent to a Fabry-Pérot resonator27,32. Then we generalize the equations for various self- (A) and cross-phase (B) modulation strengths,11,24, resulting in the following Eqs. (8)–(11)).
Right circular polarization
Forward propagating, u(t, τ):
Backward propagating, \(\bar{u}(t,\tau )\):
Left circular polarization
Forward propagating, v(t, τ):
Backward propagating, \(\bar{v}(t,\tau )\):
where u and v are the forward propagating field components with right- and left-circular polarizations, respectively, with \(\bar{u}\) and \(\bar{v}\) being the backwards propagating variants (representing the reflections of fields u and v respectively), Ein accounts for the input pump, θ is the cavity detuning (the difference between the frequency of the input pump laser and the closest cavity resonance frequency), η controls the type of dispersion (with its value ± 1 referring to normal or anomalous dispersion, respectively), and t and τ are both temporal variables but on relative slow and fast time-scales, respectively33. We also set the following boundary conditions
where tR is the round trip time of the resonator.
Drawing inspiration from Cole et al.27, we seek to combine Eq. (8) and (9) and Eq. (10) and (11), respectively, together, such that Eqs. ((8)–(11)) reduce to a system with only two equations. To achieve this, we introduce the following modal expansions in terms of the modal amplitudes \({\tilde{u}}_{n},{\tilde{v}}_{n},{\tilde{E}}_{in}\):
where δn,0 is the Kronecker delta function, and the modal amplitudes are given by
These allow us to extend our field equations over a full round trip since
Focusing momentarily alone on Eq. (8), we insert the modal expansions of Eqs. (13) and (14) to obtain
with a similar equation focusing on \({\tilde{v}}_{n}\). We can then decompose \(\tilde{u}\) and \(\tilde{v}\) into the product of two functions on distinct time scales by setting
If we take an average of the decomposed Eq. (16) over an extended slow-time, t, interval then the exponential terms on the average vanish for n″ ≠ n. This turns Eq. (16) to
with again a similar equation focusing on \({\tilde{v}}_{n}\).
Finally, if we collapse the modal expansions by defining:
one obtains the used model, Eq. (1).
where the terms with angled brackets correspond to \(\langle f\rangle =(1/{t}_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}})\int\nolimits_{-{t}_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}/2}^{{t}_{{{{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}}}}/2}f\left(\tau \right)\,d\tau\), i.e., the temporal averages over the round-trip time tR. The presence of this kind of averaged terms in Fabry-Pérot configurations was first suggested by Firth in ref. 42 when describing the phase shift due to the counter-propagating fields in the Kerr medium.
Linear stability analysis
To derive Eq. (4), we focus on the nth term of Eq. (18) and linearized it around a homogeneous stationary state Un,HS where we defined Un(τ) = δn,0UHS + δUn(τ). Details of this method are discussed by Cole et al.27.
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The codes that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Hänsch, T. W. Nobel lecture: passion for precision. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297 (2006).
Del’Haye, P. et al. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature 450, 1214–1217 (2007).
Pasquazi, A. et al. Micro-combs: a novel generation of optical sources. Phys. Rep. 729, 1–81 (2018).
Fortier, T. & Baumann, E. 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications. Commun. Phys. 2, 1–16 (2019).
Lundberg, L. et al. Phase-coherent lightwave communications with frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 11, 201 (2020).
Kaplan, A. & Meystre, P. Enhancement of the Sagnac effect due to nonlinearly induced nonreciprocity. Opt. Lett. 6, 590–592 (1981).
Kaplan, A. & Meystre, P. Directionally asymmetrical bistability in a symmetrically pumped nonlinear ring interferometer. Opt. Commun. 40, 229–232 (1982).
Wright, E. M., Meystre, P., Firth, W. & Kaplan, A. Theory of the nonlinear sagnac effect in a fiber-optic gyroscope. Phys. Rev. A 32, 2857 (1985).
Del Bino, L., Silver, J. M., Stebbings, S. L. & Del’Haye, P. Symmetry breaking of counter-propagating light in a nonlinear resonator. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–6 (2017).
Woodley, M. T. et al. Universal symmetry-breaking dynamics for the kerr interaction of counterpropagating light in dielectric ring resonators. Phys. Rev. A 98, 053863 (2018).
Hill, L., Oppo, G.-L., Woodley, M. T. & Del’Haye, P. Effects of self-and cross-phase modulation on the spontaneous symmetry breaking of light in ring resonators. Phys. Rev. A 101, 013823 (2020).
Woodley, M. T., Hill, L., Del Bino, L., Oppo, G.-L. & Del’Haye, P. Self-switching Kerr oscillations of counterpropagating light in microresonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 043901 (2021).
Cui, C., Zhang, L., & Fan, L. Control spontaneous symmetry breaking of photonic chirality with reconfigurable anomalous nonlinearity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04866 (2022).
Bitha, R. D. D., Giraldo, A., Broderick, N. G. & Krauskopf, B. Bifurcation analysis of complex switching oscillations in a Kerr microring resonator. Phys. Rev. E 108, 064204 (2023).
Zhang, Y. et al. Symmetry breaking in high-q silicon nitride resonators. In Proc. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC), 1–1 (IEEE, 2023).
Moroney, N. et al. A Kerr polarization controller. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–8 (2022).
Garbin, B. et al. Asymmetric balance in symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023244 (2020).
Xu, G. et al. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of dissipative optical solitons in a two-component Kerr resonator. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–9 (2021).
Xu, G. et al. Breathing dynamics of symmetry-broken temporal cavity solitons in Kerr ring resonators. Opt. Lett. 47, 1486–1489 (2022).
Quinn, L. et al. Random number generation using spontaneous symmetry breaking in a Kerr resonator. Opt. Lett. 48, 3741–3744 (2023).
Coen, S. et al. Nonlinear topological symmetry protection in a dissipative system. Nat. Commun. 15, 1398 (2024).
Quinn, L. et al. Towards a novel coherent ising machine using symmetry breaking in a Kerr resonator. In AI and Optical Data Sciences IV, PC1243806 (SPIE, 2023).
Cheah, K. W., Mai, J., Huang, X., Guo, X. & Fan, H. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of non-hermitian coupled nano-cavities. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3647220/v1] (2023).
Hill, L., Oppo, G.-L. & Del’Haye, P. Multi-stage spontaneous symmetry breaking of light in Kerr ring resonators. Commun. Phys. 6, 208 (2023).
Ghosh, A., Hill, L., Oppo, G.-L. & Del’Haye, P. Four-field symmetry breakings in twin-resonator photonic isomers. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L042012 (2023).
Ghosh, A. et al. Controlled light distribution with coupled microresonator chains via Kerr symmetry breaking (2024). 2402.10673.
Cole, D. C., Gatti, A., Papp, S. B., Prati, F. & Lugiato, L. Theory of Kerr frequency Combs in fabry-perot resonators. Phys. Rev. A 98, 013831 (2018).
Wildi, T., Gaafar, M. A., Voumard, T., Ludwig, M. & Herr, T. Dissipative Kerr solitons in integrated fabry–perot microresonators. Optica 10, 650–656 (2023).
Campbell, G. N., Hill, L., Del’Haye, P. & Oppo, G.-L. Dark solitons in Fabry-Pérot resonators with Kerr media and normal dispersion. Phys. Rev. A 108, 033505 (2023).
Christodoulides, D. N. & Joseph, R. Vector solitons in birefringent nonlinear dispersive media. Opt. Lett. 13, 53–55 (1988).
Lugiato, L. A. & Lefever, R. Spatial dissipative structures in passive optical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2209 (1987).
Geddes, J., Moloney, J., Wright, E. & Firth, W. Polarisation patterns in a nonlinear cavity. Opt. Commun. 111, 623–631 (1994).
Haelterman, M., Trillo, S. & Wabnitz, S. Dissipative modulation instability in a nonlinear dispersive ring cavity. Opt. Commun. 91, 401–407 (1992).
Pitois, S., Millot, G. & Wabnitz, S. Nonlinear polarization dynamics of counterpropagating waves in an isotropic optical fiber: theory and experiments. JOSA B 18, 432–443 (2001).
Blanco-Redondo, A. et al. Pure-quartic solitons. Nat. Commun. 7, 10427 (2016).
Li, Z., Xu, Y., Coen, S., Murdoch, S. G. & Erkintalo, M. Experimental observations of bright dissipative cavity solitons and their collapsed snaking in a Kerr resonator with normal dispersion driving. Optica 7, 1195–1203 (2020).
Anderson, M. H. et al. Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Commun. 13, 4764 (2022).
Zhang, S., Bi, T. & Del’Haye, P. Quintic dispersion soliton frequency combs in a microresonator. Laser Photon. Rev. 17, 2300075 (2023).
Bi, T., Zhang, S., Hill, L. & Del’Haye, P. Pure quintic dispersion microresonator frequency combs. In CLEO: Fundamental Science, FW4B–4 (Optica Publishing Group, 2023).
Campbell, G. N., Zhang, S., Del Bino, L., Del’Haye, P. & Oppo, G.-L. Counterpropagating light in ring resonators: switching fronts, plateaus, and oscillations. Phys. Rev. A 106, 043507 (2022).
Firth, W. J., Geddes, J. B., Karst, N. J. & Oppo, G.-L. Analytic instability thresholds in folded Kerr resonators of arbitrary finesse. Phys. Rev. A 103, 023510 (2021).
Firth, W. J. Stability of nonlinear Fabry-Pérot resonators. Opt. Commun. 39, 343–346 (1981).
Acknowledgements
L.H. acknowledges funding provided by the CNQO group within the Department of Physics at the University of Strathclyde, the “Saltire Emerging Researcher" scheme through SUPA (Scottish University’s Physics Alliance) and provided by the Scottish Government and Scottish Funding Council (SFC), and the SALTO funding scheme from the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. This work was further supported by the European Union’s H2020 ERC Starting Grants 756966, the Marie Curie Innovative Training Network “Microcombs” 812818 and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LH and GLO defined the research project. LH completed the derivation of the used model with assistance from EMH and GC. The numerical simulations were completed by LH and EMH with assistance from GC. The stability analysis was completed by GC and LH. All authors, including TB and AG, assisted with the analysis and discussions on the results. LH wrote the manuscript with inputs from all authors. PDH, GLO and LH secured funding for the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks Leon Bello and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, L., Hirmer, EM., Campbell, G. et al. Symmetry broken vectorial Kerr frequency combs from Fabry-Pérot resonators. Commun Phys 7, 82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01566-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01566-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.