Article | Open

A three miRNAs signature predicts survival in cervical cancer using bioinformatics analysis

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 5624 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06032-2
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Growing evidences showed that a large number of miRNAs were abnormally expressed in cervical cancer tissues and played irreplaceable roles in tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis. The aim of the present study was to identify the differential miRNAs expression between cervical cancer and normal cervical tissues by analyzing the high-throughput miRNA data downloaded from TCGA database. Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic values of the differentially expressed miRNAs and constructed a three-miRNA signature that could effectively predict patient survival. According to the cut-off criteria (P < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 2.0), a total of 78 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified between cervical cancer tissues and matched normal tissues, including 37 up-regulated miRNAs and 41 down-regulated miRNAs. The Kaplan-Meier survival method revealed the prognostic function of the three miRNAs (miRNA-145, miRNA-200c, and miRNA-218-1). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the three-miRNA signature was an independent prognostic factor in cervical cancer. The functional enrichment analysis suggested that the target genes of three miRNAs may be involved in various pathways related to cancer, including MAPK, AMPK, focal adhesion, cGMP-PKG, wnt, and mTOR signaling pathway. Taken together, the present study suggested that three-miRNA signature could be used as a prognostic marker in cervical cancer.

Introduction

According to the world cancer statistics, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women globally and the second most common cancer in developing areas1, 2, with an estimated global incidence of 530,000 new cases and 270,000 deaths annually3. The preventive vaccination and organized screening programs are critical in identifying the cervical cancer before it enters advanced stages. Moreover, the treatments are often less effective in advanced stages compared with early interventions4. Thus, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cervical cancer development and identification of novel biomarkers are required for the early detection and treatment of cervical cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a key component of the noncoding RNA family, are approximately 18–25 nucleotides that involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression5. It has been shown that miRNAs are aberrantly expressed in various types of malignancies and function either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors6. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that miRNAs regulated various carcinogenesis processes including cell maturation7, cell proliferation8, migration, invasion8, autophagy8, apoptosis9, and metastasis10. Therefore, miRNAs have a large potential to serve as promising markers in the diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized targeted therapies.

Although a number of miRNAs have been identified in predicting the clinical outcome in cervical cancer, there exists inconsistence in previous studies. This may due to the small sample size, heterogeneous histological subtype, different detection platforms, and various data processing methods. The Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) is a National Cancer Institute effort to profile at least 20 different tumor types using genomic platforms and to make raw and processed data available to all researchers11. The TCGA released a large number of miRNA sequencing data for cervical cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to identify the differential miRNAs expression between cervical cancer tissues and matched normal cervical tissues by analyzing the high-throughput miRNA data downloaded from TCGA database. Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of the differential expressed miRNAs and constructed a three-miRNA signature that could effectively predict patient survival. Furthermore, we analyzed the pathway and function of the target genes of three miRNAs, which may provide novel insights into understanding the underlying molecular mechanism of cervical cancer.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs in cervical cancer

In the present study, a total of 254 samples were enrolled in this study, including 251 cervical cancer tissues and 3 matched normal tissues. The detailed clinical characteristics include diagnosis at age, metastasis, lymph node status, stage, T stage, histological type, pregnancy numbers, and smoking history category (Table 1). According to the cut-off criteria (P < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 2.0), a total of 78 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified between cervical cancer tissues and matched normal tissues, including 37 up-regulated and 41 down-regulated miRNAs (Table S1). In order to prove the P value and |log2FC| whether conform to logic with different test, we present the result as Volcano plot (Fig. 1). Unsupervised hierarchic cluster analysis revealed that cervical cancer tissues could be distinguished from normal tissues based on differentially expressed miRNAs patterns (Figure S1).

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of cervical cancer patients.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs. The red dot represents up-regulated miRNA, and green dot represents down-regulated miRNA.

Identification of three miRNAs associated with OS in cervical cancer

To identify the miRNAs which would be potentially associated with overall survival of cervical cancer patients, we evaluated the association between miRNAs expression and patients’ survival using Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test. The results showed that one miRNA (miR-200c) was negatively correlated with overall survival (OS), and two miRNAs (miR-145 and miR-218-1) were positively related to OS (Fig. 2). The association between three miRNAs and clinical features was evaluated in cervical cancer patients (Table 2). The results showed that miR-145 was significantly associated with metastasis (P = 0.033) and T stage (P < 0.001); miR-218-1 was associated with stage (P = 0.004), T stage (P = 0.001), and histological type (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between miR-200c and clinical features (P > 0.05).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Three miRNAs were associated with overall survival in cervical cancer patients by using Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test. The patients were stratified into high level group and low level group according to median of each miRNA. (A) miR-145; (B) miR-200c; and (C) miR-218-1.

Table 2: Association of three miRNAs and clinical features.

Prognostic value of three miRNAs signature risk score in cervical cancer

We constructed a prognostic signature by integrating the expression profiles of three miRNAs and corresponding estimated regression coefficient. Then, we calculated a risk score for each patient, and ranked them according to increased score. Thus, a total of 251 patients were classified into a high risk group (n = 125) and a low risk group (n = 126) according to the median risk score. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a Log-rank statistical test. The result showed that patients in high risk group have significantly worse OS than patients in low risk group (P < 0.001, Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve for the three-miRNA signature in cervical cancer patients. The patients were stratified into high risk group and low risk group based on median.

Taking into account the following clinical features: age, metastasis, lymph node status, stage, T stage, histological type, pregnancy number, and smoking history category, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to test the effect of the three-miRNA signature (high risk vs. low risk) on OS. In univariate analysis, age (HR = 0.562, P = 0.037), lymph node status (HR = 2.567, P = 0.010), stage (HR = 2.511, P = 0.001), T stage (HR = 4.640, P < 0.001), and three-miRNA signature (HR = 2.574, P < 0.001) were associated with OS in cervical cancer patients. In multivariate analysis, the three-miRNA signature (HR = 2.183, P = 0.028) was showed to be an independent prognostic factor in cervical cancer patients (Table 3).

Table 3: Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis in CC patients.

Target prediction and function analysis

The target genes of three miRNAs (miR-145, miR-200c, and miR-218-1) were predicted using TargetScan, miRDB, PicTar, and miRanda online analysis tools. A total of 67 overlapping genes of miR-145, 126 overlapping genes of miR-200c, and 5 overlapping genes of miR-218-1 were identified (Fig. 4). Then, enrichment analysis was performed to elucidate the biological function of consensus target genes. The KEGG pathways were significantly enriched in MAPK signaling pathway, AMPK signaling pathway, focal adhesion, cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, wnt signaling pathway, and mTOR signaling pathway. In addition, the GO biological process (BP) terms were mainly enriched in signal transduction, regulation of cell migration, and regulation of transcription.

Figure 4
Figure 4

The target gene prediction and function analysis. The overlapping target genes were predicted using TargetScan, miRDB, PicTar, and miRanda online analysis tools. (A) miRNA-145; (B) miRNA-200c; (C) miR-218-1; (D) the significant enriched KEGG pathways of target genes; (E) the significant enriched GO biological processes of target genes.

Discussion

With the introduction of vaccination and screening programs, the incidence of mortality associated with cervical cancer in developed areas have dramatically declined in recent decades, but the mortality in developing countries remains high, up to 87% of cervical cancer deaths12,13,14,15. The cervical cancer patient prognosis would be improved considerably if tumor behavior could be predicted reliably at the time of initial diagnosis. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms of cervical cancer development and identification of novel biomarkers are needed. In the present study, a total of 78 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified, and three of them were associated with overall survival in cervical cancer patients. The three-miRNA (miR-145, miR-200c, and miR-218-1) signature was established and was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients. Moreover, we screened the target genes of these three miRNAs, and predicted the enrichment pathways and biological functions of target genes using bioinformatics methods.

In the last decade, MiRNAs, as the master modulators of multiple biological and pathological processes, are a hot research topic in the field of cancer development. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that miRNAs established a complex combinatorial system of gene expression and pathway regulation, as well as prognostic indicators and therapeutic targets in different cancers, including cervical cancer16, 17. Previous studies have demonstrated that many miRNAs are crucial for the initiation, progression and metastasis of cervical cancer by regulating various processes, including cancer cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, adhesion, cell cycle arrest, migration and invasion18. To date, several studies had identified a number of miRNAs with prognostic values, such as miR-15519, miR-425-5p20, miR-196a21, miR-50322, miR-26b23, miR-33524, miR-325, miR-21526, miR-22427, and so on. However, previous studies were based on small sample size, sample types, different detection platforms, various assay methods, and relatively limited numbers of miRNAs. In the present study, we analyzed high-throughput data, and identified that two down-regulated miRNAs (miR-145and miR-218-1) and one up-regulated miRNA (miR-200c) were associated with clinical outcome of cervical cancer patients. Zhou X, et al. reported miRNA-145 inhibits tumorigenesis and invasion of cervical cancer stem cells by inducing cancer stem cell (CSC) differentiation through down-regulation of the stem cell transcription factors that maintain CSC pluripotency28. Sathyanarayanan A, et al. suggested that miRNA-145 modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting SIP1 in human cervical cancer cells29. Previous article has also reported human papillomaviruses (HPV) oncoproteins E6 and E7 could suppress miR-145 expression30. Moreover, miR-218, as a tumor suppressor, was strongly down-expressed and related to proliferation, apoptosis and invasion in cervical cancer31. Yamamoto N, et al. demonstrated that miR-218, acting as a tumor suppressor in cervical cancer, inhibited cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting focal adhesion pathways in cervical squamous cell carcinoma32. In addition, HPV16 E6 promoted EMT and invasion in cervical cancer via the repression of miR-218, while miR-218 inhibited EMT and invasion in cervical cancer by targeting Scm-like with four MBT domains 1 (SFMBT1) and defective in cullin neddylation 1, domain containing 1 (DCUN1D1)33. MiR-200c, a member of miR-200 family, located on chromosome 12p1334. MiR-200c was confirmed to be down-regulated in human breast cancer stem cells, and up-regulated in ovarian cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer35, suggesting its complexity role in cancer as it can act either as oncogene or tumor suppressor depending on the origin of cancer. Our results showed that miR-200c was up-regulated in cervical cancer, and may be as an oncogene in development of cervical cancer. Furthermore, miR-145 was significantly associated with metastasis and T stage; miR-218-1 was associated with stage, T stage, and histological type, indicating miR-145 and miR-218-1 were involved in the progression of cervical cancer. But, no significant difference was found between miR-200c and clinical features. TCGA database does not provide completed cell differentiation (Grade), HPV infection, CIN stage, FIGO stage, and so on. Maybe, miRNA-200c was related to other factors. The future study will focus on this point, and investigate the function of miRNA-200c in cervical cancer.

In the present study, we found that miR-145, miR-200c, and miR-218-1 were differentially expressed, and significantly associated with overall survival in cervical cancer patients. While efficacy of a single marker was limited, multi-markers based model may provide more powerful information for the prognosis prediction of patients. We constructed three-miRNA signature, and the results suggested that the three-miRNA signature (high risk and low risk) predicted survival well, and was an independent prognostic factor in cervical cancer.

To gain a deep insight into the molecular functions of three miRNAs, we predicted the target genes and analyzed the related pathways and GO annotations. Abnormal signaling pathways play crucial roles in the pathogenesis and progression of cervical cancer. We found that three miRNAs could regulate several key signaling pathways, including MAPK signaling pathway, AMPK signaling pathway, focal adhesion, cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, wnt signaling pathway, and mTOR signaling pathway. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that activation of MAPK signaling pathway is important in cervical cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis36. Yung M. M., et al. reported that activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a metabolic sensor, hampers cervical cancer cell growth through blocking the Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity37. The transformation of HPV expressing human keratinocytes requires activation of the Wnt pathway and that this activation may serve as a screening tool in HPV-positive populations to detect malignant progression38. Moreover, it has been well established that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway plays a crucial role in cervical cancer development39, and inhibition of mTOR kinase activity suppress tumor growth40. Therefore, further molecular investigations are needed to confirm these predictions, and it can provide new therapeutic interventions in cervical cancer.

Taken together, we identified three-miRNA signature as a potential prognostic predictor for cervical cancer patients. Further studies are needed to validate our findings in large sample size, and further function investigation are also required to explore the molecular mechanism of these miRNAs in cervical cancer progression.

Materials and Methods

Data processing

The raw sequencing data and clinical information were downloaded from TCGA database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/). The inclusion criteria were set as follows: (1) the sample with both miRNA sequencing data and clinical information; (2) the sample with prognosis information. Finally, a total of 254 samples were enrolled in this study, including 251 cervical cancer tissues and 3 matched normal tissues. The detailed clinical characteristics and differentially expressed miRNAs were list in Table S2. The miRNA sequencing data were processed using R language package. The differentially expressed miRNAs between cervical cancer and normal tissues were analyzed by limma package in R. The fold changes (FCs) in the expression of individual miRNA were calculated and differentially expressed miRNAs with log2|FC| > 2.0 and P < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Association of differentially expressed miRNAs and patient prognosis

The differentially expressed miRNA profiles were normalized by log2 transformed. The prognostic value of each differentially expressed miRNA was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank method. The miRNAs that were significantly associated with overall survival were identified as prognostic miRNAs, and then subjected to a binary logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, a prognostic miRNA signature was constructed, and the miRNA signature could calculate a risk score for each cervical cancer patient. With the miRNA signature, cervical cancer patients were classified into high risk and low risk groups using the median risk score. Then, the differences in patients’ survival between the high risk group and low risk group were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.

The target gene prediction of prognostic miRNA signature

The target genes of prognostic miRNAs were predicted using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/), miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org/miRDB/), PicTar (http://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/), and miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/) online analysis tools. To further enhance the bioinformatics analysis reliability, the overlapping target genes were identified using Venn diagram. Then, the overlapping genes were analyzed by The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) bioinformatics tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). DAVID is a web-based online bioinformatics resource that aims to provide a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools for the investigators to understand the biological mechanisms associated with large lists of genes/proteins41. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were then performed for the target genes. The P-value < 0.05 and gene count ≥ 3 were set as the cut-off criteria.

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The expression levels of miRNAs in cervical cancer and matched normal tissues were analyzed by unpaired t test. The chi-square and t tests were performed to assess the relationship between miRNA expression and clinical features. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were carried out to compare each miRNA (low vs. high level) and prognostic miRNA signature (low vs. high risk). P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistical significant. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software program version 22.0 (IBM Corp., NY, USA).

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Catarino, R., Petignat, P., Dongui, G. & Vassilakos, P. Cervical cancer screening in developing countries at a crossroad: Emerging technologies and policy choices. World J Clin Oncol 6, 281–290 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Ferlay, J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136, E359–386 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Lahue, B. J., Baginska, E., Li, S. S. & Parisi, M. Health technology assessment on cervical cancer screening, 2000–2014. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 31, 171–180 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Subramanian, S. et al. Cost of cervical cancer treatment: implications for providing coverage to low-income women under the Medicaid expansion for cancer care. Womens Health Issues 20, 400–405 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Chen, L. & Kang, C. miRNA interventions serve as ‘magic bullets’ in the reversal of glioblastoma hallmarks. Oncotarget 6, 38628–38642 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Hou, L. K. et al. Association of microRNA-33a Molecular Signature with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis after Chemotherapy. PLoS One. 12, e0170431 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Winter, J., Jung, S., Keller, S., Gregory, R. I. & Diederichs, S. Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol 11, 228–234 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Shenoy, A. & Blelloch, R. H. Regulation of microRNA function in somatic stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15, 565–576 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Otsuka, K. & Ochiya, T. Genetic networks lead and follow tumor development: microRNA regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis in the p53 pathways. Biomed Res Int. 2014, 749724 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Munding, J. B. et al. Global microRNA expression profiling of microdissected tissues identifies miR-135b as a novel biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 131, E86–95 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Chandran, U. R. et al. TCGA Expedition: A Data Acquisition and Management System for TCGA Data. PLoS One. 11, e0165395 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Arbyn, M. et al. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 22, 2675–2686 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65, 87–108 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Jemal, A. et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61, 69–90 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Saslow, D. et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 62, 147–172 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Iorio, M. V. & Croce, C. M. MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med 4, 143–159 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Hausser, J. & Zavolan, M. Identification and consequences of miRNA-target interactions–beyond repression of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 15, 599–612 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Nagamitsu, Y. et al. Profiling analysis of circulating microRNA expression in cervical cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 5, 189–194 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Fang, H., Shuang, D., Yi, Z., Sheng, H. & Liu, Y. Up-regulated microRNA-155 expression is associated with poor prognosis in cervical cancer patients. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie 83, 64–69 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Sun, L. et al. MicoRNA-425-5p is a potential prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer. Annals of clinical biochemistry 54, 127–133 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Liu, P., Xin, F. & Ma, C. F. Clinical significance of serum miR-196a in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Genetics and molecular research: GMR 14, 17995–18002 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Yin, Z. L. et al. Reduced expression of miR-503 is associated with poor prognosis in cervical cancer. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences 19, 4081–4085 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Luo, M., Shen, D., Wang, W. & Xian, J. Aberrant expression of microRNA-26b and its prognostic potential in human cervical cancer. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 8, 5542–5548 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Wang, C. & Jiang, T. MicroRNA-335 represents an independent prognostic marker in cervical cancer. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine 36, 5825–5830 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Wang, N., Zhou, Y., Zheng, L. & Li, H. MiR-31 is an independent prognostic factor and functions as an oncomir in cervical cancer via targeting ARID1A. Gynecologic oncology. 134, 129–137 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Liang, H., Li, Y., Luo, R. Y. & Shen, F. J. MicroRNA-215 is a potential prognostic marker for cervical cancer. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban 34, 207–212 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Shen, S. N. et al. Upregulation of microRNA-224 is associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis in human cervical cancer. Diagnostic pathology 8, 69 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Zhou, X., Yue, Y., Wang, R., Gong, B. & Duan, Z. MicroRNA-145 inhibits tumorigenesis and invasion of cervical cancer stem cells. Int J Oncol (2017).

  29. 29.

    Sathyanarayanan, A., Chandrasekaran, K. S. & Karunagaran, D. microRNA-145 modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting SIP1 in human cervical cancer cells. Cell Oncol (Dordr) (2016).

  30. 30.

    Gunasekharan, V. & Laimins, L. A. Human papillomaviruses modulate microRNA 145 expression to directly control genome amplification. J Virol. 87, 6037–6043 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Kogo, R. et al. The microRNA-218~Survivin axis regulates migration, invasion, and lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. Oncotarget 6, 1090–1100 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Yamamoto, N. et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-218 inhibits cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting focal adhesion pathways in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol 42, 1523–1532 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Jiang, Z. et al. MicroRNA-218 inhibits EMT, migration and invasion by targeting SFMBT1 and DCUN1D1 in cervical cancer. Oncotarget 7, 45622–45636 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Korpal, M., Lee, E. S., Hu, G. & Kang, Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem 283, 14910–14914 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Shao, Y. et al. Prognostic role of tissue and circulating microRNA-200c in malignant tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem 35, 1188–1200 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Li, W. et al. Non-thermal plasma inhibits human cervical cancer HeLa cells invasiveness by suppressing the MAPK pathway and decreasing matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression. Sci Rep 6, 19720 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Yung, M. M., Chan, D. W., Liu, V. W., Yao, K. M. & Ngan, H. Y. Activation of AMPK inhibits cervical cancer cell growth through AKT/FOXO3a/FOXM1 signaling cascade. BMC Cancer. 13, 327 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Uren, A. et al. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway during genital keratinocyte transformation: a model for cervical cancer progression. Cancer Res. 65, 6199–6206 (2005).

  39. 39.

    Feng, T. et al. Growth factor progranulin promotes tumorigenesis of cervical cancer via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Oncotarget 7, 58381–58395 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Li, S. et al. The mTOR inhibitor AZD8055 inhibits proliferation and glycolysis in cervical cancer cells. Oncol Lett 5, 717–721 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Jiao, X. et al. DAVID-WS: a stateful web service to facilitate gene/protein list analysis. Bioinformatics. 28, 1805–1806 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported and funded by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 81301835). We acknowledge the staff members in Bioinformatics Department in China Medical University.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Ministry of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology, Ministry of Education, College of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, China

    • Bin Liang
    •  & Tianjiao Wang
  2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, No. 202 Hospital of PLA, Shenyang, China

    • Yunhui Li

Authors

  1. Search for Bin Liang in:

  2. Search for Yunhui Li in:

  3. Search for Tianjiao Wang in:

Contributions

Liang B. wrote the main manuscript and prepared all figures, Liang B. and Li Y. collect the data and performed the statistical analysis, and Wang T. performed the bioinformatics analysis.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Liang.

Supplementary information

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.