Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening

Abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) gene therapy is a potent form of cellular immunotherapy in which patient T cells are genetically engineered to express TCRs with defined tumor reactivity. However, the isolation of therapeutic TCRs is complicated by both the general scarcity of tumor-specific T cells among patient T cell repertoires and the patient-specific nature of T cell epitopes expressed on tumors. Here we describe a high-throughput, personalized TCR discovery pipeline that enables the assembly of complex synthetic TCR libraries in a one-pot reaction, followed by pooled expression in reporter T cells and functional genetic screening against patient-derived tumor or antigen-presenting cells. We applied the method to screen thousands of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-derived TCRs from multiple patients and identified dozens of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell-derived TCRs with potent tumor reactivity, including TCRs that recognized patient-specific neoantigens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic overview and performance of massively parallel TCR gene synthesis.
Fig. 2: Overview and validation of large-scale functional profiling of synthetic TCR libraries.
Fig. 3: Personalized mining of tumor-reactive TCRs from melanoma TILs.
Fig. 4: Phenotype of tumor-specific T cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

DNA sequencing data of TCR discovery screens have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Informationʼs Sequence Read Archive under accession codes PRJNA1068078 (ref. 41), PRJNA1068299 (ref. 42), PRJNA1068301 (ref. 43) and PRJNA1068303 (ref. 44).

References

  1. Ribas, A. & Wolchok, J. D. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 359, 1350–1355 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohaan, M. W. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy or ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 2113–2125 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg, S. A. & Restifo, N. P. Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 348, 62–68 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Klebanoff, C. A., Chandran, S. S., Baker, B. M., Quezada, S. A. & Ribas, A. T cell receptor therapeutics: immunological targeting of the intracellular cancer proteome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 996–1017 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simoni, Y. et al. Bystander CD8+ T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates. Nature 557, 575–579 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheper, W. et al. Low and variable tumor reactivity of the intratumoral TCR repertoire in human cancers. Nat. Med. 25, 89–94 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schumacher, T. N., Scheper, W. & Kvistborg, P. Cancer neoantigens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37, 173–200 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schumacher, T. N. & Schreiber, R. D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gros, A. et al. Prospective identification of neoantigen-specific lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients. Nat. Med. 22, 433–438 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gubin, M. M. et al. Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens. Nature 515, 577–581 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rizvi, N. A. et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 348, 124–128 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Alspach, E. et al. MHC-II neoantigens shape tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy. Nature 574, 696–701 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh, D. Y. et al. Intratumoral CD4+ T cells mediate anti-tumor cytotoxicity in human bladder cancer. Cell 181, 1612–1625 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tran, E. et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science 344, 641–645 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Borst, J., Ahrends, T., Babala, N., Melief, C. J. M. & Kastenmuller, W. CD4+ T cell help in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 635–647 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, Z. et al. A cloning and expression system to probe T-cell receptor specificity and assess functional avidity to neoantigens. Blood 132, 1911–1921 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, X. Z. et al. Rapid cloning, expression, and functional characterization of paired αβ and γδ T-cell receptor chains from single-cell analysis. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 3, 15054 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zong, S. et al. Very rapid cloning, expression and identifying specificity of T-cell receptors for T-cell engineering. PLoS ONE 15, e0228112 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Genolet, R. et al. TCR sequencing and cloning methods for repertoire analysis and isolation of tumor-reactive TCRs. Cell Rep. Methods 3, 100459 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fahad, A. S. et al. Immortalization and functional screening of natively paired human T cell receptor repertoires. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 35, gzab034 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Spindler, M. J. et al. Massively parallel interrogation and mining of natively paired human TCRαβ repertoires. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 609–619 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Muller, T. R. et al. A T-cell reporter platform for high-throughput and reliable investigation of TCR function and biology. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 9, e1216 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fahad, A. S. et al. Cell activation-based screening of natively paired human T cell receptor repertoires. Sci. Rep. 13, 8011 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vazquez-Lombardi, R. et al. High-throughput T cell receptor engineering by functional screening identifies candidates with enhanced potency and specificity. Immunity 55, 1953–1966 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cattaneo, C. M. et al. Identification of patient-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell neoantigens through HLA-unbiased genetic screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 783–787 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lowery, F. J. et al. Molecular signatures of antitumor neoantigen-reactive T cells from metastatic human cancers. Science 375, 877–884 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gros, A. et al. PD-1 identifies the patient-specific CD8+ tumor-reactive repertoire infiltrating human tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 2246–2259 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnaud, M. et al. Sensitive identification of neoantigens and cognate TCRs in human solid tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 656–660 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Foy, S. P. et al. Non-viral precision T cell receptor replacement for personalized cell therapy. Nature 615, 687–696 (2022).

  30. Hilf, N. et al. Actively personalized vaccination trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Nature 565, 240–245 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ott, P. A. et al. An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma. Nature 547, 217–221 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lefranc, M. P. et al. IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system® 25 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D413–D422 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, X. & Porter, E. Compositions and methods for T-cell receptor gene assembly. Patent WO2020206238A2 (2020).

  35. Klein, J. C. et al. Multiplex pairwise assembly of array-derived DNA oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e43 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chapuis, A. G. et al. T cell receptor gene therapy targeting WT1 prevents acute myeloid leukemia relapse post-transplant. Nat. Med. 25, 1064–1072 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmitt, T. M., Greenberg, P. D. & Nguyen, H. N. T cell immunotherapy specific for WT-1. US patent US20160083449A1 (2015).

  38. Borbulevych, O. Y., Santhanagopolan, S. M., Hossain, M. & Baker, B. M. TCRs used in cancer gene therapy cross-react with MART-1/Melan-A tumor antigens via distinct mechanisms. J. Immunol. 187, 2453–2463 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson, L. A. et al. Gene transfer of tumor-reactive TCR confers both high avidity and tumor reactivity to nonreactive peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 177, 6548–6559 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kwakkenbos, M. J. et al. Generation of stable monoclonal antibody–producing B cell receptor–positive human memory B cells by genetic programming. Nat. Med. 16, 123–128 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moravec, Z. et al. Functional discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening: validation in CD8 T cells. NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1068078 (2024).

  42. Moravec, Z. et al. Functional discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening: validation in CD4 T cells and OVC190 TCR screen. NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1068299 (2024).

  43. Moravec, Z. et al. Functional discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening: NKIRTIL063 titration screen. NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1068301 (2024).

  44. Moravec, Z. et al. Functional discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening: NKIRTIL063 neoantigen screen. NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1068303 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank P. Kaptein and J. Urbanus for valuable help with developing the screening technology; S. Ketelaars for bioinformatic support; R. Tissier for support with statistical analyses; the Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL) Flow Cytometry Facility for flow cytometric support; the NKI-AVL Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking for supplying NKI-AVL Biobank material and laboratory support; and the NKI-AVL Genomics Core Facility for support with next-generation sequencing. This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society Young Investigator Grant (no. 2020-1/12977) (to W.S.); ZonMw Translational Research Program 2 (no. 446002001) (to W.S. and J.B.A.G.H.); the Stevin Prize and the Louis-Jeantet Prize (to T.N.S.); National Institutes of Health grants (no. R01CA269898 and no. R37CA273333-01) (to J.W.); the V Foundation (to J.W.); the Mark Foundation ASPIRE award (to J.W.); the Melanoma Research Alliance Young Investigator award (to J.W.); and a generous donation from Florry Vyth (to J.B.A.G.H.). Research at the Netherlands Cancer Institute is supported by institutional grants from the Dutch Cancer Society and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.M., R.V., D.R.C., Y.Z., B.R., B.C., H.Y., J.O., J.X., T.N.S., X.C., E.P. and W.S. designed, performed, analyzed and/or interpreted experiments. Z.M. and S.K. analyzed sequencing data. J.B.A.G.H. and D.H. supplied patient tumor material. T.W. and L.R. supplied patient tumor material and isolated and cultured patient TIL lines. J.W. helped conceptualize the methodology. E.P., X.C. and W.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xi Chen, Ely Porter or Wouter Scheper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.R.C., Y.Z., B.C., S.K., H.Y., J.O., J.X. and E.P. are employees and stock option holders of RootPath, Inc. or its affiliates. X.C. is a director and shareholder of RootPath, Inc. or its affiliates. J.W. is a paid consultant for RootPath Genomics, Bristol Myers Squibb (Relatlimab Advisory Council) and Hanmi Pharmaceutical and is a founder and equity holder of and a consultant to Remunix, Inc. J.B.A.G.H. is an advisor to Achilles Therapeutics, BioNTech, Instil Bio, Neogene Therapeutics, PokeAcell, Scenic Biotech, T-Knife and Third Rock Ventures; is a recipient of research grant support from BioNTech; and is a stock option holder of Neogene Therapeutics. T.N.S. serves as an advisor for Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics and Scenic Biotech and is a stockholder in Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Control, Celsius, Merus and Scenic Biotech. T.N.S. is also a venture partner at Third Rock Ventures, all outside the submitted work. W.S. is an advisor to BD Biosciences and Lumicks. The TCR library synthesis method is described in patent application WO2020206238A2, assigned to a subsidiary of RootPath, Inc. (X.C. and E.P.). The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biotechnology thanks Michael Birnbaum and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Pooled TCR library subcloning and accuracy.

(a, b) Schemes to produce ssDNA CDR3Jα pools (a) and ssDNA CDR3Jβ pools (b). Squares indicate 5′ phosphothioate modification. See Supplementary Table 29 for primer sequences. (c) Complete VCV pools can be PCR-amplified prior to subcloning using the common forward (CF) and reverse (CR) primers. Individual TCRs may be selectively amplified from VCV pools using the common forward primers (CF) and reverse primers targeting their respective Zip barcode sequences. (d) For the proof-of-concept TCR library (553 TCRs), the frequencies of individual CDR3Jα and CDR3Jβ sequences within the commercially synthesized CDR3Jα and CDR3Jβ ssDNA oligo pools and the assembled CDR3Jα-CDR3Jβ product were assessed by deep sequencing. The expected frequency of each CDR3Jα-CDR3Jβ pair was derived by multiplication of the observed frequencies of its respective CDR3Jα and CDR3Jβ sequences in the original, unassembled oligo pools. (e) Relation between Zip and CDR3Jα/CDR3Jβ oligo characteristics and the frequencies of resulting CDR3Jα-CDR3Jβ pairs after hybridization. (f) Relation between Zip and CDR3Jα/CDR3Jβ oligo characteristics and the accuracy of CDR3Jα-CDR3Jβ pairing (‘α-β pairing accuracy’).

Extended Data Fig. 2 ConnA and ConnB orthogonality for murine TRAV and TRBV genes and acquisition accuracies.

(a) Computer-predicted orthogonality of natural (left) and codon-diversified (right) FR3 connector sequences (ConnA) for murine TRAV. (b) Computer-predicted orthogonality of natural (left) and codon-diversified (right) FR3 connector sequences (ConnB) for murine TRBV. (c, d) Acquisition accuracies for TRAV (c) and TRBV (d) genes used in the proof-of-concept TCR library. The average acquisition accuracy for each TRAV/TRBV gene is shown above the bars.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Gating strategies.

(a) Gating strategy for the isolation of CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells from patient tumor material, for the purpose of identifying patient-derived TCRs by single-cell TCR sequencing (relating to the patient TCR libraries used in Figs. 2 to 4). (b) Gating strategy for the isolation of activated reporter T cells in TCR library screens (relating to Figs. 2b–d, 3a,d and 4a, and Extended Data Figs. 7a–c, and 9b,d. (c) Gating strategy for T cell activation assays (relating to Figs. 3c,e,f and 4b,c, and Extended Data Figs. 7d–f and 9a. CD137 served as activation marker when using primary T cells, and CD69 served as activation marker when using Jurkat cells. (d) Gating strategy for T cell cytotoxicity assays (relating to Figs. 3g and 4d).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Quality control of the NKIRTIL063 TCR library.

(a) Schematic overview of the custom ‘2-reads-on-1-strand’ sequencing method. (b) Overall assembly accuracies and frequencies of TCRs in the fully assembled NKIRTIL063 VCV library (n = 935 TCRs). Dots represent individual TCRs. Box plots depict the median, the interquartile range and whiskers extending to minimal and maximal values. (c) Pie chart depicting the overall fraction of NKIRTIL063 VCV molecules with and without sequence errors (taking both assembly accuracy and sequence mutations into account). (d) The fraction of NKIRTIL063 library TCRs successfully expressed at the cell surface of library-transduced cells was determined by isolation of mouse TCRβ+ Jurkat cells by flow cytometry, followed by deep sequencing. NKIRTIL063 library-expressing Jurkat cells that were not subjected to cell sorting were used as reference. Internal control TCRs DMF4 and DMF5 are highlighted for reference.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Quality control of the OVC190 TCR libraries.

(a) Overall assembly accuracies and frequencies of TCRs in the fully assembled OVC190 CD4+ TIL-derived VCV libraries (combined n = 1,341 TCRs). Selected TCRs were encoded in replicate, resulting in a total of 2,899 unique sequences that were assembled in two separate reactions (SP1 and SP2). Dots represent individual TCRs. Box plots depict the median, the interquartile range and whiskers extending to minimal and maximal values. (b) Overall assembly accuracies and frequencies of TCRs in the fully assembled OVC190 CD8+ TIL-derived VCV library (n = 274 TCRs). (c) Pie chart depicting the overall fraction of OVC190 CD4+ and CD8+ TIL-derived VCV molecules with and without sequence errors (taking both assembly accuracy and sequence mutations into account).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Quality control of the CV19 TCR library.

(a) Overall assembly accuracies and frequencies of TCRs in the fully assembled CV19 TIL-derived VCV libraries (combined n = 1,501 TCRs). Sequences were assembled in two separate reactions (SP1 and SP2). Dots represent individual TCRs. Box plots depict the median, the interquartile range and whiskers extending to minimal and maximal values. (b) Pie chart depicting the overall fraction of CV19 VCV molecules with and without sequence errors (taking both assembly accuracy and sequence mutations into account).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Functional screening of intratumoral TCR repertoire of patient CV19.

(a) The SiHa cervical cancer cell line was engineered to express the entire MHC class I haplotype of patient CV19 (A*24:02, A*33:03, B*38:15, B*55:02, C*03:02 and C*12:03). The CV19 TCR library (n = 1,501 TCRs) was subsequently expressed in donor T cells and screened against either the unmodified or MHC-modified SiHa line. Fold change represents the relative abundance of TCRs after incubating T cells with unmodified or MHC-modified SiHa cells. TCRs selected for validation are highlighted in red. (b, c) To assess TIL reactivity against HPV-derived antigens, the patient TCR library was screened against K562 cells that were modified to express the patient’s MHC class I alleles as well as the full ORF of either HPV E6 (b) or E7 (c) oncoproteins. Data are depicted as in (a). Two of four selected TCRs (2495 and 362) responded to E7-expressing K562 cells, while no TCRs responded against E6-expressing cells. (d) The reactivity of selected TCRs was validated by amplifying TCRs from the CV19 VCV pool, followed by expression in donor T cells and co-incubation with the indicated cell lines. T cell activation was assessed by measuring CD137 expression using flow cytometry. (e, f) MHC restriction of selected TCRs was assessed by expressing individual patient MHC alleles in SiHa cells and incubating resulting cells with donor T cells engineered to express selected TCRs. T cell activation was assessed by measuring CD137 surface expression. (g) SiHa-reactive TCRs 1007 and 3645, but not E7-specific TCRs 362 and 2495, recognize autologous patient tumor cells. TCR-modified donor T cells were incubated with unmodified, HLA-B*55:02-modified or HLA-B*38:15-modified SiHa cells, or autologous dissociated tumor tissue at the indicated effector to target ratios. Activation of TCR-engineered T cells in measured by IFNγ ELISpot.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Sensitive TCR discovery across variable TCR frequencies and sequence fidelities.

(a) Projection of all NKIRTIL063 screen hit TCRs with confirmed (blue, n = 44) and unconfirmed (red, n = 36) reactivity (as reported in Fig. 3) onto the quality control data of the NKIRTIL063 TCR library (see Extended Data Fig. 4). (b, c) Comparison between the frequencies (b) and assembly accuracies (c) of the overall NKIRTIL063 TCR library, TCRs with confirmed reactivity and TCRs with unconfirmed reactivity. Box plots depict the median, the interquartile range and whiskers extending to minimal and maximal values. P values were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Neoantigen specificities of OVC190 TCRs.

(a) TCR-modified CD4+ Jurkat cells were incubated with patient B cells expressing either the mutant or wildtype sequence of the individual minigenes of TMG 5. T cell activation was determined by measuring CD69 expression on T cells by flow cytometry. (b) CD8+ Jurkat cells were transduced with the CD8+ TIL-derived TCR library of patient OVC190 (n = 274 unique TCRs). Patient immortalized B cells were transduced with TMGs encoding all expressed non-synonymous mutations (n = 61) of the patient’s tumor, combined in pools and used to screen the OVC190 TCR library. Dots represent individual TCRs. Fold change represents the relative abundance of TCRs in cultures with the indicated TMG pools. (c) Flow cytometry analysis of MHC class I (top panels) and MHC class II (bottom panels) expression on CD45+ and CD45- cells within the OVC190 tumor. Fluorescence minus one (FMO) stains with antibody panels that lacked either the panMHC-I or panMHC-II antibody served as negative control. (d) CD8+ Jurkat cells expressing the OVC190 CD8+ TIL-derived TCR library were screened against single cell suspension of OVC190 tumor. Screening the TCR library against tumor cells in the presence of MHC class I blocking antibody (clone W6-32) served as negative control. Data are depicted as in (b).

Extended Data Fig. 10 Patient HC25 tumor-specific TCR identification.

(a) Patient HC25 PD-1+ TIL were sorted by flow cytometry, and subjected to paired single cell RNA and TCR sequencing. NeoTCR4 and NeoTCR8 transcriptional signatures were derived for CD4+ and CD8+ clonotypes, respectively, and clonotypes with the 382 highest scores were gene-synthesized. Individual TCRs were expressed in donor T cells and reactivity to autologous dissociated tumor tissue was assessed by IFNγ ELISpot. Wells with responding TCRs are marked by red asterisks. Red boxes indicate HC25 TCR-independent experimental controls. (b) Selective reactivity of hit TCRs to patient tumor cells, but not non-malignant cells, was validated by incubating TCR-engineered donor T cells with either medium, patient HC25 activated T blasts, or patient HC25 dissociated tumor tissue. T cell activation was assessed by measuring CD137 expression using flow cytometry. Asterisks indicate TCRs with selective tumor-reactivity.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–29.

POC TCRsZip sequences. POC a-b pairing. POC a-b uniformity. ConnA sequences. ConnB sequences. POC Va-CDR3Ja. POC Vb-CDR3Jb. NKIRTIL063 Ref. NKIRTIL063 QC. OVC190CD4 SP1 Ref. OVC190CD4 SP2 Ref. OVC190CD4 SP1 QC. OVC190CD4 SP2 QC. OVC190CD8 Ref. OVC190CD8 QC. CV19 SP1 Ref. CV19 SP2 Ref. CV19 SP1 QC. CV19 SP2 QC. HC25 Ref. POC Oligos. NKIRTIL063 Oligos. OVC190CD4-SP1 Oligos. OVC190CD4-SP2 Oligos. OVC190CD8 Oligos. CV19-SP1 Oligos. CV19-SP2 Oligos. Other sequences.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moravec, Z., Zhao, Y., Voogd, R. et al. Discovery of tumor-reactive T cell receptors by massively parallel library synthesis and screening. Nat Biotechnol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02210-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02210-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer