Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become one of the most important and transformative technologies of our time, with applications in virtually every field and industry. Among these applications, academic writing is one of the areas that has experienced perhaps the most rapid development and uptake of AI-based tools and methodologies. We argue that use of AI-based tools for scientific writing should widely be adopted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing
Critical Care Open Access 06 July 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S. & Bianchi, G. AI-assisted peer review. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 25 (2021).
Hutson, M. Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature 611, 192–193 (2022).
Krzastek, S. C., Farhi, J., Gray, M. & Smith, R. P. Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Transl Androl. Urol. 9, 2797–2813 (2020).
Khullar, D. Social media and medical misinformation: confronting new variants of an old problem. JAMA 328, 1393–1394 (2022).
Reddy, R. V. et al. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Andrologia 54, e14607 (2022).
Khodamoradi, K., Golan, R., Dullea, A. & Ramasamy, R. Exosomes as potential biomarkers for erectile dysfunction, varicocele, and testicular injury. Sex. Med. Rev. 10, 311–322 (2022).
Stone, L. You’ve got a friend online. Nat. Rev. Urol. 17, 320 (2020).
Pai, R. K. et al. A review of current advancements and limitations of artificial intelligence in genitourinary cancers. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 8, 152–162 (2020).
You, J. B. et al. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 387–403 (2021).
Stone, L. The dawning of the age of artificial intelligence in urology. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 322 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The manuscript was edited for grammar and structure using the advanced language model ChatGPT. The authors thank S. Verma for addressing inquiries related to artificial intelligence.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.R. is funded by the National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK130991 and the Clinician Scientist Development Grant from the American Cancer Society. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Related links
ChatGPT: https://chat.openai.com/
Cohere: https://cohere.ai/
CoSchedule Headline Analyzer: https://coschedule.com/headline-analyzer
DALL-E 2: https://openai.com/dall-e-2/
Elicit: https://elicit.org/
Penelope.ai: https://www.penelope.ai/
Quillbot: https://quillbot.com/
Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/
Wordtune by AI21 Labs: https://www.wordtune.com/
Writefull: https://www.writefull.com/
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A. et al. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nat Rev Urol 20, 327–328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
This article is cited by
-
Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI
Nature Biomedical Engineering (2024)
-
How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing
Critical Care (2023)
-
What do academics have to say about ChatGPT? A text mining analytics on the discussions regarding ChatGPT on research writing
AI and Ethics (2023)