Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

BLADDER CANCER

No survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy: now what?

The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy is debated as it might affect oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. Gschwend et al. now demonstrate that the survival benefit is small and that the study might need to be repeated with a larger cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Limited, extended and superextended PLND templates.

References

  1. Gschwend, J. E. et al. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial. Eur. Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.047 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horenblas, S. et al. Differences in histopathological evaluation of standard lymph node dissections result in differences in nodal count but not in survival. World J. Urol. 31, 1297–1302 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seiler, R. et al. Impact of molecular subtypes on muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur. Urol. 72, 544–554 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herr, H. W. et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 2781–2789 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhar, N. et al. Outcome after radical cystectomy with limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J. Urol. 179, 873–878 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zehnder, P. et al. Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study. J. Urol. 186, 1261–1268 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01224665 (2018).

  8. Skinner, D. G. Management of invasive bladder cancer: a meticulous pelvic node dissection can make a difference. J. Urol. 128, 34–36 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perera, M. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 15, 686–692 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George N. Thalmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burkhard, F.C., Thalmann, G.N. No survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy: now what?. Nat Rev Urol 16, 3–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0126-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0126-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer