Abstract
Reticular chemistry — the linking of well-defined molecular building blocks by strong bonds into crystalline extended frameworks — has enabled the synthesis of diverse metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks, in which the pore shape, size and functionality can be tailored towards specific applications. Structural design methodologies are based on three main requisites: building blocks, targeted nets and isoreticular chemistry. In this Review, we highlight the well-developed and cutting-edge methodologies in reticular chemistry for the structural design and discovery of periodic solids. We illustrate the diversity of building blocks and delineate the suitable blueprint nets — namely, edge-transitive nets — for the design of MOFs. These edge-transitive nets are classified into three categories to help rationalize existing MOFs and to provide guidelines for the design of new structures. Two emerging topological concepts, namely, the merged-net approach and net-coded building units, are highlighted for their potential in synthesizing intricate or multi-component MOFs. We also consider isoreticular design strategies for the modification, expansion and contraction of building blocks, and identify challenges and opportunities in the assembly of increasingly intricate frameworks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ockwig, N. W., Delgado-Friedrichs, O., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 176–182 (2005).
Yaghi, O. M. Reticular chemistry — construction, properties, and precision reactions of frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15507–15509 (2016).
Jia, J. T. et al. Extremely hydrophobic POPs to access highly porous storage media and capturing agent for organic vapors. Chem 5, 180–191 (2019).
Diercks, C. S. & Yaghi, O. M. The atom, the molecule, and the covalent organic framework. Science 355, eaal1585 (2017).
Yaghi, O. M., Kalmutzki, M. J. & Diercks, C. S. Introduction to Reticular Chemistry: Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks (Wiley, 2019).
Yaghi, O. M. Reticular chemistry in all dimensions. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1295–1300 (2019).
O’Keeffe, M., Peskov, M. A., Ramsden, S. J. & Yaghi, O. M. The reticular chemistry structure resource (RCSR) database of, and symbols for, crystal nets. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1782–1789 (2008).
Chen, Z., Jiang, H., O’Keeffe, M. & Eddaoudi, M. Minimal edge-transitive nets for the design and construction of metal–organic frameworks. Faraday Discuss. 201, 127–143 (2017).
Chen, Z. et al. Applying the power of reticular chemistry to finding the missing alb-MOF platform based on the (6,12)-coordinated edge-transitive net. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3265–3327 (2017).
Jiang, H. et al. Enriching the reticular chemistry repertoire: merged nets approach for the rational design of intricate mixed-linker metal–organic framework platforms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 8858–8867 (2018).
Eddaoudi, M., Sava, D. F., Eubank, J. F., Adil, K. & Guillerm, V. Zeolite-like metal–organic frameworks (ZMOFs): design, synthesis, and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 228–249 (2015).
Banerjee, R. et al. High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science 319, 939–943 (2008).
Yang, J. et al. Principles of designing extra-large pore openings and cages in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6448–6455 (2017).
Liu, Y., Kravtsov, V. C., Larsen, R. & Eddaoudi, M. Molecular building blocks approach to the assembly of zeolite-like metal–organic frameworks (ZMOFs) with extra-large cavities. Chem. Commun. 1488–1490 (2006).
Liu, Y., Kravtsov, V. C. & Eddaoudi, M. Template-directed assembly of zeolite-like metal–organic frameworks (ZMOFs): a usf-ZMOF with an unprecedented zeolite topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 8446–8449 (2008).
Wu, T. et al. Zeolite RHO-type net with the lightest elements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6111–6113 (2009).
Zhang, J. et al. Zeolitic boron imidazolate frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2542–2545 (2009).
Cadiau, A. et al. Hydrolytically stable fluorinated metal-organic frameworks for energy-efficient dehydration. Science 356, 731–735 (2017).
Belmabkhout, Y. et al. Natural gas upgrading using a fluorinated MOF with tuned H2S and CO2 adsorption selectivity. Nat. Energy 3, 1059–1066 (2018).
Tchalala, M. R. et al. Fluorinated MOF platform for selective removal and sensing of SO2 from flue gas and air. Nat. Commun. 10, 1328 (2019).
Nugent, P. et al. Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation. Nature 495, 80–84 (2013).
Subramanian, S. & Zaworotko, M. J. Porous solids by design: [Zn(4,4′-bpy)2(SiF6)]n·xDMF, a single framework octahedral coordination polymer with large square channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 24, 2127–2129 (1995).
Shekhah, O. et al. A facile solvent-free synthesis route for the assembly of a highly CO2 selective and H2S tolerant NiSIFSIX metal–organic framework. Chem. Commun. 51, 13595–13598 (2015).
Shekhah, O. et al. Made-to-order metal-organic frameworks for trace carbon dioxide removal and air capture. Nat. Commun. 5, 4228 (2014).
Bhatt, P. M. et al. A fine-tuned fluorinated MOF addresses the needs for trace CO2 removal and air capture using physisorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9301–9307 (2016).
Cadiau, A., Adil, K., Bhatt, P. M., Belmabkhout, Y. & Eddaoudi, M. A metal-organic framework–based splitter for separating propylene from propane. Science 353, 137–140 (2016).
Adil, K. et al. Valuing metal–organic frameworks for postcombustion carbon capture: a benchmark study for evaluating physical adsorbents. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702953 (2017).
Chui, S. S.-Y., Lo, S. M.-F., Charmant, J. P. H., Orpen, A. G. & Williams, I. D. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu3(TMA)2(H2O)3]n. Science 283, 1148–1150 (1999).
Eubank, J. F. et al. The next chapter in MOF pillaring strategies: trigonal heterofunctional ligands to access targeted high-connected three dimensional nets, isoreticular platforms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17532–17535 (2011).
Chun, H. Low-level self-assembly of open framework based on three different polyhedra: metal-organic analogue of face-centered cubic dodecaboride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 800–801 (2008).
Tu, B. et al. Reversible redox activity in multicomponent metal–organic frameworks constructed from trinuclear copper pyrazolate building blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7998–8007 (2017).
Nouar, F. et al. Supermolecular building blocks (SBBs) for the design and synthesis of highly porous metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1833–1835 (2008).
Quartapelle Procopio, E. et al. Cation-exchange porosity tuning in anionic metal–organic frameworks for the selective separation of gases and vapors and for catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 7308–7311 (2010).
Alezi, D. et al. MOF crystal chemistry paving the way to gas storage needs: aluminum-based soc-MOF for CH4, O2, and CO2 storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13308–13318 (2015).
Towsif Abtab, S. M. et al. Reticular chemistry in action: a hydrolytically stable MOF capturing twice its weight in adsorbed water. Chem 4, 94–105 (2018).
Serre, C., Millange, F., Surblé, S. & Férey, G. A route to the synthesis of trivalent transition-metal porous carboxylates with trimeric secondary building units. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6285–6289 (2004).
Férey, G. et al. A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309, 2040–2042 (2005).
Feng, D. et al. Stable metal–organic frameworks containing single-molecule traps for enzyme encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 6, 5979 (2015).
Liu, Q., Cong, H. & Deng, H. Deciphering the spatial arrangement of metals and correlation to reactivity in multivariate metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13822–13825 (2016).
Jia, J. et al. Highly porous and robust ionic MOFs with nia topology constructed by connecting an octahedral ligand and a trigonal prismatic metal cluster. Chem. Commun. 48, 6010–6012 (2012).
Liu, Y. et al. Assembly of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based on indium-trimer building blocks: a porous MOF with soc topology and high hydrogen storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 3278–3283 (2007).
Zhang, Y.-B., Zhang, W.-X., Feng, F.-Y., Zhang, J.-P. & Chen, X.-M. A highly connected porous coordination polymer with unusual channel structure and sorption properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5287–5290 (2009).
Jiang, G. et al. A nine-connected mixed-ligand nickel-organic framework and its gas sorption properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 3713–3716 (2011).
Zhang, Y.-B. et al. Geometry analysis and systematic synthesis of highly porous isoreticular frameworks with a unique topology. Nat. Commun. 3, 642 (2012).
Zhao, X. et al. Selective anion exchange with nanogated isoreticular positive metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 4, 2344 (2013).
Zhai, Q.-G. et al. An ultra-tunable platform for molecular engineering of high-performance crystalline porous materials. Nat. Commun. 7, 13645 (2016).
Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal–organic framework. Nature 402, 276–279 (1999).
Eddaoudi, M. et al. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 295, 469–472 (2002).
Montoro, C. et al. Capture of nerve agents and mustard gas analogues by hydrophobic robust MOF-5 type metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11888–11891 (2011).
Brozek, C. K. & Dincă, M. Ti3+-, V2+/3+-, Cr2+/3+-, Mn2+-, and Fe2+-substituted MOF-5 and redox reactivity in Cr- and Fe-MOF-5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12886–12891 (2013).
Luo, T.-Y. et al. Rare earth pcu metal–organic framework platform based on RE4(μ3-OH)4(COO)62+ clusters: rational design, directed synthesis, and deliberate tuning of excitation wavelengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9333–9340 (2017).
Chen, D.-m, Shi, W. & Cheng, P. A cage-based cationic body-centered tetragonal metal–organic framework: single-crystal to single-crystal transformation and selective uptake of organic dyes. Chem. Commun. 51, 370–372 (2015).
Wang, D., Zhao, T., Li, G., Huo, Q. & Liu, Y. A porous sodalite-type MOF based on tetrazolcarboxylate ligands and [Cu4Cl]7+ squares with open metal sites for gas sorption. Dalton Trans. 43, 2365–2368 (2014).
Dincǎ, M. et al. Hydrogen storage in a microporous metal–organic framework with exposed Mn2+ coordination sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16876–16883 (2006).
Castells-Gil, J. et al. Chemical engineering of photoactivity in heterometallic titanium–organic frameworks by metal doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 8453–8457 (2018).
Lammert, M. et al. Cerium-based metal organic frameworks with UiO-66 architecture: synthesis, properties and redox catalytic activity. Chem. Commun. 51, 12578–12581 (2015).
Cavka, J. H. et al. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008).
Xue, D.-X. et al. Tunable rare-earth fcu-MOFs: a platform for systematic enhancement of CO2 adsorption energetics and uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7660–7667 (2013).
Xue, D.-X. et al. Topology meets MOF chemistry for pore-aperture fine tuning: ftw-MOF platform for energy-efficient separations via adsorption kinetics or molecular sieving. Chem. Commun. 54, 6404–6407 (2018).
Furukawa, H. et al. Water adsorption in porous metal–organic frameworks and related materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4369–4381 (2014).
Pang, J. et al. Control the structure of Zr-tetracarboxylate frameworks through steric tuning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16939–16945 (2017).
Alezi, D. et al. Quest for highly connected metal–organic framework platforms: rare-earth polynuclear clusters versatility meets net topology needs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5421–5430 (2015).
Alezi, D. et al. Reticular chemistry at its best: directed assembly of hexagonal building units into the awaited metal-organic framework with the intricate polybenzene topology, pbz-MOF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 12767–12770 (2016).
Feng, D. et al. A highly stable zeotype mesoporous zirconium metal–organic framework with ultralarge pores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 149–154 (2015).
Liu, Q. et al. Mesoporous cages in chemically robust MOFs created by a large number of vertices with reduced connectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 488–496 (2019).
Wang, H. et al. Topologically guided tuning of Zr-MOF pore structures for highly selective separation of C6 alkane isomers. Nat. Commun. 9, 1745 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. A flexible metal–organic framework with 4-connected Zr6 nodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11179–11183 (2018).
Masciocchi, N. et al. Cubic octanuclear Ni(II) clusters in highly porous polypyrazolyl-based materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7902–7904 (2010).
Holmberg, R. J. et al. An unprecedented CoII cuboctahedron as the secondary building unit in a Co-based metal–organic framework. Chem. Commun. 50, 5333–5335 (2014).
Feng, D. et al. Metal–organic frameworks based on previously unknown Zr8/Hf8 cubic clusters. Inorg. Chem. 52, 12661–12667 (2013).
Luebke, R. et al. Versatile rare earth hexanuclear clusters for the design and synthesis of highly-connected ftw-MOFs. Chem. Sci. 6, 4095–4102 (2015).
Kapustin, E. A., Lee, S., Alshammari, A. S. & Yaghi, O. M. Molecular retrofitting adapts a metal–organic framework to extreme pressure. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 662–667 (2017).
Gándara, F., Furukawa, H., Lee, S. & Yaghi, O. M. High methane storage capacity in aluminum metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5271–5274 (2014).
Lee, S., Kapustin, E. A. & Yaghi, O. M. Coordinative alignment of molecules in chiral metal-organic frameworks. Science 353, 808–811 (2016).
Ahnfeldt, T. et al. [Al4(OH)2(OCH3)4(H2N-bdc)3]⋅x H2O: a 12-connected porous metal–organic framework with an unprecedented aluminum-containing brick. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5163–5166 (2009).
Dan-Hardi, M. et al. A new photoactive crystalline highly porous titanium(IV) dicarboxylate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10857–10859 (2009).
Guillerm, V. et al. Discovery and introduction of a (3,18)-connected net as an ideal blueprint for the design of metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 6, 673–680 (2014).
Schoedel, A., Li, M., Li, D., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Structures of metal–organic frameworks with rod secondary building units. Chem. Rev. 116, 12466–12535 (2016).
Deng, H. et al. Large-pore apertures in a series of metal-organic frameworks. Science 336, 1018–1023 (2012).
Kapelewski, M. T. et al. M2(m-dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) metal–organic frameworks exhibiting increased charge density and enhanced H2 binding at the open metal sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12119–12129 (2014).
McDonald, T. M. et al. Capture of carbon dioxide from air and flue gas in the alkylamine-appended metal–organic framework mmen-Mg2(dobpdc). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7056–7065 (2012).
Groves, J. A. et al. The first route to large pore metal phosphonates. Chem. Commun. 3305–3307 (2006).
Miller, S. R. et al. Structural transformations and adsorption of fuel-related gases of a structurally responsive nickel phosphonate metal–organic framework, Ni-STA-12. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 15967–15981 (2008).
Wharmby, M. T., Mowat, J. P. S., Thompson, S. P. & Wright, P. A. Extending the pore size of crystalline metal phosphonates toward the mesoporous regime by isoreticular synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1266–1269 (2011).
Catarineu, N. R. et al. Two principles of reticular chemistry uncovered in a metal–organic framework of heterotritopic linkers and infinite secondary building units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10826–10829 (2016).
Herm, Z. R. et al. Separation of hexane isomers in a metal-organic framework with triangular channels. Science 340, 960–964 (2013).
Yang, S. et al. Selectivity and direct visualization of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide in a decorated porous host. Nat. Chem. 4, 887–894 (2012).
Dai, H. et al. Reticulation of 2D semiconductors by metal–organic approach for efficient hydrogen evolution. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 8102–8110 (2020).
Eddaoudi, M. et al. Porous metal–organic polyhedra: 25 Å cuboctahedron constructed from 12 Cu2(CO2)4 paddle-wheel building blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4368–4369 (2001).
Fujita, D. et al. Self-assembly of tetravalent Goldberg polyhedra from 144 small components. Nature 540, 563–566 (2016).
Sun, Q.-F. et al. Self-assembled M24L48 polyhedra and their sharp structural switch upon subtle ligand variation. Science 328, 1144–1147 (2010).
Guillerm, V. et al. A supermolecular building approach for the design and construction of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6141–6172 (2014).
Bon, V., Senkovskyy, V., Senkovska, I. & Kaskel, S. Zr(iv) and Hf(iv) based metal–organic frameworks with reo-topology. Chem. Commun. 48, 8407–8409 (2012).
Sun, X. et al. A stable mesoporous Zr-based metal organic framework for highly efficient CO2 conversion. Inorg. Chem. 58, 7480–7487 (2019).
Xie, L.-H., Liu, X.-M., He, T. & Li, J.-R. Metal-organic frameworks for the capture of trace aromatic volatile organic compounds. Chem 4, 1911–1927 (2018).
Park, I.-H., Lee, E., Lee, S. S. & Vittal, J. J. Chemical patterning in single crystals of metal–organic frameworks by [2+2] cycloaddition reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 14860–14864 (2019).
He, Y., Li, B., O’Keeffe, M. & Chen, B. Multifunctional metal–organic frameworks constructed from meta-benzenedicarboxylate units. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5618–5656 (2014).
Eddaoudi, M., Kim, J., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Cu2[o-Br-C6H3(CO2)2]2(H2O)2·(DMF)8(H2O)2: a framework deliberately designed to have the NbO structure type. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 376–377 (2002).
Li, P. et al. Bottom-up construction of a superstructure in a porous uranium-organic crystal. Science 356, 624–627 (2017).
Guillerm, V. & Maspoch, D. Geometry mismatch and reticular chemistry: strategies to assemble metal–organic frameworks with non-default topologies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 16517–16538 (2019).
Guillerm, V., Grancha, T., Imaz, I., Juanhuix, J. & Maspoch, D. Zigzag ligands for transversal design in reticular chemistry: unveiling new structural opportunities for metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10153–10157 (2018).
Nguyen, T. T. M., Le, H. M., Kawazoe, Y. & Nguyen, H. L. Reticular control of interpenetration in a complex metal–organic framework. Mater. Chem. Front. 2, 2063–2069 (2018).
Benecke, J. et al. Polymorphous indium metal–organic frameworks based on a ferrocene linker: redox activity, porosity, and structural diversity. Inorg. Chem. 59, 9969–9978 (2020).
Ni, Z., Yassar, A., Antoun, T. & Yaghi, O. M. Porous metal–organic truncated octahedron constructed from paddle-wheel squares and terthiophene links. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12752–12753 (2005).
Li, J.-R., Timmons, D. J. & Zhou, H.-C. Interconversion between molecular polyhedra and metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6368–6369 (2009).
Li, J.-R. et al. Ligand bridging-angle-driven assembly of molecular architectures based on quadruply bonded Mo–Mo dimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17599–17610 (2010).
Gosselin, E. J., Rowland, C. A., Balto, K. P., Yap, G. P. A. & Bloch, E. D. Design and synthesis of porous nickel(II) and cobalt(II) cages. Inorg. Chem. 57, 11847–11850 (2018).
Rowland, C. A. et al. Methane storage in paddlewheel-based porous coordination cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11153–11157 (2018).
Cairns, A. J. et al. Supermolecular building blocks (SBBs) and crystal design: 12-connected open frameworks based on a molecular cubohemioctahedron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1560–1561 (2008).
Stoeck, U., Krause, S., Bon, V., Senkovska, I. & Kaskel, S. A highly porous metal–organic framework, constructed from a cuboctahedral super-molecular building block, with exceptionally high methane uptake. Chem. Commun. 48, 10841–10843 (2012).
Krause, S. et al. A pressure-amplifying framework material with negative gas adsorption transitions. Nature 532, 348–352 (2016).
Stoeck, U., Senkovska, I., Bon, V., Krause, S. & Kaskel, S. Assembly of metal–organic polyhedra into highly porous frameworks for ethene delivery. Chem. Commun. 51, 1046–1049 (2015).
Zou, Y., Park, M., Hong, S. & Lah, M. S. A designed metal–organic framework based on a metal–organic polyhedron. Chem. Commun. 2340–2342 (2008).
Zhang, P., Li, B., Zhao, Y., Meng, X. & Zhang, T. A novel (3,36)-connected and self-interpenetrated metal–organic framework with high thermal stability and gas-sorption capabilities. Chem. Commun. 47, 7722–7724 (2011).
Lu, Z. et al. The utilization of amide groups to expand and functionalize metal–organic frameworks simultaneously. Chemistry 22, 6277–6285 (2016).
Li, J.-R. & Zhou, H.-C. Metal–organic hendecahedra assembled from dinuclear paddlewheel nodes and mixtures of ditopic linkers with 120 and 90° bend angles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8465–8468 (2009).
Slater, A. G. et al. Reticular synthesis of porous molecular 1D nanotubes and 3D networks. Nat. Chem. 9, 17–25 (2016).
Eubank, J. F. et al. The quest for modular nanocages: tbo-MOF as an archetype for mutual substitution, functionalization, and expansion of quadrangular pillar building blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14204–14207 (2011).
Chun, H., Dybtsev, D. N., Kim, H. & Kim, K. Synthesis, X-ray crystal structures, and gas sorption properties of pillared square grid nets based on paddle-wheel motifs: implications for hydrogen storage in porous materials. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3521–3529 (2005).
Ma, B.-Q., Mulfort, K. L. & Hupp, J. T. Microporous pillared paddle-wheel frameworks based on mixed-ligand coordination of zinc ions. Inorg. Chem. 44, 4912–4914 (2005).
Seki, K., Takamizawa, S. & Mori, W. Design and gas adsorption property of a three-dimensional coordination polymer with a stable and highly porous framwork. Chem. Lett. 30, 332–333 (2001).
Spanopoulos, I. et al. Reticular synthesis of HKUST-like tbo-MOFs with enhanced CH4 storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 1568–1574 (2016).
Moreau, F. et al. Tailoring porosity and rotational dynamics in a series of octacarboxylate metal-organic frameworks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3056–3061 (2017).
Liu, X., Oh, M. & Lah, M. S. Size- and shape-selective isostructural microporous metal–organic frameworks with different effective aperture sizes. Inorg. Chem. 50, 5044–5053 (2011).
Chen, Z., Adil, K., Weseliński, J., Belmabkhout, Y. & Eddaoudi, M. A supermolecular building layer approach for gas separation and storage applications: the eea and rtl MOF platforms for CO2 capture and hydrocarbon separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 6276–6281 (2015).
Wang, R. et al. Porous zirconium metal–organic framework constructed from 2D → 3D interpenetration based on a 3,6-connected kgd net. Inorg. Chem. 53, 7086–7088 (2014).
Li, M., O’Keeffe, M., Proserpio, D. M. & Zhang, H.-F. A new group of edge-transitive 3-periodic nets and their derived nets for reticular. Chem. Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 4062–4068 (2020).
Chen, Z., Jiang, H., Li, M., O’Keeffe, M. & Eddaoudi, M. Reticular chemistry 3.2: typical minimal edge-transitive derived and related nets for the design and synthesis of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 120, 8039–8065 (2020).
Li, M., Li, D., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Topological analysis of metal–organic frameworks with polytopic linkers and/or multiple building units and the minimal transitivity principle. Chem. Rev. 114, 1343–1370 (2014).
Chen, Z. et al. Enriching the reticular chemistry repertoire with minimal edge-transitive related nets: access to highly coordinated metal–organic frameworks based on double six-membered rings as net-coded building units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 20480–20489 (2019).
Feng, D. et al. Construction of ultrastable porphyrin Zr metal–organic frameworks through linker elimination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17105–17110 (2013).
Gomez-Gualdron, D. A. et al. Evaluating topologically diverse metal-organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3279–3289 (2016).
Nguyen, P. T. K. et al. New metal–organic frameworks for chemical fixation of CO2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 733–744 (2018).
He, Y. et al. Low-energy regeneration and high productivity in a lanthanide–hexacarboxylate framework for high-pressure CO2–CH4–H2 separation. Chem. Commun. 49, 6773–6775 (2013).
Wang, B. et al. Highly stable Zr(IV)-based metal–organic frameworks for the detection and removal of antibiotics and organic explosives in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6204–6216 (2016).
Liu, T.-F. et al. Adding to the arsenal of zirconium-based metal–organic frameworks: the topology as a platform for solvent-assisted metal incorporation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 4349–4352 (2016).
Zhang, M. et al. Symmetry-guided synthesis of highly porous metal–organic frameworks with fluorite topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 815–818 (2014).
Liu, B., Wu, W.-P., Hou, L., Li, Z.-S. & Wang, Y.-Y. Two nanocage-based metal–organic frameworks with mixed-cluster SBUs and CO2 sorption selectivity. Inorg. Chem. 54, 8937–8942 (2015).
Assen, A. H. et al. Ultra-tuning of the rare-earth fcu-MOF aperture size for selective molecular exclusion of branched paraffins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 14353–14358 (2015).
Morris, W. et al. Synthesis, structure, and metalation of two new highly porous zirconium metal–organic frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 51, 6443–6445 (2012).
Liu, T. F. et al. Topology-guided design and syntheses of highly stable mesoporous porphyrinic zirconium metal-organic frameworks with high surface area. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 413–419 (2015).
Zhang, Q. et al. Förster energy transport in metal–organic frameworks is beyond step-by-step hopping. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5308–5315 (2016).
Feng, D. et al. A highly stable porphyrinic zirconium metal–organic framework with shp-a topology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17714–17717 (2014).
AbdulHalim, R. G. et al. A fine-tuned metal–organic framework for autonomous indoor moisture control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10715–10722 (2017).
Gilson, S. E. et al. In situ formation of unprecedented neptunium-oxide wheel clusters stabilized in a metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11842–11846 (2019).
Chen, Z. et al. Ligand-directed reticular synthesis of catalytically active missing zirconium-based metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12229–12235 (2019).
Eubank, J. F. et al. On demand: the singular rht net, an ideal blueprint for the construction of a metal–organic framework (MOF) platform. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10099–10103 (2012).
Farha, O. K. et al. Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15016–15021 (2012).
Sun, Q. et al. A novel polyhedron-based metal–organic framework with high performance for gas uptake and light hydrocarbon separation. Dalton Trans. 47, 5005–5010 (2018).
Tu, B. et al. Ordered vacancies and their chemistry in metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14465–14471 (2014).
Wu, H., Yang, J., Su, Z.-M., Batten, S. R. & Ma, J.-F. An exceptional 54-fold interpenetrated coordination polymer with 103-srs network topology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11406–11409 (2011).
Furukawa, H. et al. Isoreticular expansion of metal–organic frameworks with triangular and square building units and the lowest calculated density for porous crystals. Inorg. Chem. 50, 9147–9152 (2011).
Abrahams, B. F., Batten, S. R., Hamit, H., Hoskins, B. F. & Robson, R. A cubic (3,4)-connected net with large cavities in solvated [Cu3(tpt)4](ClO4)3 (tpt = 2,4,6-tri(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35, 1690–1692 (1996).
Dybtsev, D. N., Chun, H. & Kim, K. Three-dimensional metal–organic framework with (3,4)-connected net, synthesized from an ionic liquid medium. Chem. Commun. 1594–1595 (2004).
Chen, B. et al. Cu2(ATC)·6H2O: design of open metal sites in porous metal–organic crystals (ATC: 1,3,5,7-adamantane tetracarboxylate). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 11559–11560 (2000).
Zheng, M., Liu, Y., Wang, C., Liu, S. & Lin, W. Cavity-induced enantioselectivity reversal in a chiral metal–organic framework Brønsted acid catalyst. Chem. Sci. 3, 2623–2627 (2012).
Ma, S., Wang, X.-S., Collier, C. D., Manis, E. S. & Zhou, H.-C. Ultramicroporous metal–organic framework based on 9,10-anthracenedicarboxylate for selective gas adsorption. Inorg. Chem. 46, 8499–8501 (2007).
Sudik, A. C., Côté, A. P., Wong-Foy, A. G., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. A metal–organic framework with a hierarchical system of pores and tetrahedral building blocks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 2528–2533 (2006).
Chen, Z. et al. Reticular access to highly porous acs-MOFs with rigid trigonal prismatic linkers for water sorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2900–2905 (2019).
Chen, Z. et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 368, 297–303 (2020).
Chun, H. & Jung, H. Targeted synthesis of a prototype MOF based on Zn4(O)(O2C)6 units and a nonlinear dicarboxylate ligand. Inorg. Chem. 48, 417–419 (2009).
Chae, H. K., Kim, J., Friedrichs, O. D., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Design of frameworks with mixed triangular and octahedral building blocks exemplified by the structure of [Zn4O(TCA)2] having the pyrite topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3907–3909 (2003).
Park, K. S. et al. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10186–10191 (2006).
Schulz, M. et al. A calixarene-based metal–organic framework for highly selective NO2 detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 12961–12965 (2018).
Han, Y. et al. In-situ ligand formation-driven preparation of a heterometallic metal–organic framework for highly selective separation of light hydrocarbons and efficient mercury adsorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 23331–23337 (2016).
Sun, D., Collins, D. J., Ke, Y., Zuo, J.-L. & Zhou, H.-C. Construction of open metal–organic frameworks based on predesigned carboxylate isomers: from achiral to chiral nets. Chem. Eur. J. 12, 3768–3776 (2006).
Yuan, S. et al. Sequential linker installation: precise placement of functional groups in multivariate metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3177–3180 (2015).
Deria, P. et al. Framework-topology-dependent catalytic activity of zirconium-based (porphinato)zinc(II) MOFs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14449–14457 (2016).
Feng, D. et al. Zirconium-metalloporphyrin PCN-222: mesoporous metal–organic frameworks with ultrahigh stability as biomimetic catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10307–10310 (2012).
Li, P. et al. Hierarchically engineered mesoporous metal-organic frameworks toward cell-free immobilized enzyme systems. Chem 4, 1022–1034 (2018).
Thiam, Z. et al. Extension of the surface organometallic chemistry to metal–organic framework: development of well-defined single site [(≡Zr–O–)W(=O)(CH2tBu)3] olefin metathesis catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 16690–16703 (2020).
Jiang, H.-L. et al. An exceptionally stable, porphyrinic Zr metal–organic framework exhibiting pH-dependent fluorescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13934–13938 (2013).
Zhang, Y.-Z. et al. Nanocage containing metal-organic framework constructed from a newly designed low symmetry tetra-pyrazole ligand. J. Coord. Chem. 69, 3242–3249 (2016).
Duan, X. et al. A microporous metal–organic framework of a rare sty topology for high CH4 storage at room temperature. Chem. Commun. 49, 2043–2045 (2013).
Lin, X. et al. High capacity hydrogen adsorption in Cu(II) tetracarboxylate framework materials: the role of pore size, ligand functionalization, and exposed metal sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2159–2171 (2009).
Wang, X.-S. et al. Three-dimensional porous metal–metalloporphyrin framework consisting of nanoscopic polyhedral cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 16322–16325 (2011).
Grünker, R. et al. Topological diversity, adsorption and fluorescence properties of MOFs based on a tetracarboxylate ligand. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 3835–3841 (2010).
Mohideen, M. I. H. et al. Upgrading gasoline to high octane numbers using a zeolite-like metal–organic framework molecular sieve with ana-topology. Chem. Commun. 54, 9414–9417 (2018).
An, J. et al. Metal-adeninate vertices for the construction of an exceptionally porous metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 3, 604 (2012).
Li, T., Kozlowski, M. T., Doud, E. A., Blakely, M. N. & Rosi, N. L. Stepwise ligand exchange for the preparation of a family of mesoporous MOFs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11688–11691 (2013).
Zhang, J., Chen, S., Zingiryan, A. & Bu, X. Integrated molecular chirality, absolute helicity, and intrinsic chiral topology in three-dimensional open-framework materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 17246–17247 (2008).
Zhang, J.-P., Horike, S. & Kitagawa, S. A flexible porous coordination polymer functionalized by unsaturated metal clusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 889–892 (2007).
Yuan, S. et al. Retrosynthesis of multi-component metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 9, 808 (2018).
Furukawa, H. et al. Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science 329, 424–428 (2010).
Liu, L., Konstas, K., Hill, M. R. & Telfer, S. G. Programmed pore architectures in modular quaternary metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17731–17734 (2013).
Liu, L. & Telfer, S. G. Systematic ligand modulation enhances the moisture stability and gas sorption characteristics of quaternary metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3901–3909 (2015).
Jiang, J., Furukawa, H., Zhang, Y.-B. & Yaghi, O. M. High methane storage working capacity in metal–organic frameworks with acrylate links. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10244–10251 (2016).
Liang, C.-C. et al. Engineering of pore geometry for ultrahigh capacity methane storage in mesoporous metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13300–13303 (2017).
Hönicke, I. M. et al. Balancing mechanical stability and ultrahigh porosity in crystalline framework materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 13780–13783 (2018).
Han, D. et al. A non-interpenetrated porous metal–organic framework with high gas-uptake capacity. Chem. Commun. 47, 9861–9863 (2011).
Klein, N. et al. Route to a family of robust, non-interpenetrated metal–organic frameworks with pto-like topology. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 13007–13016 (2011).
Koh, K., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Matzger, A. J. A crystalline mesoporous coordination copolymer with high microporosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 677–680 (2008).
Muldoon, P. F. et al. Programmable topology in new families of heterobimetallic metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 6194–6198 (2018).
Pang, Q., Tu, B. & Li, Q. Metal–organic frameworks with multicomponents in order. Coord. Chem. Rev. 388, 107–125 (2019).
Furukawa, H., Müller, U. & Yaghi, O. M. “Heterogeneity within order” in metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3417–3430 (2015).
Xu, W. et al. Anisotropic reticular chemistry. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 764–779 (2020).
Zhai, Q.-G., Bu, X., Zhao, X., Li, D.-S. & Feng, P. Pore space partition in metal–organic frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 407–417 (2017).
Zhao, X. et al. Multivariable modular design of pore space partition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15102–15105 (2016).
Chae, H. K. et al. A route to high surface area, porosity and inclusion of large molecules in crystals. Nature 427, 523–527 (2004).
Zhang, Y.-B. et al. Introduction of functionality, selection of topology, and enhancement of gas adsorption in multivariate metal–organic framework-177. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2641–2650 (2015).
Férey, G. et al. A hybrid solid with giant pores prepared by a combination of targeted chemistry, simulation, and powder diffraction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6296–6301 (2004).
Park, Y. K. et al. Crystal structure and guest uptake of a mesoporous metal–organic framework containing cages of 3.9 and 4.7nm in diameter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8230–8233 (2007).
Fang, Q. et al. A metal–organic framework with the zeolite MTN topology containing large cages of volume 2.5 nm3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3845–3848 (2005).
Mallick, A. et al. Unprecedented ultralow detection limit of amines using a thiadiazole-functionalized Zr(IV)-based metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7245–7249 (2019).
Cohen, S. M. The postsynthetic renaissance in porous solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2855–2863 (2017).
Xue, D.-X. et al. Tunable rare earth fcu-MOF platform: access to adsorption kinetics driven gas/vapor separations via pore size contraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5034–5040 (2015).
Deng, H. et al. Multiple functional groups of varying ratios in metal-organic frameworks. Science 327, 846–850 (2010).
Kong, X. et al. Mapping of functional groups in metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 882–885 (2013).
Fracaroli, A. M. et al. Seven post-synthetic covalent reactions in tandem leading to enzyme-like complexity within metal–organic framework crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8352–8355 (2016).
Feng, L. et al. Creating hierarchical pores by controlled linker thermolysis in multivariate metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2363–2372 (2018).
Wang, L. J. et al. Synthesis and characterization of metal–organic framework-74 containing 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 different metals. Inorg. Chem. 53, 5881–5883 (2014).
Luo, T.-Y. et al. Multivariate stratified metal–organic frameworks: diversification using domain building blocks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2161–2168 (2019).
Feng, L. et al. Imprinted apportionment of functional groups in multivariate metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14524–14529 (2019).
Feng, L. et al. Lattice expansion and contraction in metal-organic frameworks by sequential linker reinstallation. Matter 1, 156–167 (2019).
Lin, G. et al. 3D porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8705–8709 (2017).
Ma, T. et al. Single-crystal x-ray diffraction structures of covalent organic frameworks. Science 361, 48–52 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) and thank V. Guillerm for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.J. and M.E. formulated the content of this Review. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Materials thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, H., Alezi, D. & Eddaoudi, M. A reticular chemistry guide for the design of periodic solids. Nat Rev Mater 6, 466–487 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00287-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00287-y
This article is cited by
-
A zero-valent palladium cluster-organic framework
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Recent progress on charge transfer engineering in reticular framework for efficient electrochemiluminescence
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2024)
-
Solar-assisted photocatalytic water splitting using defective UiO-66 solids from modulated synthesis
Nano Research (2024)
-
Functional dynamics in framework materials
Communications Chemistry (2023)
-
Structural survey of metal-covalent organic frameworks and covalent metal-organic frameworks
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials (2023)