Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Energy spread minimization in a beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator

Abstract

Next-generation plasma-based accelerators can push electron bunches to gigaelectronvolt energies within centimetre distances1,2. The plasma, excited by a driver pulse, generates large electric fields that can efficiently accelerate a trailing witness bunch3,4,5, enabling the realization of laboratory-scale applications ranging from high-energy colliders6 to ultrabright light sources7. So far, several experiments have demonstrated large accelerations8,9,10 but the resulting beam quality, particularly the energy spread, is still far from state-of-the-art conventional accelerators. Here we show the results of a beam-driven plasma acceleration experiment where we used an electron bunch as a driver followed by an ultrashort witness bunch. By setting a positive energy chirp on the witness bunch, its longitudinal phase space is rotated during acceleration, resulting in an ultralow energy spread that is even lower than the spread at the plasma entrance. This result will significantly impact the optimization of the plasma acceleration process and its implementation in forthcoming compact machines for user-oriented applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Experimental set-up.
Fig. 2: Beam configuration generated by the photo-injector.
Fig. 3: Acceleration with the 200 pC driver.
Fig. 4: Acceleration with the 350 pC driver.
Fig. 5: Plasma wakefield simulations of the beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Faure, J. Controlled injection and acceleration of electrons in plasma wakefields by colliding laser pulses. Nature 444, 737–739 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonsalves, A. J. Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capillary discharge waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084801 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Litos, M. High-efficiency acceleration of an electron beam in a plasma wakefield accelerator. Nature 515, 92–95 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinke, S. Multistage coupling of independent laser-plasma accelerators. Nature 530, 190–193 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adli, A. Acceleration of electrons in the plasma wakefield of a proton bunch. Nature 561, 363–367 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, S. Energy doubler for a linear collider. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 011001 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakajima, K. Towards a table-top free-electron laser. Nat. Phys. 4, 92–93 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangles, S. P. D. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser–plasma interactions. Nature 431, 535–538 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blumenfeld, I. Energy doubling of 42 GeV electrons in a metre-scale plasma wakefield accelerator. Nature 445, 741–744 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, A. Generation and acceleration of electron bunches from a plasma photocathode. Nat. Phys. 15, 1156–1160 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, P., Dawson, J. M., Huff, R. W. & Katsouleas, T. Acceleration of electrons by the interaction of a bunched electron beam with a plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 693–696 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loisch, G. Observation of high transformer ratio plasma wakefield acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 064801 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roussel, R. Single shot characterization of high transformer ratio wakefields in nonlinear plasma acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 044802 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprangle, P., Esarey, E. & Krall, J. Laser driven electron acceleration in vacuum, gases, and plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 3, 2183–2190 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrario, M. SPARC_LAB present and future. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 309, 183–188 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pompili, R. Focusing of high-brightness electron beams with active-plasma lenses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 174801 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tzoufras, M. Beam loading in the nonlinear regime of plasma-based acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 145002 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shpakov, V. Longitudinal phase-space manipulation with beam-driven plasma wakefields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 114801 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Arcy, R. Tunable plasma-based energy dechirper. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 034801 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Y. P. Phase space dynamics of a plasma wakefield dechirper for energy spread reduction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 204804 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrario, M. Laser comb with velocity bunching: preliminary results at SPARC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 637, 43 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Serafini, L. & Ferrario, M. Velocity bunching in photo-injectors. In AIP Conference Proc. Vol. 581, 87–106 (AIP, 2001).

  24. Pompili, R. Compact and tunable focusing device for plasma wakefield acceleration. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 033302 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenzweig, J. B. et al. Plasma wakefields in the quasi-nonlinear regime. In AIP Conference Proc. Vol. 1299, 500–504 (AIP, 2010).

  26. Marocchino, A., Massimo, F., Rossi, A. R., Chiadroni, E. & Ferrario, M. Efficient modeling of plasma wakefield acceleration in quasi-non-linear-regimes with the hybrid code architect. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 829, 386–391 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yakimenko, V. FACET-II facility for advanced accelerator experimental tests. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, 101301 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrario, M. EUPRAXIA@SPARC_LAB design study towards a compact FEL facility at LNF. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 909, 134–138 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrario, M. Experimental demonstration of emittance compensation with velocity bunching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 054801 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Poplau, G., Van Rienen, U., Van der Geer, B. & de Loos, M. Multigrid algorithms for the fast calculation of space-charge effects in accelerator design. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 714–717 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pompili, R. Femtosecond timing-jitter between photo-cathode laser and ultra-short electron bunches by means of hybrid compression. N. J. Phys. 18, 083033 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson, S. G. Velocity bunching of high-brightness electron beams. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 014401 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Massimo, F., Atzeni, S. & Marocchino, A. Comparisons of time explicit hybrid kinetic-fluid code architect for plasma wakefield acceleration with a full pic code. J. Comput. Phys. 327, 841–850 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Londrillo, P., Gatti, C. & Ferrario, M. Numerical investigation of beam-driven pwfa in quasi-nonlinear regime. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 740, 236–241 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chao, A. W. et al. Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering (World Scientific, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the EU Commission under the Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement number 312453-EuCARD-2, the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 653782 (EuPRAXIA) and the INFN by the GRANT73/PLADIP grant. The work of A.Z. was partially supported by the ISF foundation. We thank all of the machine operators involved in the experimental run, D. Pellegrini for the realization of the high-voltage discharge pulser and M. Del Franco for providing the layout of the SPARC_LAB photo-injector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F. and R.P. planned and managed the experiment with input from all co-authors. R.P. carried out the data analysis. A.B. provided the plasma characterization. A.C and V.S. realized and managed the beam diagnostics. A.D.D. provided numerical simulations for the beam–plasma interaction. R.P. and A.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in the experiment, extensively discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Pompili.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Konstantin Lotov and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Chirp manipulation.

Witness energy chirp (blue line) obtained at the plasma entrance by varying the accelerator compression phase. The inset shows the resulting LPS for several phases. The vertical axis reports the energy of each particle with respect to the central energy. The chirp value is obtained by performing a linear fit on each LPS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pompili, R., Alesini, D., Anania, M.P. et al. Energy spread minimization in a beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator. Nat. Phys. 17, 499–503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01116-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01116-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing