Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

How we name academic prizes matters

Nature Human Behaviour volume 8, pages 190–193 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Most scientific prizes and medals are named after men, and most of these are also awarded to men. The very few awards named after women or not named after a person at all are more frequently awarded to women, although parity between the gender of recipients is still not achieved. We call on the scientific community to rethink the naming of academic awards, medals and prizes, their nomination and selection criteria, and to diversify awarding committees and procedures to ensure greater inclusivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Gender disparities in naming and awarding scientific medals and prizes.

References

  1. Converso, D., Loera, B., Molinengo, G., Viotti, S. & Guidetti, G. Front. Psychol. 9, 2408 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang, A. C., Chekijian, S. A., Zeidan, A. J., Choo, E. K. & Sethuraman, K. N. J. Emerg. Med. 61, 540–549 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Koster, J. B. & Leboy, P. S. Soc. Stud. Sci. 42, 307–320 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lunnemann, P., Jensen, M. H. & Jauffred, L. Palgrave Commun 5, 46 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gehmlich, K. & Krause, S. Preprint at OSF, https://www.osf.io/ynbzm (2023).

  6. Carnes, M., Geller, S., Fine, E., Sheridan, J. & Handelsman, J. J. Womens Health 14, 684–691 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. James, A., Chisnall, R. & Plank, M. J. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190633 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oshagbemi, T. Women Manage. Rev. 15, 331–343 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grogan, K. E. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 3–6 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sterling, A. D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 30303–30308 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank E. Gibney for the stimulating discussions when producing her Nature News article on the initial findings of this study, which were presented at the 2022 European Geoscience Union General Assembly. K.G. is funded by the British Heart Foundation (PG/19/45/34419), The Medical Research Council (MR/V009540/1) and the The National Centre for the 3Rs and Industry (NC/T001747/1) and received funding for research by a US-based pharmaceutical company (Rocket Pharmaceuticals). The Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, has received an Accelerator Award by the British Heart Foundation (AA/18/2/34218). S.K. is funded by the Royal Society (INF\R2\212060), The Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2021-030; RPG-2017-377), Natural Environment Research Council (NE/X018830/1), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X03626X/1; EP/X036472/1; EP/Y004027/1), NIHR (NIHR204871), GameChangers programme 347 and 471 and EU Horizon Europe (HORIZON-MSCA-2021-DN-01-01 PlasticUnderground) and is supported by the Birmingham Institute for Global Innovation. None of the funders had a role in the decision to publish or in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK

    Katja Gehmlich

  2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Katja Gehmlich

  3. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK

    Stefan Krause

  4. Institute of Global Innovation, Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK

    Stefan Krause

  5. Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1 Claude Bernard, UMR 5023 LEHNA, Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, France

    Stefan Krause

Authors
  1. Katja Gehmlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Katja Gehmlich or Stefan Krause.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gehmlich, K., Krause, S. How we name academic prizes matters. Nat Hum Behav 8, 190–193 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01773-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01773-9

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene