Mental health, neuroscience and neuroethics researchers must engage local African communities to enable discourses on cultural understandings of mental illness. To ensure that these engagements are both ethical and innovative, they must be facilitated with cultural competence and humility, because serious consideration of different contextual and local factors is critical.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Matshabane, O. P. et al. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 55, 1679–1686 (2020).
de Vries, J., Landouré, G. & Wonkam, A. Soc. Sci. Med. 258, 113091 (2020).
Stein, J. D. & Singh, I. Global Mental Health and Neuroethics (Academic, 2020).
Kpanake, L. Transcult. Psychiatry 55, 198–218 (2018).
Wiredu, K. & Gyekye, K. Person and Community (Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Washington, DC, 1992).
Cordeiro-Rodrigues, L. & Ewuoso, C. Neuroethics 14, 1–14 (2021).
Nwoye, A. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 45, 305–317 (2015).
Burns, J. K. & Tomita, A. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 50, 867–877 (2015).
Read, U. M. in Cosmos, Gods and Madmen in the Anthropology of Medicine (Berghahn, 2016).
Herrera-Ferrá, K., Muñoz, J. M., Nicolini, H., Saruwatari Zavala, G. & Martínez Bullé Goyri, V. M. AJOB Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2022.2048722 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge A. Hartford and F. Gilpin-Macfoy for their helpful comments on this publication. O.P.M. and L.M.K. are supported by the Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), NIH. O.P.M. is an African Postdoctoral Training Initiative (APTI) Fellow funded by the NIH and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in partnership with the African Academy of Sciences, under the auspices of the Coalition of African Research and Innovation. J.d.V. is supported by a Research Development Award from the Wellcome Trust (WT222784/Z/21/Z) entitled ‘Incompleteness and the ethics of new and emerging health technologies: fostering African conversations on relational ontology, epistemic justice and academic activism’, which supported a visiting scholarship to the UCT Neuroscience Institute for C.A.A. O.P.M., J.d.V. and C.A.A. also gratefully acknowledge the Global Forum on Bioethics in Research (GFBR) for support towards attendance at the 2021 GFBR annual meeting, where they discussed some of these issues. The findings and conclusions in this Comment are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US National Institutes of Health or any other institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Kaymarlin Govender and Judy Illes for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matshabane, O.P., Mgweba-Bewana, L., Atuire, C.A. et al. Cultural diversity is crucial for African neuroethics. Nat Hum Behav 6, 1185–1187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01436-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01436-1
This article is cited by
-
Cultural competence must not leave anyone behind
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)