Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Building a better dialogue between energy research and policy

The world is becoming more complex for policymakers and researchers alike as climate change, new technology and digitalization drive unprecedented energy-system change. Understanding one another is paramount if we are to address the challenges they present.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kenny, C., Rose, D. C., Hobbs, A., Tyler, C. & Blackstock, J. The Role of Research in the UK Parliament (Houses of Parliament, 2019); https://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/The-Role-of-Research-in-the-UK-Parliament.pdf.

  2. Cairney, P. & Kwiatkowski, R. Palgrave Commun. 3, 37 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Preparing for a Changing World (Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, 2019); https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST-PB-0033

  4. 100 Opportunities for Finland and the World (Finnish Committee for the Future, 2014); https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/tietoaeduskunnasta/julkaisut/Documents/tuvj_11+2014.pdf

  5. Smith, H. & Gilbert, C. Sustainability 10, 449 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sovacool, B. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 1–29 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stirling, A. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 83–95 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, Y. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17673–17682 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Winskel, M. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 74–84 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallaband, B. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 25, 9–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reich, S. M. & Reich, J. A. Am. J. Community Psychol. 38, 51–62 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, B. R. Res. Eval. 20, 247–254 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pain, R. & Raynor, R. “A soup of different inspirations”: Co-produced research and recognising impact as a process, not an outcome. LSE Impact Blog https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/01/28/a-soup-of-different-inspirations-impact-and-co-produced-research/ (2016).

  14. Demski, C. & Pidgeon, N. Paying for Energy Transitions: Public Perspectives and Acceptability (UKERC, 2019); http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/publications/paying-for-energy-transitions.html

  15. Tyler, C. & Akerlof, K. Nature 566, 175–177 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, H., Suldovsky, B. & Lindenfield, L. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 44, 78–95 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, J. Building a better dialogue between energy research and policy. Nat Energy 4, 816–818 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0483-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0483-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing