Comment

Grand challenges for the study of cultural evolution

The founding members of the Cultural Evolution Society were surveyed to identify the major scientific questions and ‘grand challenges’ currently facing the study of cultural evolution. We present the results and discuss the implications for an emergent synthesis in the study of culture based on Darwinian principles.

  • Subscribe to Nature Ecology & Evolution for full access:

    $99

    Subscribe

  • Purchase article full text and PDF:

    $18

    Buy now

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Individuality and Entanglement: The Moral and Material Bases of Social Life (Princeton Univ. Press, 2015).

  2. 2.

    & Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion (MIT Press, 2013).

  3. 3.

    , & Nat. Rev. Gen. 11, 137–148 (2010).

  4. 4.

    The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, 1871).

  5. 5.

    Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Belknap Press of Harvard Univ., 1975).

  6. 6.

    Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).

  7. 7.

    Cultural Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

  8. 8.

    Evol. Biol. 43, 481–497 (2015).

  9. 9.

    & Am. Ed. Res. J. 47, 532–562 (2010).

  10. 10.

    , & Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proc. 4th Int. ICWSM Conf. (2009);

  11. 11.

    & Developing the field site concept for the study of cultural evolution. Social Evolution Forum (16 October 2016);

  12. 12.

    A Long-Form Research Program in Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture (2016);

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Evolution Institute and the University of Maryland for assisting with arrangements and providing space for the meetings in which the Cultural Evolution Society was organized and the grand challenges survey was developed. These organizational meetings and the analysis of the grand challenges survey results were funded through a grant to the Evolution Institute from the John Templeton Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. J. Brewer is at Cognitive Policy Works, Seattle, Washington 98122, USA.

    • J. Brewer
  2. M. Gelfand is at the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

    • M. Gelfand
  3. J. C. Jackson is at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

    • J. C. Jackson
  4. I. F. MacDonald and D. S. Wilson are at Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902, USA.

    • I. F. MacDonald
    •  & D. S. Wilson
  5. P. N. Peregrine is at Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin 54911 USA, and the Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA.

    • P. N. Peregrine
  6. P. J. Richerson is at the University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.

    • P. J. Richerson
  7. P. Turchin is at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.

    • P. Turchin
  8. H. Whitehouse is at Oxford University, Oxford OX1 4AU, UK.

    • H. Whitehouse

Authors

  1. Search for J. Brewer in:

  2. Search for M. Gelfand in:

  3. Search for J. C. Jackson in:

  4. Search for I. F. MacDonald in:

  5. Search for P. N. Peregrine in:

  6. Search for P. J. Richerson in:

  7. Search for P. Turchin in:

  8. Search for H. Whitehouse in:

  9. Search for D. S. Wilson in:

Contributions

J.B. and I.F.M. conducted the grand challenges survey and processed the initial results. P.N.P. analysed the processed results to draft the preliminary list of grand challenges. All the authors evaluated the initial list of grand challenges and aided in parsing them to the final eight. J.B., I.F.M., P.N.P. and D.S.W. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and all the authors contributed to revisions.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. N. Peregrine.