Letter

Spin alignment of stars in old open clusters

  • Nature Astronomy 1, Article number: 0064 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0064
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Stellar clusters form by gravitational collapse of turbulent molecular clouds, with up to several thousand stars per cluster1. They are thought to be the birthplace of most stars and therefore play an important role in our understanding of star formation, a fundamental problem in astrophysics2,3. The initial conditions of the molecular cloud establish its dynamical history until the stellar cluster is born. However, the evolution of the cloud’s angular momentum during cluster formation is not well understood4. Current observations have suggested that turbulence scrambles the angular momentum of the cluster-forming cloud, preventing spin alignment among stars within a cluster5. Here we use asteroseismology6,​7,​8 to measure the inclination angles of spin axes in 48 stars from the two old open clusters NGC 6791 and NGC 6819. The stars within each cluster show strong alignment. Three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of proto-cluster formation show that at least 50% of the initial proto-cluster kinetic energy has to be rotational in order to obtain strong stellar-spin alignment within a cluster. Our result indicates that the global angular momentum of the cluster-forming clouds was efficiently transferred to each star and that its imprint has survived several gigayears since the clusters formed.

  • Subscribe to Nature Astronomy for full access:

    $99

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Milky Way star-forming complexes and the turbulent motion of the galaxy’s molecular gas. Astrophys. J. 752, 146–159 (2012).

  2. 2.

    et al. Protostars and Planets (eds. Beuther, H., Klessen, R., Dullemond, C. & Henning, T.) Ch. 13, 291 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).

  3. 3.

    & Embedded clusters in molecular clouds. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 41, 57–115 (2003).

  4. 4.

    & Theory of star formation. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 565–687 (2007).

  5. 5.

    & Are the spin axes of stars randomly aligned within a cluster? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 1380–1390 (2010).

  6. 6.

    & Determining the inclination of the rotation axis of a sun-like star. Astrophys. J. 589, 1009–1019 (2003).

  7. 7.

    et al. Fast core rotation in red-giant stars as revealed by gravity-dominated mixed modes. Nature 481, 55–57 (2012).

  8. 8.

    et al. Stellar spin-orbit misalignment in a multiplanet system. Science 342, 331 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. ATLASGAL—towards a complete sample of massive star forming clumps. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 443, 1555–1586 (2014).

  10. 10.

    , & Rotation speed and stellar axis inclination from p modes: how CoRoT would see other suns. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 1281–1286 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Nearly uniform internal rotation of solar-like main-sequence stars revealed by space-based asteroseismology and spectroscopic measurements. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 2654–2674 (2015).

  12. 12.

    et al. Gravity modes as a way to distinguish between hydrogen- and helium-burning red giant stars. Nature 471, 608–611 (2011).

  13. 13.

    , & Asteroseismology Ch. 3 (Springer, 2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Sounding open clusters: asteroseismic constraints from Kepler on the properties of NGC 6791 and NGC 6819. Astrophys. J. 729, L10–L15 (2011).

  15. 15.

    et al. An asteroseismic membership study of the red giants in three open clusters observed by Kepler: NGC 6791, NGC 6819, and NGC 6811. Astrophys. J. 739, 13–25 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Asteroseismology of the open clusters NGC 6791, NGC 6811, and NGC 6819 from 19 months of Kepler photometry Astrophys. J. 757, 190–202 (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. Age and helium content of the open cluster NGC 6791 from multiple eclipsing binary members. II. Age dependencies and new insights. Astron. Astrophys. 543, A106–A122 (2012).

  18. 18.

    & DIAMONDS: a new Bayesian nested sampling tool. Application to peak bagging of solar-like oscillations. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A71–A92 (2014).

  19. 19.

    , & Bayesian peak bagging analysis of 19 low-mass low-luminosity red giants observed with Kepler. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A83–A158 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. A spin-down clock for cool stars from observations of the 2.5-billion-year-old cluster. Nature 517, 589–591 (2015).

  21. 21.

    , & Direct N-body modeling of the old open cluster NGC 188: a detailed comparison of theoretical and observed binary star and blue straggler populations. Astron. J. 145, 8–29 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Tidal evolution in close binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 99, 126–140 (1981).

  23. 23.

    & Galactic distribution of the oldest open clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 88, 360–362 (1980).

  24. 24.

    & Formation of a protocluster: a virialized structure from gravoturbulent collapse. I. Simulation of cluster formation in a collapsing molecular cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A30–A46 (2016).

  25. 25.

    et al. A new look at the old star cluster NGC 6791. Astrophys. J. 733, L1–L5 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. The CFHT open star cluster survey. II. Deep CCD photometry of the old open star cluster NGC 6819. Astron. J. 122, 266–282 (2001).

  27. 27.

    et al. Determining the age of the Kepler open cluster NGC 6819 with a new triple system and other eclipsing binary stars. Astron. J. 151, 66–85 (2016).

  28. 28.

    et al. Asteroseismology of old open clusters with Kepler: direct estimate of the integrated red giant branch mass-loss in NGC 6791 and 6819. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 2007–2088 (2012).

  29. 29.

    et al. WIYN open cluster study. LX. Spectroscopic binary orbits in NGC 6819. Astron. J. 148, 38–57 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Probing the core structure and evolution of red giants using gravity-dominated mixed modes observed with Kepler. Astron. Astrophys. 540, A143–A153 (2012).

  31. 31.

    et al. Mixed modes in red giants: a window on stellar evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 572, L5–L9 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Preparation of Kepler light curves for asteroseismic analyses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, L6–L10 (2011).

  33. 33.

    et al. Impact on asteroseismic analyses of regular gaps in Kepler data. Astron. Astrophys. 568, A10–A18 (2014).

  34. 34.

    et al. Gap interpolation by inpainting methods: application to ground and space-based asteroseismic data. Astron. Astrophys. 574, A18–A27 (2014).

  35. 35.

    , & Period spacings in red giants. II. Automated measurement. Astron. Astrophys. 588, 87–99 (2016).

  36. 36.

    et al. Revised stellar properties of Kepler targets for the Q1-17 (DR25) transit detection run. Preprint at (2016).

  37. 37.

    et al. The connection between stellar granulation and oscillation as seen by the Kepler mission. Astron. Astrophys. 570, A41–A57 (2014).

  38. 38.

    et al. Determining global parameters of the oscillations of solar-like stars. Astron. Astrophys. 511, A46–A58 (2010).

  39. 39.

    Asymptotic approximations for stellar nonradial pulsations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 43, 469–490 (1980).

  40. 40.

    et al. Testing the asymptotic relation for period spacings from mixed modes of red giants observed with the Kepler mission. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A82–A95 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement: a new high resolution code called RAMSES. Astron. Astrophys. 385, 337–364 (2002).

  42. 42.

    , & A high order Godunov scheme with constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement for astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics. Astron. Astrophys. 457, 371–384 (2006).

  43. 43.

    et al. Measuring reliable surface rotation rates from Kepler photometric observations. Astron. Soc. Pac. 479, 129–136 (2013).

  44. 44.

    , & Rotation periods of 34,030 Kepler main-sequence stars: the full autocorrelation sample. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 211, 24–37 (2014).

  45. 45.

    et al. Rotation and magnetism of Kepler pulsating solar-like stars: towards asteroseismically calibrated age-rotation relations. Astron. Astrophys. 572, 34–48 (2014).

  46. 46.

    et al. Rotation periods and seismic ages of KOIs—comparison with stars without detected planets from Kepler observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, 119–125 (2016).

  47. 47.

    et al. Testing the recovery of stellar rotation signals from Kepler light curves using a blind hare-and-hounds exercise. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 3211–3226 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

E.C. is funded by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 312844 (SPACEINN) and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 664931. Y.-N.L. and P.H. acknowledge funding by the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 grant agreement no. 306483) and the HPC resources of CINES under the allocation x2014047023 made by GENCI (Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif). R.A.G. received funding from the CNES GOLF and PLATO grants at CEA. R.A.G. and P.G.B. received funding from the ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France) program IDEE (no. ANR-12-BS05-0008) ‘Interaction Des Étoiles et des Exoplanètes’. S.Mathur acknowledges support from the NASA grant NNX12AE17G. S.Mathis acknowledges funding by the European Research Council through ERC grant SPIRE no. 647383. D.S. is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (project no. FT140100147). J.B. acknowledges financial support from grant ANR 2011 Blanc SIMI5-6 020 ‘Toupies: Towards understanding the spin evolution of stars’. This work has received funding from the CNES grants at CEA. All the light curves used in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX09AF08G and by other grants and contracts. UKIRT is supported by NASA and operated under an agreement among the University of Hawaii, the University of Arizona and Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center; operations are enabled through the cooperation of the East Asian Observatory. We thank D. Salabert for the preparation of the website containing the source data used in this work.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/DRF — CNRS — Université Paris Diderot, IRFU/SAp Centre de Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

    • Enrico Corsaro
    • , Yueh-Ning Lee
    • , Rafael A. García
    • , Patrick Hennebelle
    • , Paul G. Beck
    •  & Stephane Mathis
  2. Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

    • Enrico Corsaro
  3. Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

    • Enrico Corsaro
  4. INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy

    • Enrico Corsaro
  5. Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street Suite 205, Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA

    • Savita Mathur
  6. Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

    • Dennis Stello
  7. Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

    • Dennis Stello
  8. Université Grenoble Alpes, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • Jérôme Bouvier
  9. CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • Jérôme Bouvier

Authors

  1. Search for Enrico Corsaro in:

  2. Search for Yueh-Ning Lee in:

  3. Search for Rafael A. García in:

  4. Search for Patrick Hennebelle in:

  5. Search for Savita Mathur in:

  6. Search for Paul G. Beck in:

  7. Search for Stephane Mathis in:

  8. Search for Dennis Stello in:

  9. Search for Jérôme Bouvier in:

Contributions

E.C. performed the fits of the background in the power spectra, identified the oscillation modes, measured the mode parameters and the inclination angles for all the stars in the sample, and interpreted the results. Y.-N.L. performed the hydrodynamical simulations of the proto-cluster formation and for the significance of the stellar-spin alignment, and contributed to interpreting the initial conditions in the molecular cloud. R.A.G. prepared the data sets calibrated for the asteroseismic analysis, contributed to discussing the analysis method and the observational results, and reanalysed the independent sample of stars observed in NGC 6819. P.H. contributed to the computation of the hydrodynamical simulations and in the interpretation of observational results and of the initial conditions in the molecular cloud. S.Mathur provided input guesses for the background properties in the power spectra of all the stars and contributed to the selection of the control sample. P.G.B. contributed to discussing the data analysis method and the identification of the oscillation modes. S.Mathis contributed to discussing the N-body interactions among stars in open clusters and to quantifying the tidal effects in binary stars. D.S. provided spatial positions for the entire population of red giants identified in the field of the two clusters and contributed to discussing the observational results and the data analysis method. J.B. provided theoretical and observational insights on the effect and evolution of angular momentum in stellar clusters. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Corsaro.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–3 and Supplementary Tables 1–5.