Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37108-5, published online 13 March 2023

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 2, in which c was incorrectly described as “middle scenario” where it should have been described as “low scenario”. The correct version of Fig. 2 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.