Abstract
Concentrating a trace amount of molecules from liquids, solid objects, or the gas phase and delivering them to a localized area are crucial for almost any trace analyte detection device. Analytes within a liquid droplet resting on micro/nanostructured surfaces with liquid-repellent coatings can be concentrated during solvent evaporation. However, these coatings suffer from complex manufacturing procedures, poor versatility, and limited analyte enrichment efficiency. Here, we report on the use of an acoustic levitation platform to losslessly concentrate the analyte molecules dissolved in any volatile liquid, attached to solid objects, or spread in air. Gold nanoparticles can be simultaneously concentrated with the analytes in different phases, realizing sensitive, surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection even at attomolar (10−18 mol/L) concentration levels. The acoustic levitation platform-enabled, lossless analyte enrichment can significantly increase the analytical performance of many conventional microsensing techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ultrasensitive detection of trace analytes is important in a broad range of fields, ranging from analytical chemistry1 to disease diagnostics2,3,4,5, biomedicine6,7,8,9, environmental science10,11,12, and national security13,14. In these practical application fields, a trace amount of multiple analytes is either dispersed in water or organic liquids, attached to solid surfaces, or dispersed within a gaseous mixture3,4,5,6,7,12,13,14,15. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is promising in trace analyte detection because of its high sensitivity, label-free detection, and miniaturization16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Various SERS substrates integrated with dense and uniformly distributed, ultrasensitive SERS sites (known as “hot spots” and usually located at <10 nm gaps between adjacent nanoparticles) have already been fabricated24,25,26,27,28. The working area of the SERS sensors, which is generally at the level of a few square micrometers, is determined by the spot size of the excitation laser beam12. To address the enriched analyte aggregate under a microscope during SERS measurements, concentrating and driving the analytes in different phases into hot spots ideally located at the level of hundreds of square micrometers is desirable but has been proven challenging12,26,29,30. The pinning of the solid/liquid/gas three-phase contact line caused the accumulation of analyte molecules around the pinning circle, which is known as the “coffee ring” effect31. Contact line pinning may be greatly delayed on the liquid repellent surfaces (e.g., superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces, molecularly smooth slippery surfaces) but is inevitable32. The slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs) can enrich analytes from common liquids after solvent evaporation, avoiding the “coffee ring” effect, whereas the lubricant tends to wrap the liquid droplet and influence the SERS detection12 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Actually, it is impossible to enrich all of the analytes into the final aggregate on any slippery surface, induced by either the wetting defects and/or the evaporation process (Supplementary Fig. 2). Additionally, all of the existing surfaces are only applicable to nonsticky solutions and have limited analyte enrichment efficiency for sticky solutions (Supplementary Fig. 3). Optical trapping and other concentration methods have been developed to concentrate analytes/nanoparticles in bulk solutions33,34,35, whereas it is difficult to concentrate all of the analytes from the solutions. Methods capable of losslessly enriching analytes in any volatile liquid and from tiny solid objects are still unavailable.
Acoustic levitation, namely, levitating objects in various media (e.g., air) using acoustic radiation forces36,37,38,39, has been investigated in metallic solidification40, contactless transport of matter41,42, drop dynamics43 and analytical chemistry44,45,46,47 for many decades. The SERS technique was selected to monitor the chemical reaction and crystallization process within a levitating drop in 2003 by Prof. Lendl’s group and Prof. Nilsson’s group, respectively48,49. Here, we report lossless analyte enrichment in any phase using a droplet levitating enrichment (DLE) platform. Au nanoparticles as SERS enhancers are introduced to a levitating analyte solution droplet, simultaneously enriching with the analytes to realize ultrasensitive SERS detection. The limit of detection (LOD) can be pushed down simply by increasing the starting volume of the levitating droplet. The DLE platform can be combined with almost any sensing technique collecting signals from microscale areas (or microsensing) methods (e.g., photoluminescence, near-infrared absorption), showing great application potential in trace analyte detection fields.
Results
Analyte enrichment capability of the DLE platform
The sound pressure of an acoustic wave generated by a piezoelectronic transducer (frequency: 20.7 kHz) can compensate for the gravitational force of the droplet and thus realize droplet levitation50,51 (Fig. 1a). The challenging lossless, multiplex, and multiphase analyte enrichment for slippery surfaces became simple and straightforward for the DLE platform. Multiple analytes in the solvents can be simultaneously concentrated with the Au nanoparticles during solvent evaporation for consequent SERS detection. Aqueous solutions were introduced to the organic phase (e.g., toluene) by a pipette tip, achieving multiphase analyte enrichment (Supplementary Movie 1 and Fig. 1a). Experimentally, the droplet was squeezed into an ellipsoid shape to provide enough force to balance the gravitational force52 (Fig. 1a). As evaporation proceeded, the ellipsoid droplet gradually became quasi-spherical. At this moment, we needed to slightly reduce the distance between the acoustic emitter and the reflector to squeeze the quasi-spherical droplet back into the ellipsoid shape. When the droplet was very small (e.g., 2 nL in volume), it oscillated at a high frequency. We should transfer the tiny droplet onto a substrate for further characterization. The successful transfer rate for a 10 nL droplet was 100%, while for a 2 nL droplet, it was ~70% for our apparatus. A 10 µL transparent droplet composed of 10 µM crystal violet (CV) dye molecules was enriched into an ~100 µm violet droplet (~0.5 nL in volume) after solvent evaporation, easily achieving a concentration increase of 20000 times (Supplementary Movie 2 and Fig. 1b). When the ratio of the hydrostatic pressure to the capillary pressure exceeds ~1.5, the droplet will disintegrate and explode44. Therefore, organic droplets with low surface tensions tend to explode. The largest droplet of water/ethanol that can be levitated for our equipment can reach 180 µL/30 µL, corresponding to a concentration increase of 360,000/60,000 times. Increasing the power and adjusting the acoustic frequency of the acoustic levitator can expand the size range of the droplet that can be levitated37, further increasing the analyte enrichment capability.
In addition to the analyte molecules, microparticles with different shapes, nanoparticles, and ions can also be concentrated using an acoustic levitator (Fig. 1c). The 500 nm polystyrene spheres dispersed in ethanol assembled into a large ball after ethanol evaporated (Supplementary Movie 3). The outermost layer of the ball comprised hexagonally arranged polystyrene spheres. In contrast, the 300 nm-sized metal-organic-framework (MOF) octahedra and truncated dodecahedra assembled into concave pancakes after water evaporated. The droplet composed of 50 nm Au nanoparticles was picked up using a piece of silicon wafer from the acoustic levitator when the droplet was almost invisible; the concentration of the Au nanoparticles inside the droplet was significantly increased (Supplementary Fig. 4). A thin film formed by densely packed Au nanoparticles appeared on the silicon wafer. A crystalline CuSO4 sphere was formed after water completely evaporated from a water droplet composed of CuSO4. The weight of the CuSO4 crystal was equivalent to that dissolved in water, proving the lossless enrichment. A rhodamine 6G (R6G) analyte aggregate was formed after water completely evaporated from a levitating R6G ethanol droplet. Importantly, hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) ethanol solutions are very sticky, and no solid surfaces can enrich HPC molecules into a small aggregate after solvent evaporation (Supplementary Fig. 3). In contrast, a spherical HPC sphere appeared after ethanol evaporated from a levitating ethanol droplet composed of HPC.
Spherical Au nanoparticles with a size of 50 nm (Fig. 2a) were introduced to the levitating droplet formed by the analyte solutions because of their strong SERS enhancement performance (Supplementary Fig. 5). During solvent evaporation, the Au nanoparticles and analyte molecules were simultaneously concentrated. A piece of silicon wafer was used to pick up the levitating droplet when its volume was reduced from 10 µL to ~2 nL as more smaller droplets would oscillate in our acoustic levitator and became almost invisible. After a very small amount of solvent evaporated, an aggregate composed of Au nanoparticles and analyte molecules was formed (Fig. 2b). Strong electromagnetic fields (i.e., hot spots) were located at the nanoscale gaps between adjacent Au nanoparticles (Fig. 2c). Two heating lamps were used to accelerate the solvent evaporation process, significantly reducing the evaporation time to less than 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 6). Forcing analyte molecules without interactions with noble metal surfaces into SERS hot spots is challenging for conventional SERS substrates1,12. In contrast, both analyte molecules with interactions and those without interactions with Au nanoparticles can be enriched and delivered to SERS hot spots for the DLE platform.
CV molecules were utilized to evaluate the SERS sensitivity of the SERS platform with the DLE function. Ten pM Au nanoparticles were introduced to 10 µL of CV ethanol solutions as too little would make the aggregate difficult to visualize, while too much would decrease the analyte number density within the aggregate (Supplementary Fig. 7). Obvious SERS peaks from CV molecules were observed after enrichment from their solutions with a starting concentration in the range of 10 nM to 10 fM composed of 10 pM Au nanospheres using the DLE platform (Fig. 2d). SERS mapping measurements had to be performed to address the location of the CV molecules within the Au nanoparticle/CV molecule aggregate when the starting concentration was 100 aM or lower (Supplementary Fig. 8). The SERS enhancement factor (EF) of the DLE platform was estimated to be ~5.55 × 1013 when the starting concentration was 100 aM. The intensity of the SERS signals saturated when the starting concentration was higher than 100 nM as all of the SERS hot spots were occupied by CV molecules after ethanol evaporated (Supplementary Fig. 9). Similarly, CV molecules in aqueous solutions in the concentration range of 10 nM to 100 fM could be detected after enrichment with 40 pM Au nanoparticles using the DLE platform (Fig. 2e). The relationship between the concentration of CV molecules in ethanol/water and the intensity of the 1616 cm−1 SERS peak is described by log I = 0.28 log C + 6.87/log I = 0.36 log C + 7.76 with an R2 (goodness of fit) of ~ 0.9899/0.9996 (Fig. 2 f). The LOD was calculated to be 7.05 aM using Student’s t-distribution (details are provided in the “Methods” section), which was at least four orders of magnitude better than conventional SERS substrates without using the DLE technique. CV molecules in other organic solvents with a starting concentration of 1 pM were easily detected (Fig. 2g). In principle, the DLE platform can be employed for ultrasensitive SERS detection in volatile solvents. For biological applications, adenosine and adenine, which are related to life processes, can be easily detected by SERS in aqueous solutions using the SERS platform with the DLE function (Supplementary Fig. 10).
Multiphase and multiplex trace analyte detection
Multiplex SERS detection was further demonstrated using the DLE platform. SERS spectra of a mixture of R6G and 4-methoxy-α-toluenethiol (MATT) molecules codissolved in ethanol at four different concentration ratios (i.e., 50 nM:50 nM, 5 nM:50 nM, 500 pM:50 nM, and 50 nM:5 nM) were measured after enrichment using the DLE system (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Fig. 11). The SERS spectra of the mixture could be deconvoluted to those of the two molecules, with the SERS peak intensity dependent on their concentrations. The relationship between the concentration ratio and the SERS intensity ratio is described by log (IR6G/IMATT) = 0.68 log (CR6G/CMATT) + 0.80, indicating a good quantitative ability in multiplex SERS detection (Fig. 2i).
Multiphase SERS detection using the DLE platform was further demonstrated (Fig. 3). Aqueous solutions can be introduced into the levitating droplet of organic liquids (e.g., toluene), or vice versa (Fig. 3a). Toluene wrapped one side of the ellipsoid water droplet. When Au nanospheres were dispersed in water, the analyte molecules dispersed in both toluene and water could be trapped within the Au nanosphere aggregates after the solvent evaporated. However, Au nanospheres immediately aggregated in toluene, making it difficult for the analyte molecules either dispersed in water or in toluene to enter the Au nanoparticle aggregates after the solvent evaporated. Therefore, strong SERS signals of R6G dispersed in water and MATT dispersed in toluene were simultaneously observed when Au nanoparticles were dispersed in water (Curve I in Fig. 3b). In contrast, the intensity of the SERS signals was reduced by ~2 times for MATT dispersed in toluene and by > 10 times for R6G dispersed in water (Curve II in Fig. 3b). The SERS intensity ratio between R6G and MATT indicated that the R6G molecules dissolved in water had difficulty entering the preformed Au nanoparticle aggregate in toluene (Fig. 3c). SERS spectra of R6G in water and MATT in toluene with different concentration ratios (50 nM:50 nM, 10 nM:50 nM, 5 nM:50 nM, and 1 nM:50 nM) were measured by introducing Au nanoparticles to the water phase after solvent evaporation using the DLE platform (Fig. 3d). The relationship between the concentration ratio and the SERS intensity ratio of R6G and MATT is described by log (IR6G/IMATT) = 0.92 log (CR6G/CMATT) + 0.93 with an R2 of 0.998 (Fig. 3e).
SERS detection in the solid phase and gas phase
It is frequently required to detect analytes attached to tiny solid objects (e.g., pesticide residue and soil contamination). Multiple pretreatment processes are usually required to separate analytes from solid objects before detection. The DLE system allowed us to directly analyze the analytes on tiny solid objects by SERS (Fig. 4). Using pesticide residue detection on a slice of sesame seed as an example, the sesame seed slice was levitated by the acoustic levitator (Fig. 4a). Then, 10 µL of ethanol composed of Au nanospheres was dropped onto the seed slice (Process I in Fig. 4a, b). The acoustic force helped peel off the pesticide molecules from the seed slice. As the solvent evaporated, the Au nanoparticles and pesticide molecules simultaneously assembled onto the seed surface (Process II in Fig. 4a, b). Tetramethylthiuram disulfide (TMTD) was selected as a model pesticide because of its wide usage all over the world. SERS signals of TMTD were observed from the sesame contaminated by TMTD at a concentration of 7.6 pg/cm2 without any pretreatment procedures using the DLE platform (Fig. 4c). Sensitive SERS detection of the TMTD ethanol solutions at a concentration as low as 100 pM was realized using the DLE platform (Fig. 4d). We further demonstrated the application of the DLE platform in the SERS detection of environmental pollutants and antibiotics. Decachlorobiphenyl 209 (PCB 209) is a polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) that can cause serious health issues even at extremely low concentrations53. It is difficult to levitate PCB 209-contamined sand grains with a diameter of <0.2 because of their small size, high density, and low power of our acoustic levitator. Therefore, we levitated an ethanol droplet composed of Au nanoparticles. Then, several sand grains were introduced into the ethanol droplet (Fig. 4e, f). After ethanol was evaporated, the SERS signals of PCB 209 were directly observed by measuring a single sand grain (Fig. 4g). Oxytetracycline (OTC) is a commonly used antibiotic. Similar to the detection process of PCB 209, OTC was also analyzed by direct SERS measurement of a sand grain contaminated by OTC using the DLE platform (Fig. 4g).
SERS detection of airborne analytes is challenging54,55. Complex procedures must be followed to capture the analytes spreading in air. We demonstrated efficient capture, enrichment, and SERS detection of airborne analytes using the DLE platform without any peripheral equipment (Fig. 4h, i). Considering that the MATT molecules preferred to dissolve in ethanol, a 10 µL ethanol droplet composed of Au nanoparticles was levitated to trap surrounding MATT molecules spreading in air (Fig. 4h). Once the MATT molecules diffused into the ethanol drop, they anchored onto the Au nanoparticle surface. MATT molecules were enriched and trapped between neighboring Au nanoparticles after ethanol evaporated using the DLE platform, realizing sensitive SERS detection of MATT molecules in air (Fig. 4i). The DLE platform could also be combined with the photoluminescence method to significantly strengthen its sensing capability (Supplementary Fig. 12).
In conclusion, the DLE platform conquers the limitation of the slippery solid surface-based analyte enrichment scenario, allowing us to efficiently concentrate and drive analyte molecules into a localized area in any volatile liquid, on solid objects, or in air. Combining the DLE platform with the SERS sensing technique, we realize multiphase and multiplex analysis at femtomolar levels. The LOD can be further improved simply by increasing the starting volume of the levitating droplet. The DLE platform is compatible with most microsensing techniques. We suggest that the detection performance of traditional analytical methods can be significantly improved by combining them with the DLE platform, potentially expanding their applicability in the fields of biomedicine, environmental science, food safety, and counterterrorism.
Methods
Chemicals
Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB, ≥99%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, ≥99%), polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP, molecular weight 55 kg mol−1), and hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC, 99%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4∙3H2O, 99%), crystal violet (CV, >95%), and rhodamine 6G (R6G, >95%) were obtained from Macklin Chemical. Reagent Co., Ltd. Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC, >95%) was obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. Ascorbic acid (AA, 99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Adenine (>99%) and adenosine (>99%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. 4-Methoxy-α-toluenethiol (MATT, 99%) was obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. All the reagents were used as received. Milli-Q water (>18.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C) was utilized in all experiments.
Preparation of Au nanospheres
Single-crystal Au nanospheres with different sizes were synthesized by a seed-mediated growth method56. The first step is fabrication of the CTAB-capped Au clusters. HAuCl4 (0.5 mM, 5 mL) and CTAB (200 mM, 5 mL) were ultrasonically and thoroughly mixed. Then, fresh NaBH4 (1 mM, 0.6 mL) aqueous solutions were rapidly added to the above mixture. The solution immediately turned brown. After magnetic stirring for 2 min, the solution was kept undisturbed at 27 °C for 3 h. CTAC (0.2 M, 6 mL), AA (0.1 M, 4.5 mL) and 150 μL of CTAB-capped Au cluster were mixed in a 30 mL glass vial. HAuCl4 solutions (0.5 mM, 6 mL) were then added to the vial by one-shot injection. The mixture was stirred at 27 °C for 15 min. The prepared Au seeds were collected by centrifugation at 28,600 × g for 20 min and washed with water one time. The Au seeds were dispersed in 3 mL of CTAC (0.02 M) for further growth. Aqueous solutions of CTAC (0.1 M, 40 mL), AA (0.01 M, 2.2 mL), and 200 μL of Au seeds was mixed in a conical flask. Then, HAuCl4 (0.5 mM, 40 mL) aqueous solutions were introduced to the flask by a syringe pump at an injection rate of 40 mL/h. The solution was kept at 27 °C for 10 min after the injection finished. The prepared Au nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation at 9500 × g for 15 min and washed with water one time.
Droplet levitating system
A single-axis acoustic levitator consisting of an acoustic emitter and a reflector was employed (SonaRh-1, Shengdu Ltd., China). The frequency of the acoustic emitter was 20.7 kHz. The operating power was 200 W. Two ceramic heating lamps (~100 W) were utilized to accelerate the droplet evaporation process.
During the droplet levitating process, the sound intensity was slightly controlled by adjusting the distance between the acoustic emitter and the reflector52. To levitate an ethanol droplet, we increased the reflector-emitter distance to decrease the sound intensity. Then, an ethanol droplet hanging on a pipette tip was exposed to the acoustic field. We slowly decreased the distance to pull the droplet to leave the pipette tip, obtaining the levitating ethanol droplet. The water droplet was unlikely to explode with suitable sound intensities, and the reflector-emitter distance remained unchanged during the water droplet loading process.
The levitation force per unit volume of an ellipsoid droplet is larger than that on a spherical droplet with the same volume. The aspect ratio of the axes of the levitating ellipsoid droplet should remain at ~2. If the ratio is larger than 2, the droplet tends to explode. If the ratio is smaller than 2, the droplet tends to escape from the acoustic field (drops down for large droplets and ejects for tiny droplets). The ellipsoid droplet gradually turns quasi-spherical during evaporation. Slightly reducing the distance between the acoustic emitter and the reflector by ~1 mm for our apparatus could squeeze the spherical droplet back to the ellipsoid shape. Air flows should be avoided for levitating very tiny droplets (e.g., <50 nL).
Preparation of slippery surfaces
The SLIPSs were prepared by pouring a perfluorinated fluid (DuPont Krytox GPL 102) into a porous Teflon membrane12. Briefly, a piece of Teflon membrane was attached to a piece of glass slide. Then, the perfluorinated fluid was sprayed onto the Teflon membrane. The polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) slippery surface was prepared via an acid-catalyzed polycondensation process of dimethyldimethoxysilane27. First, a piece of oxygen plasma-treated silicon substrate was immersed into a solution composed of isopropanol (10 g), dimethyldimethoxysilane (1 g), and sulfuric acid (0.1 g) for 10 s. Second, the silicon substrate was dried at room temperature (25 °C, 65% relative humidity) for 30 min before rinsing with isopropanol and water. The hydrophobic perfluorinated surface was fabricated by putting an oxygen plasma-treated silicon substrate and 20 μl of 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane in a petri dish for 12 h.
Characterization
The morphology of the aggregates was observed by a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi SU-8010). The shape of the Au nanospheres was characterized by a JEOL JEM-2010 transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV. UV–Vis absorption spectra of the Au nanosphere colloids were acquired on a UV-2006 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan).
SERS measurements
CV solutions with 10 pM Au nanospheres were obtained by mixing the Au nanosphere colloid and CV solutions. Ten microlitres of the mixture solution was levitated by the single-axis acoustic levitator. As the solvent evaporated, the concentration of the levitating droplet gradually increased. When the diameter of the droplet was less than ~150 μm, it started to rapidly oscillate. We transferred the droplet onto a piece of silicon wafer for SERS analysis.
SERS measurements were conducted on a Renishaw inVia confocal Raman microscope spectrometer equipped with a 633 nm laser. A 50× objective was used for all the SERS experiments. The laser power was ~0.09 mW. The integration time for CV molecules in ethanol solutions was 1 s. The integration time for other SERS measurements was 10 s, unless otherwise specified. SERS mapping measurements over the aggregates were performed at a step of 1 μm.
Evaluation of the SERS enhancement factor and LOD
Ten microlitres of 100 aM CV ethanol solution with Au nanospheres was enriched by an acoustic levitator. The intensity of the SERS peak at 1616 cm−1 was 3158 counts. Similarly, 10 μL of 1 mM CV ethanol solution without Au nanospheres was concentrated by an acoustic levitator. The intensity of the Raman peak at 1616 cm−1 was 569 counts. The SERS EF relying on the DLE platform was evaluated by the following equation:
where ISERS is the SERS intensity after enrichment of the 100 aM CV solutions with the Au nanospheres. Ibulk is the Raman intensity after enrichment of 1 mM CV solutions without Au nanospheres. Nads and Nbulk are the number of CV molecules exposed to the laser spot after enrichment of the 100 aM CV solutions with the Au nanospheres and after enrichment of the 1 mM CV solutions without Au nanospheres, respectively. The SERS EF of the DLE platform was estimated to be ~5.55 × 1013.
The LOD was estimated using Student’s t-distribution57:
where \({\bar{y}}_{b}\) is the average blank signal value; \({t}_{\alpha }^{n-1}\) is the critical value of the t-distribution; \({s}_{b}^{n-1}\) is the standard deviation; and n−1 is the degree of freedom, which is 9. Then, we transformed the SERS intensity to the analyte concentration using the relationship between the concentration of CV in ethanol and the SERS intensity of the 1616 cm−1 peak58:
Eventually, the calculated LOD is 7.05 aM.
FDTD simulations
FDTD simulations were performed using Ansys Lumerical software (Lumerical 2018a). We simulated the electromagnetic field distribution over the Au nanosphere aggregate with an inter-nanoparticle distance of 0.5 nm. The wavelength of the light was 633 nm. The simulation time was 1000 fs.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All experimental data within the article and its Supplementary Information are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Cecchini, M. P., Turek, V. A., Paget, J., Kornyshev, A. A. & Edel, J. B. Self-assembled nanoparticle arrays for multiphase trace analyte detection. Nat. Mater. 12, 165–171 (2013).
Crosby, D. et al. Early detection of cancer. Science 375, 1244 (2022).
Quijano-Rubio, A. et al. De novo design of modular and tunable protein biosensors. Nature 591, 482 (2021).
Cohen, J. D. et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science 359, 926 (2018).
de la Rica, R. & Stevens, M. M. Plasmonic ELISA for the ultrasensitive detection of disease biomarkers with the naked eye. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 821–824 (2012).
Gao, W. et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 529, 509 (2016).
Altug, H., Oh, S. H., Maier, S. A. & Homola, J. Advances and applications of nanophotonic biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 5–16 (2022).
Kelley, S. O. et al. Advancing the speed, sensitivity and accuracy of biomolecular detection using multi-length-scale engineering. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 969–980 (2014).
Howes, P. D., Chandrawati, R. & Stevens, M. M. Colloidal nanoparticles as advanced biological sensors. Science 346, 53 (2014).
Rezaee, M. et al. Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 1116, 1–9 (2006).
Kim, H. N., Ren, W. X., Kim, J. S. & Yoon, J. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for detection of lead, cadmium, and mercury ions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3210–3244 (2012).
Yang, S., Dai, X., Stogin, B. B. & Wong, T. S. Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection in common fluids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 268–273 (2016).
Golightly, R. S., Doering, W. E. & Natan, M. J. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and homeland security: A perfect match? Acs Nano 3, 2859–2869 (2009).
Lichtenstein, A. et al. Supersensitive fingerprinting of explosives by chemically modified nanosensors arrays. Nat. Commun. 5, 4195 (2014).
Puskar, L. et al. Raman acoustic levitation spectroscopy of red blood cells and Plasmodium falciparum trophozoites. Lab Chip 7, 1125–1131 (2007).
Kneipp, K. et al. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667–1670 (1997).
Moskovits, M. Surface-enhanced spectroscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 783–826 (1985).
Wang, X., Huang, S.-C., Hu, S., Yan, S. & Ren, B. Fundamental understanding and applications of plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 253–271 (2020).
Langer, J. et al. Present and future of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano 14, 28–117 (2020).
Lindquist, N. C., de Albuquerque, C. D. L., Sobral-Filho, R. G., Paci, I. & Brolo, A. G. High-speed imaging of surface-enhanced Raman scattering fluctuations from individual nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 981–987 (2019).
Lim, D. K., Jeon, K. S., Kim, H. M., Nam, J. M. & Suh, Y. D. Nanogap-engineerable Raman-active nanodumbbells for single-molecule detection. Nat. Mater. 9, 60–67 (2010).
Li, J. F. et al. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 464, 392–395 (2010).
Cardinal, M. F. et al. Expanding applications of SERS through versatile nanomaterials engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3886–3903 (2017).
Nie, S. M. & Emery, S. R. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 275, 1102–1106 (1997).
Kim, Y. J., Lee, G. R., Cho, E. N. & Jung, Y. S. Fabrication and applications of 3D nanoarchitectures for advanced electrocatalysts and sensors. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907500 (2020).
De Angelis, F. et al. Breaking the diffusion limit with super-hydrophobic delivery of molecules to plasmonic nanofocusing SERS structures. Nat. Photon 5, 682–687 (2011).
Ding, Q. et al. Quantitative and sensitive SERS platform with analyte enrichment and filtration function. Nano Lett. 20, 7304–7312 (2020).
Benz, F. et al. Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities”. Science 354, 726–729 (2016).
Zhou, B. et al. Amphiphilic functionalized acupuncture needle as SERS sensor for In situ multiphase detection. Anal. Chem. 90, 3826–3832 (2018).
Alvarez-Puebla, R. A. et al. Gold nanorods 3D-supercrystals as surface enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy substrates for the rapid detection of scrambled prions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8157–8161 (2011).
Shen, X., Ho, C. M. & Wong, T. S. Minimal size of coffee ring structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 5269–5274 (2010).
Chen, X. et al. Evaporation of droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces: surface roughness and small droplet size effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 024301 (2012).
Patra, P. P., Chikkaraddy, R., Tripathi, R. P. N., Dasgupta, A. & Kumar, G. V. P. Plasmofluidic single-molecule surface-enhanced Raman scattering from dynamic assembly of plasmonic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 5, 4357 (2014).
Bar, J. et al. Silicon microchannel-driven Raman scattering enhancement to improve gold nanorod functions as a SERS substrate toward single-molecule detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 36482–36491 (2021).
Zhang, L. et al. Ultra-rapid and highly efficient enrichment of organic pollutants via magnetic mesoporous nanosponge for ultrasensitive nanosensors. Nat. Commun. 12, 6849 (2021).
Brandt, E. H. Levitation in physics. Science 243, 349–355 (1989).
Brandt, E. H. Acoustic physics - suspended by sound. Nature 413, 474–475 (2001).
Marzo, A. & Drinkwater, B. W. Holographic acoustic tweezers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 84–89 (2019).
Foresti, D. & Poulikakos, D. Acoustophoretic contactless elevation, orbital transport and spinning of matter in air. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 024301 (2014).
Herlach, D. M., Cochrane, R. F., Egry, I., Fecht, H. J. & Greer, A. L. Containerless processing in the study of metallic melts and their solidification. Int. Mater. Rev. 38, 273–347 (1993).
Foresti, D., Nabavi, M., Klingauf, M., Ferrari, A. & Poulikakos, D. Acoustophoretic contactless transport and handling of matter in air. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12549–12554 (2013).
Marzo, A. et al. Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nat. Commun. 6, 8661 (2015).
Zang, D. Y. et al. Acoustic levitation of liquid drops: dynamics, manipulation and phase transitions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 243, 77–85 (2017).
Welter, E. & Neidhart, B. Acoustically levitated droplets—a new tool for micro and trace analysis. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 357, 345–350 (1997).
Santesson, S. & Nilsson, S. Airborne chemistry: acoustic levitation in chemical analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 378, 1704–1709 (2004).
Wood, B. R. et al. A portable Raman acoustic levitation spectroscopic system for the identification and environmental monitoring of algal cells. Anal. Chem. 77, 4955–4961 (2005).
Tuckermann, R., Puskar, L., Zavabeti, M., Sekine, R. & McNaughton, D. Chemical analysis of acoustically levitated drops by Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 394, 1433–1441 (2009).
Leopold, N. et al. On-line monitoring of airborne chemistry in levitated nanodroplets: In situ synthesis and application of SERS-active Ag-sols for trace analysis by FT-Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 75, 2166–2171 (2003).
Santesson, S. et al. Airborne chemistry coupled to Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 75, 2177–2180 (2003).
Brenn, G., Deviprasath, L. J., Durst, F. & Fink, C. Evaporation of acoustically levitated multi-component liquid droplets. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 50, 5073–5086 (2007).
Yarin, A. L., Pfaffenlehner, M. & Tropea, C. On the acoustic levitation of droplets. J. Fluid Mech. 356, 65–91 (1998).
Xie, W. J. & Wei, B. Dynamics of acoustically levitated disk samples. Phys. Rev. E 70, 046611 (2004).
Van den Berg, M. et al. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 106, 775–792 (1998).
Phan-Quang, G. C. et al. Plasmonic hotspots in air: an omnidirectional three-dimensional platform for stand-off in-air SERS sensing of airborne species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 5792–5796 (2018).
Phan-Quang, G. C. et al. Tracking airborne molecules from afar: three-dimensional metal-organic framework-surface-enhanced Raman scattering platform for stand-off and real-time atmospheric monitoring. ACS Nano 13, 12090–12099 (2019).
Zheng, Y., Zhong, X., Li, Z. & Xia, Y. Successive, seed-mediated growth for the synthesis of single-crystal gold nanospheres with uniform diameters controlled in the range of 5–150 nm. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 31, 266–273 (2014).
Massarini, E. et al. Methodologies for assessment of limit of detection and limit of identification using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 207, 437–446 (2015).
Isabel Lopez, M., Ruisanchez, I. & Pilar Callao, M. Figures of merit of a SERS method for Sudan I determination at traces levels. Spectrochim. Acta Part A-Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 111, 237–241 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR19E010001), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB0703803), the National Science Foundation of China (51971200 and 52273233), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (512200-X92103), and the Open Research Program of Key Laboratory of 3D Micro/Nano Fabrication and Characterization of Zhejiang Province, Westlake University. Part of the work was conducted in the ZJU micro-nanofabrication center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.Y. conceived the idea. S.Y. and J.R. directed the project. X.C. constructed the experimental setup. X.C. and Q.D. carried out the measurements, analyzed the data, and performed the simulations. C.B. provided testing assistance and analyzed the data. X.C. and S.Y. wrote the manuscript, and all authors participated in discussions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Bayden Wood and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Ding, Q., Bi, C. et al. Lossless enrichment of trace analytes in levitating droplets for multiphase and multiplex detection. Nat Commun 13, 7807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35495-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35495-9
This article is cited by
-
A digital twin approach for experimental acoustic hologram optimization
Communications Engineering (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.