Abstract
It is challenging to search for high Tc superconductivity (SC) in transition metal elements wherein d electrons are usually not favored by conventional BCS theory. Here we report experimental discovery of surprising SC up to 310 GPa with Tc above 20 K in wide pressure range from 108 GPa to 240 GPa in titanium. The maximum Tconset above 26.2 K and zero resistance Tczero of 21 K are record high values hitherto achieved among element superconductors. The Hc2(0) is estimated to be ∼32 Tesla with coherence length 32 Å. The results show strong s-d transfer and d band dominance, indicating correlation driven contributions to high Tc SC in dense titanium. This finding is in sharp contrast to the theoretical predications based on pristine electron-phonon coupling scenario. The study opens a fresh promising avenue for rational design and discovery of high Tc superconductors among simple materials via pressure tuned unconventional mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Titanium (Ti) metal has long attracted tremendous scientific interests because of its combined properties of light weight, high strength and corrosion resistance. As an advanced metallic structural material, Ti and its alloys find wide use in the fields of aerospace, biomedicine and at extreme conditions1,2,3. High pressure can modify crystal structures which, in turn, may lead to new functionalities. At ambient pressure and room temperature, Ti crystalizes in a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure (Ti-α phase)4. Under applied pressure, Ti undergoes structural transitions in the sequence of Ti-α, Ti-ω, Ti-γ, Ti-δ, and Ti-β phases, where Ti-ω phase is a hexagonal structure, Ti-γ and Ti-δ phases are orthorhombic and Ti-β phase is body-centered cubic5,6,7,8,9. The α-to-ω transition occurs around 8 GPa5,6, and the Ti-ω phase is stable up to about 100 GPa, then transforms into Ti-γ phase6,10, which further transforms into Ti-δ phase at ~140 GPa6, before cubic Ti-β phase stabilizes at 243 GPa9.
Superconductivity (SC) in high-pressure phases of Ti metal was previously reported to have a measured maximal critical temperature (Tc) of 3.5 K at 56 GPa11; early theoretical calculations based on the electron-phonon coupling mechanism predicate that the Tc for Ti metal is capped at about 5 K for all the known high-pressure phases12. Generally, compression of crystal lattice has markedly different effects on the 4s and 3d bands, prompting notable s-d electron transfer. The narrower d bands possess stronger correlation characters, while the s-d transfer tends to enhance electronic density of state (DOS) near the Fermi level in favor of SC13,14,15,16,17. Here, we report a surprising experimental observation of dramatic pressure enhanced SC in Ti over a wide pressure range with the maximal Tc above 26 K, setting a new record among element superconductors. Measured normal state conductivity results and analysis of electronic and superconducting properties indicate prominent influence of the s-d transfer and d-band driven correlation effects on the significantly enhanced and unusually high Tc SC in highly compressed Ti metal.
Results
High-pressure superconductivity at high pressure
The high-pressure resistance experiments have been carried out using diamond anvil cell apparatus. The sample assembly and the electrode configuration for four probe Van der Pauw method are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1a, b. The pressure is calibrated by the shift of the first-order Raman edge frequency from the diamond cutlet as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1c. Figure 1a shows the experimentally measured temperature dependence of electrical resistance at high pressure up to 180 GPa for Ti metal in Sample 1. The results show that Ti metal becomes superconductive with Tc above 2 K at 18 GPa and rises slightly to ~3.5 K at 54 GPa, which agrees with previously reported results11. The value of Tc increases at an enhanced pace from 54 to 99 GPa, then undergoes a steep rise from 10.2 K at 99 GPa to 20.3 K at 108 GPa, and Tc is further enhanced to 22 K at 180 GPa. For Sample 2, the pressure range was increased, with the highest pressure reaching 310 GPa that was calibrated by using the method described in ref. 18. The resistance curves at pressure are shown in Fig. 1b. With further increasing pressure the Tc reaches a maximum of 26 K at 248 GPa, as shown in Fig. 1c. The onset critical temperature (Tconset), the midpoint critical temperature (Tcmid) and the zero resistance critical temperature (Tczero) of superconducting transition are determined by the derivative of resistance with respect to temperature dR/dT as shown in Fig. 1c. It is noted that Tc stays almost constant over a wide pressure range up to at least 240 GPa, and such robust superconducting behaviors are consistently seen in different specimens (Supplementary Fig. 2). At 108 GPa where Tc jumps up, the resistance exhibits a two step superconducting transition behavior with the lower Tc of ~11 K that is comparable to the Tc value at 99 GPa, indicating a phase transition near 108 GPa, which is close to the pressure for the reported ω-γ phase transition6,10. In the Ti-ω phase, Tc rises smoothly with pressure below 56 GPa with a slope of 0.07 K/GPa; assuming this slope keeps unchanged, Tc should reach 8.7 K before the ω-γ phase transition (at 128 GPa)11. However, our results show that the slope dTc/dP increases significantly between 54 and 99 GPa, which leads to the much higher measured Tc at 99 GPa.
To further probe the pressure driven SC phase of Ti metal, we have examined the effect of magnetic field on the SC transition behavior. Figure 2a presents the electrical resistance measured at 248 GPa and at different magnetic fields. It is seen that the transition is gradually suppressed by the magnetic field. We plotted onset Tc versus magnetic field in Fig. 2b, from which the upper critical field at zero temperature μ0Hc2(0) can be estimated. The μ0Hc2(T) date were fitted to the Ginzburg Landau (GL) function,
which gives a value of μ0Hc2(0) = 32 T. At other pressures where Tc is above 20 K, the estimated upper critical field has been obtained to be near 30 T (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b), which is larger than that of the most commonly used low-temperature NbTi superconductor (μ0Hc2(T) = 15 T). Using the μ0Hc2(T) value of 32 T, the GL coherence length was calculated to be ξ = 32 Å via μ0Hc2(0)= Φ0/2πξ2, where Φ0 = 2.067 × 10−15 Web is the magnetic flux quantum.
Superconducting phase diagram
Figure 3a, b present the measured Hall resistance at room temperature and different pressures. The Hall resistance is negative and decreases linearly with magnetic field, indicating that the major carriers are electrons. The carrier density n as a function pressure estimated from the Hall resistance is presented in Fig. 3c, with a value of about 2.5 × 1022/cm3 that is little changed in the low-pressure range. Above 108 GPa, n increases dramatically and is enhanced by more than one order of magnitude to 3.1 × 1023/cm3 at 137 GPa. Further increasing pressure leads to reduced carrier density of 4.5 × 1022/cm3 at 144 GPa. The changes of the carrier density indicate phase transitions at pressures of about 108 and 144 GPa, respectively. To see more clearly these phase transitions, the pressure dependence of resistance R(P) at fixed temperature is plotted in Fig. 3d. The R(P) curve shows two peaks near the critical pressures, which corresponds to the ω–γ phase and γ–δ phase transitions reported by the authors in refs. 6, 10, respectively.
We have carried out the high-pressure X ray diffraction experiments, and the results are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a–d. Combining the phase transition reported by previous works and our transport experiments, we plot the superconducting versus structural phase diagram in Fig. 4. Up to 310 GPa, five different crystal structures, in the sequence of Ti-α, Ti-ω, Ti-γ, Ti-δ, and Ti-β are identified. The Ti-α phase (P = 0–9 GPa) hosts SC with Tc below 2 K; the Ti-ω phase (P = 9–108 GPa) sees a monotonously increasing Tc with pressure to 12 K at ~108 GPa; while in the high-pressure phases of Ti-γ (P = 108–144 GPa) and Ti-δ (P = 144–240 GPa), Tc stays above 20 K with the maximum Tc = 26 K occurring at the boundary of Ti-δ and Ti-β phases. It is remarkable that the Tc of compressed Ti metal stays robust above 20 K in a very wide range of pressures. This behavior is at odds with the expectation of conventional phonon-mediated superconducting theory, which predicts sensitive pressure dependence and descending Tc at very high pressures due to phonon stiffening. Interestingly, it is noted that the phenomenon of robust Tc values extended over a wide pressure range has been found in high-Tc cuprates wherein SC is driven by correlation effects19. This analogy indicates that mechanisms of novel many-body origin may be driving the unexpectedly SC in dense Ti metal at ultrahigh pressures.
Discussion
Among all elements, only a few have been reported to exhibit SC with Tc near 20 K at high pressures, including alkali metal Li20,21, alkali earth metal Ca15 and rare earth metals of Y16. The high Tc values of Li, which is the lightest element metal containing only simple 2s electrons, is attributed to the enhancement of the electron-phonon coupling due to the phonon modes softening under high pressure22; while the Tc enhancements in Ca and Y are mainly ascribed to pressure induced electron transfer from the s to d shell. The superconducting Ti at high pressure has the highest Tc among the elements in the period table.
The resistance of Ti as a function of temperature measured at 18 GPa (Supplementary Fig. 5) exhibits interesting scaling behavior. Upon fitting with the formula R = R0 + A*Tn, where R0 is the residual resistance, A is the coefficient of the power law, and n is the exponent, the resulting scaling exponent n = 3.1 is different from the value expected for systems dominated by either electron-phonon scattering (n = 5) or pure electron-electron scattering (n = 2). In fact, the n value near 3 implies that the s–d interband scattering dominates the electron transport with contributions from electron correlation effects, as observed in 1T-TiSe223 or Ta4Pd3Te1624. It reveals that at 18 GPa the energies between 4s and 3d shells are very near to each other and their electron configurations are mixed. Upon further applying pressure, the s band will move to higher energy as shown in the following calculations, promoting the s-d electron transfer, increasing the number of d electrons and inducing sequence of structural phase transitions. As a result, the Tc is greatly enhanced and a record Tc among the elements has been achieved. It seems that the Tc is closely related with the s-d electron transfer, which suggests the impact of the d electron correlation effects on the formation of Cooper pairs.
We have examined relative energetic stability of the high-pressure phases of Ti metal from first principles calculations, and the results are in generally consistent with the experimentally measured phase stability and transformation sequence. Adopting the determined crystal structures of the Ti metal phases, we have calculated their electronic, phonon and electron-phonon coupling properties, which are used as input to determine the SC critical temperature Tc. The obtained Tc data for the Ti-ω, Ti-γ, and Ti-δ phases (Supplementary Fig. 6) reveal the following trends: (i) Tc increases with rising pressure monotonically in the Ti-ω phase over its entire stability range; (ii) Tc is significantly enhanced upon the phase transition into the Ti-γ phase over the relatively narrow pressure range where this transition occurs; (iii) Tc undergoes an even larger jump when the structure enters the Ti-δ phase. These findings are in overall agreement with the experimental results up to about 160 GPa, but large discrepancies exist at higher pressures where the record-setting Tc is observed.
The experimentally observed superconducting properties of the densely compressed Ti metal indicate clear inadequacy of the conventional phonon-mediated SC mechanism for describing the unexpectedly high values of Tc and anomalously robust superconducting state over a very wide pressure range. The electron-electron correlation effects associated with the d bands in Ti are expected to have a strong influence on transport and superconducting properties. Calculated electronic band structure of Ti-ω phase at 20 GPa (Fig. 5a) shows significant overlap of the s and d electron states near the Fermi level, which corroborates our measured normal state resistivity results (Supplementary Fig. 5) indicating strong s-d scattering contribution to the resistivity24,25. At higher pressure of 100 GPa, the band structure of Ti-γ phase (Fig. 5b) shows that the s states move up in energy while still have large overlap with the d bands, which is conducive to significant s-d scattering. At further increased pressure of 180 GPa, the electronic states in Ti-δ phase (Fig. 5c) near the Fermi level are dominated by the d electron states. There are flat d bands below the Fermi level that can host significant correlation effects. These d bands will likely rise much closer to the Fermi level due to the electron-electron interactions when properly treated by many-body theory. Such correlation effects could greatly enhance the d band derived electronic DOS at the Fermi level favorable for increasing Tc and also drive additional non-phonon-mediated mechanisms for further strengthening the superconducting state with higher Tc and maintaining its robust presence over a wide pressure range. This study raises intriguing possibility of major impact by many-body effects on SC in dense Ti, which needs in-depth study by sophisticated many-body theoretical treatments to explore pertinent novel processes and underlying mechanisms.
The present study unveils unexpectedly high Tc SC in compressed Ti metal with record-setting among elemental superconductors. The Tc and μ0Hc2 values of Ti are notably higher than those of the widely used superconducting NbTi alloy. Our discovery raises the possibility of finding more materials via pressure driven correlation effects stemming from the contributions of d electrons, leading to SC with much higher Tc than previously believed achievable, and such materials may be stabilized at lower pressures via mechanical strain or chemical pressure. This intriguing scenario calls for further research into the impact on SC by the s–d interaction and d electron dominated correlation effects in highly compressed d band metals for evaluation of diverse materials, from elemental solids to alloys, in search of hitherto unknown and unexplored superconducting materials that could improve fundamental understanding of broader varieties of superconductors. Equally important, the present findings open new avenues for expanding the scope of superconductors with notably enhanced Tc and μ0Hc2 that are more adaptive and suitable for applications in diverse and demanding implementation environments. We became aware during writing the paper (arXiv:2112.12396) that an independent work by Liu et al. was carried out where maximum Tc 23.6K was observed at 145 GPa within experimental pressure up to 183 GPa.25.
Methods
High-pressure measurements
The electrical resistance and Hall Effect measurements were performed using the four probe Van der Pauw method for tiny specimen as described in Supplementary Methods. The pressures are calibrated via the shift of the first order Raman edge frequency from the diamond cutlet as shown in Supplementary Fig. 118. The applied current is 100 μA. Diamond anvil cells were used to produce high pressures. A variant of anvils with beveled culet size of 20/140/300 μm, 30/140/300 μm or 50/140 300 μm are adopted in the experiments. A plate of T301 stainless steel that is covered with mixture of cBN powder and epoxy as insulate layer was used as the gasket. A hole of approximately 15–30 μm in diameter depending on top culet size was drilled in the center of the gasket to serve as high-pressure chamber. The hBN powder was generally used as pressure transmitting medium that filled in the high-pressure chamber. We used the ATHENA procedure to produce the specimen assembly26. Four Pt foils with thickness approximately 0.5 μm as the inner electrode were deposited on the culet surface. Cross shaped Ti specimens with side lengths ~10 μm × 10 μm and thickness of 1 μm were stacked on the electrodes. Pressure was calibrated by the shift of the first order Raman edge frequency from the diamond cutlet18. Diamond anvil cells were put into a MagLab system that provides synergetic extreme environments with temperatures from 300 to 1.5 K and magnetic fields up to 9 T for the transport measurements26,27,28,29.
High-pressure synchrotron X-ray experiments
In situ high-pressure angle-dispersive X-ray diffraction data were collected at room temperature at GSECARS of Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory. The X-ray with the wavelength λ = 0.3344 Å was focused down to a spot of ~3 μm in diameter on the sample. A symmetric diamond anvil cell with beveled anvil (50/300 μm) was used. Rhenium steel gasket was pre-pressed to a thickness of 20 μm, and a hole of diameter of 15 μm was drilled at the center to serve as sample chamber, which was then filled with Ti power mixed with Pt. Pressure was calibrated using the equitation of state of both Re and Pt. The X-ray diffraction images are converted to two dimensional diffraction data with Dioptas30.
First-principle theoretical calculation
To assess structural, electronic, and phonon-mediated superconducting properties of Ti metal under pressure, we employed the latest computational techniques to determine the total energy, lattice dynamics and electron-phonon coupling using the QUANTUM ESPRESSO code31, with improved description over previously reported results12. Superconducting critical temperature Tc has been evaluated based on the Eliashberg theory of SC32,33, using the following formula that McMillan derived34 and later modified by Allen and Dynes35,
where ωlog is a logarithmically averaged characteristic phonon frequency, and μ* is the Coulomb pseudopotential, which describes the effective electron–electron repulsion36. This equation is generally accurate for materials with EPC parameter λ at 1.5 or less 37,38, which is satisfied in the present study. The Coulomb pseudopotential μ* is often treated as an adjustable parameter with values within a narrow range around 0.1 for most materials, making this formulism highly robust36,37,38,39, and compares well with the latest ab initio Eliashberg theory. In this work, the commonly used value of μ* = 0.13 is adopted for all the reported calculations. Such pseudopotential calculations have been employed to study structural stability and transformation of Ti compressed up to at least 200 GPa, and the results are in good agreement with those from full potential calculations and provide a good description of the experimental data4. We also calculated electronic band structures to assess the evolution of the s and d bands under pressure.
Data availability
All the data generated in the study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
References
Kear, B. H. & Thompson, E. R. Aircraft gas-turbine materials and processes. Science 208, 847–856 (1980).
Boyer, R. R. An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 213, 103–114 (1996).
Coon, M. E. et al. Nitinol thin films functionalized with CAR-T cells for the treatment of solid tumours. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 195–206 (2020).
Dewaele, A. et al. High pressure-temperature phase diagram and equation of state of titanium. Phys. Rev. B 91, 134108 (2015).
Xia, H. et al. Crystal-structures of group-IVa metals at ultrahigh pressures. Phys. Rev. B 42, 6736–6738 (1990).
Akahama, Y., Kawamura, H. & Le Bihan, T. New delta (distorted-bcc) titanium to 220 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 275503 (2001).
Akahama, Y., Kawamura, H. & Le Bihan, T. A new distorted body-centred cubic phase of titanium (delta-Ti) at pressures up to 220 GPa. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 10583–10588 (2002).
Kutepov, A. L. & Kutepova, S. G. Crystal structures of Ti under high pressure: theory. Phys. Rev. B 67, 132102 (2003).
Akahama, Y., Kawaguchi, S., Hirao, N. & Ohishi, Y. Observation of high-pressure bcc phase of titanium at 243GPa. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 035901 (2020).
Vohra, Y. K. & Spencer, P. T. Novel gamma-phase of titanium metal at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3068–3071 (2001).
Bashkin, I. O., Tissen, V. G., Nefedova, M. V. & Ponyatovsky, E. G. Superconducting temperature of the omega-phase in Ti, Zr and Hf metals at high pressures. Phys. C. Supercond. Appl. 453, 12–14 (2007).
Iyakutti, K., Louis, C. N., Anuratha, S. & Mahalakshmi, S. Pressure-induced electronic phase transitions and superconductivity in titanium. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23, 723–741 (2009).
Ahuja, R., Wills, J. M., Johansson, B. & Eriksson, O. Crystal-structures of Ti, Zr, and Hf under compression - theory. Phys. Rev. B 48, 16269–16279 (1993).
Skriver, H. L. Crystal-structure from one-electron theory. Phys. Rev. B 31, 1909–1923 (1985).
Yabuuchi, T., Matsuoka, T., Nakamoto, Y. & Shimizu, K. Superconductivity of Ca exceeding 25 K at megabar pressures. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 083703 (2006).
Hamlin, J. J., Tissen, V. G. & Schilling, J. S. Superconductivity at 20 K in yttrium metal at pressures exceeding 1 Mbar. Phys. C. Supercond. Appl. 451, 82–85 (2007).
Ishizuka, M., Iketani, M. & Endo, S. Pressure effect on superconductivity of vanadium at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. B 61, R3823–R3825 (2000).
Akahama, Y. & Kawamura, H. Pressure calibration of diamond anvil Raman gauge to 310 GPa. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 043516 (2006).
Chu, C. W. et al. Superconductivity above 150 K in HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+Delta at high-pressures. Nature 365, 323–325 (1993).
Struzhkin, V. V. et al. Superconductivity in dense lithium. Science 298, 1213–1215 (2002).
Shimizu, K. et al. Superconductivity in compressed lithium at 20 K. Nature 419, 597–599 (2002).
Kasinathan, D. et al. Superconductivity and lattice instability in compressed lithium from fermi surface hot spots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 047004 (2006).
Kusmartseva, A. F. et al. Pressure induced superconductivity in pristine 1T-TiSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 236401 (2009).
Pan, J. et al. Nodal superconductivity and superconducting dome in the layered superconductor Ta4Pd3Te16. Phys. Rev. B 92, 180505 (2015).
Liu, X. et al. Tc up to 23.6 K and robust superconductivity in the transition metal δ−Ti phase at megabar pressure. Phys. Rev. B 105, 224511 (2022).
Jia, Y. T. et al. A combinatory package for diamond anvil cell experiments. Crystals 10, 1116 (2020).
Zhang, J. L. et al. Pressure-induced superconductivity in topological parent compound Bi2Te3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 24–28 (2011).
Li, Z. et al. Superconductivity above 200 K discovered in superhydrides of calcium. Nat. Commun. 13, 2863 (2022).
Zhang, C. L. et al. Superconductivity in zirconium polyhydrides with Tc above 70K. Sci. Bull. 67, 907 (2022).
Prescher, C. & Prakapenka, V. B. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High. Press. Res. 35, 223–230 (2015).
Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
Eliashberg, G. M. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys. Jetp 11, 696–702 (1960).
Scalapino, D. J., Schrieffer, J. R. & Wilkins, J. W. Strong-coupling superconductivity. I. Phys. Rev. 148, 263–279 (1966).
Mcmillan, W. L. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors. Phys. Rev. 167, 331–344 (1968).
Allen, P. B. & Dynes, R. C. Transition-temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 12, 905–922 (1975).
Morel, P. & Anderson, P. W. Calculation of superconducting state parameters with retarded electron-phonon interaction. Phys. Rev. 125, 1263–1271 (1962).
Carbotte, J. P. Properties of Boson-exchange superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 1027–1157 (1990).
Carbotte, J. P. & Marsiglio, F. Electron-Phonon Superconductivity (Springer-Verlag, 2003).
Sanna, A. et al. Ab initio Eliashberg theory: making genuine predictions of superconducting features. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 041012 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The work is supported by NSF & MOST of China through the research projects (2018YFA0305700; 11921004; 11820101003). Portions of this work were performed at GeoSoilEnviroCARS (The University of Chicago, Sector 13), Advanced Photon Source (APS), and Argonne National Laboratory. GeoSoilEnviroCARS is supported by the National Science Foundation–Earth Sciences (EAR–1634415) and Department of Energy-GeoSciences (DE-FG02-94ER14466). The research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We are grateful to Professor L. Yu, Professor J. G. Cheng, and Professor J. P. Hu for the discussions. We thank Professor T. Xiang, Professor B.G. Shen, and Professor Z.X. Zhao for the comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Research design and supervision: C.J.; high-pressure synthesis and in situ resistance measurements: C.Z., X.H., Z.L., K.L., S.Z., S.F., X.W., Y.L., R.Y., Y.P., C.J.; in situ synchrotron experiments: L.W., V.P., S.C., H.L.; first principle calculations: C.L., Q.L., C.C.; manuscript writing: C.Z., X.W., C.J. and C.C. All authors contributed to the discussions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Artem Oganov and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, C., He, X., Liu, C. et al. Record high Tc element superconductivity achieved in titanium. Nat Commun 13, 5411 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33077-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33077-3
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.