Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15658-2, published online 14 April 2020.

In the original version of the Article, there were typographical errors in the Abstract and Discussion sections.

In the original Abstract, the gene ‘NidaYABB5’ was missing a Y and should have been NidaYABBY5.

In the first paragraph of the Discussion, the sentence ‘Specifically, being protrusive, colorful, and reflective make pseudonectaries…’ should have read: ‘Specifically, being protrusive, colorful, and reflective makes pseudonectaries…’.

In the fourth paragraph of the Discussion, the sentence ‘Genes involved in nectar development, such as orthologs STY1/2 and LRP…’ should have read: ‘Genes involved in nectary development, such as orthologs of STY1/2 and LRP…’.

In the fourth paragraph of the Discussion, the sentence ‘…ectopic expression of NidaYAB5 can explain the reason why pseudonectaries was formed in the adaxial side of the lower lip of the petal’ should have read: ‘…ectopic expression of NidaYAB5 can explain the reason why pseudonectaries were formed in the adaxial side of the lower lip of the petal’.

This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.