Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Corneal stress‒strain index in relation to retinal nerve fibre layer thickness among healthy young adults

Eye volume 38, pages 1654–1659 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives

To determine the relationship between corneal stress-strain index (SSI) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness.

Subjects/Methods

1645 healthy university students from a university-based study contributed to the analysis. The RNFL thickness was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT), axial length (AL) was measured by IOL Master, and corneal biomechanics including SSI, biomechanical corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured by Corvis ST. Multivariate linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between the SSI and RNFL thickness after adjusting for potential covariates.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 19.0\(\pm \)0.9 years, and 1132 (68.8%) were women. Lower SSI was significantly associated with thinner RNFL thickness (\(\beta \)=8.601, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.999–14.203, \(P\) = 0.003) after adjusting for age, CCT, bIOP, and AL. No significant association between SSI and RNFL was found in men, while the association was significant in women in the fully adjusted model. The association was significant in the nonhigh myopic group (\(P\) for trend = 0.021) but not in the highly myopic group. Eyes with greater bIOP and lower SSI had significantly thinner RNFL thickness.

Conclusions

Eyes with lower SSI had thinner RNFL thickness after adjusting for potential covariates, especially those with higher bIOP. Our findings add novel evidence of the relationship between corneal biomechanics and retinal ganglion cell damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The distribution of SSI.
Fig. 2: The β coefficient of multivariate linear regression for the association between SSI and RNFL thickness.
Fig. 3: Three-dimensional bar charts showing the mean RNFL thickness stratified according to bIOP and SSI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311:1901–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Miki A, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Jain S, He F, Sharpsten L, et al. Rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma suspect eyes. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1350–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee M-W, Kim J-m, Shin Y-I, Jo Y-J, Kim J-Y. Longitudinal changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:522–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Du J, Du Y, Xue Y, Wang H, Li Y. Factors associated with changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in healthy myopic eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3462004.

  5. Ruberti JW, Sinha Roy A, Roberts CJ. Corneal biomechanics and biomaterials. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;13:269–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bao F, Geraghty B, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Consideration of corneal biomechanics in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: is it important? Eye Vis (Lond). 2016; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0048-4.

  7. Dackowski EK, Lopath PD, Chuck RS. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative assessment of corneal biomechanics in refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31:234–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang W, Du S, Zhang X. Corneal deformation response in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and in healthy subjects analyzed by Corvis ST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:5557–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JH, Jun RM, Choi K-R. Significance of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with progressive normal-tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:746–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bueno-Gimeno I, Gene-Sampedro A, Piñero-Llorens DP, Lanzagorta-Aresti A, España-Gregori E. Corneal biomechanics, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic disc in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1474–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khawaja AP, Chan MP, Broadway DC, Garway-Heath DF, Luben R, Yip JL, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma-related quantitative traits in the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:117–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang C, Tatham AJ, Abe RY, Diniz-Filho A, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Corneal hysteresis and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;166:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Qassim A, Mullany S, Abedi F, Marshall H, Hassall MM, Kolovos A, et al. Corneal stiffness parameters are predictive of structural and functional progression in glaucoma suspect eyes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:993–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, Fong A, Kotecha A, Sim EL, et al. Corneal biomechanics, thickness and optic disc morphology in children with optic disc tilt. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1461–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mansouri K, Leite MT, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma severity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:419–27.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang PY, Chang SW. Corneal biomechanics, optic disc morphology, and macular ganglion cell complex in myopia. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu Y, Ye Y, Chen Z, Xu J, Yang Y, Fan Y, et al. Corneal stiffness and modulus of normal-tension glaucoma in Chinese. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;242:131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, Lopes BT, Abass A, Vinciguerra P, et al. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00105.

  19. Dong XX, Liang G, Li DL, Liu MX, Yin ZJ, Li YZ, et al. Association between parental control and depressive symptoms among college freshmen in China: The chain mediating role of chronotype and sleep quality. J Affect Disord. 2022;317:256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu MX, Li DL, Yin ZJ, Li YZ, Zheng YJ, Qin Y, et al. Smoking, alcohol consumption and corneal biomechanical parameters among Chinese university students. Eye (Lond). 2023;37:2723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrósio R Jr., Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refractive Surg. 2017;43:1495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts CJ. Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refractive Surg. 2014;40:862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66:134–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Safa BN, Wong CA, Ha J, Ethier CR. Glaucoma and biomechanics. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2022;33:80–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Downs JC, Girkin CA. Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28:113–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McBrien NA, Gentle A. Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:307–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Metzler KM, Mahmoud AM, Liu J, Roberts CJ. Deformation response of paired donor corneas to an air puff: intact whole globe versus mounted corneoscleral rim. J cataract Refractive Surg. 2014;40:888–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen BA, Reilly MA, Roberts CJ. Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2019.107904.

  29. Bochmann F, Ang GS, Azuara-Blanco A. Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON). Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol = Albrecht von Graefes Arch fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2008;246:735–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong BJ, Moghimi S, Zangwill LM, Christopher M, Belghith A, Ekici E, et al. Relationship of corneal hysteresis and anterior lamina cribrosa displacement in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;212:134–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu W, Dou R, Wang Y. Comparison of corneal biomechanics between low and high myopic eyes-a meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:419–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Azimi A, Fakhimi Z, Ziaei M, Danesh Z, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in varying severities of Myopia. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.595330.

  33. Jonas JB, Ohno-Matsui K, Panda-Jonas S. Myopia: anatomic changes and consequences for its etiology. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila, Pa). 2019;8:355–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kang BS, Wang LK, Zheng YP, Guggenheim JA, Stell WK, Kee CS. High myopia induced by form deprivation is associated with altered corneal biomechanical properties in chicks. PLoS One. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207189.

  35. Liu G, Rong H, Zhang P, Xue Y, Du B, Wang B, et al. The effect of axial length elongation on corneal biomechanical property. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.777239.

  36. Chu Z, Ren Q, Chen M, Cheng L, Cheng H, Cui W, et al. The relationship between axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio and stress-strain index in myopic eyeballs: Using Corvis ST tonometry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.939129.

Download references

Funding

Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82122059 and No. 82160204) and Nankai University Eye Institute (NKYKD202206).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

    Min-Xin Liu, Dan-Lin Li & Chen-Wei Pan

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, China

    Zhi-Jian Yin

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China

    Yue-Zu Li, Ya-Jie Zheng, Yu Qin, Rong Ma & Gang Liang

  4. Department of Ophthalmology, the Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China

    Yue-Zu Li, Ya-Jie Zheng, Yu Qin, Rong Ma & Gang Liang

Authors
  1. Min-Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan-Lin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi-Jian Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue-Zu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ya-Jie Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gang Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chen-Wei Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study conception and design: CWP, GL. Data collection: MXL, DLL, ZJY, YZL, YJZ, YQ, RM. Data analysis and interpretation: MXL, DLL, YZL; Paper writing: MXL, CWP. Final approval of paper: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gang Liang or Chen-Wei Pan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, MX., Li, DL., Yin, ZJ. et al. Corneal stress‒strain index in relation to retinal nerve fibre layer thickness among healthy young adults. Eye 38, 1654–1659 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links