Abstract
Pressure engineering in semiconductors leads to a variety of novel physical phenomena and has recently received considerable attention. Here, we report on pressure-induced superconductivity in III–V gallium phosphide (GaP), a commercially important semiconductor that exhibits excellent optical performance. We show that the emergence of superconductivity is accompanied by the concurrence of piezochromic transition and metallization and can be correlated to a structural transition from the cubic to orthorhombic phase. In line with the structural origin of superconductivity, the critical temperature Tc monotonically decreases with increasing pressure up to ~50 GPa. Moreover, the superconductivity could be preserved toward ambient pressure because of the irreversibility of the structural transition. Nevertheless, the superconducting transition displays evident broadening associated with the presence of amorphization in the depressurized sample. The synchronous evolution of the structural and electronic properties not only shows a vivid structure-property relationship but also could facilitate the exploration of novel functionalities by means of pressure treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As a highly representative III–V compound semiconductor, gallium phosphide (GaP) has attracted immense interest, which crystalizes in either zincblende or wurtzite structures at ambient pressure1,2. Zincblende GaP possesses extensive practical applications in the fields of light-emitting diodes, near-infrared optics, photonic crystals, and photocatalysis owing to its noncentrosymmetric crystal structure, large second-order nonlinearity, nonzero piezoelectric coefficient and high refractive index across the visible and near-infrared regime3,4,5,6,7. Nanostructured counterparts with various morphologies also display fascinating properties and have become promising materials for efficient second harmonic generation, ultrafast all-optical modulators, and integrated nonlinear photonics waveguides8,9,10,11. Moreover, nanostructured GaP can be further fabricated and applied in metasurface-based nanophotonics12,13,14,15. In contrast to the zincblende structure, which has an indirect bandgap of 2.26 eV, hexagonal wurtzite-type GaP nanowires host a direct bandgap and can be used as green light emitter candidates1,16.
Pressure, as a thermodynamic variable, is an effective and powerful way to modulate the crystal lattice as well as electronic states, thereby documenting the structure-property relationship of materials17,18,19,20. Recently, pressure-tuned crystal structure and physical properties have been reported among various layered optoelectronic and photovoltaic semiconductors, such as MoS2, ReS2, and SnSe21,22,23,24. Due to the excellent optical functionalities of three-dimensional GaP semiconductors with wide bandgaps mentioned above, their structural and electronic properties under pressure have been thoroughly studied in the past decades. It is now widely accepted that GaP undergoes a cubic-to-orthorhombic transition (F-43m to Cmcm) at a pressure slightly above 20 GPa, concomitant with the simultaneous appearance of metallization25,26,27,28. Moreover, the decompressed sample is mainly amorphous, indicating the irreversibility of the structural transition28,29,30. Compared with the systematic investigation of structural evolution under pressure, the study of electrical transport is limited28,31,32. Apart from some electrical transport studies conducted above the liquid nitrogen temperature, the low-temperature electrical properties of GaP under pressure are yet unexplored to date.
Here, we investigated the structure-property relationship of bulk GaP crystals by combining optical micrographic, Raman spectroscopic, and electrical transport measurements under high pressure. We show that the cubic-orthorhombic phase transition not only leads to the occurrence of piezochromic transition and metallization but also gives rise to the emergence of superconductivity. In accordance with the irreversible structural transition, the evolution of electronic properties is also irreversible. The superconductivity can be retained toward ambient pressure and displays broadening features due to the presence of amorphization.
Materials and methods
Synthesis and characterization of GaP at ambient pressure
GaP single crystals were synthesized by the Czochralski method33. Room-temperature X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of single crystals were obtained with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) using a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer (Miniflex-600). The atomic proportion of the crystal was confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS, Helios Nanolab 600i, FEI) via area-scanning mode.
Raman spectra, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and ac magnetic susceptibility measurements under high pressure
High-pressure experimental details were similar to those in ref. 34. The culet of the diamond was 300 μm. Raman spectra were recorded on bulk crystal GaP surfaces by using a Renishaw spectrometer with a pseudo backscattering configuration (λ = 532 nm). The laser power was kept below 2.5 mW to avoid sample damage and heating effects. The back-scattered signal was collected in an unpolarized geometry through a 20× objective and 1800 g/mm grating. A powder angle-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiment was carried out using the beamline BL15U1 at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (λ = 0.6199 Å). Silicone oil was used as the pressure-transmitting medium (PTM). The ac magnetic susceptibility was measured using a magnetic inductance technique as reported previously35. The excitation current was 1 mA with a frequency of 1997 Hz. Systematic transport measurements with PTM NaCl were further performed in a four-probe configuration. The applied magnetic field was perpendicular to the surface of the flake. The pressure values for all of the above experiments were determined via the ruby fluorescence method at room temperature36.
Results and discussion
The structural and physical properties of the GaP single crystal at ambient pressure were characterized via XRD, EDS, and Raman spectroscopic measurements, as shown in Fig. S1. Bulk GaP has a cubic structure (space group F-43m) and contains two atoms in a primitive cell. The as-grown GaP single crystal was yellowish, and its surface was oriented along (h00). The EDS measurement yielded a composition of GaP0.97. Two Raman peaks were observed at 367 and 405 cm−1 from the room-temperature Raman spectrum in the range of 300–500 cm−1, which could be assigned to the transverse optical (TO) and longitudinal optical (LO) modes, respectively37. All results indicate the good quality of our samples.
We first investigated the effect of pressure on the optical properties of GaP crystals at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 1a, the optical micrographs recorded at various pressures indicate that GaP changes from transparent yellowish to opaque black with increasing pressure above 22.0 GPa and remains opaque black upon further decompression from 31.1 to 0.4 GPa. This color change at approximately 22.0 GPa demonstrates a piezochromic transition with irreversibility after a compression-decompression cycle. This phenomenon is strongly correlated with the structural phase transition25,26,38. The relatively small color change of GaP below 22.0 GPa is compatible with the pressure variation of Eg of −14.9 meV GPa−1 extracted from the early high-pressure transmission experiments39. At 17 GPa, the indirect bandgap of ~2.0 eV is equal to 620 nm in the orange region (590 to 625 nm) according to the formula Eg = 1240/λ (eV)39.
To further investigate the pressure evolution of the lattice vibrational property of the GaP crystal, we performed Raman spectroscopic measurements at room temperature. Figure 1b displays the representative Raman spectra of GaP under high pressure. At 0.5 GPa, there exists two Raman modes, TO and LO, which are similar to those at ambient pressure (see Fig. S1d). With increasing pressure, both the TO and LO modes are continuously shifted toward higher wavenumbers and show a progressive reduction in intensity. Then, these two modes disappear above 25.1 GPa, where the Raman spectrum remains featureless under decompression from 49.6 to 0.6 GPa. Moreover, the high-pressure X-ray diffraction experiment shows a cubic-to-orthorhombic transition at 27.1 GPa and mainly amorphous features upon decompression to 0.2 GPa, indicating the irreversibility of the structural transition, as shown in Fig. 1d. This is consistent with the early experimental literatures25,26,27. The extracted lattice parameters and volume as a function of pressure are shown in Fig. S2. Therefore, the disappearance of Raman modes upon compression could be related to the structural phase transition. Additionally, the preservation of featureless Raman could be due to the presence of amorphization in the depressurized sample28,30. Fig. 1c shows the pressure-dependent Raman modes. For the TO and LO modes, the slopes extracted by linear fitting are 3.3 and 2.9 cm−1 GPa−1, respectively.
To explore the conductivity change of the sample, we performed a high-pressure transport experiment. Figure 2a shows representative temperature-dependent resistance R(T) curves. Due to the upper limit of the experimental setup (<107 Ω), the room-temperature resistance of the sample could only be detected with a gradual approach to 18.2 GPa. Clearly, at 18.2 GPa, GaP displays metallic behavior over the entire temperature range. The appearance of metallization is accompanied by a resistance decrease of several orders of magnitude, similar to the results of refs. 31,32. Metallic conductivity and zero resistance are simultaneously observed, signaling the concurrence of metallization and the superconducting transition in pressurized GaP. Further high-pressure ac magnetic susceptibility measurements show the Meissner effect above 20 GPa, indicating the bulk nature of superconductivity (see Fig. 2e). The zero-resistance state retains under compression to 49.7 GPa, as shown in Fig. 2b. The critical magnetic field of superconducting GaP is measured by varying the external magnetic field at 18.2 and 46.1 GPa. The superconducting transition is gradually shifted toward lower temperatures and is nearly suppressed above 2.0 T (see Fig. 2c, d). The temperature-magnetic field phase diagram is plotted in Fig. 2e. By fitting the data to the GL model, the upper critical field μ0Hc(0) is 2.9 and 2.15 T at 18.2 and 46.1 GPa, respectively. These are much lower than the corresponding Pauli limiting field of μ0HP(0) = 1.84Tc40.
Based on the irreversibility of the structural phase transition and the presence of amorphization in the depressurized GaP, we further investigated the electrical transport behavior when the pressure was gradually released from 49.7 GPa, as shown in Fig. 3. GaP does not recover to its original insulating state with decreasing pressure to 2.1 GPa. The superconducting transition width appears to be inert to pressures above 6.5 GPa but becomes much larger at 6.5 GPa, as reflected by the tail in the R(T) curve before reaching the zero-resistance state. Since the two probes were suddenly broken at 2.1 GPa, we did not observe zero resistance upon cooling to 2 K. Nevertheless, the metallic conductivity is maintained at this pressure, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3c. We measured the critical magnetic field of superconducting GaP at 20.5 GPa. The upper critical field μ0Hc(0) is 2.68 T, which is comparable to that of 18.2 GPa under compression (Fig. 2c). This result demonstrates that the superconductivity is preserved toward ambient pressure, indicating the irreversibility of the electrical transport properties after a compression-decompression cycle. According to the XRD results and early literature30, this result also indicates the presence of superconductivity embedded in the amorphous phase.
Based on these transport results and the pressure evolution of the crystal structure28,30, we constructed a comprehensive phase diagram to elucidate the structure-property relationship in pressurized cubic GaP, as depicted in Fig. 4. This clearly demonstrates the structural origin of the unusual evolution of electrical properties. First, since the structural phase transition from the LP to HP phase leads to a unit-cell volume contraction of ~15.5% at a critical pressure Pc of ~18 GPa17, such a large volume variation can account for the immediate appearance of both metallization and superconductivity. Simultaneously, a piezochromic transition and featureless Raman spectra were observed around the structural phase transition. Note that the discrepancy in the critical transition pressure in the different experiments could be attributed to the pressure distribution due to the difference in the pressure medium41. Although the HP orthorhombic structure with the D2h point group could host Raman-active modes according to the group theoretical analysis, no Raman mode was observed in the high-pressure phase due to the metallic conductivity42. Second, a decrease in Tc with increasing pressure in the HP phase, namely, a negative pressure effect on the superconductivity, could be easily accounted for within Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) theory, which is based on an electron-phonon pairing interaction43,44. We further calculated the electronic band structures and density of states (DOSs) at the Fermi level of the HP phase, as shown in Fig. S3. Notably, the overall band evolution remains relatively stable, while the DOS peak value decreases within the range of 0.25 eV. Thus, the decreased DOS along with lattice stiffening could be responsible for the observed decrease in Tc with increasing pressure in HP superconducting GaP within BCS theory. For the amorphous phase developed during the decompression process, however, the Tc evolution versus pressure shows a positive pressure effect. Considering the formation of a mainly amorphous structure during decompression, this is likely correlated with the metastable amorphous structure with disorder. Third, the irreversibility of the structural transition after a compression-decompression cycle is consistently reflected by the preserved metallic conductivity and the unrecovered Raman modes. Lastly, although the GaP decompressed from 49.7 GPa is reminiscent of as-grown amorphous GaP45, the decompressed amorphous GaP exhibited metallic conductivity, as shown in Fig. 3c. This result indicates that different amorphous states of GaP with fine local structure features could host different physical properties in nature. Apart from the same superconducting phenomenon in both the HP orthorhombic phase of GaP and its derivative ZnGeP234, they have some differences as follows: (1) GaP crystalizes in a cubic structure at ambient pressure. ZnGeP2 hosts a cubic phase as its first HP phase with cation disorder. (2) Similar amorphous behavior during decompression was observed for both GaP and ZnGeP2; this could be attributed to the connection with the pressure dependence of kinetic barriers for the phase transitions by using a configuration-coordinate model.29 However, the starting phases of amorphization are different, i.e., orthorhombic in GaP versus cubic in ZnGeP2. Therefore, the same amorphous superconductivity in GaP and ZnGeP2 is likely caused by their different parent lattices.
Conclusion
In summary, we have investigated the relationship between the structural, optical, and electrical properties of bulk GaP single crystals at high pressures by combining Raman scattering, piezochromism, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and ac magnetic susceptibility experiments. We show that pressure-engineered electronic properties are effectively correlated with the structural and optical evolutions. During compression, metallization and superconductivity simultaneously appear, which is accompanied by a piezochromic transition and attributed to the appearance of a structural transition from the cubic to orthorhombic phase. Upon further decompression, the superconductivity is preserved toward ambient pressure, consistent with the irreversibility of the cubic-orthorhombic phase transition and the presence of an amorphous phase in the depressurized sample. The newly observed two high-pressure superconducting phases, as well as the irreversible evolution of the structural and electrical properties provide a comprehensive understanding of the physical properties of semiconductor GaP under pressure.
References
Assali, S. et al. Direct band gap wurtzite gallium phosphide nanowires. Nano Lett. 13, 1559 (2013).
Tilmann, B. et al. Nanostructured amorphous gallium phosphide on silica for nonlinear and ultrafast nanophotonics. Nanoscale Horiz. 5, 1500 (2020).
Aspnes, D. E. & Studna, A. A. Dielectric functions and optical parameters of Si, Ge, GaP, GaAs, GaSb, InP, InAs, and InSb from 1.5 to 6.0 eV. Phys. Rev. B 27, 985 (1983).
Lessio, M. & Carter, E. A. What is the role of pyridinium in pyridine-catalyzed CO2 reduction on p-GaP photocathodes? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13248 (2015).
Lorenz, M. R., Pettit, G. D. & Taylor, R. C. Band gap of gallium phosphide from 0 to 900°K and light emission from diodes at high temperatures. Phys. Rev. 171, 876 (1968).
Wilson, D. J. et al. Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photonics 14, 57 (2020).
Rutkauskas, M., Srivastava, A. & Reid, D. T. Supercontinuum generation in orientation-patterned gallium phosphide. Optica 7, 172 (2020).
Sanatinia, R., Anand, S. & Swillo, M. Modal engineering of second-harmonic generation in single GaP nanopillars. Nano Lett. 14, 5376 (2014).
Cambiasso, J. et al. Bridging the gap between dielectric nanophotonics and the visible regime with effectively lossless gallium phosphide antennas. Nano Lett. 17, 1219 (2017).
Grinblat, G. et al. Efficient ultrafast all-optical modulation in a nonlinear crystalline gallium phosphide nanodisk at the anapole excitation. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb3123 (2020).
Bolshakov, A. D. et al. Single GaP nanowire nonlinear characterization with the aid of an optical trap. Nanoscale 14, 993 (2022).
Karawdeniya, B. I. et al. Surface functionalization and texturing of optical metasurfaces for sensing applications. Chem. Rev. 122, 14990 (2022).
Melli, M. et al. Gallium phosphide optical metasurfaces for visible light applications. Sci. Rep. 10, 20694 (2020).
Anthur, A. P. et al. Continuous wave second harmonic generation enabled by quasi-bound-states in the continuum on gallium phosphide metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 20, 8745 (2020).
Shcherbakov, M. R. et al. Generation of even and odd high harmonics in resonant metasurfaces using single and multiple ultra-intense laser pulses. Nat. Commun. 12, 4185 (2021).
Dasgupta, N. P. et al. 25th anniversary article: semiconductor nanowires - synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv. Mater. 26, 2137 (2014).
Ackland, G. J. High-pressure phases of group IV and III-V semiconductors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 483 (2001).
Mujica, A., Rubio, A., Muñoz, A. & Needs, R. J. High-pressure phases of group-IV, III–V, and II–VI compounds. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 863 (2003).
Li, Q. et al. Pressure-induced superconductivity in HgTe single-crystal film. Adv. Sci. 9, 2200590 (2022).
Liang, Y. et al. New metallic ordered phase of perovskite CsPbI3 under pressure. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900399 (2019).
Chi, Z. H. et al. Superconductivity in pristine 2Ha-MoS2 at ultrahigh pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 037002 (2018).
Zhou, D. W. et al. Pressure-induced metallization and superconducting phase in ReS2. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 19 (2017).
Chen, X. L. et al. Topological Dirac line nodes and superconductivity coexist in SnSe at high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 96, 165123 (2017).
Liu, G. et al. Pressure‐induced bandgap optimization in lead-based perovskites with prolonged carrier lifetime and ambient retainability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604208 (2016).
Nelmes, R. J., McMahon, M. I. & Belmonte, S. A. Nonexistence of the diatomic tin structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3668 (1997).
Ono, S. & Kikegawa, T. Determination of the phase boundary of GaP using in situ high pressure and high-temperature X-ray diffraction. High. Press. Res. 37, 28 (2017).
Baublitz, M. & Ruoff, A. L. Diffraction studies of the high pressure phases of GaAs and GaP. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6179 (1982).
Dai, L. et al. Characterization of metallization and amorphization for GaP under different hydrostatic environments in diamond anvil cell up to 40.0 GPa. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 066103 (2019).
Tsuji, K., Katayama, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Kanda, H. & Nosaka, H. Amorphization from quenched high-pressure phase in tetrahedrally bonded materials. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 56, 559 (1995).
Tsuji, K., Katayama, Y., Kanda, H. & Nosaka, H. Amorphization from the quenched high-pressure phase in GaAs and GaP. J. Non Cryst. Solids 518, 205 (1996).
Li, Y. Q. et al. Electrical transport properties of gallium phosphide under high pressure. Phys. Status Solidi B 257, 1900470 (2019).
Liu, H. et al. Pressure effects on the metallization and dielectric properties of GaP. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 26829 (2021).
Kokubun, Y., Washizuka, S., Ushizawa, J., Watanabe, M. & Fukuda, T. Properties of high quality GaP single crystals grown by computer controlled liquid encapsulated Czochralski technique. Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 841 (1982).
Yuan, Y. F. et al. Pressure induced superconductivity in nonlinear optical crystal ZnGeP2 and its capture at ambient pressure. Mater. Today Phys. 25, 100707 (2022).
Pan, X. C. et al. Pressure-driven dome-shaped superconductivity and electronic structural evolution in tungsten ditelluride. Nat. Commun. 6, 7805 (2015).
Mao, H. K., Xu, J. & Bell, P. M. Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673 (1986).
Hobden, M. V. & Russell, J. P. The Raman spectrum of gallium phosphide. Phys. Lett. 13, 39 (1964).
Aquilanti, G. et al. High-pressure phase of GaP: structure and chemical ordering. Phys. Rev. B 76, 064103 (2007).
Jauberthie-Carillon, C. & Guillemin, C. Dependence of the indirect energy gap of GaP on quasihydrostatic pressure and phase transition. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 6807 (1989).
Ginzburg, V. L. & Landau, L. D. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950).
Klotz, S., Chervin, J. C., Munsch, P. & Le Marchand, G. Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42, 075413 (2009).
Goncharov, A. F. & Struzhkin, V. V. Raman spectroscopy of metals, high-temperature superconductors and related materials under high pressure. J. Raman Spectrosc. 34, 532 (2003).
Schilling, J. S. & Hamlin, J. J. Recent studies in superconductivity at extreme pressures. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 121, 052006 (2008).
Hamlin, J. J. Superconductivity in the metallic elements at high pressures. Physica C. 514, 59 (2015).
Itic, J. P., Polian, A. & Jauberthie-Carillon, C. High-pressure phase transition in gallium phosphide: An x-ray-absorption spectroscopy study. Phys. Rev. B 40, 9709 (1989).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2022YFA1602603 and 2018YFA0305704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174395, 12204004, 12374049, U1932152, 12004004, and U19A2093), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Grant Nos. 2308085MA16 and 2308085QA18), and the Users with Excellence Project of Hefei Center CAS (Grant No. 2021HSC-UE008). Yonghui Zhou was supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Grant No. 2020443). A portion of this work was performed at the Steady High Magnetic Field Facilities, High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The X-ray diffraction experiment was performed using the beamline BL15U1 at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y-H.Z. and Z.Y. conceived the study and explained the experimental results. N.Q. synthesized the single crystal. N.Q., C.C., S.W., R.Z., X.Z., Y.Y., X.C., C.A., Y.Z. and M.Z. measured the physical properties of the sample. L.L. and X.Y. performed the theoretical calculations. N.Q., Y-H.Z. and Z.Y. analyzed the data and wrote the paper and Supplementary Information. All authors were involved in the discussion of the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, N., Chen, C., Zhou, Y. et al. Two high-pressure superconducting phases in pressurized optical semiconductor GaP. NPG Asia Mater 15, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-023-00506-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-023-00506-8
This article is cited by
-
Crystalline-amorphization-recrystallization structural transition and emergent superconductivity in van der Waals semiconductor SiP under compression
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)