Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Substituting carmustine for lomustine is safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory Lymphoma—a retrospective study from the BSBMT (BEAM versus LEAM)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: No statistically significant difference in OS shown between BEAM and Leam conditioning.

References

  1. Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, Moir D, Hancock B, Mcmillan A, et al. Dose intensification with autologous bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin’s disease: results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet. 1993;341:1051–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van Der Lelie H, Bron D, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1540–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MHRA. https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windows.net/docs/5dfe0ce949110e10fe7ff2775a454e38ae2395c7. Accessed February 2019.

  4. GRAY RJ. A Class of K-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk. Ann Stat. 1998;16:1141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. GRAY JPFARJ. A proportional Hazards Model for Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997;94:496–509.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kothari J, Foley M, Peggs KS, Mackenzie S, Thomson K, Morris E, et al. A retrospective comparison of toxicity and initial efficacy of two autologous stem cell transplant conditioning regimens for relapsed lymphoma: LEAM and BEAM. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:1397–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma A, Kayal S, Iqbal S, Malik PS, Raina V. Comparison of BEAM vs. LEAM regimen in autologous transplant for lymphoma at AIIMS. Springerplus. 2013;2:489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contribution of data from each centre; St George’s Hospital (M Koh, A Drake), Cardiff (K Wilson, D Davies), Christie Hospital Manchester (A Bloor, A Sjursen) Leeds (M Gilleece, R Goodall, C Mountain, H Moss) Southampton (K Orchard, R Lown) Nottingham (N Russell, E Cox) St Bartholomews (J Gribben, D Anderson) Royal Marsden (M Potter, E Nicholson) Edinburgh (A Broom) Newcastle (M Collin, L Duncan) Leicester (M Martin, R Lewin) Brimingham Heartlands (M Nikolousis, M Sharkey) Coventry (F Jones, W Harris-Bailey) Ireland (A Hayat, N Mannion) Derriford/Plymouth (H Hunter, A Whitnall) Poole (F Jack, S Pope) North Staffordshire (S Pillai, K Yarwood) Taunton and Somerset (S Bolam, M Ewings) Cheltenham (S Chown, C Carter) Bournemouth (R Hall, J Davies) Manchester (E Tholouli, E Marchan) Swindon (N Blessing, L Ishmael-Walrond) Dudley (S Fernandes) Bath (C Knetchli, T Peters).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The Authors contributions were as follows: PK- Wrote the paper. RP- Study statistician. JP- Study co-ordinator. KK- Data manager. RP- Oversaw data collection. JAS- Co-investigator. JL- Contribution of significant patient numbers. NM- Study Chair.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippa Kelsey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelsey, P., Pearce, R., Perry, J. et al. Substituting carmustine for lomustine is safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory Lymphoma—a retrospective study from the BSBMT (BEAM versus LEAM). Bone Marrow Transplant 56, 730–732 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01071-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01071-2

Search

Quick links