Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

clinical

Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients

Subjects

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hswen Y, Nguyen TT. The inclusion of social determinants of health into evaluations of quality and appropriateness of AI assistant-ChatGPT. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;2023:1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Cherkin D. A framework for making patient-centered care front and center. Perm J. 2012;16:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. National Academies of Sciences E and M, Division H and M, Practice B on PH and PH, States C on C-BS to PHE in the U, Baciu A, Negussie Y, et al. The root causes of health inequity. Communities action pathways to heal equity. 2017. p. 1–558. https://doi.org/10.17226/24624.

  4. Di H, Wen Y. Will generalist medical artificial intelligence be the future path for health-related natural language processing models? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41391-023-00719-6.

  5. Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, Krumholz HM, Leskovec J, Topol EJ, et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;616:259–65.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AC and ED: manuscript development, manuscript writing/editing. MP, MLR, GIR, MGA, MF, GC, SC and AM: manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Cocci.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cocci, A., Pezzoli, M., Lo Re, M. et al. Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 27, 159–160 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00754-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00754-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links