Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Monocytic and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell plasticity and differentiation are organ-specific

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells that proliferate in the setting of cancer and have potent immunosuppressive functions hindering anti-tumor immunity. Here we establish that the immunologic landscape and tumor microenvironments (TME) vary between different organs which discretely shape MDSC repertoires. We found that pSTAT3 signaling exerts a dominant effect on MDSC programming in liver metastasis (LM). In contrast, in lung metastasis (LuM), MDSC programming is driven mainly by pSTAT5. Adoptive transfer of LM-MDSC into LuM resulted in a shift from pSTAT3 signaling to pSTAT5, in association with an overall shift toward lung MDSC programming. A shift from more immunosuppressive M-MDSC to G-MDSC, along with enhanced differentiation of MDSCs into pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages in LuM, indicated that MDSC plasticity and differentiation patterns are environmentally dependent. Using mass spectroscopy, we confirmed that LM-MDSCs showed enhanced expression of key proliferation pathway markers. This confirmed that liver-specific MDSC programing was comprehensive but reversible, implying that therapeutic targeting of LM-MDSC could prime the TME in a favorable manner. Our data suggest that MDSC programming in response to malignancy is highly dependent on organ-specific conditions and is modifiable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Accumulation of immunosuppressive M-MDSC in tumor-bearing liver as compared to tumor-bearing lungs.
Fig. 2: LM-MDSC and LuM-MDSC proliferation occurs via pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 signaling pathways, respectively.
Fig. 3: Uniform myeloid cell subset within tumors is organ and not cell type-dependent.
Fig. 4: Shift from M-MDSC to G-MDSC phenotype in LuM and normal lung with subsequent shift in STAT signaling.
Fig. 5: Distinct genetic and proteomic profile of LM-MDSC and LuM MDSC.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones RP, Kokudo N, Folprecht G, Mise Y, Unno M, Malik HZ, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: a critical review of state of the art. Liver Cancer. 2016;6:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng PP, Kros JM, Li J. Approved CAR T cell therapies: ice bucket challenges on glaring safety risks and long-term impacts. Drug Disco Today. 2018;23:1175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Provenzano PP, Cuevas C, Chang AE, Goel VK, Von Hoff DD, Hingorani SR. Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:418–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliver AJ, Lau PKH, Unsworth AS, Loi S, Darcy PK, Kershaw MH, et al. Tissue-dependent tumor microenvironments and their impact on immunotherapy responses. Front Immunol. 2018;9:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burga RA, Thorn M, Point GR, Guha P, Nguyen CT, Licata LA, et al. Liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand in response to liver metastases in mice and inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CEA CAR-T. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:817–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guha P, Reha J, Katz SC. Immunosuppression in liver tumors: opening the portal to effective immunotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017;24:114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guha P, Gardell J, Darpolor J, Cunetta M, Lima M, Miller G, et al. STAT3 inhibition induces Bax-dependent apoptosis in liver tumor myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncogene 2019;38:533–48.

  8. Thorn M, Guha P, Cunetta M, Espat NJ, Miller G, Junghans RP, et al. Tumor-associated GM-CSF overexpression induces immunoinhibitory molecules via STAT3 in myeloid-suppressor cells infiltrating liver metastases. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;23:188–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiu DK, Xu IM, Lai RK, Tse AP, Wei LL, Koh HY, et al. Hypoxia induces myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment to hepatocellular carcinoma through chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 26. Hepatology. 2016;64:797–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horst AK, Neumann K, Diehl L, Tiegs G. Modulation of liver tolerance by conventional and nonconventional antigen-presenting cells and regulatory immune cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13:277–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:162–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawila E, Razon H, Wildbaum G, Blattner C, Sapir Y, Shaked Y, et al. CCR5 directs the mobilization of CD11b(+)Gr1(+)Ly6C(low) polymorphonuclear myeloid cells from the bone marrow to the blood to support tumor development. Cell Rep. 2017;21:2212–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nefedova Y, Nagaraj S, Rosenbauer A, Muro-Cacho C, Sebti SM, Gabrilovich DI. Regulation of dendritic cell differentiation and antitumor immune response in cancer by pharmacologic-selective inhibition of the janus-activated kinase 2/signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 pathway. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9525–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jablonski KA, Amici SA, Webb LM, Ruiz-Rosado Jde D, Popovich PG, Partida-Sanchez S, et al. Novel markers to delineate murine M1 and M2 macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0145342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolahian S, Oz HH, Zhou B, Griessinger CM, Rieber N, Hartl D. The emerging role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in lung diseases. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:967–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardy LL, Wick DA, Webb JR. Conversion of tyrosine to the inflammation-associated analog 3′-nitrotyrosine at either TCR- or MHC-contact positions can profoundly affect recognition of the MHC class I-restricted epitope of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein 33 by CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:5956–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinha P, Clements VK, Bunt SK, Albelda SM, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Cross-talk between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and macrophages subverts tumor immunity toward a type 2 response. J Immunol. 2007;179:977–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Umemura N, Saio M, Suwa T, Kitoh Y, Bai J, Nonaka K, et al. Tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells are pleiotropic-inflamed monocytes/macrophages that bear M1- and M2-type characteristics. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83:1136–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bronte V, Zanovello P. Regulation of immune responses by L-arginine metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:641–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC. Arginine regulation by myeloid derived suppressor cells and tolerance in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Immunol Rev. 2008;222:180–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Perez-Soler R. The role of erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI 774) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4238s–4240s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan T, Wiltrout RH, Weiss JM. Immunotherapeutic modulation of the suppressive liver and tumor microenvironments. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:879–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorn M, Point GR, Burga RA, Nguyen CT, Joseph Espat N, Katz SC. Liver metastases induce reversible hepatic B cell dysfunction mediated by Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96:883–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng H, Wang Z, Fu L, Xu T. Macrophage polarization in the development and progression of ovarian cancers: an overview. Front Oncol. 2019;9:421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amici SA, Young NA, Narvaez-Miranda J, Jablonski KA, Arcos J, Rosas L, et al. CD38 is robustly induced in human macrophages and monocytes in inflammatory conditions. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin S, Li J, Zhou C, Privratsky B, Schettler J, Deng X, et al. SHIP-1 regulates phagocytosis and M2 polarization through the PI3K/Akt-STAT5-Trib1 circuit in pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Front Immunol. 2020;11:307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waight JD, Netherby C, Hensen ML, Miller A, Hu Q, Liu S, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell development is regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 axis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4464–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghiringhelli F, Puig PE, Roux S, Parcellier A, Schmitt E, Solary E, et al. Tumor cells convert immature myeloid dendritic cells into TGF-beta-secreting cells inducing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell proliferation. J Exp Med. 2005;202:919–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin A, Schildknecht A, Nguyen LT, Ohashi PS. Dendritic cells integrate signals from the tumor microenvironment to modulate immunity and tumor growth. Immunol Lett. 2010;127:77–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang B, Pan PY, Li Q, Sato AI, Levy DE, Bromberg J, et al. Gr-1+CD115+ immature myeloid suppressor cells mediate the development of tumor-induced T regulatory cells and T-cell anergy in tumor-bearing host. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1123–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li H, Han Y, Guo Q, Zhang M, Cao X. Cancer-expanded myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce anergy of NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-beta 1. J Immunol. 2009;182:240–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Katz SC, Point GR, Cunetta M, Thorn M, Guha P, Espat NJ, et al. Regional CAR-T cell infusions for peritoneal carcinomatosis are superior to systemic delivery. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;23:142–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Centuori SM, Trad M, LaCasse CJ, Alizadeh D, Larmonier CB, Hanke NT, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells from tumor-bearing mice impair TGF-beta-induced differentiation of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs from CD4+CD25-FoxP3- T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92:987–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Louis Chai and Dr. Chandra C. Ghosh for proofreading and technical assistance. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Benjamin Barlock for SWATH-MS technical assistance and Dr. Fatemeh Akhlaghi for access to the Mass Spectrometer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Katz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guha, P., Gardell, J., Rabinowitz, B. et al. Monocytic and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell plasticity and differentiation are organ-specific. Oncogene 40, 693–704 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01559-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01559-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links