Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Development of a yeast-based system to identify new hBRAFV600E functional interactors

Abstract

BRAFV600E is a mutant Ser–Thr protein kinase that plays a crucial role in many types of cancer, including melanoma. Despite several aspects of BRAFV600E biology have been already elucidated, the proteins that regulate its expression and activity remain largely unknown, hampering our capacity to control its unrestrained effects. Here, we propose yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system that can be used to achieve a better understanding of the regulation of human BRAFV600E.

By showing that in osmotic stress conditions hBRAFV600E can rescue the growth of strains carrying a double or triple deletion in MAPKKK belonging to the HOG pathway, we demonstrate that this oncogenic kinase is active in yeast even if it does not have an ortholog. Moreover, we report that, in the yeast ptp3∆ptc1∆ strain that is deleted in the genes encoding for two phosphatases responsible for Hog1 de-phoshorylation, hBRAFV600E mimics the toxicity observed in the presence of constitutive Hog1 activation. Finally, we exploit such a toxicity to perform a functional screening of a human cDNA library, looking for cDNAs able to rescue yeast growth. In this way, we identify SMIM10, a mitochondrial protein that in melanoma cells selectively downregulates BRAFV600E RNA and protein levels, by acting indirectly at the post-transcriptional level. Upon SMIM10 overexpression, BRAFV600E melanoma cells show disrupted mitochondrial structure/function and undergo senescence. They also show decreased ability to proliferate and form colonies, as well as increased sensitivity to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Interestingly, the analysis of TCGA melanoma samples indicates that patients with higher SMIM10 levels have a better prognosis. Therefore, these data suggest that SMIM10 exerts an oncosuppressive role in melanoma cells.

Taken together, our results unveil the potential of S. cerevisiae to study hBRAFV600E, to populate the network of its functional interactors and, in doing so, to uncover new cancer-associated genes with therapeutic potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lavoie H, Therrien M. Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:281–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wan PT, Garnett MJ, Roe SM, Lee S, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Good VM, et al. Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF. Cell. 2004;116:855–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE Jr., et al. Braf(V600E) cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:544–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ascierto PA, Agarwala SS, Ciliberto G, Demaria S, Dummer R, Duong CPM, et al. Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016. J Transl Med. 2017;15:236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritt DA, Monson DM, Specht SI, Morrison DK. Impact of feedback phosphorylation and Raf heterodimerization on normal and mutant B-Raf signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:806–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park S, Yeung ML, Beach S, Shields JM, Yeung KC. RKIP downregulates B-Raf kinase activity in melanoma cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:3535–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Condelli V, Piscazzi A, Sisinni L, Matassa DS, Maddalena F, Lettini G, et al. TRAP1 is involved in BRAF regulation and downstream attenuation of ERK phosphorylation and cell-cycle progression: a novel target for BRAF-mutated colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6693–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saei A, Palafox M, Benoukraf T, Kumari N, Jaynes PW, Iyengar Po. et al. Loss of USP28-mediated BRAF degradation drives resistance to RAF cancer therapies. J Exp Med. 2018;215:1913–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Laurent JM, Young JH, Kachroo AH, Marcotte EM. Efforts to make and apply humanized yeast. Brief Funct Genomics. 2015;15:155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Q, Reed JC. Bax inhibitor-1, a mammalian apoptosis suppressor identified by functional screening in yeast. Mol Cell. 1998;1:337–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perkins E, Sun D, Nguyen A, Tulac S, Francesco M, Tavana H, et al. Novel inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase/PARP1 and PARP2 identified using a cell-based screen in yeast. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito H. Regulation of cross-talk in yeast MAPK signaling pathways. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13:677–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Atienza JM, Suh M, Xenarios I, Landgraf R, Colicelli J. Human ERK1 induces filamentous growth and cell wall remodeling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:20638–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Piper PW, Truman AW, Millson SH, Nuttall J. Hsp90 chaperone control over transcriptional regulation by the yeast Slt2(Mpk1)p and human ERK5 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34:783–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Shaughnessy EC, Palani S, Collins JJ, Sarkar CA. Tunable signal processing in synthetic MAP kinase cascades. Cell. 2011;144:119–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han J, Lee JD, Bibbs L, Ulevitch RJA. MAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and hyperosmolarity in mammalian cells. Science. 1994;265:808–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marranci A, Tuccoli A, Vitiello M, Mercoledi E, Sarti S, Lubrano S, et al. Identification of BRAF 3’UTR isoforms in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:1694–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marranci A, Jiang Z, Vitiello M, Guzzolino E, Comelli L, Sarti S, et al. The landscape of BRAF transcript and protein variants in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Rourke SM, Herskowitz I. Unique and redundant roles for HOG MAPK pathway components as revealed by whole-genome expression analysis. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:532–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhi H, Tang L, Xia Y, Zhang J. Ssk1p-independent activation of Ssk2p plays an important role in the osmotic stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: alternative activation of Ssk2p in osmotic stress. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wurgler-Murphy SM, Maeda T, Witten EA, Saito H. Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOG1 mitogen-activated protein kinase by the PTP2 and PTP3 protein tyrosine phosphatases. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:1289–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maeda T, Tsai AY, Saito H. Mutations in a protein tyrosine phosphatase gene (PTP2) and a protein serine/threonine phosphatase gene (PTC1) cause a synthetic growth defect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:5408–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, Nourry A, Niculescu-Duvas I, Dhomen N, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010;140:209–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Collavoli A, Comelli L, Rainaldi G, Galli A. A yeast-based genetic screening to identify human proteins that increase homologous recombination. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:351–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vitiello M, Tuccoli A, D’Aurizio R, Sarti S, Giannecchini L, Lubrano S, et al. Context-dependent miR-204 and miR-211 affect the biological properties of amelanotic and melanotic melanoma cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:25395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt O, Pfanner N, Meisinger C. Mitochondrial protein import: from proteomics to functional mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:655–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 2004;383:66–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Harvey MJ, Giupponi G, Fabritiis GD. ACEMD: accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5:1632–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. The essence of senescence. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2463–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Papin C, Denouel A, Calothy G, Eychene A. Identification of signalling proteins interacting with B-Raf in the yeast two-hybrid system. Oncogene. 1996;12:2213–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen CH, Yuan P, Perez-Lorenzo R, Zhang Y, Lee SX, Ou Y, et al. Phosphorylation of BRAF by AMPK impairs BRAF-KSR1 association and cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2013;52:161–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jain A, Tripathi R, Turpin CP, Wang C, Plattner R. Abl kinase regulation by BRAF/ERK and cooperation with Akt in melanoma. Oncogene. 2017;36:4585–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. Large-scale high-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:38–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stuckey S, Storici F. Gene knockouts, in vivo site-directed mutagenesis and other modifications using the delitto perfetto system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 2013;533:103–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cozza G, Rossetto M, Bosello-Travain V, Maiorino M, Roveri A, Toppo S, et al. Glutathione peroxidase 4-catalyzed reduction of lipid hydroperoxides in membranes: the polar head of membrane phospholipids binds the enzyme and addresses the fatty acid hydroperoxide group toward the redox center. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;112:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:3684–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pastor RW, Brooks BR, Szabo A. An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms. Mol Phys. 1988;65:1409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haq R, Shoag J, Andreu-Perez P, Yokoyama S, Edelman H, Rowe GC, et al. Oncogenic BRAF regulates oxidative metabolism via PGC1alpha and MITF. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:302–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the Poliseno and Galli lab members, as well as A. Tuccoli, for helpful discussions. They also thank E. O’Shea (Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States, USA) for providing the ECY46 yeast strain. This work was supported by: Progetto Giovani Ricercatori (University of Padova) to GC; Start up funding ITT and Progetto Giovani Ricercatori #GR-2011-02348535 (Ministero della Salute) to LP. It was also partially supported by AIRC grant #MFAG 17095 to LP; Fondazione Pisa grant #127/16 as well as AIRC grant #IG 14477 to AG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alvaro Galli, Laura Poliseno or Tiziana Cervelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lubrano, S., Comelli, L., Piccirilli, C. et al. Development of a yeast-based system to identify new hBRAFV600E functional interactors. Oncogene 38, 1355–1366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0496-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0496-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links