Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

Mutational mechanisms of EZH2 inactivation in myeloid neoplasms

Abstract

EZH2, a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2, catalyses the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27, a chromatin mark associated with transcriptional repression. EZH2 loss-of-function mutations are seen in myeloid neoplasms and are associated with an adverse prognosis. Missense mutations in the SET/CXC domain abrogate catalytic activity as assessed by in vitro histone methylation assays, but missense mutations clustering in the conserved DI and DII regions retain activity. To understand the role of DI and DII mutations, we initially developed a cell-based histone methylation assay to test activity in a cellular context. Murine induced pluripotent stem cells lacking EZH2 were transiently transfected with wild type or mutant EZH2 (n = 15) and any resulting histone methylation was measured by flow cytometry. All DI mutations (n = 5) resulted in complete or partial loss of methylation activity whilst 5/6 DII mutations retained activity. Next, we assessed the possibility of splicing abnormalities induced by exon 8 mutations (encoding DII) using RT-PCR from primary patient samples and mini-gene assays. Exon 8 mutations resulted in skipping of exon 8 and an out-of-frame transcript. We have therefore shown that mutations within regions encoding EZH2 domains DI and DII are pathogenic by loss of function and exon skipping, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: EZH2 mutations from COSMIC, selected for non-lymphoid hematopoietic neoplasms, showing amino acid numbering.
Fig. 2: In vitro histone methylation assay of baculovirus expressed components shows retained activity of Ezh2-mutant PRC2 complexes for the three variants tested.
Fig. 3: Assessment of methylation activity of EZH2 mutations methylation activity by flow cytometry.
Fig. 4: Effect of exonic variants on exon skipping.
Fig. 5: EZH2 exon 8 mutations result in exon skipping.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ernst T, Chase AJ, Score J, Hidalgo-Curtis CE, Bryant C, Jones AV, et al. Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders. Nat Genet. 2010;42:722–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikoloski G, Langemeijer SM, Kuiper RP, Knops R, Massop M, Tonnissen ER, et al. Somatic mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2010;42:665–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonysamy S, Condon B, Druzina Z, Bonanno JB, Gheyi T, Zhang F, et al. Structural context of disease-associated mutations and putative mechanism of autoinhibition revealed by X-ray crystallographic analysis of the EZH2-SET domain. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu H, Zeng H, Dong A, Li F, He H, Senisterra G, et al. Structure of the catalytic domain of EZH2 reveals conformational plasticity in cofactor and substrate binding sites and explains oncogenic mutations. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CH, Yu JR, Kumar S, Jin Y, LeRoy G, Bhanu N, et al. Allosteric Activation Dictates PRC2 Activity Independent of Its Recruitment to Chromatin. Mol Cell. 2018;70:422–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Villasante A, Piazzolla D, Li H, Gomez-Lopez G, Djabali M, Serrano M. Epigenetic regulation of Nanog expression by Ezh2 in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:1488–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuda T, Cepko CL. Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:16–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishore S, Khanna A, Stamm S. Rapid generation of splicing reporters with pSpliceExpress. Gene. 2008;427:104–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cross NC, Melo JV, Feng L, Goldman JM. An optimized multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of BCR-ABL fusion mRNAs in haematological disorders. Leukemia. 1994;8:186–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raponi M, Kralovicova J, Copson E, Divina P, Eccles D, Johnson P, et al. Prediction of single-nucleotide substitutions that result in exon skipping: identification of a splicing silencer in BRCA1 exon 6. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:436–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fraile-Bethencourt E, Diez-Gomez B, Velasquez-Zapata V, Acedo A, Sanz DJ, Velasco EA. Functional classification of DNA variants by hybrid minigenes: Identification of 30 spliceogenic variants of BRCA2 exons 17 and 18. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laible G, Wolf A, Dorn R, Reuter G, Nislow C, Lebersorger A, et al. Mammalian homologues of the Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste mediate gene silencing in Drosophila heterochromatin and at S. cerevisiae telomeres. EMBO J. 1997;16:3219–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiao L, Liu X. Structural basis of histone H3K27 trimethylation by an active polycomb repressive complex 2. Science. 2015;350:aac4383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Margueron R, Justin N, Ohno K, Sharpe ML, Son J, Drury WJ 3rd, et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature. 2009;461:762–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, Syed A, Middha S, Kim HR, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23:703–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartels S, Schipper E, Hasemeier B, Kreipe H, Lehmann U. Routine clinical mutation profiling using next generation sequencing and a customized gene panel improves diagnostic precision in myeloid neoplasms. Oncotarget. 2016;7:30084–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seiwert TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, Khattri A, Pedamallu CS, Stricker T, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:632–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shirahata-Adachi M, Iriyama C, Tomita A, Suzuki Y, Shimada K, Kiyoi H. Altered EZH2 splicing and expression is associated with impaired histone H3 lysine 27 tri-Methylation in myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res. 2017;63:90–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, et al. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 2018;562:217–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professor Manuel Serrano for providing us with the murine Ezh2 knockout iPS cell line Ezh2 Δ/Δ clone 10. This study was funded by Bloodwise Specialist Programme Grant nos. 13002 and 18007 to NCPC and AC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Chase.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chase, A., Score, J., Lin, F. et al. Mutational mechanisms of EZH2 inactivation in myeloid neoplasms. Leukemia 34, 3206–3214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0816-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0816-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links