Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Dilemmas in human milk fortification

Abstract

Fortification of human milk is the standard of care for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and is required to support adequate postnatal growth and development. Achieving adequate growth velocity and preventing growth faltering is critical for the developing neonatal brain and optimizing long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Mother’s milk is the gold standard nutrition to feed preterm infants, however, it does not provide the nutrients needed to support the growth of VLBW infants. After the decision is made to use mother’s milk (if available) or alternatively, donor human milk, many dilemmas exist with regards to additional treatment decisions surrounding the type of fortification to use, when to fortify, and the duration of fortification. In this article, we will review the differences in mother’s milk compared to donor milk, the different types of human milk fortifiers, the optimal timing of fortification, and discuss when to discontinue human milk fortification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Dilemmas clinicians face when choosing which fortifier to use for very low birth weight infants.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eidelman AI. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk: an analysis of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Breastfeeding Policy Statement. Breastfeed Med: Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2012;7:323–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vohr BR, Poindexter BB, Dusick AM, McKinley LT, Wright LL, Langer JC, et al. Beneficial effects of breast milk in the neonatal intensive care unit on the developmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months of age. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vohr BR, Poindexter BB, Dusick AM, McKinley LT, Higgins RD, Langer JC, et al. Persistent beneficial effects of breast milk ingested in the neonatal intensive care unit on outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants at 30 months of age. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e953–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JVE, Walsh V, McGuire W. Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8:Cd002972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schanler RJ. Evaluation of the evidence to support current recommendations to meet the needs of premature infants: the role of human milk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:625s–8s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenton TR, Cormack B, Goldberg D, Nasser R, Alshaikh B, Eliasziw M, et al. “Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2020;40:704–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou FS, Pandey V, Yeh HW. Postnatal growth in extremely low birth weight newborns: nature or nurture? J Perinatol. 2021;41:648–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belfort MB, Ramel SE. NICU diet, physical growth and nutrient accretion, and preterm infant brain development. Neoreviews. 2019;20:e385–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, De Curtis M, Darmaun D, Decsi T, et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:85–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton TR, Griffin IJ, Groh-Wargo S, Gura K, Martin CR, Taylor SN, et al. Very low birthweight preterm infants: a 2020 evidence analysis center evidence-based nutrition practice guideline. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022;122:182–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Quigley M, Embleton ND, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:Cd002971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg DL, Becker PJ, Brigham K, Carlson S, Fleck L, Gollins L, et al. Identifying malnutrition in preterm and neonatal populations: recommended indicators. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118:1571–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown JV, Embleton ND, Harding JE, McGuire W. Multi-nutrient fortification of human milk for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;5:Cd000343.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fenton TR, Groh-Wargo S, Gura K, Martin CR, Taylor SN, Griffin IJ, et al. Effect of enteral protein amount on growth and health outcomes in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: phase II of the pre-B project and an evidence analysis center systematic review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021;121:2287–2300.e2212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor SN, Martin CR. Evidence-based discharge nutrition to optimize preterm infant outcomes. Neoreviews. 2022;23:e108–e116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rustico SE, Calabria AC, Garber SJ. Metabolic bone disease of prematurity. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2014;1:85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Faienza MF, D’Amato E, Natale MP, Grano M, Chiarito M, Brunetti G. et al. Metabolic bone disease of prematurity: diagnosis and management. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kositamongkol S, Suthutvoravut U, Chongviriyaphan N, Feungpean B, Nuntnarumit P. Vitamin A and E status in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2011;31:471–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mactier H, Weaver LT. Vitamin A and preterm infants: what we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F103–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mactier H, McCulloch DL, Hamilton R, Galloway P, Bradnam MS, Young D, et al. Vitamin A supplementation improves retinal function in infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr. 2012;160:954–9.e951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shenai JP. Vitamin A supplementation in very low birth weight neonates: rationale and evidence. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1369–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greer FR. Feeding the premature infant in the 20th century. J Nutr. 2001;131:426s–30s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e827–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, Braegger C, Campoy C, Colomb V, et al. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:535–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition, Section on Breastfeeding, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Donor human milk for the high-risk infant: preparation, safety, and usage options in the united states. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20163440.

  27. Meier P, Patel A, Esquerra-Zwiers A. Donor human milk update: evidence, mechanisms, and priorities for research and practice. J Pediatr. 2017;180:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Friend LL, Perrin MT. Fat and protein variability in donor human milk and associations with milk banking processes. Breastfeed Med: Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2020;15:370–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Burge K, Vieira F, Eckert J, Chaaban H. Lipid composition, digestion, and absorption differences among neonatal feeding strategies: potential implications for intestinal inflammation in preterm infants. Nutrients. 2021;13:550.

  30. Arslanoglu S, Boquien CY, King C, Lamireau D, Tonetto P, Barnett D, et al. Fortification of human milk for preterm infants: update and recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on human milk fortification. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Koo W, Tice H. Human milk fortifiers do not meet the current recommendation for nutrients in very low birth weight infants. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2018;42:813–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Barrington KJ, Fortin-Pellerin E, Pennaforte T. Fluid restriction for treatment of preterm infants with chronic lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd005389.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, et al. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010;156:562–7.e561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, Sullivan S, Trawoeger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, et al. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1592–5.e1.

  35. Hair AB, Rechtman DJ, Lee ML, Niklas V. Beyond necrotizing enterocolitis: other clinical advantages of an exclusive human milk diet. Breastfeed Med: Off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2018;13:408–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Assad M, Elliott MJ, Abraham JH. Decreased cost and improved feeding tolerance in VLBW infants fed an exclusive human milk diet. J Perinatol. 2016;36:216–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Connor DL, Kiss A, Tomlinson C, Bando N, Bayliss A, Campbell DM, et al. Nutrient enrichment of human milk with human and bovine milk-based fortifiers for infants born weighing <1250 g: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108:108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bergner EM, Taylor SN, Gollins LA, Hair AB. Human milk fortification: a practical analysis of current evidence. Clin Perinatol. 2022;49:447–60.

  39. Meredith-Dennis L, Xu G, Goonatilleke E, Lebrilla CB, Underwood MA, Smilowitz JT. Composition and variation of macronutrients, immune proteins, and human milk oligosaccharides in human milk from nonprofit and commercial milk banks. J Hum Lactation. 2018;34:120–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramey SR, Merlino Barr S, Moore KA, Groh-Wargo S. Exploring innovations in human milk analysis in the neonatal intensive care unit: a survey of the United States. Front Nutr. 2021;8:692600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meinzen-Derr J, Poindexter B, Wrage L, Morrow AL, Stoll B, Donovan EF. Role of human milk in extremely low birth weight infants’ risk of necrotizing enterocolitis or death. J Perinatol. 2009;29:57–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/infant-formula-recall-what-know. Accessed 26 Feb 2022.

  43. Hair AB, Hawthorne KM, Chetta KE, Abrams SA. Human milk feeding supports adequate growth in infants ≤1250 grams birth weight. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yee WH, Soraisham AS, Shah VS, Aziz K, Yoon W, Lee SK, et al. Incidence and timing of presentation of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hampson G, Roberts SLE, Lucas A, Parkin D. An economic analysis of human milk supplementation for very low birth weight babies in the USA. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Radmacher PG, Adamkin DH. Fortification of human milk for preterm infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thanigainathan S, Abiramalatha T. Early fortification of human milk versus late fortification to promote growth in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD013392.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shah SD, Dereddy N, Jones TL, Dhanireddy R, Talati AJ. Early versus delayed human milk fortification in very low birth weight infants-a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2016;174:126–31.e121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Godden B, Collins CT, Hilditch C, McLeod G, Keir A. Does early compared to late fortification of human milk for preterm infants improve clinical outcomes? J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55:867–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Poindexter BB, Cormack BE, Bloomfield FH. Approaches to growth faltering. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2021;122:312–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Brennan AM, Kiely ME, Fenton S, Murphy BP. Standardized parenteral nutrition for the transition phase in preterm infants: a bag that fits. Nutrients. 2018;10:170.

  52. Falciglia GH, Murthy K, Holl JL, Palac HL, Oumarbaeva Y, Woods DM, et al. Energy and protein intake during the transition from parenteral to enteral nutrition in infants of very low birth weight. J Pediatr. 2018;202:38–43.e31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Miller M, Vaidya R, Rastogi D, Bhutada A, Rastogi S. From parenteral to enteral nutrition: a nutrition-based approach for evaluating postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2014;38:489–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Parker MG, Greenberg LT, Edwards EM, Ehret D, Belfort MB, Horbar JD. National trends in the provision of human milk at hospital discharge among very low-birth-weight infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:961–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Groh-Wargo S, Thompson M. Managing the human-milk-fed, preterm, VLBW infant at NICU discharge: the sprinkles dilemma. Infant, Child, Adolesc Nutr. 2014;6:262–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). 2021 https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/about-wic. Accessed 1 May 2022.

  57. McCallie KR, Lee HC, Mayer O, Cohen RS, Hintz SR, Rhine WD. Improved outcomes with a standardized feeding protocol for very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2011;31:S61–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

BS is supported by Gerber Foundation grant #21-6234 and a grant from Evolve Biosystems. ABH and MG are supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01DK124614, and MG is also supported by NIH grants R01DK118568 and R01HD105301. None of the funding sources had any role in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ABH, BS, and MG wrote the initial and final drafts of the manuscript, approved the final published version, and are accountable for all aspects of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misty Good.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hair, A.B., Scottoline, B. & Good, M. Dilemmas in human milk fortification. J Perinatol 43, 103–107 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01502-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01502-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links