Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Behavior, Psychology and Sociology

The impact of early body-weight variability on long-term weight maintenance: exploratory results from the NoHoW weight-loss maintenance intervention

Abstract

Background

Weight-loss programmes often achieve short-term success though subsequent weight regain is common. The ability to identify predictive factors of regain early in the weight maintenance phase is crucial.

Objective

To investigate the associations between short-term weight variability and long-term weight outcomes in individuals engaged in a weight-loss maintenance intervention.

Methods

The study was a secondary analysis from The NoHoW trial, an 18-month weight maintenance intervention in individuals who recently lost ≥5% body weight. Eligible participants (n = 715, 64% women, BMI = 29.2 (SD 5.0) kg/m2, age = 45.8 (SD 11.5) years) provided body-weight data by smart scale (Fitbit Aria 2) over 18 months. Variability in body weight was calculated by linear and non-linear methods over the first 6, 9 and 12 weeks. These estimates were used to predict percentage weight change at 6, 12, and 18 months using both crude and adjusted multiple linear regression models.

Results

Greater non-linear weight variability over the first 6, 9 and 12 weeks was associated with increased subsequent weight in all comparisons; as was greater linear weight variability measured over 12 weeks (up to AdjR2 = 4.7%). Following adjustment, 6-week weight variability did not predict weight change in any model, though greater 9-week weight variability by non-linear methods was associated with increased body-weight change at 12 (∆AdjR2 = 1.2%) and 18 months (∆AdjR2 = 1.3%) and by linear methods at 18 months (∆AdjR2 = 1.1%). Greater non-linear weight variability measured over 12 weeks was associated with increased weight at 12 (∆AdjR2 = 1.4%) and 18 (∆AdjR2 = 2.2%) months; and 12-week linear variability was associated with increased weight at 12 (∆AdjR2 = 2.1%) and 18 (∆AdjR2 = 3.6%) months.

Conclusion

Body-weight variability over the first 9 and 12 weeks of a weight-loss maintenance intervention weakly predicted increased weight at 12 and 18 months. These results suggest a potentially important role in continuously measuring body weight and estimating weight variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Participant flow chart.
Fig. 2: Description of the frequency of participant smart scale use throughout the trial in eligible participants (n = 715).
Fig. 3: Changes in body weight over the trial in eligible participants (n = 715).
Fig. 4: Association matrix between short-term body-weight variability (BWV) and long-term weight change shown using scatterplot with linear trendlines.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

There are legal restrictions on sharing data that contain potentially identifying or sensitive person information. The restrictions are imposed by The Danish Data Protection Agency (https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english/). Data used in the current study will be made available upon request after application to the NoHoW data controller (The James Hutton Institute: https://www.hutton.ac.uk/). The application procedure can be obtained from The James Hutton Institute (DPO@hutton.ac.uk) or David Nutter (david.nutter@bioss.ac.uk).

References

  1. Van Wye G, Dubin JA, Blair SN, DiPietro L. Adult obesity does not predict 6-year weight gain in men: the aerobics center longitudinal study. Obesity. 2007;15:1571–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Speakman JR, Westerterp KR. Associations between energy demands, physical activity, and body composition in adult humans between 18 and 96 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:826–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turicchi J, O’Driscoll R, Horgan G, Duarte C, Palmeira AL, Larsen SC, et al. Weekly, seasonal and holiday body weight fluctuation patterns among individuals engaged in a European multi-centre behavioural weight loss maintenance intervention. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0232152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhutani S, Kahn E, Tasali E, Schoeller DA. Composition of two-week change in body weight under unrestricted free-living conditions. Physiol Rep. 2017;5. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13336.

  5. Lowe MR, Feig EH, Winter SR, Stice E. Short-term variability in body weight predicts long-term weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:995–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe MR, Benson L, Singh S. Individual differences in within-subject weight variability: there’s a signal in the noise. Physiol Behav. 2020;226:113112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stice E, Durant S, Burger KS, Schoeller DA. Weight suppression and risk of future increases in body mass: effects of suppressed resting metabolic rate and energy expenditure 1-3. Orig Res Commun Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:7–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pietiläinen KH, Saarni SE, Kaprio J, Rissanen A. Does dieting make you fat? A twin study. Int J Obes. 2012;36:456–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Higginson AD, McNamara JM. An adaptive response to uncertainty can lead to weight gain during dieting attempts. Evol Med Public Heal. 2016;2016:369–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strychar I, Lavoie M-È, Messier L, Karelis AD, Doucet É, Prud’homme D, et al. Anthropometric, metabolic, psychosocial, and dietary characteristics of overweight/obese postmenopausal women with a history of weight cycling: a MONET (Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team) Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:718–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kajioka T, Tsuzuku S, Shimokata H, Sato Y. Effects of intentional weight cycling on non-obese young women. Metabolism. 2002;51:149–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Coward WA, Murgatroyd PR, Prentice AM. Effects of weight cycling caused by intermittent dieting on metabolic rate and body composition in obese women. Int J Obes. 1991;15:367–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fothergill E, Guo J, Howard L, Kerns JC, Knuth ND, Brychta R, et al. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition. Obesity. 2016;24:1612–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou Y, Gao X, Chen H, Kong F. High-disinhibition restrained eaters are disinhibited by self-regulatory depletion in the food-related inhibitory control. Eat Behav. 2017;26:70–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe MR. Dieting: proxy or cause of future weight gain? Obes Rev. 2015;16:19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stergiou N, Decker LM. Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? Hum Mov Sci. 2011;30:869–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kodama S, Fujihara K, Ishiguro H, Horikawa C, Ohara N, Yachi Y, et al. Unstable bodyweight and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8:501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zou H, Yin P, Liu L, Liu W, Zhang Z, Yang Y, et al. Body-weight fluctuation was associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turicchi J, O’Driscoll R, Horgan G, Duarte C, Santos I, Encantado J, et al. Body weight variability is not associated with changes in risk factors forcardiometabolic disease. Int J Cardiol Hypertens. 2020;6:100045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feig EH, Lowe MR. Variability in weight change early in behavioral weight loss treatment: theoretical and clinical implications. Obesity. 2017;25:1509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benson L, Zhang F, Espel-Huynh H, Lua W, Lowe MR. Weight variability during self-monitored weight loss predicts future weight loss outcome. Int J Obes. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0534-6.

  22. Scott SE, Duarte C, Encantado J, Evans EH, Harjumaa M, Heitmann BL, et al. The NoHoW protocol: a multicentre 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial investigating an evidence-based digital toolkit for weight loss maintenance in European adults. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Folsom AR, French SA, Zheng W, Baxter JE, Jeffery RW. Weight variability and mortality: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:704–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turicchi J, O’Driscoll R, Finlayson G, Duarte C, Palmeira AL, Larsen SC, et al. Data imputation and body weight variability calculation using linear and nonlinear methods in data collected from digital smart scales: simulation and validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e17977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito Y, Takahashi O, Arioka H, Kobayashi D. Associations between body fat variability and later onset of cardiovascular disease risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee J, Kawakubo K, Kobayashi Y, Mori K, Kasihara H, Tamura M. PAPER Effects of ten year body weight variability on cardiovascular risk factors in Japanese middle-aged men and women. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1063–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. French S, Folsom A, Jeffery R, Zheng W, Mink P, Baxter J. Weight variability and incident disease in older women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. https://www.nature.com/articles/0800390.pdf?origin=publication_detail. Accessed 22 Dec 2017.

  28. Taylor CB, Jatulis DE, Fortmann SP, Kraemer HC. Weight variability effects: a prospective analysis from the stanford five-city project. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:461–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim MK, Han K, Park Y-M, Kwon H-S, Kang G, Yoon K-H, et al. Associations of variability in blood pressure, glucose and cholesterol concentrations, and body mass index with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. Circulation. 2018;138:2627–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson F, Pratt M, Wardle J. Dietary restraint and self-regulation in eating behavior. Int J Obes. 2012;36:665–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Westenhoefer J. Dietary restraint and disinhibition: is restraint a homogeneous construct? Appetite. 1991;16:45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bryant EJ, Kiezebrink K, King NA, Blundell JE. Interaction between disinhibition and restraint: implications for body weight and eating disturbance. Eat Weight Disord. 15:e43–51.

  33. Winter SR, Yokum S, Stice E, Osipowicz K, Lowe MR. Elevated reward response to receipt of palatable food predicts future weight variability in healthy-weight adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105:781–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Turicchi J. jaketuricchi/Publication_scripts: scripts associations with published studies. https://github.com/jaketuricchi/Publication_scripts. Accessed 24 Aug 2020.

  35. Althouse AD. Adjust for multiple comparisons? It’s not that simple. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1644–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubin M, Do P. Values lose their meaning in exploratory analyses? It depends how you define the familywise error rate. Rev Gen Psychol. 2017;21:269–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Turicchi J, O’Driscoll R, Finlayson G, Beaulieu K, Deighton K, Stubbs RJ. Associations between the rate, amount, and composition of weight loss as predictors of spontaneous weight regain in adults achieving clinically significant weight loss: a systematic review and meta‐regression. Obes Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12849.

  38. Turicchi J, O’Driscoll R, Finlayson G, Duarte C, Hopkins M, Martins N, et al. Associations between the proportion of fat-free mass loss during weight loss, changes in appetite, and subsequent weight change: results from a randomized 2-stage dietary intervention trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111:536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng Y, Klem MLou, Sereika SM, Danford CA, Ewing LJ, Burke LE. Self-weighing in weight management: a systematic literature review. Obesity. 2015;23:256–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shieh C, Knisely MR, Clark D, Carpenter JS. Self-weighing in weight management interventions: a systematic review of literature. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016;10:493–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kroke A, Liese A, Schulz M, Bergmann M, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Hoffmann K, et al. Recent weight changes and weight cycling as predictors of subsequent two year weight change in a middle-aged cohort. Int J Obes. 2002;26:403–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Field AE, Manson JE, Taylor CB, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Association of weight change, weight control practices, and weight cycling among women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Int J Obes. 2004;28:1134–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Orsama A-L, Mattila E, Ermes M, van Gils M, Wansink B, Korhonen I. Weight rhythms: weight increases during weekends and decreases during weekdays. Obes Facts. 2014;7:36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rosenbaum DL, Schumacher LM, Schaumberg K, Piers AD, Gaspar ME, Lowe MR, et al. Energy intake highs and lows: how much does consistency matter in weight control? Clin Obes. 2016;6:193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas DM, Martin CK, Redman LM, Heymsfield SB, Lettieri S, Levine JA, et al. Effect of dietary adherence on the body weight plateau: a mathematical model incorporating intermittent compliance with energy intake prescription. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:787–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author’s responsibilities were as follows—BLH and JS acquired funding and designed the NoHoW trial; JT designed and leds the present secondary study; JT and ML were involved in conceptualisation and hypothesis generating; JT and ROD implemented all statistical analyses; JT wrote the manuscript; JT, JS, GF, ROD, ML, ALP, SCL, and BLH were involved in editing the manuscript; all authors approved the final manuscript; JT had primary responsibility for the final content. We thank all individuals involved in the collection of data and trial maintenance at The University of Leeds (UK), The University of Lisbon (PT) and The Parker Institute (DK).

Funding

The NoHoW study received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement Number: 643309). Funding for the present analysis was part of a PhD studentship from the University of Leeds awarded to JT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jake Turicchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turicchi, J., O’Driscoll, R., Lowe, M. et al. The impact of early body-weight variability on long-term weight maintenance: exploratory results from the NoHoW weight-loss maintenance intervention. Int J Obes 45, 525–534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00706-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00706-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links