Abstract
Autophagy is an essential quality control mechanism for maintaining organellar functions in eukaryotic cells. Defective autophagy in pancreatic beta cells has been shown to be involved in the progression of diabetes through impaired insulin secretion under glucolipotoxic stress. The underlying mechanism reveals the pathologic role of the hyperactivation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), which inhibits lysosomal biogenesis and autophagic processes. Moreover, accumulating evidence suggests that oxidative stress induces Ca2+ depletion in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and cytosolic Ca2+ overload, which may contribute to mTOR activation in perilysosomal microdomains, leading to autophagic defects and β-cell failure due to lipotoxicity. This review delineates the antagonistic regulation of autophagic flux by mTOR and AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) at the lysosomal membrane, and both of these molecules could be activated by perilysosomal calcium signaling. However, aberrant and persistent Ca2+ elevation upon lipotoxic stress increases mTOR activity and suppresses autophagy. Therefore, normalization of autophagy is an attractive therapeutic strategy for patients with β-cell failure and diabetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia due to a deficiency in insulin secretion or an increase in insulin resistance. The main subtype is type 2 diabetes, which is characterized by insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. Insulin resistance is triggered by overnutrition and physical inactivity, leading to pancreatic β-cell neogenesis and hypersecretion of insulin to compensate for the elevated insulin demand. However, prolonged exposure to high glucose and saturated fatty acids eventually induces a cytotoxic effect on β-cells, causing defective insulin secretion, a major determinant in disease progression1,2.
Pancreatic β-cells play a major role as sensors and rectifiers of glucose homeostasis. Insulin, the main hormone that lowers blood glucose, is secreted from β-cells upon nutrient ingestion. To precisely decode signals reflecting the extracellular metabolic environment, β-cells have a metabolic sensing system. Nutrients are metabolized in the cytosol, and their products funnel into mitochondria to generate ATP and metabolites, which induce insulin exocytosis. Furthermore, upon glucose stimulation, a β-cell produces up to a million molecules of a single-chain precursor, proinsulin, per minute, which is a more than 20-fold increase in protein under the same transcriptional level3. Proinsulin enters the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen to undergo protein folding. In the ER lumen, proinsulin molecules acquire three disulfide bonds through prooxidant enzymes such as ER oxidoreductase 1α (ERO1α) and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), which contribute to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation under stressful conditions4.
Maintenance of functional mitochondria and the ER in β-cells could be threatened by the stress burden related to excess nutrients5. This stress causes compensatory increases in insulin synthesis and β-cell proliferation, but prolonged hyperinsulinemia can deteriorate the efficiency of insulin receptor signaling. Insulin resistance can cause β-cell failure due to long-term increased insulin demand1,2. Additionally, ROS production induced by lipotoxic conditions can contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction and ER stress, as β-cells have a weak antioxidative capacity to counteract redox insults6. Therefore, cellular stresses induced by lipotoxicity impose a double burden on β-cells: an accelerated insulin synthesizing load and cellular oxidative stress, which lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and ER stress.
In addition to stresses on mitochondria and the ER, lysosomal stress can also play a role in β-cell lipotoxicity. Defective autophagic degradation due to lysosomal stress can impair cell survival under lipotoxic stress. The intralysosomal Ca2+ concentration is known to be in the range of hundreds of micromolar, corresponding to that of the ER, even though lysosomes do not have any active Ca2+ ATPase. This large Ca2+ gradient across the lysosomal membrane is known to be dependent on the proton gradient developed by the V-ATPase H+ pump7. However, Xu et al. suggested that there may exist a direct Ca2+ transfer from the ER to lysosomes via passive Ca2+ transporters or channels8. Disturbance in lysosomal Ca2+ homeostasis impairs autophagic degradation and deteriorates cell survival under lipotoxic stress. We have previously reported oxidative stress-mediated ER Ca2+ depletion and cytotoxicity by saturated fatty acids9, consistent with the results published by others10. In this review, we will focus on autophagic defects related to lysosomal Ca2+ dysregulation and pathologic signaling in β-cell lipotoxicity, which could be effective therapeutic targets for type 2 diabetes and other metabolic diseases.
ER calcium depletion in beta-cell lipotoxicity
A large body of evidence describes the involvement of ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in β-cell lipotoxicity related to oxidative stress. Elevated levels of glucose and saturated fatty acids elicit pathologic oxidative stress through different mechanisms, such as activation of the protein kinase C (PKC)-NADPH oxidase (NOX) axis in the cytosol or increased superoxide generation from mitochondria. ERO1α and PDI also participate in ROS generation from the ER, which amplifies oxidative stress via a feed-forward mechanism. This redox disequilibrium induces aberrant ER Ca2+ release by activating inositol trisphosphate (IP3) receptors and ryanodine receptors11,12,13. Oxidative stress also decreases sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) activity14, resulting in ER Ca2+ depletion and associated ER stress.
Another critical role of the ER, in addition to protein folding, is the sensing of cellular stresses and maintaining homeostasis15. The accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins due to ER dysfunction activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), which attempts to attenuate pathologic progression and recover ER function within a limited range. This process is initiated by three ER membrane proteins: inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). During ER stress, these three distinct signal transduction arms dissociate from 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78), also known as binding immunoglobulin (BiP), and activate downstream signaling cascades. Functional consequences of the UPR include (1) the reduction of global protein synthesis by attenuating translation, (2) the promotion of selective translation of chaperones to increase ER protein folding capacity, and (3) signaling for ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) to eliminate misfolded proteins by the ubiquitin‒proteasome system (UPS) (Fig. 1). However, if the ER is unable to reestablish homeostasis, cell death is initiated through proapoptotic signaling.
Due to active Ca2+ transport via SERCA, the luminal Ca2+ concentration of the ER remains high (100~800 μM)16. This phenomenon is important for the function of chaperones in the ER; thus, depleted ER Ca2+ levels cause accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins. In addition to pathologies of the ER itself, ER Ca2+ release disrupts cytosolic as well as organellar Ca2+ homeostasis, including that of mitochondria and lysosomes. Mitochondrial Ca2+ overload may be related to superoxide generation and mitochondrial dysfunction, consequently triggering the apoptotic process. The connection between oxidative stress and organellar Ca2+ homeostasis by lipotoxicity has been supported by the formation of mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) in metabolic stress. Notably, a noncanonical function of IRE1 is the regulation of the expression of the MAM protein IP3 receptor17. This spatial proximity facilitates aberrant Ca2+ transfer between the ER and mitochondria, establishing a vicious loop of organelle dysfunction. Increased MAMs have been described in palmitate-treated insulin-secreting cells, and the mechanism involves upregulation of the MAM protein GRP7518. Disturbances in lysosomal Ca2+ regulation related to ER Ca2+ release can impair lysosomal protein degradation.
Intriguingly, unresolved ER stress induces ERAD with additional activation of autophagy, which plays a physiologic protective role against pathological burdens. During the UPR, IRE1α dissociates from BiP/GRP78 and activates c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs), leading to the release of Beclin1 and enhanced basal autophagy19. Stimulation of PERK induces ATF4 and CHOP, which drive the expression of autophagy-related proteins, including Atg5 and Atg12, initiating the formation of autophagosomes20. However, chronic ER stress blocks autophagic initiation and degradation, which aggravates lipotoxicity in β-cells. Continuous and excessive demand for insulin secretion due to insulin resistance or inefficient compensatory UPR leads to autophagic defects and β cell failure.
Autophagy defects in beta-cell lipotoxicity
Role of autophagy in β-cell function
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved self-defense process that removes toxic materials and damaged organelles to maintain cellular homeostasis21. Over many years, this process has been demonstrated to be critical in cellular physiology and stress defense in mammalian tissues. Autophagy can be classified, with respect to cargo delivery mode and biological functions, into several major categories: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). In macroautophagy and related processes (hereafter referred to as autophagy), the major lysosomal degradation pathway is used to eliminate long-lived proteins and intracellular organelles. The autophagic process occurs through a series of steps: initiation, elongation, maturation, fusion, and degradation22. The onset of autophagy is marked by the formation of an isolated double membrane (phagophore) surrounding cytoplasmic cargos. The complete engulfment of the material to be degraded by the phagophore forms the autophagosome, which has a vesicle structure that captures the cargos. The autophagosome subsequently fuses with a lysosome to form an autolysosome where material undergoing autophagy is being degraded. Degradation products are recycled back for other cellular processes23.
In pancreatic β-cells, autophagy was first described in the context of the intracellular degradation of insulin granules24,25. The disposal of aged granules in β-cells is carried out by crinophagy, a process of degrading excess secretory granules containing insulin by delivering them to lysosomes. Crinophagy is required for maintaining insulin granule pools at an optimal level26. If any abnormalities exist in the degradation pathway, the imbalance between proinsulin biosynthesis and insulin secretion leads to β-cell dysfunction. Autophagy in β-cells received additional attention after reports about large aggregates of ubiquitinated proteins in insulin-positive β-cells from Zucker diabetic fatty rats27. The degradation of these proteins was performed by lysosomes, rather than proteasomes, following the process of autophagy.
Does autophagy have a protective or a detrimental function in β-cells in response to stress conditions? Autophagy defects in a mouse model lacking Atg7 in β-cells (Atg7f/f:RIP-Cre mice) resulted in progressive β-cell loss and impaired glucose tolerance28,29. This phenotype suggests that autophagy is fundamental for β-cell survival. In addition, autophagy is indispensable for various physiological processes in β-cells, including differentiation, development, and insulin homeostasis30,31. Autophagy is also needed to remove dysfunctional mitochondria (mitophagy) to maintain a healthy mitochondrial network through mitochondrial fission and fusion32. The ER, as the crucial organelle responsible for insulin biosynthesis, also has an intimate link to autophagy33. During the unfolded protein response (UPR), severely damaged fragments become selectively eliminated by autophagy to maintain ER homeostasis, called ER-phagy34. Impaired autophagic flux renders the quality control system inefficient and serves to eliminate damaged organelles. This process explains the accumulation of swollen mitochondria and expanded ER in Atg7 knockout β-cells28,29.
While autophagy is protective in β-cells, hyperactivation of autophagy reduces β-cell function and survival both in vitro and in vivo35. For example, strong activation of autophagy by rapamycin, as a suppressor of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), decreases insulin production and exacerbates β-cell death. The autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine abrogates the effects of rapamycin and restores insulin secretion, suggesting that β-cell dysfunction induced by rapamycin might be mediated through the excessive induction of autophagy. A similar phenotype has been reported in a Raptor knockout model, in which the deletion induces mTOR inhibition and enhances autophagy. This mouse exhibited compromised insulin secretion, which was rescued by autophagy inhibition36. Consistently, knockdown of Atg5/7 or short-term bafilomycin A1 treatment led to autophagy inhibition and enhanced proinsulin biosynthesis and insulin secretion31. Thus, well-regulated autophagy is crucial for maintaining β-cell homeostasis. Stresses disturbing autophagic activity, either inhibition or overactivation, contribute to β-cell dysfunction and the development of diabetes (Fig. 2). A recent study showed that proper autophagic function is also needed for the regulation of glucagon secretion in alpha cells37,38. However, α-cells are resistant to lipotoxicity, partially explained by abundant expression of antiapoptotic proteins39.
Defective autophagy as a therapeutic target in lipotoxicity
As described above, several mechanisms have been implicated in lipotoxicity, such as ER stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. Recently, defective autophagy has emerged as a focus for a new pathogenic mechanism40. Consequently, how can excess fatty acids regulate autophagic activity? Could inhibition of this mechanism be a novel therapeutic strategy to protect against lipotoxicity? Images of human islets treated with nonessential fatty acids showed an accumulation of autophagic vacuoles, increased size and number of autophagosomes, and increased β-cell death41. The accumulation of autophagic vesicles was also observed in pancreatic β-cells in a mouse model of tacrolimus-induced diabetes, a side effect of the immunosuppressant drug42. An increased number of autophagosomes can result from either stimulated autophagosome formation or slowed degradation. Stimulation of autophagosome formation could be due to an increase in autophagic flux by free fatty acids (FFAs)43,44,45; alternatively, FFAs could inhibit autophagic turnover, consequently leading to aggregation of autophagosomes in β-cells46,47. These conflicting interpretations of the impact of FFAs on autophagy may be explained by varying time points chosen to examine autophagic activities and/or the use of different inhibitors to follow autophagy.
Autophagy was reported to be suppressed by lipotoxic conditions due to AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) inhibition following mTORC1 activation in different cell types48,49,50. Consistent with these reports, a marked downregulation of autophagy-related proteins (Atg5 and Ag7) was observed in obese mice, contributing to autophagy suppression51. Furthermore, a high-fat diet challenge in mice resulted in compromised autophagic activity associated with impaired lysosomal acidification that contributes to lipotoxicity in the kidney52. Likewise, lipotoxicity-induced inhibition of autophagy in β-cells was normalized by lysosomal acidification, which also restored mitochondrial function53. Moreover, dyshomeostasis of intracellular Ca2+ has been proposed to inhibit autophagosome-lysosome fusion54. Thus, the application of verapamil, a Ca2+ channel blocker, restored autophagic flux in the liver and attenuated inflammation and insulin resistance in obese mice54. However, the role of voltage-gated Ca2+ entry in the intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis of hepatocytes, as nonexcitable cells, identifies a Ca2+ channel-independent action of verapamil. Of note, verapamil has been shown to inhibit thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the NOD-like receptor pyrin domain containing-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in a manner independent of Ca2+ channels55. Moreover, in the clonal β-cell lines INS-1 or MIN6, verapamil stimulates autophagy55,56.
The relationship between lipotoxicity and autophagy is intricate, and the pathophysiological mechanism involves multiple factors (Fig. 2). Understanding the contribution of each factor involved in regulating autophagy is critical for discovering therapeutic treatments for lipotoxicity-related disorders. Notably, dysfunctional autophagy caused by the downregulation of key regulators of the process could be reversed by antidiabetic drugs known to modulate autophagy41,42,57,58. Metformin, the most commonly prescribed antidiabetic agent, is known to prevent lipotoxic β-cell apoptosis and restore glucose-stimulated insulin secretion59. Metformin enhanced the removal of aggregated autophagic vacuoles in β-cells and AMPK-dependent protection from lipotoxicity57. The latter study mainly used 2 mM, a suprapharmacological concentration of metformin, while a 100-fold lower dose was sufficient to restore glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in islets from type 2 diabetic organ donors. The acute restoration of insulin secretion by metformin is caused by inhibition of voltage-dependent anion channel-1 (VDAC1), which is mistargeted to the β-cell plasma membrane in diabetes60. Insulin sensitizers, such as thiazolidinediones, have been reported to stimulate autophagy associated with activation of AMPK and suppression of mTORC161.
Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog, also protects against β-cell lipotoxicity via a number of mechanisms, including induction of the ER chaperone and antiapoptotic BiP/GRP78 protein62, inhibition of proapoptotic stress kinases63, and restoration of lysosomal function and autophagic flux42,64. Exendin-4 prevented the excessive accumulation of autophagosomes and restored autophagic clearance in defective β-cells42. GLP-1 agonists as well as the GLP-1-degrading dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor also increase LC3 II and autophagosome formation, restoring insulin secretion in beta-cells from high-fat diet obese or diabetic mice65,66,67. However, there was no effect of exendin-4 on autophagy in the absence of glucolipotoxicity67.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a newly introduced class of antidiabetic drugs that reduce circulating glucose levels through the induction of glycosuria. SGLT2 inhibitors were reported to activate autophagy and preserve normal morphology and function in renal cells or tissues from diabetic mice68,69. In a recent study, an SGLT2 inhibitor or knockdown of the SGLT2 transporter restored autophagic levels via AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition in a human proximal tubular cell line cultured in high-glucose medium70. The direct molecular mechanisms explaining the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in isolated cells are not fully understood but are consistent with the concept that SGLT2 acts as a sensor of excess nutrients. Inhibition of this molecule causes intracellular signaling linked to nutrient deprivation and AMPK-mediated autophagy activation even in cell types or tissues that do not express SGLT271. In addition to currently known antidiabetic drugs, other agents that positively modulate autophagy, such as the antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone, were shown to recover β-cell function in islet amyloid polypeptide-expressing insulinoma and human islet cells72,73. These results suggest that modulating autophagy is a promising strategy to counteract beta-cell loss and the development of diabetes.
Lysosomal calcium regulation and autophagy
Regulation of lysosomal Ca2+ signaling
Lysosomes are a group of membrane-enclosed organelles containing the bulk of digestive enzymes found in most eukaryotic cells74. As lysosomes have more than fifty acid hydrolases, the primary role of lysosomes has been regarded as a degradation system for damaged organelles and cellular macromolecules. Recently, lysosomes have been shown to have many additional functions to maintain cellular homeostasis by engaging with other compartments75. Lysosomal signal sensing and degradation have been proposed to cooperate to control fundamental physiological processes76. In response to different environmental cues, the lysosomal signaling network functions to induce adaptive responses as well as secure proper cellular demand for degradation. Moreover, the degradative process provides catabolites that act as a nutrient-sensing signal to turn on adaptive responses. Given this important association, it is not surprising that any disturbance of lysosomal degradation and signal sensing leads to the development of pathological conditions, such as lysosomal storage disorders or neurodegenerative diseases.
Lysosomes carry diverse lysosomal membrane proteins which function to transport metabolites, enzymes, and ions across the membrane. The transporting activities generate luminal acidification and are directly involved in regulating proper lysosomal functions. Particularly, by harboring the H+ ATPase pump, lysosomes have a unique strongly acidic luminal pH (4.5–5.0) that favors the activity of degradation enzymes. These organelles also contain a wide range of other ion channels that transport H+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl− driven by the electrochemical gradient across the lysosomal membrane77. In the past, it was reported that the function of lysosomes was mostly dependent on the activity of proton pumps and luminal acidification, and most studies have focused on pathological changes in lysosomal pH78. Currently, this view has changed to include other ion channels with advances in lysosomal patch-clamp technique79,80.
Ca2+ signaling is critical for lysosomal functions such as lysosomal mobility, degradation, and connection at membrane contact sites. Lysosomes are considered an intracellular Ca2+ store, along with the ER, having a high luminal Ca2+ concentration of ~ 500 μM, more than 5000-fold higher than cytosolic Ca2+7. Ca2+ efflux is conducted via at least three types of lysosomal Ca2+ channels: transient receptor potential cation channels of the mucolipin family (TRPML1-3), two-pore channels (TPC1-2), and trimeric Ca2+ two transmembrane channels (P2X4) (Fig. 3). The uptake of Ca2+ into lysosomes is not yet well elucidated. Several studies support the idea that a Ca2+/H+ exchanger exists due to a notable reduction in lysosomal Ca2+ when lysosomal pH is disturbed by a V-ATPase inhibitor or alkalizing reagents such as NH4Cl7,81,82,83. However, the ER is proposed to serve as the main source to refill lysosomal Ca2+ via IP3R8. However, the route and mechanism by which Ca2+ is transported into lysosomes remain unclear. A putative Ca2+ channel that resides on the contact site between the ER and lysosomes has been implicated.
In the history of lysosomal Ca2+ studies, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) was the first potent reagent discovered to strongly induce Ca2+ release from lysosomes. Initially, NAADP administration provoked a cytosolic Ca2+ rise originating from a Ca2+ store that is insensitive to IP3 and cyclic ADP-ribose84. Following this, the source of Ca2+ release induced by NAADP was shown to originate from the endolysosomal system85,86,87. With a better understanding of the important role of lysosomal Ca2+ signaling, more factors have been found to regulate lysosomal Ca2+, including pH, nutrients, stressful conditions, or small molecules such as ATP, phospholipids and sphingosine7,88,89,90,91. Each stimulus modulates lysosomal Ca2+ via different mechanisms to trigger selective Ca2+ signaling responses that favor the needs of the cell.
In addition, lysosomal signaling was shown to be regulated via contact sites with other membrane-bound organelles, such as the ER, Golgi, mitochondria, and peroxisomes. Many important functional events occur at lysosome-organelle contact sites, including lipid transfer, lysosomal positioning and trafficking. Regarding the regulation of lysosomal Ca2+, there might be Ca2+-mediated functional coupling at the microdomain between the ER and lysosomes. Indeed, NAADP triggers Ca2+ release via TPCs, which requires intact function of IP3Rs and RyRs on the ER. This observation suggested a trigger hypothesis by NAADP in which the Ca2+ mobilized from lysosomes can initiate a global Ca2+ increase via Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from the ER87,92,93. The triggering function of Ca2+ released from lysosomes is nicely illustrated in adrenaline-induced glucagon secretion from pancreatic α-cells, which is attenuated in TPC-2 channel KO mice94, while such channel deletion does not alter insulin secretion95. In addition, a membrane contact site between mitochondria and lysosomes was identified to facilitate the direct transfer of Ca2+ from lysosomes to mitochondria96. Lysosomal TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ efflux was shown to transfer Ca2+ into mitochondria via VDAC1 and MCU. This new discovery contributes an additional mechanism for regulating Ca2+ dynamics, which might be implicated in pathological diseases, including neurodegenerative and lysosomal storage disorders96,97,98.
Autophagy regulation by lysosomal Ca2+
Lysosomal Ca2+ is one of the essential factors needed for various physiological processes, including endocytic membrane trafficking, autophagy, membrane repair, formation of ER-lysosomal contact sites, and protein transport75. Most studies have revealed the important role of TRPMLs, and some have highlighted TPCs and P2X4 in autophagy and lysosomal system regulation. TRPMLs belong to a large family of transient receptor potential ion channels containing three isoforms (TRPML1, 2, and 3). TRPML1 mainly localizes in lysosomes, while TRPML2 and TRPML3 are found to reside on early endosomes, late endosomes and lysosomes99.
TRPML1 is the best-studied channel regarding lysosomal adaptation and autophagy regulation. The first report about the role of TRPML1 in pathophysiology characterized a disorder affecting the lysosomal pathway, so-called mucolipidosis type IV (MLIV)100. The TRPML1-mutated cells clearly show defective autophagic processes with impaired lysosomal pH, enlargement of lysosomes and autophagosomes along with accumulation of undigested materials. The pathogenic manifestations of TRPML1 mutation include the increased formation of new autophagosomes and a delay in autophagosome-lysosome fusion101. Imaging studies revealed substantial aggregation of cytoplasmic bodies in the cerebral cortex of TRPML1 knockout mice. As a result of suppressed autophagic degradation, the levels of LC3-II and p62 were markedly increased, suggesting that macroautophagy is defective in mucolipin-1-deficient neurons. This observation, together with the characteristics of MLIV fibroblasts, contributes new insight into the neuronal pathogenesis of this disease102.
In fasting conditions, as a molecular mechanism of autophagic regulation, lysosomal Ca2+ release via TRPML1 was enhanced, generating a high Ca2+ microdomain surrounding lysosomes103. The increased Ca2+ level in the perilysosomal microdomain activates the calcium-dependent serine/threonine phosphatase calcineurin and dephosphorylates transcription factor EB (TFEB), enabling the translocation of TFEB into the nucleus, where it activates the transcription of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy-related genes. Another study proposed TRPML1-dependent autophagy activation by reactive oxygen species (ROS)88. In response to ROS generation, TRPML1 is directly activated and releases Ca2+, followed by calcineurin stimulation and TFEB translocation into the nucleus. Genetic or pharmacological intervention to suppress TRPML1 prevents the removal of damaged and ROS-generating mitochondria. Thus, TRPML1 is a positive regulator of autophagy required for autophagosome-lysosome fusion and transcriptional upregulation of autophagy-related genes.
TRPML2 and TRPML3 have received less attention regarding autophagy regulation. Nevertheless, TRPML3 may play an important function as a regulator of membrane trafficking and autophagy104. Overexpression of TRPML3 enhances autophagy, and knockdown or loss-of-function mutation of TRPML3 was shown to inhibit autophagy. TRPML3 was reported to specifically bind to GATE16, a mammalian Atg8 homolog, to facilitate autophagosome maturation by providing Ca2+ during the membrane fusion process105. Each TRPML channel plays a distinct role in autophagy, as noted earlier. Furthermore, the role of TRPML heteromultimerization was proven to regulate starvation-induced autophagy and cell viability, indicating that hetero-TRPMLs, not a distinct type, might be more important in the context of regulating autophagy106.
In addition to TRPMLs, another lysosomal Ca2+ flux regulator of autophagy is the TPC. Mammalian cells contain two forms of TPCs: TPC1 resides on endosomes and lysosomes, and TPC2 localizes to lysosomes83,107. Due to the specific localization of TPCs on the lysosomal membrane and their regulation of Ca2+ efflux, TPCs were predicted to be involved in autophagy regulation. However, it remains controversial whether TPCs act as enhancers or inhibitors of autophagy. Several studies have proposed that Ca2+ signaling from TPCs is needed for the activation of autophagy. NAADP, a well-known agonist of TPCs, triggers Ca2+ release and regulates the autophagic process in astrocytes by increasing lysosome formation and two autophagic markers, LC3-II and Beclin1108. The Ca2+ signal evoked by NAADP is linked to calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CaMKK2) and AMPK to promote autophagosome formation109. This Ca2+-dependent signaling also influences autophagic degradation at the lysosomal level. The link between TPCs and autophagy was postulated clearly in TPC knockout mice110. In the absence of TPC activity, autophagic flux was decreased in cardiomyocytes upon starvation, suggesting the critical role of TPCs in appropriate basal and induced autophagic flux in cardiac tissues110,111.
Conversely, TPCs have been considered a negative regulator of autophagy via effects on lysosomal pH112. Lu et al. reported that TPC2 overexpression or activation of TPC2 by NAADP inhibited autophagosome-lysosome fusion. However, knockdown of TPC2 or application of a TPC2 antagonist (Ned-19) reduced TPC2-dependent autophagosome accumulation. The molecular mechanism demonstrated that TPC2/NAADP/Ca2+ signaling alkalinizes lysosomal pH to specifically inhibit the later stage of basal autophagic progression. In another knockout experiment, TPC2−/− mice exhibited an atrophic phenotype with enhanced autophagic flux under starvation, which was different from the study mentioned above112. This discrepancy was thought to result from different strategies used in generating the TPC2 knockout mice. As a lysosomal Ca2+ channel, P2X4R (purinergic receptor P2X4) participates in the fusion step of autophagy by regulating Ca2+ release. A complex formed by the interaction between P2X4 and calmodulin (CaM) at the endolysosomal membrane promotes fusion and vacuolation in a Ca2+-dependent fashion113.
Role of mTOR in autophagy regulation
Regulation of mTOR signaling at the lysosome
The mTOR complex, a master regulator of cell growth, has two major targets of rapamycin: mTOR1 and mTOR2, which not only have distinct roles but also regulate each other to maintain growth and proliferation114. mTORC1 functions as a main mediator of protein synthesis and cell growth, whereas mTORC2 is involved in regulating cell proliferation in response to growth factors as well as metabolism. A canonical signaling cascade to activate mTORC1 requires both active Rags and GTP-bound Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb) residing on the lysosomal surface. Rag-GTPases, members of the Ras family of GTP-binding proteins, regulate mTORC1 in an amino acid-dependent manner (Fig. 4). In response to increased amino acid abundance, Rag heterodimers interact with the Raptor component of mTORC1, which induces the redistribution of mTORC1 to Rab7-containing lysosomes115. The movement of mTORC1 to the lysosomal surface is driven by the interaction between the trimeric Ragulator protein complex of mTORC1 and Rag GTPases116. After translocating to the lysosomal surface, mTORC1 interacts with its kinase activator, Rheb GTPase, to enhance the binding of 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. Under conditions of limited amino acids, Rap1-GTPases concentrate lysosomes in the perinuclear area and reduce the available lysosomal surface for mTORC1 activation117. The absence of Rap1 expands the lysosome population, increasing the association between mTORC1 and activators on lysosomes, resulting in mTORC1 activation.
In addition to canonical pathways regulating mTORC1, different extracellular and intracellular signal inputs have been reported to control mTORC1 activity. Notably, the intracellular second messenger Ca2+ has been shown to activate the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase, which is situated directly downstream of mTORC1, as shown in rat liver epithelial cell lines118,119,120. The activating mechanism of mTORC1 by amino acids has also been demonstrated to be Ca2+-dependent121. Amino acids increase cytosolic Ca2+ binding to CaM, in turn activating hVPS34 and mTORC1 signaling. The mTOR signal was diminished by intracellular Ca2+ chelators, a CaM antagonist, or knockdown of CaM, suggesting that intracellular Ca2+ and CaM are involved in amino acid-induced mTORC1 activation122. Another mechanism has been suggested for amino acid activation of mTORC1 through regulation of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2)-Rheb axis by Ca2+/CaM123. These interesting findings prompted a surge of questions as to which intracellular Ca2+ source directly plays the critical role in mediating mTORC1 activation. Several studies have reported that lysosomal Ca2+ dyshomeostasis observed in lysosomal storage diseases might be responsible for the inhibition of the mTORC1 signaling pathway. Indeed, in flies lacking TRPML1 function, mTORC1 signaling was attenuated. Reactivation of mTORC1 by a high-protein diet reduced the severity of the mutant TRPML1 phenotype, indicating the interrelationship between the TRPML and TORC1 pathways124,125. Consistent with these findings, TRPML1-mediated lysosomal Ca2+ release activates mTORC1 by promoting interaction with CaM122. Furthermore, negative feedback regulation of mTORC1 activity on TRPML1 through a CaM-dependent mechanism has been shown to be important for maintaining cellular homeostasis during starvation126.
mTOR activation in β-cell lipotoxicity
With a full nutrient supply, mTORC1 is rapidly activated to promote biosynthesis, which generates new cellular materials such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. In contrast, during starvation, an adaptive mechanism is turned on to suppress mTORC1 activity to conserve the limited cellular energy and enhance the production of recycled materials via the degradation pathway. Depending on the cell type, mTORC1 plays a tissue-specific role in contributing to the maintenance of energy homeostasis127,128,129. In pancreatic β-cells, mTORC1 has been implicated in cell proliferation by modulating critical factors of the cell cycle, including cyclin D2, cyclin D3 and Cdk4, in response to growth factors, insulin and nutrients130. In addition, the importance of mTORC1 activity in β-cells has been documented by the integration of several growth signaling pathways, such as protein kinase B (AKT), protein kinase C, Hippo, epidermal growth factor receptor, and synapses of amphids defective protein kinase A130,131,132,133,134. In a genetic approach, gain or loss of mTORC1 function provided important insights into the role of mTORC1 in β-cell physiology. Knockout of Raptor, a core component of mTORC1, in mouse β-cells resulted in a diabetic phenotype, impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and decreased β-cell viability and proliferation. The underlying mechanisms revealed that the 4E-BPs/eIF4E arm of mTORC1 regulates β-cell proliferation, while S6K controls cell size, autophagy and apoptosis. In addition, the mTORC1/4EBP2/eIF4E pathway is implicated in insulin processing via cap-dependent translation of carboxypeptidase E135. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 by overexpressing Rheb resulted in an increase in β-cell mass and insulin secretion136. Furthermore, inhibition of mTORC1 by rapamycin has been shown to trigger the onset of diabetes137. Intriguingly, another study showed biphasic effects of mTORC1 overactivation by the deletion of TSC2: β-cell mass as well as an increase in insulin secretion were increased in young (up to 30 weeks), while hyperglycemia developed along with insulin resistance due to β-cell exhaustion after 40 weeks of age138. This result indicates that prolonged and continuous upregulation of mTORC1 exerts deleterious effects and causes β-cell pathology in contrast to its physiologic roles. Upon chronic exposure to excess nutrients, mTORC1 in β-cells is consistently activated, which is accompanied by an increase in β-cell death. Notably, relative to that of the controls, mTORC1 was upregulated in islets from organ donors with type 2 diabetes, while mTORC2 was downregulated139. Consistently, genetic and pharmacological suppression of mTORC1-S6K1 signaling recovered insulin secretion in diabetic patient islets. The same results were observed in islets exposed to glucotoxic conditions and in islets from diabetic mice.
How does the sustained activation of mTORC1 cause β-cell dysfunction? Constitutively active mTORC1 has a negative impact on downstream signaling, including mTORC1-S6K1-IRS and mTORC2, as well as other intracellular processes, such as ER homeostasis and autophagy140. There are negative feedback loops between mTORC1-S6K1 and the mTORC2-AKT axis that prevent excessive insulin downstream signaling cascades. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 can downregulate RTK-IRS1/2-PI3K-AKT signaling. Another suggested mechanism is the suppression of autophagy by mTORC1. Early observations using electron microscopy showed the abnormal accumulation of autophagosomes in β-cells after exposure to high fatty acid and glucose or in islets of T2D patients41,141. Further studies reported that autophagic flux was blocked by a high-fat diet or under excessive nutrient conditions141,142. In this context, inhibition of mTORC1 was shown to improve autophagic activity and β-cell survival against overnutrition stress. One of the molecular mechanisms was demonstrated to be mTORC1-mediated Unc-51-Like Kinase 1 (ULK1) phosphorylation at Ser757, which prevented autophagy initiation143. Conversely, AMPK promotes autophagy by directly activating ULK1 through phosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser777. Along with autophagic suppression under overnutrition stress, prolonged mTORC1 upregulation induces ER stress and apoptosis in human and rodent islets and clonal β-cells141,144,145. Accordingly, hyperactivation of mTORC1 in TSC2-KO mice resulted in strong induction of UPR markers, including PERK, p-eIF2α, ATF4 and CHOP.
Autophagy regulation by mTORC1
Given the important role of autophagy, the multiple signaling modalities involved in the regulation of the process have been divided into two main categories: mTOR-dependent and mTOR-independent pathways146. The first study on autophagy regulation by mTOR reported the control mechanism of Tor (a homolog of mTOR) for autophagy induction in yeast, which blocks a factor required for autophagy initiation147. Several groups have proposed that mTORC1 is regulated by phosphorylating the autophagy regulatory complex formed by ULK1-Atg13-FIP200, which subsequently inhibits autophagy initiation148,149,150. In addition, AMBRA1, interacting with the E3 ligase TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), leads to Lys63 ubiquitylation and stabilization of ULK1, which enhances its kinase activity and autophagy induction (Fig. 4). However, under nonautophagic conditions, mTORC1 inhibits AMBRA1 by phosphorylation and subsequently inhibits autophagy151. Another mechanism has been suggested according to which mTORC1 specifically inhibits the ATG14-containing autophagic class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex, which is involved in autophagy induction through phosphorylation of ATG14 at multiple sites152. mTORC1 has also been implicated in autophagy inhibition by the phosphorylation of NRBF2/Atg38, which has been identified as the fifth subunit of the autophagic class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex153.
Recently, mTORC1 has been shown to not only participate in the early step of autophagy but also extensively function at later stages, including autophagy elongation and maturation (summary in Table 1). The elongation step is one of three major steps in autophagy that results in complete autophagosome formation. mTORC1 has been shown to be involved in this step via the phosphorylation of WIPI2 at Ser395, a critical protein in the growth of the isolation membrane and elongation, promoting the interaction between WIPI2 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase HUWE1 for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation154. Additionally, mTORC1 was shown to inhibit autophagy via p300 phosphorylation, which reduces the acetylation of several autophagy-related proteins such as LC3, Atg5, and Atg7155. Regarding the late stage of autophagy, mTOR regulates factors participating in autophagosome-lysosome fusion, including UV radiation resistance-associated gene (UVRAG) and proteins associated with UVRAG as an autophagy enhancer (Pacer)156,157. mTORC1 interacts with and phosphorylates UVRAG, which prevents the interaction with the HOPS complex, a component of the late endosome/lysosome fusion machinery, enhancing autophagosome and endosome maturation156. In response to nutrients, mTORC1 phosphorylates Pacer at serine 157 to disrupt its association with Stx17 and the HOPS complex, thus preventing Pacer-mediated autophagosome maturation157. The function of mTORC1 in autophagy is not only via post-translational modification but also through the transcription factors TFEB, TFE3 and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) to regulate lysosome biogenesis and autophagy. TFEB and TFE3 were identified as transcription factors controlling genes involved in autophagosome formation, fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, and lysosomal biogenesis158,159. The activity of mTORC1 negatively regulates autophagy by phosphorylating different serine residues in TFEB/TFE3 (Ser211, Ser122, Ser142 on TFEB, and Ser321 on TFE3), which promotes the binding between TFEB/TFE3 and the 14-3-3 family of proteins, resulting in their retention in the cytosol160,161,162,163. Therefore, the two master regulators can no longer turn on lysosomal gene expression, which has negative impacts on autophagy. Another member of the MiT/TFE family, MITF, was able to induce autophagy via upregulation of microRNA 211 (miR211)164. Inhibition of mTORC1 by the Torin-1 compound induces nuclear translocation of MITF and triggers the expression of genes involved in autophagy.
By functioning at different autophagic steps, mTORC1 is recognized as the master regulator of autophagy. Under nutrient-rich conditions, mTORC1 is known to inhibit the process at various steps of autophagy. Intriguingly, autophagy and mTORC1 have been shown to reciprocally regulate each other. During starvation, mTORC1 is inhibited, which is needed for the induction of autophagy. However, prolonged starvation leads to the reactivation of mTORC1 to restore the lysosomal system to maintain homeostasis165. Thus, there is an evolutionary cycle between autophagy and the master regulator mTORC1 to maintain the balance of the intracellular system, so any factor disrupting the regulatory cycle would lead to pathologic conditions and eventually the development of diseases.
Role of AMPK in autophagy regulation
Activation of AMPK signaling
AMPK, similar to mTOR signaling, is also an evolutionarily conserved key sensor and master regulator of metabolism. Under physiological or pathological conditions such as exercise, starvation, hypoxia, and shock, AMPK is activated through phosphorylation of upstream kinases related to a high AMP/ATP ratio or Ca2+ signaling. Activation of AMPK promotes catabolic processes such as glycolysis, fatty acid oxidation, and autophagic degradation and suppresses anabolic processes including synthesis of proteins, fatty acids, or cholesterol166. Mammalian AMPK is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three subunits: an α subunit harboring a protein kinase catalytic domain and noncatalytic β and γ regulatory subunits (Fig. 5). A serine/threonine kinase domain exists in the amino-terminal region of AMPKα, which contains the activation loop, playing a pivotal role in its regulation. In particular, phosphorylation of Thr172 in the activation loop is needed for maximal activities of AMPK167.
Three upstream kinases have been known to phosphorylate Thr172 in AMPK: liver kinase B1 (LKB1), calcium/CaM-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CaMKK2 or CaMKKβ), and transforming growth factor-β activating kinase (TAK1)168,169,170. First, the tumor suppressor LKB1 is a serine/threonine kinase functioning as a heterotrimer with two other subunits, the STE20-related adapter protein (STRAD) and the scaffolding mouse protein 25 (MO25)171. Genetic deletion of Lkb1 abrogates the activation of AMPK by agonists such as aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR), metformin or phenformin or in response to energy stress, revealing that LKB1 is responsible for the majority of AMPK activation172. Increases in AMP or ADP activate AMPK mainly by promoting the phosphorylation of LKB1 but also by inhibiting dephosphorylation by protein phosphatases or directly activating AMPK173.
Second, activation of CaMKK2 by intracellular Ca2+ phosphorylates Thr172 in AMPK, thus linking Ca2+ signaling to the regulation of energy metabolism169. Upstream signals for Ca2+ elevation, such as adiponectin receptor activation or muscle contraction (exercise), can increase Ca2+-bound CaM and activate CaMKK2 and AMPK174. As previously mentioned, the ER maintains cellular Ca2+ homeostasis and generates signals by releasing Ca2+. A relationship between AMPK and the ER-localized protein stromal interaction molecule 2 (STIM2) has been demonstrated175. The interaction among STIM2, CaMKK2, and AMPK could be promoted by the release of ER Ca2+ and store-operated Ca2+ entry.
TAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPKK) family, proposed as an alternative third AMPK kinase. TAK1 is induced in response to TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), resulting in a cytoprotective autophagic response mediated by AMPK176. Stress-inducible proteins, sestrins, were identified to mediate DNA damage-induced AMPK activation. Sestrin1/2 induces AMPK phosphorylation at T172 and enhances AMPK-mediated mTOR suppression177.
The lysosome is known as a center of amino acid sensing and regulation of mTOR signaling178. Recently, the lysosome has emerged as a regulatory and functional site for AMPK, promoting the idea of lysosomes as hubs of cellular metabolic regulation179. Nutrient deprivation, such as glucose deprivation, which is not associated with gross changes in cellular ATP levels, promotes the formation of an LKB1-AMPK complex at the lysosomal surface180. AMPK not only localizes to the endolysosomal compartment but also mediates lysosomal biogenesis by regulating the nuclear translocation of TFEB/TFE3181. The target genes for TFEB/TFE3 carry a common genetic motif, coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation (CLEAR), which induces the expression of a network of lysosomal hydrolases, lysosomal membrane proteins, and autophagy-related proteins in response to pathways sensing lysosomal stress158. TEFB/TFE3 also induces TRPML1, which can regulate lysosomal membrane fusion with the plasma membrane, eliciting lysosomal exocytosis or autophagosome formation of autophagolysosomes and autophagic degradation. In addition to transcriptional upregulation of autophagy-related proteins, AMPK activation is involved in the initiation, maturation, and processing of autophagy in the endolysosome system.
Regulatory actions of AMPK on metabolism and autophagy
Upon energetic crisis, AMPK reprograms metabolic activity by covalent modifications, transcriptional regulation, altered substrate utilization, and ultimate restoration of cellular and whole organismal homeostasis182. AMPK reduces lipid storage and promotes mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. The downstream enzymes inhibited by AMPK include mTOR, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR), and fatty acid synthase (Fig. 5). AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits ACC, the enzyme catalyzing the conversion of acetyl-CoA into malonyl-CoA, the first step in fatty acid synthesis. AMPK also inhibits HMGR, which is the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis182. The phosphorylation of SREBP1c and SREBP2 by AMPK inhibits their activities, but there are additional indirect mechanisms involving the regulation of SREBP-mediated lipid synthesis by AMPK. AMPK activates adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), catalyzing lipolysis and facilitating mitochondrial fatty acid uptake for β-oxidation by reducing an allosteric inhibitor, malonyl-CoA.
Accumulating evidence suggests that AMPK increases mitochondrial mass (biogenesis) by phosphorylation and activation of proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α (PGC1α)183. TFEB activated by AMPK also directly binds to and activates the promoter of the gene encoding PGC1α184. The consequences of AMPK activation on mitochondria are not restricted to biogenesis but also include mitochondrial dynamics (fission) and mitophagy. Mitochondrial fission is mediated by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), which is recruited to the outer mitochondrial membrane by mitochondrial fission factor (MFF). AMPK phosphorylates two serines on a core component of MFF and activates its action on mitochondrial fission185.
AMPK activates the autophagic process, including mitophagy, by two main mechanisms: i) direct activation of ULK1 and ii) inhibition of the mTOR complex. AMPK binds to and phosphorylates ULK1 on multiple residues: Ser317, Ser467, Ser555, Thr574, Ser637 and Ser777143,186. Activated ULK1 in turn phosphorylates class III PI3K complex I, composed of VPS34, ATG14L and Beclin1. This complex generates phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate as a key signal for the formation of a mature phagophore, encapsulating cytosolic constituents and delivering them to the lysosome187. Cells expressing nonphosphorylatable ULK1 mutants accumulate defective mitochondria, supporting the importance of the AMPK-ULK1 axis for the selective removal of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy186.
To maintain energy and nutrient homeostasis, cells must balance anabolic and catabolic inputs. Antagonistic cross-inhibition exists between mTORC1 and AMPK signaling in energy metabolism and autophagic processes. For the inhibition of the mTORC1 complex, AMPK phosphorylates TSC2 at its Thr1127 and Ser1345 sites, which promotes the GTPase activity of the TSC1/TSC2 complexes. Rheb-GTP is transformed into an inactive Rheb-GDP state, and mTORC1 activity is turned off188. AMPK also directly phosphorylates the Ser772 and Ser792 sites of Raptor, increasing 14-3-3 protein binding to Raptor, hindering the binding of Raptor to mTOR or mTOR substrates, and subsequently resulting in inhibition of the mTOR signaling pathway189.
Autophagic regulation on the lysosomal membrane
Activation of mTOR and AMPK on the lysosomal membrane
As described above, the autophagosome is degraded through autophagosome-lysosome fusion and digestion by lysosomal hydrolases. This membrane fusion has been hypothesized to involve soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins due to their known actions in vesicle fusion190. The proposed molecular mechanism suggests that syntaxin 17 tethered onto the autophagosome membrane recruits synaptosomal-associated protein 29 (SNAP29) to stabilize this complex with ATG14 and vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8). VAMP8 is localized on endosomes and lysosomes and forms a syntaxin17-SNAP29-VAMP8 complex allowing autophagolysosomal fusion191. There is crosstalk between different signaling pathways, including mTORC1 and AMPK, in which the lysosome plays an important role in autophagic flux.
The localization of mTORC1 to Rab7-containing lysosomes is needed for its function, implying that the lysosome is the site of mTOR activation115. mTORC1 localization to the lysosome is dependent on Rag GTPases and the Ragulator complex composed of late endosomal/lysosomal adapter and MAPK and mTOR activator 1-5 (LAMTOR1-5)116. Rag GTPases are a Ras superfamily of small GTPases of large molecular weight lacking the post-translational modification needed for membrane localization. Instead, the Ragulator complex, which acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for RagA/B, is the anchoring site for Rag GTPases to lysosomal membrane192. The active conformation of Rag GTPases (RagA/B-GTP and RagC/D-GDP) with the Ragulator complex can recruit Raptor and mTORC1 to the lysosomal membrane. Activation of Rag GTPases by amino acids and glucose abundance determines lysosomal localization of mTORC1, which can be regulated by a range of GEF and GTPase-activating proteins. In addition, mTORC1 on the lysosome brings it in close proximity to its regulator, Rheb, residing on the lysosome. Thus, the lysosome provides a nutrient signaling hub that tightly controls mTORC1 activation.
AMPK is known to be present in the nucleus and cytoplasm but was reported to be a residential protein of the late endosome/lysosome193. AXIN, being a scaffold protein for AMPK and its upstream regulator LKB1, interacts with a lysosome-anchoring protein, LAMTOR1, leading to the formation of an LKB1-AMPK- AXIN-LAMTOR complex on the lysosomal membrane116. Starvation or the presence of AMP enhances LKB1-AMPK-AXIN binding to LAMTOR1 and accelerates AMPK activation on the lysosome (Fig. 6). Furthermore, phospho-AMPK was found exclusively on the lysosomal membrane, suggesting that LKB1 phosphorylates AMPK on this membrane surface. In addition, the energy sensor vATPase regulates lysosomal localization of the LKB1-AMPK-AXIN-LAMTOR1 complex not only for turning on catabolic processes under glucose-starved conditions but also for turning off anabolic metabolism through lysosomal association and dissociation of mTORC1193.
The critical role of the perilysosomal LKB1-AMPK-AXIN-LAMTOR1-vATPase axis in regulating mTORC1 and AMPK signaling was further demonstrated by its action on the metformin-induced beneficial effects on metabolism. Metformin promotes the formation of the AMPK-AXIN-LAMTOR1-vATPase complex and activates AMPK on the lysosomal membrane. In parallel, metformin treatment results in dissociation of mTORC1 from the Ragulator-vATPase complex and inhibits mTORC1 signaling194,195. Another cross-regulation of mTORC1 and AMPKα2 on the lysosome is mediated by sestrin2, which interacts with TSC1/2 and AMPK. Their binding inhibits Rheb-GTP loading by TSC2 phosphorylation, thus decreasing mTORC1 activity and stimulating AMPK activity177. Increased AMPK and suppressed mTORC1 on the lysosomal membrane can accelerate autophagic initiation, maturation, and degradation, leading to beneficial metabolic consequences.
Perilysosomal regulation of autophagy in stressed β-cells
In most cells, Ca2+ signaling has been implicated in cell fate decisions, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and cell death. In addition, Ca2+ regulates the autophagic process from initiation to lysosome fusion and degradation. As described above, lysosomal ion channels and transporters participate in Ca2+ release into perilysosomal microdomains, which can trigger important regulatory signaling in autophagy: (1) CaM-dependent AMPK and mTOR activation and (2) calcineurin-mediated TFEB/TFE3 translocation to the nucleus.
Increases in cytosolic Ca2+ levels, particularly near the lysosomal membrane, result in efficient phosphorylation and activation of AMPK by CaMKK2. Ca2+-induced activation of AMPK triggers autophagy induction by ULK1/2 phosphorylation and mTORC1 inhibition. AMPK suppresses mTORC1 via phosphorylation of TSC2 and Raptor. At the same time, elevation of perilysosomal Ca2+ can also activate mTORC1, which is an autophagic suppressor signal (Fig. 6). Hence, activation of mTORC1 could be prevented by Ca2+ chelators or TRPML1 depletion122. Blocking the interaction between mTOR and CaM by a CaM antagonist prevents mTORC1 activation, confirming the Ca2+/CaM-dependent mechanism. Thus, perilysosomal Ca2+ elevation activates both AMPK and mTORC1 signals mediated by CaM and CaM-dependent kinases. However, it is unclear how the activities of AMPK and mTORC1 are finely regulated through antagonistic suppression by each other under the same perilysosomal Ca2+ control.
As previously mentioned, lysosomal Ca2+ release can induce the activation of calcineurin, triggering TFEB/TFE3 dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation. TFEB and TFE3, as transcription factors and master regulators for lysosomal proteins, strongly upregulate autophagy-related gene expression and lysosomal biogenesis196. This signal effectively removes dysfunctional and ROS-producing mitochondria via mitophagy, since ROS trigger TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release from the lysosome88. This mechanism is critical for β-cell function because insulin secretion relies on the synthesis of ATP and other coupling factors from mitochondrial metabolism197,198.
Mitochondrial stressors such as rotenone or oligomycin/antimycin increase mitophagy as a compensatory and protective process for survival. This phenomenon could be, in part, mediated by nuclear translocation of TFEB, which is stimulated by calcineurin or AMPK but inhibited by mTORC1. All these signals can be activated by Ca2+ increase, while BAPTA-AM, a membrane-permeable Ca2+ chelator, abrogates mitochondrial stressor-triggered TFEB translocation and mitophagy activation in β-cells199. A calcineurin inhibitor suppresses TFEB translocation and mitophagy and aggravates mitochondrial dysfunction induced by mitochondrial stressors200. Inhibition of TRPML1 decreases lysosomal Ca2+ release and mitophagy by mitochondrial stressors. Scavenging of mitochondrial superoxide also prevents mitochondrial stressor-mediated Ca2+ elevation and mitophagy, demonstrating the role of ROS in lysosomal Ca2+ release via TRPML1 in pancreatic β-cells.
Future strategies related to perilysosomal calcium regulation against beta cell lipotoxicity
In the pathogenic progression of type 2 diabetes, the most important determining step could be the β-cell failure to compensate for the elevated insulin need. Notably, high glucose and fatty acids produce noxious oxidative stress and deleterious consequences leading to β-cell death. Accumulated evidence suggests that oxidative stress from persistent elevated fatty acids induces ER Ca2+ dysregulation closely connected to mitochondrial dysfunction and defective lysosomal degradative capacity. Lysosomal function is critical for autophagic flux, including mitophagy, which is an essential quality control mechanism required for cell survival against mitochondrial or metabolic stresses in β-cell lipotoxicity.
Lysosomal biogenesis and autophagic activity are stimulated by TFEB/TFE3, as demonstrated by genetic ablation of TFEB in β-cells, which causes marked aggravation of glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion by a high-fat diet199. Potentiation of perilysosomal Ca2+-mediated TFEB activation could be a promising therapeutic strategy to augment autophagy, counteracting organellar dysfunction due to lipotoxic stress in β-cells. It is noteworthy that the whole process of autophagy is oppositely regulated by AMPK and mTOR at the lysosomal membrane, both of which are key sensors for bioenergetic and nutritional status. Until now, the molecular mechanism governing the predominance of signaling between AMPK and mTOR has not been elucidated. Different environmental factors, including the amount and duration of cytosolic Ca2+ rise, crosstalk with other cell signals, or accompanying oxidative stress, can affect this predominance and autophagic outcomes. Interestingly, reducing cellular Ca2+ overload by Ca2+ channel blockers (CCB) increases autophagic activity and cell survival against lipotoxicity in HepG2 cells as well as β-cells54,201. Consistently, verapamil, as a frequently prescribed CCB for hypertension, promotes endogenous β-cell function and therapeutic effects in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes202. Recently, we demonstrated that the small molecule ER Ca2+ pump activator CDN1163 increases ER Ca2+ content, improves mitochondrial function, and protects against palmitate-induced lipotoxicity in pancreatic β-cells203. We propose that therapeutic strategies to activate ER Ca2+ pumps could correct perilysosomal Ca2+ overload and mitigate autophagic defects induced by sustained Ca2+ elevations. In addition, recovering mitochondrial function by promoting organellar Ca2+ uptake could be another effective strategy to improve autophagy and protect β-cells from lipotoxicity.
References
Weir, G. C., Butler, P. C. & Bonner-Weir, S. The β-cell glucose toxicity hypothesis: attractive but difficult to prove. Metabolism 124, 154870 (2021).
Prentki, M., Peyot, M. L., Masiello, P. & Madiraju, S. R. M. Nutrient-induced metabolic stress, adaptation, detoxification, and toxicity in the pancreatic β-cell. Diabetes 69, 279–290 (2020).
Guest, P. C., Rhodes, C. J. & Hutton, J. C. Regulation of the biosynthesis of insulin-secretory-granule proteins. Co-ordinate translational control is exerted on some, but not all, granule matrix constituents. Biochem. J. 257, 431–437 (1989).
Steiner, D. F. Adventures with insulin in the islets of Langerhans. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 17399–17421 (2011).
Liu, M. et al. Normal and defective pathways in biogenesis and maintenance of the insulin storage pool. J. Clin. Invest. 131 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci142240 (2021).
Lenzen, S. Chemistry and biology of reactive species with special reference to the antioxidative defence status in pancreatic β-cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1861, 1929–1942 (2017).
Christensen, K. A., Myers, J. T. & Swanson, J. A. pH-dependent regulation of lysosomal calcium in macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 115, 599–607 (2002).
Garrity, A. G. et al. The endoplasmic reticulum, not the pH gradient, drives calcium refilling of lysosomes. Elife 5 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15887 (2016).
Ly, L. D. et al. Oxidative stress and calcium dysregulation by palmitate in type 2 diabetes. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e291 (2017).
Cunha, D. A. et al. Initiation and execution of lipotoxic ER stress in pancreatic β-cells. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2308–2318 (2008).
Li, G. et al. Role of ERO1-alpha-mediated stimulation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor activity in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 186, 783–792 (2009).
Cooper, L. L. et al. Redox modification of ryanodine receptors by mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species contributes to aberrant Ca2+ handling in ageing rabbit hearts. J. Physiol. 591, 5895–5911 (2013).
Hamilton, S. et al. Increased RyR2 activity is exacerbated by calcium leak-induced mitochondrial ROS. Basic Res. Cardiol. 115, 38 (2020).
Vangheluwe, P., Raeymaekers, L., Dode, L. & Wuytack, F. Modulating sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase 2 (SERCA2) activity: cell biological implications. Cell Calcium 38, 291–302 (2005).
Chipurupalli, S., Samavedam, U. & Robinson, N. Crosstalk between ER stress, autophagy and inflammation. Front. Med. 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.758311 (2021).
Maechler, P. et al. Secretagogues modulate the calcium concentration in the endoplasmic reticulum of insulin-secreting cells. Studies in aequorin-expressing intact and permeabilized ins-1 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12583–12592 (1999).
Carreras-Sureda, A. et al. Non-canonical function of IRE1α determines mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum composition to control calcium transfer and bioenergetics. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 755–767 (2019).
Tiwary, S., Nandwani, A., Khan, R. & Datta, M. GRP75 mediates endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling during palmitate-induced pancreatic β-cell apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101368 (2021).
Corazzari, M. et al. Oncogenic BRAF induces chronic ER stress condition resulting in increased basal autophagy and apoptotic resistance of cutaneous melanoma. Cell Death Differ. 22, 946–958 (2015).
B’chir, W. et al. The eIF2α/ATF4 pathway is essential for stress-induced autophagy gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7683–7699 (2013).
Takeshige, K., Baba, M., Tsuboi, S., Noda, T. & Ohsumi, Y. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J. Cell Biol. 119, 301–311 (1992).
Mizushima, N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev. 21, 2861–2873 (2007).
Levine, B. & Kroemer, G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 132, 27–42 (2008).
Schnell, A. H., Swenne, I. & Borg, L. A. Lysosomes and pancreatic islet function. A quantitative estimation of crinophagy in the mouse pancreatic B-cell. Cell Tissue Res. 252, 9–15 (1988).
Bommer, G., Schäfer, H. J. & Klöppel, G. Morphologic effects of diazoxide and diphenylhydantoin on insulin secretion and biosynthesis in B cells of mice. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 371, 227–241 (1976).
Hayat, M. A. in Autophagy: Cancer, Other Pathologies, Inflammation, Immunity, Infection, and Aging (ed. Hayat, M. A.) 1–122 (Academic Press, 2017).
Kaniuk, N. A. et al. Ubiquitinated-protein aggregates form in pancreatic beta-cells during diabetes-induced oxidative stress and are regulated by autophagy. Diabetes 56, 930–939 (2007).
Ebato, C. et al. Autophagy is important in islet homeostasis and compensatory increase of beta cell mass in response to high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 8, 325–332 (2008).
Jung, H. S. et al. Loss of autophagy diminishes pancreatic beta cell mass and function with resultant hyperglycemia. Cell Metab. 8, 318–324 (2008).
Ren, L. et al. Autophagy is essential for the differentiation of porcine PSCs into insulin-producing cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 488, 471–476 (2017).
Riahi, Y. et al. Autophagy is a major regulator of beta cell insulin homeostasis. Diabetologia 59, 1480–1491 (2016).
Twig, G. et al. Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J. 27, 433–446 (2008).
Lamb, C. A., Yoshimori, T. & Tooze, S. A. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 759–774 (2013).
Schuck, S., Gallagher, C. M. & Walter, P. ER-phagy mediates selective degradation of endoplasmic reticulum independently of the core autophagy machinery. J. Cell Sci. 127, 4078–4088 (2014).
Tanemura, M. et al. Rapamycin causes upregulation of autophagy and impairs islets function both in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Transpl. 12, 102–114 (2012).
Israeli, T. et al. The nutrient sensor mTORC1 regulates insulin secretion by modulating ß-cell autophagy. Diabetes 71, 453–469 (2021).
Himuro, M. et al. Cellular autophagy in α cells plays a role in the maintenance of islet architecture. J. Endocr. Soc. 3, 1979–1992 (2019).
Rajak, S. et al. MTORC1 inhibition drives crinophagic degradation of glucagon. Mol. Metab. 53, 101286 (2021).
Marroqui, L. et al. Pancreatic α cells are resistant to metabolic stress-induced apoptosis in type 2 diabetes. EBioMedicine 2, 378–385 (2015).
Lytrivi, M., Castell, A. L., Poitout, V. & Cnop, M. Recent insights into mechanisms of beta-cell lipo- and glucolipotoxicity in type 2 diabetes. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 1514–1534 (2020).
Masini, M. et al. Autophagy in human type 2 diabetes pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 52, 1083–1086 (2009).
Lim, S. W., Jin, L., Jin, J. & Yang, C. W. Effect of exendin-4 on autophagy clearance in beta cell of rats with tacrolimus-induced diabetes mellitus. Sci. Rep. 6, 29921 (2016).
Komiya, K. et al. Free fatty acids stimulate autophagy in pancreatic beta-cells via JNK pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 401, 561–567 (2010).
Martino, L. et al. Palmitate activates autophagy in INS-1E beta-cells and in isolated rat and human pancreatic islets. PLoS ONE 7, e36188 (2012).
Choi, S. E. et al. Protective role of autophagy in palmitate-induced INS-1 beta-cell death. Endocrinology 150, 126–134 (2009).
Las, G., Serada, S. B., Wikstrom, J. D., Twig, G. & Shirihai, O. S. Fatty acids suppress autophagic turnover in beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42534–42544 (2011).
Mir, S. U. et al. Inhibition of autophagic turnover in beta-cells by fatty acids and glucose leads to apoptotic cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 6071–6085 (2015).
Guo, W., Zhong, W., Hao, L., Sun, X. & Zhou, Z. Activation of mTORC1 by free fatty acids suppresses LAMP2 and autophagy function via ER stress in alcohol-related liver disease. Cells 10 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102730 (2021).
Li, S. et al. Sirtuin 3 acts as a negative regulator of autophagy dictating hepatocyte susceptibility to lipotoxicity. Hepatology 66, 936–952 (2017).
Wen, H. et al. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nat. Immunol. 12, 408–415 (2011).
Yang, L., Li, P., Fu, S., Calay, E. S. & Hotamisligil, G. S. Defective hepatic autophagy in obesity promotes ER stress and causes insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 11, 467–478 (2010).
Yamamoto, T. et al. High-fat diet-induced lysosomal dysfunction and impaired autophagic flux contribute to lipotoxicity in the kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 1534–1551 (2017).
Assali, E. A. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated lysosomal reacidification restores mitochondrial turnover and function in β cells under lipotoxicity. FASEB J. 33, 4154–4165 (2019).
Park, H. W. et al. Pharmacological correction of obesity-induced autophagy arrest using calcium channel blockers. Nat. Commun. 5, 4834 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Urolithin A suppresses glucolipotoxicity-induced ER stress and TXNIP/NLRP3/IL-1β inflammation signal in pancreatic β cells by regulating AMPK and autophagy. Phytomedicine 93, 153741 (2021).
Xu, G., Chen, J., Jing, G. & Shalev, A. Preventing β-cell loss and diabetes with calcium channel blockers. Diabetes 61, 848–856 (2012).
Jiang, Y. et al. Metformin plays a dual role in MIN6 pancreatic beta cell function through AMPK-dependent autophagy. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 10, 268–277 (2014).
Chen, Z. F. et al. Liraglutide prevents high glucose level induced insulinoma cells apoptosis by targeting autophagy. Chin. Med. J. 126, 937–941 (2013).
Lupi, R. et al. Lipotoxicity in human pancreatic islets and the protective effect of metformin. Diabetes 51, S134–S137 (2002).
Zhang, E. et al. Preserving insulin secretion in diabetes by inhibiting VDAC1 overexpression and surface translocation in β cells. Cell Metab. 29, 64–77.e66 (2019).
Xi, X. et al. Pioglitazone protects tubular cells against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury through enhancing autophagy via AMPK-mTOR signaling pathway. Eur. J. Pharm. 863, 172695 (2019).
Cunha, D. A. et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists protect pancreatic beta-cells from lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress through upregulation of BiP and JunB. Diabetes 58, 2851–2862 (2009).
Natalicchio, A. et al. Exendin-4 protects pancreatic beta cells from palmitate-induced apoptosis by interfering with GPR40 and the MKK4/7 stress kinase signalling pathway. Diabetologia 56, 2456–2466 (2013).
Zummo, F. P. et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 protects pancreatic β-cells from death by increasing autophagic flux and restoring lysosomal function. Diabetes 66, 1272–1285 (2017).
Wang, J. et al. Liraglutide protects pancreatic β-cells against free fatty acids in vitro and affects glucolipid metabolism in apolipoprotein E‑/‑mice by activating autophagy. Mol. Med. Rep. 12, 4210–4218 (2015).
Liu, L., Liu, J. & Yu, X. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor MK-626 restores insulin secretion through enhancing autophagy in high fat diet-induced mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 470, 516–520 (2016).
Abe, H. et al. Exendin-4 improves β-cell function in autophagy-deficient β-cells. Endocrinology 154, 4512–4524 (2013).
Korbut, A. I. et al. SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin and DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin reactivate glomerular autophagy in db/db mice, a model of type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082987 (2020).
Lee, Y. H. et al. Empagliflozin attenuates diabetic tubulopathy by improving mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 317, F767–F780 (2019).
Xu, J., Kitada, M., Ogura, Y., Liu, H. & Koya, D. Dapagliflozin restores impaired autophagy and suppresses inflammation in high glucose-treated HK-2 cells. Cells 10 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061457 (2021).
Packer, M. Critical reanalysis of the mechanisms underlying the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors and reaffirmation of the nutrient deprivation signaling/autophagy hypothesis. Circulation 146, 1383–1405 (2022).
Rivera, J. F., Costes, S., Gurlo, T., Glabe, C. G. & Butler, P. C. Autophagy defends pancreatic beta cells from human islet amyloid polypeptide-induced toxicity. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 3489–3500 (2014).
Morita, S. et al. Autophagy protects against human islet amyloid polypeptide-associated apoptosis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2, 48–55 (2011).
de Duve, C. The lysosome turns fifty. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 847–849 (2005).
Ballabio, A. & Bonifacino, J. S. Lysosomes as dynamic regulators of cell and organismal homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 101–118 (2020).
Perera, R. M. & Zoncu, R. The lysosome as a regulatory hub. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 223–253 (2016).
Li, P., Gu, M. & Xu, H. Lysosomal ion channels as decoders of cellular signals. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 110–124 (2019).
Forgac, M. Vacuolar ATPases: rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 917–929 (2007).
Jung, Y., Kim, W., Shin, N. K., Bae, Y. M. & Wie, J. Unveiling the impact of lysosomal ion channels: balancing ion signaling and disease pathogenesis. Korean J. Physiol. Pharm. 27, 311–323 (2023).
Xu, H. & Ren, D. Lysosomal physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 77, 57–80 (2015).
Lloyd-Evans, E. et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C1 is a sphingosine storage disease that causes deregulation of lysosomal calcium. Nat. Med. 14, 1247–1255 (2008).
Dickson, E. J., Duman, J. G., Moody, M. W., Chen, L. & Hille, B. Orai-STIM–mediated Ca2+ release from secretory granules revealed by a targeted Ca2+ and pH probe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, E3539–E3548 (2012).
Calcraft, P. J. et al. NAADP mobilizes calcium from acidic organelles through two-pore channels. Nature 459, 596–600 (2009).
Lee, H. C. & Aarhus, R. A derivative of NADP mobilizes calcium stores insensitive to inositol trisphosphate and cyclic ADP-ribose (∗). J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2152–2157 (1995).
Arredouani, A. et al. Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) and endolysosomal two-pore channels modulate membrane excitability and stimulus-secretion coupling in mouse pancreatic β cells. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 21376–21392 (2015).
Kilpatrick, B. S. et al. An endosomal NAADP-sensitive two-pore Ca(2+) channel regulates ER-endosome membrane contact sites to control growth factor signaling. Cell Rep. 18, 1636–1645 (2017).
Galione, A. A primer of NAADP-mediated Ca(2+) signalling: from sea urchin eggs to mammalian cells. Cell Calcium 58, 27–47 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. MCOLN1 is a ROS sensor in lysosomes that regulates autophagy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12109 (2016).
Wang, W. et al. Up-regulation of lysosomal TRPML1 channels is essential for lysosomal adaptation to nutrient starvation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1373–E1381 (2015).
Dong, X.-p et al. PI(3,5)P(2) controls membrane trafficking by direct activation of mucolipin Ca(2+) release channels in the endolysosome. Nat. Commun. 1, 38–38 (2010).
Höglinger, D. et al. Intracellular sphingosine releases calcium from lysosomes. Elife 4, e10616 (2015).
Patel, S., Churchill, G. C. & Galione, A. Coordination of Ca2+ signalling by NAADP. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 482–489 (2001).
Heister, P. M., Powell, T. & Galione, A. Glucose and NAADP trigger elementary intracellular β-cell Ca(2+) signals. Sci. Rep. 11, 10714 (2021).
Hamilton, A. et al. Adrenaline stimulates glucagon secretion by Tpc2-dependent Ca(2+) mobilization from acidic stores in pancreatic α-cells. Diabetes 67, 1128–1139 (2018).
Cane, M. C., Parrington, J., Rorsman, P., Galione, A. & Rutter, G. A. The two pore channel TPC2 is dispensable in pancreatic β-cells for normal Ca2+ dynamics and insulin secretion. Cell Calcium 59, 32–40 (2016).
Peng, W., Wong, Y. C. & Krainc, D. Mitochondria-lysosome contacts regulate mitochondrial Ca(2+) dynamics via lysosomal TRPML1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19266–19275 (2020).
Mc Donald, J. M. & Krainc, D. Lysosomal proteins as a therapeutic target in neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Med. 68, 445–458 (2017).
Plotegher, N. & Duchen, M. R. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in lysosomal storage disorders. Trends Mol. Med. 23, 116–134 (2017).
Cheng, X., Shen, D., Samie, M. & Xu, H. Mucolipins: intracellular TRPML1-3 channels. FEBS Lett. 584, 2013–2021 (2010).
LaPlante, J. M. et al. Identification and characterization of the single channel function of human mucolipin-1 implicated in mucolipidosis type IV, a disorder affecting the lysosomal pathway. FEBS Lett. 532, 183–187 (2002).
Vergarajauregui, S., Connelly, P. S., Daniels, M. P. & Puertollano, R. Autophagic dysfunction in mucolipidosis type IV patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 2723–2737 (2008).
Curcio-Morelli, C. et al. Macroautophagy is defective in mucolipin-1-deficient mouse neurons. Neurobiol. Dis. 40, 370–377 (2010).
Medina, D. L. et al. Lysosomal calcium signalling regulates autophagy through calcineurin and TFEB. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 288–299 (2015).
Kim, H. J., Soyombo, A. A., Tjon-Kon-Sang, S., So, I. & Muallem, S. The Ca(2+) channel TRPML3 regulates membrane trafficking and autophagy. Traffic 10, 1157–1167 (2009).
Choi, S. & Kim, H. J. The Ca2+ channel TRPML3 specifically interacts with the mammalian ATG8 homologue GATE16 to regulate autophagy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 443, 56–61 (2014).
Zeevi, D. A., Lev, S., Frumkin, A., Minke, B. & Bach, G. Heteromultimeric TRPML channel assemblies play a crucial role in the regulation of cell viability models and starvation-induced autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 123, 3112–3124 (2010).
Brailoiu, E. et al. Essential requirement for two-pore channel 1 in NAADP-mediated calcium signaling. J. Cell Biol. 186, 201–209 (2009).
Pereira, G. J. et al. Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) regulates autophagy in cultured astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 27875–27881 (2011).
Gómez-Suaga, P. et al. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 regulates autophagy through a calcium-dependent pathway involving NAADP. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 511–525 (2012).
García-Rúa, V. et al. Endolysosomal two-pore channels regulate autophagy in cardiomyocytes. J. Physiol. 594, 3061–3077 (2016).
Grimm, C., Chen, C. C., Wahl-Schott, C. & Biel, M. Two-pore channels: catalyzers of endolysosomal transport and function. Front. Pharm. 8, 45 (2017).
Lu, Y. et al. Two pore channel 2 (TPC2) inhibits autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion by alkalinizing lysosomal pH. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 24247–24263 (2013).
Cao, Q. et al. Calcium release through P2X4 activates calmodulin to promote endolysosomal membrane fusion. J. Cell Biol. 209, 879–894 (2015).
Heitman, J., Movva, N. R. & Hall, M. N. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 253, 905–909 (1991).
Sancak, Y. et al. The Rag GTPases bind raptor and mediate amino acid signaling to mTORC1. Science 320, 1496–1501 (2008).
Sancak, Y. et al. Ragulator-Rag complex targets mTORC1 to the lysosomal surface and is necessary for its activation by amino acids. Cell 141, 290–303 (2010).
Mutvei, A. P. et al. Rap1-GTPases control mTORC1 activity by coordinating lysosome organization with amino acid availability. Nat. Commun. 11, 1416 (2020).
Graves, L. M. et al. An intracellular calcium signal activates p70 but not p90 ribosomal S6 kinase in liver epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1920–1928 (1997).
Hannan, K. M., Thomas, G. & Pearson, R. B. Activation of S6K1 (p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1) requires an initial calcium-dependent priming event involving formation of a high-molecular-mass signalling complex. Biochem. J. 370, 469–477 (2003).
Conus, N. M., Hemmings, B. A. & Pearson, R. B. Differential regulation by calcium reveals distinct signaling requirements for the activation of Akt and p70S6k. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4776–4782 (1998).
Gulati, P. et al. Amino acids activate mTOR complex 1 via Ca2+/CaM signaling to hVps34. Cell Metab. 7, 456–465 (2008).
Li, R.-J. et al. Regulation of mTORC1 by lysosomal calcium and calmodulin. Elife 5, e19360 (2016).
Amemiya, Y. et al. Amino acid-mediated intracellular Ca(2+) rise modulates mTORC1 by regulating the TSC2-Rheb axis through Ca(2+)/calmodulin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136897 (2021).
Wong, C. O., Li, R., Montell, C. & Venkatachalam, K. Drosophila TRPML is required for TORC1 activation. Curr. Biol. 22, 1616–1621 (2012).
Venkatachalam, K., Wong, C. O. & Montell, C. Feast or famine: role of TRPML in preventing cellular amino acid starvation. Autophagy 9, 98–100 (2013).
Sun, X. et al. A negative feedback regulation of MTORC1 activity by the lysosomal Ca(2+) channel MCOLN1 (mucolipin 1) using a CALM (calmodulin)-dependent mechanism. Autophagy 14, 38–52 (2018).
Polak, P. et al. Adipose-specific knockout of raptor results in lean mice with enhanced mitochondrial respiration. Cell Metab. 8, 399–410 (2008).
Cota, D. et al. Hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Science 312, 927–930 (2006).
Bentzinger, C. F. et al. Skeletal muscle-specific ablation of raptor, but not of rictor, causes metabolic changes and results in muscle dystrophy. Cell Metab. 8, 411–424 (2008).
Balcazar, N. et al. mTORC1 activation regulates β-cell mass and proliferation by modulation of cyclin D2 synthesis and stability. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 7832–7842 (2009).
George, N. M., Boerner, B. P., Mir, S. U., Guinn, Z. & Sarvetnick, N. E. Exploiting expression of hippo effector, yap, for expansion of functional islet mass. Mol. Endocrinol. 29, 1594–1607 (2015).
Lakshmipathi, J. et al. PKCζ is essential for pancreatic β-cell replication during insulin resistance by regulating mTOR and cyclin-D2. Diabetes 65, 1283–1296 (2016).
Zarrouki, B. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling promotes pancreatic β-cell proliferation in response to nutrient excess in rats through mTOR and FOXM1. Diabetes 63, 982–993 (2014).
Nie, J. et al. SAD-A kinase controls islet β-cell size and function as a mediator of mTORC1 signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13857–13862 (2013).
Blandino-Rosano, M. et al. Loss of mTORC1 signalling impairs β-cell homeostasis and insulin processing. Nat. Commun. 8, 16014 (2017).
Hamada, S. et al. Upregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 pathway by Ras homolog enriched in brain in pancreatic β-cells leads to increased β-cell mass and prevention of hyperglycemia. Diabetes 58, 1321–1332 (2009).
Gyurus, E., Kaposztas, Z. & Kahan, B. D. Sirolimus therapy predisposes to new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: a long-term analysis of various treatment regimens. Transpl. Proc. 43, 1583–1592 (2011).
Shigeyama, Y. et al. Biphasic response of pancreatic β-cell mass to ablation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2971–2979 (2008).
Yuan, T. et al. Reciprocal regulation of mTOR complexes in pancreatic islets from humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 60, 668–678 (2017).
Ardestani, A., Lupse, B., Kido, Y., Leibowitz, G. & Maedler, K. mTORC1 signaling: a double-edged sword in diabetic β cells. Cell Metab. 27, 314–331 (2018).
Mir, S. U. et al. Inhibition of autophagic turnover in β-cells by fatty acids and glucose leads to apoptotic cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 6071–6085 (2015).
Bartolomé, A. et al. Pancreatic β-cell failure mediated by mTORC1 hyperactivity and autophagic impairment. Diabetes 63, 2996–3008 (2014).
Kim, J., Kundu, M., Viollet, B. & Guan, K. L. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 132–141 (2011).
Hatanaka, M. et al. Palmitate induces mRNA translation and increases ER protein load in islet β-cells via activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Diabetes 63, 3404–3415 (2014).
Bachar, E. et al. Glucose amplifies fatty acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic beta-cells via activation of mTORC1. PLoS ONE 4, e4954–e4954 (2009).
Al-Bari, M. A. A. & Xu, P. Molecular regulation of autophagy machinery by mTOR-dependent and -independent pathways. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1467, 3–20 (2020).
Noda, T. & Ohsumi, Y. Tor, a phosphatidylinositol kinase homologue, controls autophagy in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3963–3966 (1998).
Ganley, I. G. et al. ULK1.ATG13.FIP200 complex mediates mTOR signaling and is essential for autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 12297–12305 (2009).
Jung, C. H. et al. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 1992–2003 (2009).
Hosokawa, N. et al. Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1-Atg13-FIP200 complex required for autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 1981–1991 (2009).
Nazio, F. et al. mTOR inhibits autophagy by controlling ULK1 ubiquitylation, self-association and function through AMBRA1 and TRAF6. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 406–416 (2013).
Yuan, H. X., Russell, R. C. & Guan, K. L. Regulation of PIK3C3/VPS34 complexes by MTOR in nutrient stress-induced autophagy. Autophagy 9, 1983–1995 (2013).
Ma, X. et al. MTORC1-mediated NRBF2 phosphorylation functions as a switch for the class III PtdIns3K and autophagy. Autophagy 13, 592–607 (2017).
Wan, W. et al. mTORC1-regulated and HUWE1-mediated WIPI2 degradation controls autophagy flux. Mol. Cell 72, 303–315.e6 (2018).
Wan, W. et al. mTORC1 phosphorylates acetyltransferase p300 to regulate autophagy and lipogenesis. Mol. Cell 68, 323–335.e6 (2017).
Kim, Y. M. et al. mTORC1 phosphorylates UVRAG to negatively regulate autophagosome and endosome maturation. Mol. Cell 57, 207–218 (2015).
Cheng, X. et al. Pacer is a mediator of mTORC1 and GSK3-TIP60 signaling in regulation of autophagosome maturation and lipid metabolism. Mol. Cell 73, 788–802.e7 (2019).
Sardiello, M. et al. A gene network regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function. Science 325, 473–477 (2009).
Martina, J. A. et al. The nutrient-responsive transcription factor TFE3 promotes autophagy, lysosomal biogenesis, and clearance of cellular debris. Sci. Signal 7, ra9 (2014).
Roczniak-Ferguson, A. et al. The transcription factor TFEB links mTORC1 signaling to transcriptional control of lysosome homeostasis. Sci. Signal 5, ra42 (2012).
Vega-Rubin-de-Celis, S., Peña-Llopis, S., Konda, M. & Brugarolas, J. Multistep regulation of TFEB by MTORC1. Autophagy 13, 464–472 (2017).
Napolitano, G. & Ballabio, A. TFEB at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2475–2481 (2016).
Napolitano, G. et al. mTOR-dependent phosphorylation controls TFEB nuclear export. Nat. Commun. 9, 3312 (2018).
Ozturk, D. G. et al. MITF-MIR211 axis is a novel autophagy amplifier system during cellular stress. Autophagy 15, 375–390 (2019).
Yu, L. et al. Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature 465, 942–946 (2010).
Hardie, D. G., Schaffer, B. E. & Brunet, A. AMPK: an energy-sensing pathway with multiple inputs and outputs. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 190–201 (2016).
Suter, M. et al. Dissecting the role of 5′-AMP for allosteric stimulation, activation, and deactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase*. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 32207–32216 (2006).
Woods, A. et al. LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr. Biol. 13, 2004–2008 (2003).
Hawley, S. A. et al. Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab. 2, 9–19 (2005).
Momcilovic, M., Hong, S. P. & Carlson, M. Mammalian TAK1 activates Snf1 protein kinase in yeast and phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25336–25343 (2006).
Boudeau, J. et al. MO25alpha/beta interact with STRADalpha/beta enhancing their ability to bind, activate and localize LKB1 in the cytoplasm. EMBO J. 22, 5102–5114 (2003).
Hawley, S. A. et al. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J. Biol. 2, 28 (2003).
Gowans, G. J., Hawley, S. A., Ross, F. A. & Hardie, D. G. AMP is a true physiological regulator of AMP-activated protein kinase by both allosteric activation and enhancing net phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 18, 556–566 (2013).
Iwabu, M. et al. Adiponectin and AdipoR1 regulate PGC-1alpha and mitochondria by Ca(2+) and AMPK/SIRT1. Nature 464, 1313–1319 (2010).
Nelson, M. E. et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals conserved exercise‐stimulated signaling and AMPK regulation of store‐operated calcium entry. EMBO J. 38, e102578 (2019).
Herrero‐Martín, G. et al. TAK1 activates AMPK‐dependent cytoprotective autophagy in TRAIL‐treated epithelial cells. EMBO J. 28, 677–685 (2009).
Budanov, A. V. & Karin, M. p53 target genes sestrin1 and sestrin2 connect genotoxic stress and mTOR signaling. Cell 134, 451–460 (2008).
Saxton, R. A. & Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 168, 960–976 (2017).
Lamming, D. W. & Bar‐Peled, L. Lysosome: the metabolic signaling hub. Traffic 20, 27–38 (2019).
Li, M. et al. Transient receptor potential V channels are essential for glucose sensing by aldolase and AMPK. Cell Metab. 30, 508–524.e12 (2019).
Paquette, M. et al. AMPK-dependent phosphorylation is required for transcriptional activation of TFEB and TFE3. Autophagy 17, 3957–3975 (2021).
Steinberg, G. R. & Carling, D. AMP-activated protein kinase: the current landscape for drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 527–551 (2019).
Jäger, S., Handschin, C., St.-Pierre, J. & Spiegelman, B. M. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1α. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 12017–12022 (2007).
Settembre, C. et al. TFEB controls cellular lipid metabolism through a starvation-induced autoregulatory loop. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 647–658 (2013).
Toyama, E. Q. et al. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates mitochondrial fission in response to energy stress. Science 351, 275–281 (2016).
Egan, D. F. et al. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science 331, 456–461 (2011).
Herzig, S. & Shaw, R. J. AMPK: guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 121–135 (2018).
Inoki, K., Zhu, T. & Guan, K. L. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115, 577–590 (2003).
Gwinn, D. M. et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell 30, 214–226 (2008).
Furuta, N., Fujita, N., Noda, T., Yoshimori, T. & Amano, A. Combinational soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor proteins VAMP8 and Vti1b mediate fusion of antimicrobial and canonical autophagosomes with lysosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 1001–1010 (2010).
Itakura, E., Kishi-Itakura, C. & Mizushima, N. The hairpin-type tail-anchored SNARE syntaxin 17 targets to autophagosomes for fusion with endosomes/lysosomes. Cell 151, 1256–1269 (2012).
Bar-Peled, L., Schweitzer, L. D., Zoncu, R. & Sabatini, D. M. Ragulator is a GEF for the rag GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1. Cell 150, 1196–1208 (2012).
Zhang, C. S. et al. The lysosomal v-ATPase-Ragulator complex is a common activator for AMPK and mTORC1, acting as a switch between catabolism and anabolism. Cell Metab. 20, 526–540 (2014).
Howell, J. J. et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic mTORC1 signaling via dose-dependent mechanisms involving AMPK and the TSC complex. Cell Metab. 25, 463–471 (2017).
Zhang, C. S. et al. Metformin activates AMPK through the lysosomal pathway. Cell Metab. 24, 521–522 (2016).
Settembre, C. et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science 332, 1429–1433 (2011).
Wollheim, C. B. & Maechler, P. Beta-cell mitochondria and insulin secretion: messenger role of nucleotides and metabolites. Diabetes 51, S37–S42 (2002).
Rutter, G. A., Georgiadou, E., Martinez-Sanchez, A. & Pullen, T. J. Metabolic and functional specialisations of the pancreatic beta cell: gene disallowance, mitochondrial metabolism and intercellular connectivity. Diabetologia 63, 1990–1998 (2020).
Park, K. et al. Lysosomal Ca(2+)-mediated TFEB activation modulates mitophagy and functional adaptation of pancreatic β-cells to metabolic stress. Nat. Commun. 13, 1300 (2022).
Park, K. et al. Impaired TFEB activation and mitophagy as a cause of PPP3/calcineurin inhibitor-induced pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. Autophagy 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2022.2132686 (2022).
Ly, L. D. et al. Mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake relieves palmitate-induced cytosolic Ca(2+) overload in MIN6 cells. Mol. Cells 43, 66–75 (2020).
Ovalle, F. et al. Verapamil and beta cell function in adults with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Nat. Med. 24, 1108–1112 (2018).
Nguyen, H. T., Noriega Polo, C., Wiederkehr, A., Wollheim, C. B. & Park, K. S. CDN1163, an activator of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase, up-regulates mitochondrial functions and protects against lipotoxicity in pancreatic β-cells. Br. J. Pharm. 180, 2762–2776 (2023).
Dorsey, F. C. et al. Mapping the phosphorylation sites of Ulk1. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5253–5263 (2009).
Munson, M. J. et al. mTOR activates the VPS34-UVRAG complex to regulate autolysosomal tubulation and cell survival. EMBO J. 34, 2272–2290 (2015).
Martina, J. A., Chen, Y., Gucek, M. & Puertollano, R. MTORC1 functions as a transcriptional regulator of autophagy by preventing nuclear transport of TFEB. Autophagy 8, 903–914 (2012).
Settembre, C. et al. A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J. 31, 1095–1108 (2012).
Li, L. et al. A TFEB nuclear export signal integrates amino acid supply and glucose availability. Nat. Commun. 9, 2685 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Myung Sun Kim Memorial Foundation (2016), Yonsei University, Korea. We would like to thank Luong Dai Ly, Da Dat Ly, and Pedro Gabriel Coffler Zorzal for their valuable support of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualized the study: Ha Thu Nguyen, Claes B. Wollheim, and Kyu-Sang Park; Drafted the manuscript: Ha Thu Nguyen and Kyu-Sang Park; Edited and revised manuscript: Andreas Wiederkehr, Claes B. Wollheim, and Kyu-Sang Park.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, H.T., Wiederkehr, A., Wollheim, C.B. et al. Regulation of autophagy by perilysosomal calcium: a new player in β-cell lipotoxicity. Exp Mol Med 56, 273–288 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01161-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01161-x