Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Prostate cancer in 2012

Paradigm shifts in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment

2012 was a year of global controversy surrounding PSA screening—updated results were reported from the two largest trials and the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) released a Grade D recommendation against screening. Other data supported active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, whereas radical prostatectomy was shown to benefit those with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Schroeder, F. H. et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years follow-up. N. Engl. J.Med. 366, 981–990 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriole, G. L. et al. Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 104, 125–132 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, A. B. New data on prostate-cancer mortality after PSA screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1047–1048 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moyer, V. A. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventative Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Int. Med. 157, 120–134 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McNaughton-Collins, M. F. & Barry, M. J. One man at a time—resolving the PSA controversy. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1951–1953 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crawford, E. D. et al. Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 355–361 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilt, T. J. et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 203–213 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldenberg, S. L. et al. Intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer: a preliminary report. Urology 45, 839–845 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crook, J. M. et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 895–903 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoeks, C. M. et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 261, 46–66 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Larry Goldenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoag, N., Goldenberg, S. Paradigm shifts in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Urol 10, 69–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.251

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.251

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer