Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Transplantation

Little effect of state policies on organ donation in the USA

A new study reports that state-level policies have had little effect on rates of organ donation in the USA, highlighting the limited ability of scattered initiatives to have a national effect. Regardless of their impact on donation rate, a need exists for policies that make donation financially neutral for donors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. US Department of Health & Human Services. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network [online], (2015).

  2. Chatterjee, P., Venkataramani, A. S., Vijayan, A., Wellen, J. R. & Martin, E. G. The effect of state policies on organ donation in the United States. JAMA Intern. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194.

  3. Satel, S. & Cronin, D. C. 2nd. Time to test incentives to increase organ donation. JAMA Intern. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2200.

  4. Salomon, D. R. et al. AST/ASTS workshop increasing organ donation in the United States: creating an “arc of change” from removing disincentives to testing incentives. Am. J. Transplant. 15, 1173–1179 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dew, M. A., Myaskovsky, L., Steel, J. L. & DiMaritini, A. F. Managing the psychosocial and financial consequences of living donation. Curr. Transplant. Rep. 1, 24–34 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tushla, L. et al. Living-donor kidney transplantation: reducing financial barriers to live kidney donation—recommendations from a consensus conference. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01000115.

  7. Australian Government Department of Human Services. Supporting leave for living donors scheme. humanservices.gov.au[online], (2015).

  8. The Kidney Foundation of Canada. Living organ donor expense reimbursement program. kidney.ca[online], (2015).

  9. Lopp, L. Regulations regarding living organ donation in Europe 15–146 (Springer, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Sickand, M. et al. Reimbursing live organ donors for incurred non-medical expenses: a global perspective on policies and programs. Am. J. Transplant. 9, 2825–2836 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur J. Matas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matas, A., Hays, R. Little effect of state policies on organ donation in the USA. Nat Rev Nephrol 11, 570–572 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.113

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.113

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing