Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Chemotherapy

Current drugs still have potential in advanced ovarian cancer

Dose-dense administration of paclitaxel as well as intraperitoneal administration of platinum and paclitaxel as first-line treatments provide similar advantages compared with standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer. Both approaches, however, need to be confirmed by additional studies. A low dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with carboplatin is superior to standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of a | PFS and b | overall survival curves from the JGOG study on dose-dense therapy and the GOG study on IP therapy.1,2

References

  1. Katsumata, N. et al. Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374, 1331–1338 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, D. K. et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 34–43 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pujade-Lauraine, E., Mahner, S., Kaern, J., Gebski, M., Heywood, P. et al. A randomized, phase III study of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC): CALYPSO study of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 18s LBA5509. (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McGuire, W. P. et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 1–6 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piccart, M. J. et al. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin- cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 92, 699–708 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. du Bois, A. et al. 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference. Ann. Oncol. 16, viii7–viii12 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bookman, M. A. et al. Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1419–1425 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. du Bois, A. et al. Addition of epirubicin as a third drug to carboplatin-paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a prospectively randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 1127–1135 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogberg, T. Current drugs still have potential in advanced ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7, 191–193 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.37

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.37

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing