Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients

Nature Reviews Cancer volume 3, pages 73–77 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

In order for the genomics revolution to change how we diagnose, categorize and treat cancer, scientists and clinicians must have access to tumour samples. There has therefore never been a better time to create banks of tumour tissue. Collecting and storing tumour samples and their associated data, however, creates numerous methodological, ethical, legal and technical problems. How can we leap these hurdles in a responsible manner and still make full use of the wealth of information that can be obtained from them?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slamon, D. J. et al. Use of chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 783–792 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miettinen, M., El-Rifai, W., Sobin, H. L. & Lasota, J. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum. Pathol. 33, 478–483 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen, T. O. et al. Molecular characterisation of soft tissue tumours: a gene expression study. Lancet 359, 1301–1307 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogardus, S. T., Concato, J. & Feinstein, A. R. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards. JAMA 281, 1919–1926 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adam, D. Online tumour bank aims to offer ready route to tissues. Nature 416, 464 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Health Council (Gezondheidsraad). Towards Proper Use (Gezondheidsraad, The Hague, 1994).

  7. Nuffield, Council on Bioethics. Human Tissue, Ethical and Legal Issues (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, 1995).

  8. HUGO Ethics Committee. Statement on DNA sampling: Control and Access [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.hugo–international.org/hugo/sampling.html> (2002).

  9. European Group on Ethics Ethical aspects of tissuebanking, opinion no. 11, to the European Commission, 21 July 1998.

  10. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri Council Policy Statement Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Human Subjects, especially section 10, 1998 (revised in 2000) [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/policy.htm#contents>.

  11. National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Rockville, Maryland: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, vol 1, August 1999 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/>.

  12. Medical Research Council. Human tissue and biological samples of use in research, Medical Research Council, London 2001 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <www.mrc.ac.uk>.

  13. The NCI–Cooperative Human Tissue Network (CHTN) requires compliance with the US DHHS policy for the protection of human subjects for use of tissue from the listed repositories [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm>.

  14. World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in Edinburgh, October 2000, section A [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <www.wma.net>.

  15. Knoppers, B. M & Laberge, C. M. Research and stored tissues: persons as sources, samples as persons? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 274, 1806 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wendler, D. What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjects. Bioethics 16, 33 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Directive 95/46 EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/index.html>.

  18. Rynning, M. E. The new Swedish Act on biobanks in health care. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Medical Law (World Association for Medical Law, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2002) (English translation of the Act not yet published).

  19. Act on Biobanks No. 110/2000 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), http://ministryofhealth.is/interpro/htr/htr.nsf/pages/Act–biobanks>.

  20. Federation of Medical Scientific Societies in The Netherlands. Code for Proper Use (FMWV, Rotterdam, 2002) [online], (cited 2 Dec 2002) <www.fmwv.nl>.

  21. Medical Rearch Council. Public Perceptions on the Collection of Human Biological Samples (Medical Research Council, London 2001) [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002) <www.mrc.ac.uk>.

  22. Malone, T., Catalano, P. J., O'Dwyer, P. J. & Giatonio, B. High rate of consent to bank biological samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 769–771 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stegmayer, B. & Asplund, K. Informed consent for genetic research on blood for more than a decade: a population based study. BMJ 325, 634–635 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wendler, D. & Emanuel, E. The debate over research on stored biological samples, what do sources think? Arch. Int. Med. 162, 1457–1462 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. David Owen. Patenting human genes (National Institute for Medical Research) [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.nimr.mrc.ac.uk/MillHillEssays/1995/genepat.htm>.

  26. Directive 98/44/EC on the protection on biotechnological inventions, L.213/13 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/1998/l_213/l_21319980730en00130021.pdf>.

  27. Decision in case C-377/98 of the European Court of Justice [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://curia.eu.int/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=en>

  28. The President's Council on Bioethics. Patenting Human Organisms. Staff Working Paper no 8 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.bioethics.gov/workpaper8.html>

  29. Recital no. 9 of the Common Position (EC) No 28/2002 (C-113 E/05) [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/ce113/ce11320020514en00930108.pdf>.

  30. Article 21 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/CadreListeTraites.htm> at no. 164.

  31. The NCI–CHTN, ref. 13 supra, policy on this subject [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.chtn.ims.nci.nih.gov/commercial.html>.

  32. The NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Objectivity in Research [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00–040.html>.

  33. Massachusetts Institute of Technology conflict of interest policy [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://web.mit.edu/policies/4.4.html.

  34. American Medical Association. Opinion E-2. 08 [online], (cited 27 Nov 2002), <http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_online/pf_online?f_n=browse&doc=policyfiles/CEJA/E-2.08.HTM&&s_t=&st_p=&nth=1&prev_pol=policyfiles/CEJA/E-1.02.HTM&nxt_pol=policyfiles/CEJA/E–2.01.HTM>.

  35. Andrews, L & Nelkin, D. Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue (Crown Publishers, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands

    J. Wolter Oosterhuis

  2. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands

    Jan Willem Coebergh

  3. Eindhoven Cancer Registry of Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven, 5612 HZ, The Netherlands

    Jan Willem Coebergh

  4. MedLawConsult, The Hague, 2585 HW, The Netherlands

    Evert-Ben van Veen

Authors
  1. J. Wolter Oosterhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Willem Coebergh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evert-Ben van Veen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wolter Oosterhuis.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

LocusLink

ERBB2

c-KIT

FURTHER INFORMATION

Biobank UK, a study of genes, evironment and health

Federation of Medical Scientific societies in the Netherlands

Human Tissue Banking

NCI/National Action Plan for Breast Cancer

Office for Human Research Protections (ORHP) [1993] US Dept of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

Public Health Genetics, UK

University of Minnesota Cancer Center Tissue Procurement Facility

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosterhuis, J., Coebergh, J. & van Veen, EB. Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients. Nat Rev Cancer 3, 73–77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc973

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc973

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing