Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Screening for lung cancer: in pursuit of pre-metastatic disease

Abstract

One reason for the high death rate of lung cancer is that tumours are not usually detected until the disease is at a late stage, at which point the cancer is non-curable. Spiral computerized tomography is a highly sensitive imaging method that could be used to screen high-risk populations, such as current or former smokers, for early-stage tumours. Trials to validate this tool are just underway, but beyond the imaging tools, population-based care of pre-metastatic lung cancer requires considerable evolution in clinical management approaches. More sensitive imaging tools might also provide a window into earlier biology, enabling the molecular dynamics of lung cancer progression to be elucidated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Effect of computed tomography (CT) slice thickness on volume reconstruction.
Figure 2: Lung imaging with chest X-ray and spiral computed tomography (CT).
Figure 3: Small-volume primary lung cancer.
Figure 4: 'Ground-glass opacity' or non-solid lung nodule.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal, A., Thomas, A., Murray, T. & Thun, M. Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J. Clin. 52, 23–47 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fellows, J. L. & Trosclair, A. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost and economic cost-United States 1005–1999. MMWR 51, 300–303 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peto, R., Chen, Z. M. & Boreham, J. Tobacco — the growing epidemic. Nature Med. 5, 15–17 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McManus, R. Peto says halving premature death rate is an achievable goal. NIH Record, 1–5 (2002).

  5. Smith, R. A. & Glynn, T. J. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38, 453–470 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jemal, A., Chu, K. C. & Tarone, R. E. Recent trends in lung cancer mortality in the United States. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 93, 277–283 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaffney, M. & Altshuler, B. Examination of the role of cigarette smoke in lung carcinogenesis. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 80, 925 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Enstrom, J. E. & Heath, C. W. Jr. Smoking cessation and mortality trends among 118,000 Californians, 1960–1997. Epidemiology 10, 500–512 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Enstrom, J. E. Smoking cessation and mortality trends among two United States populations. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52, 813–825 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong, L., Spitz, M. R., Fueger, J. J. & Amos, C. A. Lung carcinoma in former smokers. Cancer 78, 1004–1010 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns, D. M. Primary prevention, smoking, and smoking cessation: implications for future trends in lung cancer prevention. Cancer 89, 2506–2509 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carney, D. N. Lung cancer — time to move on from chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 126–128 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chute, J. P., Chen, T., Feigal, E., Simon, R. & Johnson, B. E. Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 1794 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulshine, J. L., Tockman, M. S. & Smart, C. R. Considerations in the development of lung cancer screening tools. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 81, 900–906 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Szabo, E. & Mulshine, J. L. in Comprehensive Textbook of Thoracic Oncology (eds Aisner, J., Arriagada, R., Green, M., Martini, N. & Perry, M. C.) 90–104 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strauss, G. M. The Mayo Lung Cohort: a regression analysis focusing on lung cancer incidence and mortality. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 1973–1983 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reeves, A. P. & Kostis, W. J. Computer-aided diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 21, 116–128 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reeves, A. P. & Kostis, W. J. Computer-aided diagnosis for lung cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38, 497–509 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, T. H. & Brennan, T. A. Direct-to-consumer marketing of high-technology screening tests. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 529–531 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcus, P. M. Lung cancer screening: an update. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 83S–86S (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bailar, J. C. Early lung cancer cooperative study group: early lung cancer detection. Summary and conclusion. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130, 565 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strauss, G. & Dominioni, L. Varese meeting report. Lung Cancer 23, 171–172 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hounsfield, G. N. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 1016–1022 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ambrose, J. & Hounsfield, G. Computerized transverse axial tomography. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 148–149 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henschke, C. I. et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354, 99–105 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaneko, M. et al. Computed tomography screening for lung carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 89, 2485–2488 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yankelevitz, D. F., Reeves, A. P., Kostis, W. J., Zhao, B. & Henschke, C. I. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217, 251–256 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Finkelstein, S. E. et al. Virtual bronchoscopy for evaluation of malignant tumors of the thorax. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 123, 967–972 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Henschke, C. I. et al. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer 92, 153–159 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sobue, T. et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 911–920 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swensen, S. J. et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 165, 508–513 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aberle, D. R., Gamsu, G., Henschke, C. I., Naidich, D. P. & Swensen, S. J. A consensus statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography. J. Thorac. Imaging 16, 65–68 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirsch, F. et al. IV international conference on prevention and early detection of lung cancer, Reykjavik, Iceland, August 9–12, 2001. Lung Cancer 37, 325 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marshall, D., Simpson, K. N., Earle, C. C. & Chu, C. Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort. Lung Cancer 32, 227–236 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clarke, L. P., Croft, B. Y., Staab, E., Baker, H. & Sullivan, D. C. National Cancer Institute initiative: lung image database resource for imaging research. Acad. Radiol. 8, 447–450 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanazawa, K. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for pulmonary nodules based on helical CT images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 22, 157–167 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, Y., Hara, T., Fujita, H., Itoh, S. & Ishigaki, T. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med. Imaging 20, 595–604 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Diederich, S. et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222, 773–781 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wormanns, D., Fiebich, M., Saidi, M., Diederich, S. & Heindel, W. Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: clinical application of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Eur. Radiol. 12, 1052–1057 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson, J. M. & Junger, Y. G. Principles and Practices of Screening for Disease (World Health Organization, Geneva, 1968).

  41. Swensen, S. J. CT screening for lung cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 833–836 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cunningham, G. The science and politics of screening newborns. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1084–1085 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schilling, F. H. et al. Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1047–1053 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Woods, W. G. et al. Screening of infants and mortality due to neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1041–1046 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Parkin, D. M. & Moss, S. M. Lung cancer screening: improved survival but no reduction in deaths: the role of overdiagnosis. Cancer 89, 2369–2376 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Motohiro, A., Ueda, H., Komatsu, H., Yanai, N. & Mori, T. Prognosis of non-surgically treated, clinical stage I lung cancer patients in Japan. Lung Cancer 36, 65–69 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sugarbaker, D. J. & Strauss, G. M. Extent of surgery and survival in early lung carcinoma: implications for overdiagnosis in stage IA nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 89, 2432–2437 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Field, J. K. et al. Consensus statements from the Second International Lung Cancer Molecular Biomarkers Workshop: a European strategy for developing lung cancer molecular diagnostics in high risk populations. Int. J. Oncol. 21, 369–373 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sidransky, D. Emerging molecular markers of cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 2, 210–219 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Enzmann, D. R., Anglada, P. M., Haviley, C. & Venta, L. A. Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis. Radiology 219, 467–473 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Duffy, S. W. et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95, 458–469 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tabar, L. et al. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91, 1724–1731 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Martini, N. et al. Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 109, 120–129 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Martini, N. et al. Factors influencing ten-year survival in resected stages I to IIIa non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 117, 32–36; discussion 37–38 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Miller, D. L. et al. Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer 1cm or less in diameter. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73, 1545–1551 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hanahan, D. & Folkman, J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86, 353–364 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Beam, C. A., Layde, P. M. & Sullivan, D. C. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 209–213 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McQuarrie, H. G., Ogden, J. & Costa, M. Understanding the financial impact of covering new screening technologies. The case of automated Pap smears. J. Reprod. Med. 45, 898–906 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen, B. & Ning, R. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. Med. Phys. 29, 755–770 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wieder, J. A. & Belldegrun, A. S. The utility of PSA doubling time to monitor prostate cancer recurrence. Mayo Clin. Proc. 76, 571–572 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Deslauriers, J., Ginsberg, R. J., Piantadosi, S. & Fournier, B. Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer. Chest 106, 329S–330S (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Krahn, M. D. et al. Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view. JAMA 272, 773–780 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lillington, G. A. & Caskey, C. I. Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin. Chest Med. 14, 111–119 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ridker, P. M., Rifai, N., Rose, L., Buring, J. E. & Cook, N. R. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 1557–1565 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vaughan, C. J., Gotto, A. M. Jr & Basson, C. T. The evolving role of statins in the management of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 35, 1–10 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Eisenberg, D. A. Cholesterol lowering in the management of coronary artery disease: the clinical implications of recent trials. Am. J. Med. 104, 2S–5S (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fisher, B. et al. Findings from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies in stage I breast cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 30, 62–66 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jaklitsch, M. T. et al. New surgical options for elderly lung cancer patients. Chest 116, 480S–485S (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yim, A. P. VATS major pulmonary resection revisited — controversies, techniques, and results. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74, 615–623 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Swanson, S. J. et al. Management of the solitary pulmonary nodule: role of thoracoscopy in diagnosis and therapy. Chest 116, 523S–524S (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nakamura, H. et al. Early hilar lung cancer — risk for multiple lung cancers and clinical outcome. Lung Cancer 33, 51–57 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Konaka, C. et al. [Laser photodynamic therapy for central-type lung cancer]. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 34 (Suppl.), 107–110 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kato, H., Okunaka, T. & Shimatani, H. Photodynamic therapy for early stage bronchogenic carcinoma. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 14, 235–238 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Shimatani, H. et al. [Preoperative PDT for early stage lung cancer accompanied with infiltration to the central airway]. Kyobu Geka 54, 957–961 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Slaughter, D. P., Southwick, H. W. & Smejkal, W. 'Field cancerization' in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Cancer 6, 963–968 (1953).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mehta, M. et al. A new approach to dose escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 49, 23–33 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Didinger, B. H., Schlegel, W. & Debus, J. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy — technology and clinical applications. Onkologie 25, 233–238 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Glatstein, E. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: the inverse, the converse, and the perverse. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 12, 272–281 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Stellman, S. D., Muscat, J. E., Hoffmann, D. & Wynder, E. L. Impact of filter cigarette smoking on lung cancer histology. Prev. Med. 26, 451–456 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gaeta, M. et al. Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma. The computed tomographic picture and histological correlations. Radiol. Med. 87, 427–434 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mirtcheva, R. M., Vazquez, M., Yankelevitz, D. F. & Henschke, C. I. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features presenting as ground-glass opacities on CT. Clin. Imaging 26, 95–100 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Henschke, C. I. et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am. J. Roentgenol. 178, 1053–1057 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dahl, A. R. et al. Inhaled isotretinoin (13-cis retinoic acid) is an effective lung cancer chemopreventive agent in A/J mice at low doses: a pilot study. Clin. Cancer Res. 6, 3015–3024 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mulshine, J. L., De Luca, L. M. & Dedrick, R. L. Regional Delivery of Retinoids: a New Approach to Early Lung Cancer Intervention 273–284 (Birkhauser, Basel, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wang, D. L. et al. Topical delivery of 13-cis-retinoic acid by inhalation up-regulates expression of rodent lung but not liver retinoic acid receptors. Clin. Cancer Res. 6, 3636–3645 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Hershey, A. E. et al. Inhalation chemotherapy for macroscopic primary or metastatic lung tumors: proof of principle using dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors as a model. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 2653–2659 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Hunt, M. I. Changing Pattern of Pharmaceutical Innovation 1–24 (National Institute for Health Care Management Research and Educational Foundation, Washington DC, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  89. O'Shaughnessy, J. A. et al. Treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia: an important target for accelerated new agent development. Clin. Cancer Res. 8, 314–346 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Sackett, D. L. & Wennberg, J. E. Choosing the best research design for each question. BMJ 315, 1636 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Concato, J., Shah, N. & Horwitz, R. I. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1887–1892 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Schiffman, M., Hildesheim, A., Herrero, R. & Bratti, C. Human papillomavirus testing as a screening tool for cervical cancer. JAMA 283, 2525–2526 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Stoler, M. H. & Schiffman, M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 285, 1500–1505 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kupets, R. & Covens, A. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians. Gynecol. Oncol. 83, 186–197 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Goodman, S. N. The mammography dilemma: a crisis for evidence-based medicine? Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 363–365 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Sox, H. Screening mammography for younger women: back to basics. Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 361–362 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Humphrey, L. L., Helfand, M., Chan, B. K. & Woolf, S. H. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 347–360 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Force, U. S. P. T. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 344–346 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, I. o. M. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century 1–364 (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000).

  100. Advisors approve lung screening trial testing spiral CT vs. x-ray for $200M. The Cancer Letter 27, 1–7 (2001).

  101. Rich, S. & McLaughlin, V. V. Detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease: the emerging role of electron beam computed tomography. Prev. Med. 34, 1–10 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Nawa, T., Nakagawa, T., Kusano, S. & Nakata, H. [Prevalence of emphysematous changes as shown by low-dose spiral CT screening images in 6144 healthy subjects]. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 40, 468–472 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Zompatori, M. et al. [Automatic evaluation of total lung capacity and of emphysema involvement with spiral computerized tomography (CT) in obstructive pneumonia]. Radiol. Med. 101, 18–24 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Tockman, M. S. et al. Prospective detection of preclinical lung cancer: results from two studies of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 overexpression. Clin. Cancer Res. 3, 2237–2246 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Tockman, M. S. et al. Sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody recognition of human lung cancer antigen on preserved sputum cells: a new approach to early lung cancer detection. J. Clin. Oncol. 6, 1685–1693 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Fielding, P., Turnbull, L., Prime, W., Walshaw, M. & Field, J. K. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 up-regulation in bronchial lavage specimens: a clinical marker of early lung cancer detection. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 4048–4052 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Belinsky, S. A. et al. Aberrant promoter methylation in bronchial epithelium and sputum from current and former smokers. Cancer Res. 62, 2370–2377 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Zochbauer-Muller, S., Gazdar, A. F. & Minna, J. D. Molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 681–708 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Hirsch, F. R. et al. Fluorescence versus white-light bronchoscopy for detection of preneoplastic lesions: a randomized study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 93, 1385–1391 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Lam, S., MacAulay, C., leRiche, J. C. & Palcic, B. Detection and localization of early lung cancer by fluorescence bronchoscopy. Cancer 89, 2468–2473 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Mulshine, J. L. & Henschke, C. I. Prospects for lung-cancer screening. Lancet 355, 592–593 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Fenlon, H. M. et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1496–1503 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Summers, R. M. et al. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219, 51–59 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the following for their useful comments and insights, including members of the Intervention Section, D. Sullivan, R. Smith, M. Schiffman, D. Yankelvitz and J. Gomez. In addition, the author apologizes to the authors of relevant publications in this area that were omitted due to space constraints.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

CancerNet

breast cancer

cervical cancer

colon cancer

lung cancer

ovarian cancer

pancreatic cancer

prostate cancer

FURTHER INFORMATION

Clinical screening information

National Lung Screening Trial

Report of the Lung Cancer Progress Review Group

Lung Imaging Database Resource for Imaging Research

State-of-the-Science Workshop for Lung Cancer

Glossary

FIELD CARCINOGENESIS

A term for a chronic cancer diathesis coined to describe the multifocal and pleotrophic pre-cancerous and overt cancer involvement that is evident throughout the surgically removed tissues of smokers with cancer. This phenomenon occurs as a consequence of chronic exposure to aerosolized carcinogens in smokers and leads to metachronous (sequential, independent) primary cancers.

GROUND GLASS OPACITIES

A descriptive term that is used by radiologists to describe areas of interstitial congestion that is variably due to infectious processes, non-specific factors or, in a fraction of cases, related to metaplastic alveolar-cell infiltrations or early lung cancer.

REGISTRATION

The orientation of an organ structure relative to the location of the detection system when an imaging study is performed.

SOJOURN TIME

Time spent in the preclinical phase (detectable, but no symptoms present) of the natural history of a chronic disease. More-sensitive cancer-detection tests can increase the sojourn time. This could result in a longer therapeutic window before the occurrence of metastatic disease.

THORACOTOMY

An operation in which one lobe of the lung is removed along with the regional lymph nodes.

3D VOLUME RENDERING

The process of reconstructing imaging data from serial consecutive slices in three dimensions for display purposes.

VOXEL

A unit of volume corresponding to the smallest element depicted in a three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) image. For spiral CT, the size of this volume is determined by the design of the instrument and the instrument settings. For the latest scanners, the voxel size can be 0.3 mm × 0.3 mm × 0.6 mm, yielding a volume of 0.054 mm3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulshine, J. Screening for lung cancer: in pursuit of pre-metastatic disease. Nat Rev Cancer 3, 65–73 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc972

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing