Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

How scalable is sustainable intensification?

Sustainable intensification is a concept of growing importance, yet it is in danger of becoming scientifically obsolete because of the diversity of meanings it has acquired. To avoid this, it is important to consider the various scales on which it can aid progress towards feeding human populations while also protecting the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The number of articles with titles or abstracts mentioning sustainable intensification published in social science journals and natural science journals up to the end of 2015.
Figure 2: Visions of SI plotted against the time frame and spatial extent (spatiotemporal scales) at which agricultural productivity and the delivery of other ecosystem services are assessed.

References

  1. Reardon, T. et al. Food Policy 22, 317–327 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baulcombe, D. et al. Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture (Royal Society, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gunton, R. M. et al. Defining Sustainable Intensification and Developing Metrics with Respect to Ecosystem Services for the SIP Research Platform (Defra, in the press).

  4. Lewis-Brown, E. & Lymbery, P. Sustainable Intensification — An Oxymoron (CIWF, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, S. et al. Sustainable Intensification Revisited (IIED, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loos, J. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 356–361 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: A Framework for Assessment. (Island, 2003).

  8. Curran, M. et al. Ecol. Appl. 24, 617–632 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, P. Glob. Food Sec. 2, 18–23 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garnett, T. & Godfray, C. Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Navigating a Course Through Competing Food System Priorities (Food Climate Research Network and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, Univ. Oxford, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petersen, B. & Snapp, S. Land Use Pol. 46, 1–10 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mueller, N. D. et al. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Firbank, L. et al. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 173, 58–65 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, W. & Ma, B. Sci. Total Environ. 512–513 415–427 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bommarco, R. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 230–238 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, R. H., in Sustainable Agricultural Systems (eds Edwards, C. A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R. H. & House, G. ) 614–623 (Soil and Water Conservation Society, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ilbery, B. & Maye, D. Area 43, 31–41 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phalan, B. et al. Science 333, 1289–1291 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Quinn, J. E. et al. Landscape Ecol. 29, 1811–1819 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dearing, J. A. et al. Global Environ. Change 28, 227–238 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pretty, J. et al. Int. J. Agricult. Sustain. 9, 5–24 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Island, 2005).

  23. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report (UNEP-WCMC, 2011).

  24. UN Sustainable Development Platform. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Defra as part of the Sustainable Intensification Research Platform. Improvements to the manuscript were suggested by members of the SIP Science Conference 2016 and by B. Kunin, C. M. Jones, C. Marsh, Y. Gavish and D. Salgado.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie G. Firbank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunton, R., Firbank, L., Inman, A. et al. How scalable is sustainable intensification?. Nature Plants 2, 16065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.65

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.65

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene