Abstract
Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a central paradigm of elementary particle physics1, magnetism2, superfluidity3 and superconductivity4. According to Goldstone’s theorem, phase transitions that break continuous symmetries lead to the existence of gapless excitations in the long-wavelength limit5. These Goldstone modes can become the dominant low-energy excitation, showing that symmetry breaking has a profound impact on the physical properties of matter. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the elementary excitations in a homogeneous strongly interacting Fermi gas through the crossover from a Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) superfluid to a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) of molecules using two-photon Bragg spectroscopy. The spectra exhibit a discrete Goldstone mode, associated with the broken-symmetry superfluid phase, as well as pair-breaking single-particle excitations. Our techniques yield a direct determination of the superfluid pairing gap and speed of sound in close agreement with strong-coupling theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
When a Hamiltonian is invariant with respect to a continuous symmetry, but the ground state is not, a massless bosonic mode appears in the spectrum of allowed excitations5. At temperatures low enough for quantum effects to become prominent, dynamical behaviours, such as superconductivity and superfluidity, are possible only due to the low-energy excitation spectrum. Superfluid and superconducting states break gauge invariance and the resultant Goldstone mode is an oscillation of the phase of the order parameter giving rise to a collective motion of particles that is distinct from single-particle excitations. In superconductors, the Coulomb interaction lifts the collective mode up to the frequency of the classical plasma oscillation4, present in the normal phase, such that the Goldstone mode is generally imperceptible6. In neutral superfluids, however, the Goldstone mode takes the form of a gapless phonon7 and provides a dramatic signature of macroscopic order.
Ultracold gases of atomic fermions have enabled the creation and study of high-transition-temperature superfluids in the smooth crossover from the BCS to BEC regimes8. Both first-sound9,10,11 and second-sound10 propagation have been observed in inhomogeneous Fermi gases, yet the basic elementary excitation spectrum has not been measured. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the low-temperature excitations in a homogeneous Fermi superfluid throughout the whole BCS–BEC crossover. The spectra exhibit both a dominant Goldstone mode, or Bogoliubov–Anderson (BA) phonon, and a single-particle continuum. Our study reveals how the energy and spectral weight of these excitations evolve as a function of the interaction strength. We develop a theory based on the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA), which provides a good quantitative description of the data.
The starting point for our experiments is a harmonically trapped gas of fermionic 6Li atoms in a balanced mixture of the lowest two hyperfine states with tunable s-wave interactions near a broad Feshbach resonance (see Supplementary Information). Atoms are cooled to temperatures below the superfluid transition temperature, Tc, across a wide range of the BCS–BEC crossover12. We measure the density–density response of these gases using two-photon Bragg spectroscopy13,14,15. This is the cold-atom analogue of inelastic neutron scattering, which has enabled characterization of the dispersion relation, roton minimum, and condensate fraction in superfluid helium3; and inelastic X-ray scattering, used to measure electronic excitations in strongly correlated materials16. Using tightly focused Bragg lasers that intersect in the centre of a trapped atom cloud, we scatter atoms from a region of near-homogeneous density (Fig. 1a). Bragg scattering involves the absorption of a photon with energy ℏωa, where ℏ is Planck’s constant, and wavevector ka from one laser beam, and stimulated emission of a photon with energy ℏωb and wavevector kb into a second beam, thereby transferring energy ℏω = ℏ(ωa − ωb) and momentum ℏ k = ℏ(ka − kb). Within linear response the total momentum imparted to the cloud, Px, is proportional to the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility or density–density response function, (see Supplementary Information).
Bragg spectra are obtained by applying a 1.2 ms Bragg pulse and measuring Px as a function of the Bragg frequency ω. A Bragg spectrum provides full information on the energy and spectral weight of particle-conserving excitations at momentum ℏ k (ref. 17). After applying the Bragg pulse, atoms are released from the trap and we determine the centre-of-mass displacement, ΔX ∝ Px, of the Bragg scattered volume, with respect to the unperturbed atoms, after 2 ms time of flight15. In the measurements that follow, the mean atomic density in the Bragg volume, , lies in the range , where n0 is the peak density in the trap centre (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 1b shows the difference between two time-of-flight images of atom clouds, with and without Bragg scattering, on the BCS side of the Feshbach resonance for an interaction strength of 1/(kFa) = −0.6 (875 G), where is the Fermi wavevector and a is the s-wave scattering length. Bragg scattering removes atoms from the centre of the cloud, where the lasers overlap, and displaces them along x. Here, ω lies in the single-particle continuum, indicated by the green circle on the excitation spectrum (Fig. 1d), calculated for 1/(kFa) = −0.6 using the QRPA theory (see Supplementary Information). The Bragg frequency is normalized by the Fermi energy, which is set by the mean density EF = kBTF = ℏ2kF2/(2m), where kB is Boltzmann’s constant and m is the atomic mass.
Figure 1c shows a difference image taken with ω tuned to the peak of the BA phonon mode (Fig. 1e) at unitarity 1/(kFa) = 0.0. Comparing Fig. 1b with 1c reveals a qualitative difference between single-particle and phonon (collective) excitations. Phonons are a density modulation (sound wave) with the periodicity of the Bragg lattice, excited when the lattice velocity (ω/k) equals the sound velocity cs. As the phonon propagates along x and the cloud expands, the density continuously decreases and so too does the local speed of sound (gradient of the dispersion). To conserve energy and momentum, the phonon decays into lower-energy modes, whose wavevectors need not be parallel, in a manner reminiscent of Beliaev damping18. While the density-dependent decay dynamics may be quite complex, the qualitative result is a long-wavelength density modulation propagating along x (Fig. 1c). In contrast to the case of single-particle scattering, the density minimum no longer remains fixed at the location of the Bragg lasers.
We have measured a series of Bragg spectra at k ∼ kF/2, within the linear response regime, that map the low-temperature excitations for a range of interaction strengths, plotted in Fig. 2 (see Supplementary Information). For 1/(kFa) = −0.9 and −1.6, (rightmost traces in Fig. 2) we observe only single-particle excitations. Here, the pair correlation length, ξpair (ref. 19), exceeds 1/k and the phonon mode merges with the single-particle continuum for k < kF/2(refs 20,21). Closer to the Feshbach resonance, the Goldstone mode (BA phonon) first appears around 1/(kFa) ≲ −0.5, where ξpair ≈ 1/k (ref. 19), and is identified using a Gaussian fit (shaded blue). At unitarity, the BA mode dominates the spectra and the single-particle branch is increasingly suppressed. In the BEC regime single-particle excitations fall below our measurement sensitivity due to the reduced spin-susceptibility22 as fermion pairs become more tightly bound.
The local temperature within the Bragg volume is T/TF = 0.09(1) at unitarity (just over 0.5Tc), determined by fitting the density profile to the known equation of state23. While direct thermometry away from unitarity remains a challenge, tuning to the BCS (BEC) regime by scanning the magnetic field adiabatically around the Feshbach resonance will decrease (increase) T/TF such that we expect T to remain below Tc for all spectra. Our calculated temperatures following an adiabatic sweep to the limiting interaction strengths of 1/(kFa) = −1.6 and +1.1 are T/TF = 0.02(1) and 0.10(2), respectively12. In the BEC regime, 1/(kFa) ∼ +1, we observe condensate fractions exceeding 80%. A recent study of second-sound propagation in a unitary Fermi gas found that the superfluid fraction approaches unity for T ≲ 0.1TF (ref. 10). Hence, our measurements in the strongly interacting regime represent the low-temperature (near ground-state) excitations.
In the range −0.5 ≤ 1/(kFa) ≤ 0, both phonon and single-particle excitations are visible in the individual spectra. Furthermore, for −0.2 ≤ 1/(kFa) ≤ 0, these two branches separate from each other, enabling direct read-off of the superfluid pairing gap Δ. Figure 3a shows a zoomed view of the Bragg spectrum at unitarity. Filled points are experimental data and the shaded curve is the QRPA theory including the Fourier width of the Bragg pulse. Since a minimum energy of ℏω = 2Δ is required to break a pair and produce two free atoms, we associate the sharp onset of single-particle excitations with 2Δ (dotted vertical line). At unitarity we find Δ/EF = 0.47 ± 0.03. The pairing gap has previously been measured using momentum24 and spatially resolved25 radiofrequency spectroscopy. Our localized Bragg measurements are consistent with previous radiofrequency data25, yet provide the pairing gap directly, free of final-state effects, Hartree energy shifts or density inhomogeneities. Figure 3b, c shows spectra for 1/(kFa) = −0.11 and 1/(kFa) = −0.21, respectively. A plot of Δ/EF for these three spectra is provided in Fig. 3d along with different calculations12,26,27,28,29,30.
The experimentally determined pairing gap can serve as an input parameter for our diagrammatic theory, which uses the chemical potential as a fitting parameter (see Supplementary Information). We find good agreement between our QRPA calculation and experiment over the full excitation spectrum (shaded curves, Fig. 3), particularly in the frequency of the BA mode. When the theory is scaled to match the amplitude of the experimentally measured single-particle branch, the calculated BA mode is consistently more than twice as high and approximately two-thirds the width of the measured peak (inset, Fig. 3a). Damping mechanisms31, not included in the theory, may explain this discrepancy.
As k → 0, the BA mode displays linear dispersion with a gradient set by the sound velocity cs. The centre frequency of the BA mode ωBA is found from a Gaussian fit to the BA peak (solid blue lines, Fig. 2) providing a measure of cs/vF = ωBA/(kvF), where vF = ℏkF/m is the Fermi velocity. This is plotted in Fig. 4 (blue circles) for interactions where we obtain a reliable fit. In the momentum range used here, 0.4 ≲ k/kF ≲ 0.6 (see Supplementary Information), the dispersion remains close to linear near unitarity, but becomes concave (convex) in the BCS (BEC) regime21,26,31. We can estimate this curvature for finite k/kF using the QRPA calculation and correct for it to estimate cs/vF as k → 0 (see Supplementary Information). The corrected data (orange diamonds in Fig. 4) agree well with theoretical calculations of cs/vF throughout the BCS–BEC crossover12,28,30,32 and also with previous experiments9,10,11. Our measurements are the first to probe sound propagation in a homogeneous Fermi gas, allowing direct comparison with theory, free of complications arising from density inhomogeneities and partial hydrodynamics across the wavefront.
By varying the power of our trapping laser, we can tune (and hence k/kF) to map the dispersion of the BA mode. Measured BA mode frequencies for different densities reveal linear dispersion at unitarity in the range 0.45 ≲ k/kF ≲ 0.7 (Fig. 4, inset) with a slope corresponding to cs/vF = 0.36 ± 0.01. At unitarity, as T → 0, where ξ is the Bertsch parameter (ratio of the internal energy of a resonantly interacting Fermi gas to that of an ideal Fermi gas). Our measured value of cs/vF yields ξ = 0.39 ± 0.02 consistent with thermodynamic measurements23.
Focused beam Bragg spectroscopy provides a means to characterize the canonical excitations of homogeneous atomic superfluids that are difficult to access in other systems such as superconductors. This paves the way for studies of elementary excitations in a range of settings, including low-dimensional, lattice-confined and spin–orbit-coupled Fermi gases, as well as finite-temperature phenomena such as pseudogap pairing. By tuning the angle between the Bragg lasers, dynamical properties of strongly correlated quantum gases spanning different momenta can be mapped out providing robust benchmarks for theories of many-body systems.
Data availability.
The data that support the plots in this paper and other findings of this study that are not detailed in the Supplementary Information are available from the corresponding author on request.
Additional Information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Nambu, Y. & Jona-Lasino, G. Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 122, 345–358 (1961).
Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976).
Griffin, A. Excitations in a Bose Condensed Liquid (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
Anderson, P. W. Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 112, 1900–1916 (1958).
Goldstone, J. Field theories with superconductor solutions. Nuovo Cimento. 19, 154–164 (1961).
Pekker, D. & Varma, C. M. Amplitude/Higgs modes in condensed matter physics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 269–297 (2015).
Bogoliubov, N. N. On the theory of superfluidity. J. Phys. USSR 11, 23–32 (1947).
Zwerger, W. (ed.) BCS–BEC Crossover and the Unitary Fermi Gas (Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, 2012).
Joseph, J. et al. Measurement of sound velocity in a Fermi gas near a Feshbach resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 170401 (2007).
Sidorenkov, L. A. et al. Second sound and the superfluid fraction in a Fermi gas with resonant interactions. Nature 498, 78–81 (2013).
Weimer, W. et al. Critical velocity in the BEC-BCS crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 095301 (2015).
Haussmann, R., Rantner, W., Cerrito, S. & Zwerger, W. Thermodynamics of the BCS–BEC crossover. Phys. Rev. A 75, 023610 (2007).
Stenger, J. et al. Bragg spectroscopy of a Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4569–4573 (1999).
Steinhauer, J., Ozeri, R., Katz, N. & Davidson, N. Excitation spectrum of a Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 120407 (2002).
Veeravalli, G., Kuhnle, E., Dyke, P. & Vale, C. J. Bragg spectroscopy of a strongly interacting Fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250403 (2008).
Rueff, J.-P. & Shukla, A. Inelastic X-ray scattering by electronic excitations under high pressure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 847–896 (2010).
Brunello, A., Dalfovo, F., Pitaevskii, L., Stringari, S. & Zambelli, F. Momentum transferred to a trapped Bose–Einstein condensate by stimulated light scattering. Phys. Rev. A 64, 063614 (2001).
Beliaev, S. T. Energy spectrum of a non-ideal Bose gas. Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 299–307 (1958).
Schunck, C. H., Shin, Y., Schirotzek, A. & Ketterle, W. Determination of the fermion pair size in a resonantly interacting superfluid. Nature 454, 739–743 (2008).
Marini, M., Pistolesi, F. & Strinati, G. C. Evolution from BCS superconductivity to Bose condensation: analytic results for the crossover in three dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 151–159 (1998).
Combescot, R., Kagan, M. Yu. & Stringari, S. Collective mode of homogeneous superfluid Fermi gases in the BEC–BCS crossover. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042717 (2006).
Hoinka, S., Lingham, M., Delehaye, M. & Vale, C. J. Dynamic spin response of a strongly interacting Fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050403 (2012).
Ku, M. J. H., Sommer, A. T., Cheuk, L. W. & Zwierlein, M. W. Revealing the superfluid lambda transition in the universal thermodynamics of a unitary Fermi gas. Science 335, 563–567 (2012).
Stewart, J. T., Gaebler, J. P. & Jin, D. S. Using photoemission spectroscopy to probe a strongly interacting Fermi gas. Nature 454, 744–747 (2008).
Schirotzek, A., Shin, Y., Schunck, C. H. & Ketterle, W. Determination of the superfluid gap in atomic Fermi gases by quasiparticle spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 140403 (2008).
Pieri, P., Pisani, L. & Strinati, G. C. BCS–BEC crossover at finite temperature in the broken-symmetry phase. Phys. Rev. B 70, 094508 (2004).
Carlson, J. & Reddy, S. Superfluid pairing gap in strong coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 150403 (2008).
Diener, R. B., Sensarma, R. & Randeria, M. Quantum fluctuations in the superfluid state of the BCS–BEC crossover. Phys. Rev. A 77, 023626 (2008).
Gubler, P., Yamamoto, N., Hatsuda, T. & Nishida, Y. Single-particle spectral density of the unitary Fermi gas: novel approach based on the operator product expansion, sum rules and the maximum entropy method. Ann. Phys. 356, 467–497 (2015).
Tajima, H. et al. Strong-coupling corrections to ground-state properties of a superfluid Fermi gas. Phys. Rev. A 95, 043625 (2017).
Kurkjian, H., Castin, Y. & Sinatra, A. Concavity of the collective excitation branch of a Fermi gas in the BEC–BCS crossover. Phys. Rev. A 93, 013623 (2016).
Manini, N. & Salasnich, L. Bulk and collective properties of a dilute Fermi gas in the BCS–BEC crossover. Phys. Rev. A 71, 033625 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We thank W. Zwerger, G. Strinati, L. Salasnich and Y. Ohashi for sharing their data and comments on the manuscript and P. Hannaford for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by ARC Discovery Project DP130101807. G.M.B. wishes to acknowledge the support of the Villum Foundation via Grant No. VKR023163 and ARC Discovery Project DP160102739.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.H., P.D., M.G.L. and C.J.V. conducted the experimental work and data analysis. J.J.K. and G.M.B. performed the theoretical calculations. All authors contributed to the manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
Supplementary information (PDF 372 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoinka, S., Dyke, P., Lingham, M. et al. Goldstone mode and pair-breaking excitations in atomic Fermi superfluids. Nature Phys 13, 943–946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4187
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4187
This article is cited by
-
Dominant andreev reflection through nonlinear radio-frequency transport
Communications Physics (2023)
-
Spectroscopic probes of quantum gases
Nature Physics (2021)
-
Linear response of a superfluid Fermi gas inside its pair-breaking continuum
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
The low-energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid
Nature (2019)
-
Higgs mode in a strongly interacting fermionic superfluid
Nature Physics (2018)