Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The transcriptional regulator Aire coopts the repressive ATF7ip-MBD1 complex for the induction of immunotolerance

Subjects

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 19 August 2014

This article has been updated

Abstract

The maintenance of immunological tolerance requires the deletion of self-reactive T cells in the thymus. The expression of genes encoding tissue-specific antigens (TSAs) by thymic epithelial cells is critical for this process and depends on activity of the transcriptional regulator Aire; however, the molecular mechanisms Aire uses to target loci encoding TSAs are unknown. Here we identified two Aire-interacting proteins known to be involved in gene repression, ATF7ip and MBD1, that were required for Aire's targeting of loci encoding TSAs. Moreover, Mbd1−/− mice developed pathological autoimmunity and had a defect in Aire-dependent thymic expression of genes encoding TSAs, which underscores the importance of Aire's interaction with the ATF7ip-MBD1 protein complex in maintaining central tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Aire interacts with ATF7ip and MBD1.
Figure 2: ATF7ip and MBD1 are required for Aire-induced gene expression, and Aire and MBD1-VP16 globally upregulate a similar set of genes.
Figure 3: Aire and MBD1 are present at the promoters of Aire-dependent genes.
Figure 4: MBD1 is required for the prevention of autoimmunity.
Figure 5: MBD1 regulates the Aire-dependent expression of TSA-encoding genes in vivo.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Referenced accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Change history

  • 24 February 2014

    In the version of this article initially published, the blot in the third row on the right in Figure 1c (Flag-Aire, 3% input) was incorrect. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Derbinski, J., Schulte, A., Kyewski, B. & Klein, L. Promiscuous gene expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells mirrors the peripheral self. Nat. Immunol. 2, 1032–1039 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, M.S. et al. The cellular mechanism of Aire control of T cell tolerance. Immunity 23, 227–239 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liston, A., Lesage, S., Wilson, J., Peltonen, L. & Goodnow, C.C. Aire regulates negative selection of organ-specific T cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 350–354 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, M.S. et al. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 298, 1395–1401 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Consortium F-GA. An autoimmune disease, APECED, caused by mutations in a novel gene featuring two PHD-type zinc-finger domains. Nat. Genet. 17, 399–403 (1997).

  6. Nagamine, K. et al. Positional cloning of the APECED gene. Nat. Genet. 17, 393–398 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathis, D. & Benoist, C. Aire. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 287–312 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pitkänen, J. et al. The autoimmune regulator protein has transcriptional transactivating properties and interacts with the common coactivator CREB-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16802–16809 (2000).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oven, I. et al. AIRE recruits P-TEFb for transcriptional elongation of target genes in medullary thymic epithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8815–8823 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Giraud, M. et al. Aire unleashes stalled RNA polymerase to induce ectopic gene expression in thymic epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 535–540 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abramson, J., Giraud, M., Benoist, C. & Mathis, D. Aire's partners in the molecular control of immunological tolerance. Cell 140, 123–135 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liiv, I. et al. DNA-PK contributes to the phosphorylation of AIRE: importance in transcriptional activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1783, 74–83 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahaney, B., Meek, K. & Lees-Miller, S.P. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. Biochem. J. 417, 639–650 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koh, A.S. et al. Aire employs a histone-binding module to mediate immunological tolerance, linking chromatin regulation with organ-specific autoimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15878–15883 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Org, T. et al. The autoimmune regulator PHD finger binds to non-methylated histone H3K4 to activate gene expression. EMBO Rep. 9, 370–376 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh, A.S., Kingston, R.E., Benoist, C. & Mathis, D. Global relevance of Aire binding to hypomethylated lysine-4 of histone-3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13016–13021 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guerau-de-Arellano, M., Mathis, D. & Benoist, C. Transcriptional impact of Aire varies with cell type. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14011–14016 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sillanpää, N. et al. Autoimmune regulator induced changes in the gene expression profile of human monocyte-dendritic cell-lineage. Mol. Immunol. 41, 1185–1198 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Derbinski, J. et al. Promiscuous gene expression in thymic epithelial cells is regulated at multiple levels. J. Exp. Med. 202, 33–45 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Derbinski, J., Pinto, S., Rosch, S., Hexel, K. & Kyewski, B. Promiscuous gene expression patterns in single medullary thymic epithelial cells argue for a stochastic mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 657–662 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Villaseñor, J., Besse, W., Benoist, C. & Mathis, D. Ectopic expression of peripheral-tissue antigens in the thymic epithelium: probabilistic, monoallelic, misinitiated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15854–15859 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Venanzi, E.S., Melamed, R., Mathis, D. & Benoist, C. The variable immunological self: genetic variation and nongenetic noise in Aire-regulated transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15860–15865 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bloch, D.B. et al. Sp110 localizes to the PML-Sp100 nuclear body and may function as a nuclear hormone receptor transcriptional coactivator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 6138–6146 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Seeler, J.S., Marchio, A., Sitterlin, D., Transy, C. & Dejean, A. Interaction of SP100 with HP1 proteins: a link between the promyelocytic leukemia-associated nuclear bodies and the chromatin compartment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 7316–7321 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Christensen, J., Cotmore, S.F. & Tattersall, P. Two new members of the emerging KDWK family of combinatorial transcription modulators bind as a heterodimer to flexibly spaced PuCGPy half-sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7741–7750 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gross, C.T. & McGinnis, W. DEAF-1, a novel protein that binds an essential region in a Deformed response element. EMBO J. 15, 1961–1970 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bottomley, M.J. et al. The SAND domain structure defines a novel DNA-binding fold in transcriptional regulation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 626–633 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibson, T.J., Ramu, C., Gemünd, C. & Aasland, R. The APECED polyglandular autoimmune syndrome protein, AIRE-1, contains the SAND domain and is probably a transcription factor. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 242–244 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cetani, F. et al. A novel mutation of the autoimmune regulator gene in an Italian kindred with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy, acting in a dominant fashion and strongly cosegregating with hypothyroid autoimmune thyroiditis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 4747–4752 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujita, N. et al. MCAF mediates MBD1-dependent transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2834–2843 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ichimura, T. et al. Transcriptional repression and heterochromatin formation by MBD1 and MCAF/AM family proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13928–13935 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, H. et al. mAM facilitates conversion by ESET of dimethyl to trimethyl lysine 9 of histone H3 to cause transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell 12, 475–487 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gardner, J.M. et al. Deletional tolerance mediated by extrathymic Aire-expressing cells. Science 321, 843–847 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sarraf, S.A. & Stancheva, I. Methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1 couples histone H3 methylation at lysine 9 by SETDB1 to DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Mol. Cell 15, 595–605 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clouaire, T. & Stancheva, I. Methyl-CpG binding proteins: specialized transcriptional repressors or structural components of chromatin? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1509–1522 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Su, M.A. et al. Mechanisms of an autoimmunity syndrome in mice caused by a dominant mutation in Aire. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1712–1726 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Clouaire, T., de las Heras, J.I., Merusi, C. & Stancheva, I. Recruitment of MBD1 to target genes requires sequence-specific interaction of the MBD domain with methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4620–4634 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Baubec, T., Ivánek, R., Lienert, F. & Schübeler, D. Methylation-dependent and-independent genomic targeting principles of the MBD protein family. Cell 153, 480–492 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klose, R.J. et al. DNA binding selectivity of MeCP2 due to a requirement for A/T sequences adjacent to methyl-CpG. Mol. Cell 19, 667–678 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao, X. et al. Mice lacking methyl-CpG binding protein 1 have deficits in adult neurogenesis and hippocampal function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6777–6782 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yun, M., Wu, J., Workman, J.L. & Li, B. Readers of histone modifications. Cell Res. 21, 564–578 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Blackledge, N.P. et al. CpG islands recruit a histone H3 lysine 36 demethylase. Mol. Cell 38, 179–190 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bergman, Y. & Cedar, H. DNA methylation dynamics in health and disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 274–281 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang, W., Anderson, M.S., Bronson, R., Mathis, D. & Benoist, C. Modifier loci condition autoimmunity provoked by Aire deficiency. J. Exp. Med. 202, 805–815 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Åstrand, M. & Speed, T.P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gentleman, R.C. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Smyth, G.K. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3, Article 3 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Abramson (Weizmann Institute of Science) for Flag-tagged Aire; J. Bluestone, A. Abbas and members of the Bluestone and Abbas laboratories for discussions; and M. Cheng and T. LaFlam for feedback on the manuscript. Supported by the Arthritis Foundation (M.W.), the Rheumatology Research Foundation (M.W.), the Burroughs Welcome Fund (M.S.A.), the US National Institutes of Health (M.S.A.) and the Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center (program project grant DK59958 for microarray and microscopy experiments).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.W. and M.S.A. wrote the manuscript and designed the experiments; M.W., I.S.K., J.T.C., U.F., T.M., A.G. and M.S. did the experiments; K.F. did histology; and M.M.-L., J.L.P. and D.J.E. did microarray analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 The SAND domain of Aire interacts with ATF7ip and Aire binds to the CXXC domains of MBD1.

(a) Outline of the strategy employed to generate the prey cDNA library from an Aire-GFP reporter transgenic mouse. Aire-expressing cells were purified by flow sorting MHC Class II Hi, GFP+ mTECs pregated on CD45-, EPCAM+ events from a collagenase treated thymus. (b) Structural domains of MBD1 including an N terminal MBD1 domain, a nuclear localization sequence (NLS), three CXXC domains, and a C terminal trans repression domain (TRD). Two truncation mutants are shown that are used for subsequent coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP). (c) Representative example of yeast plates from pairwise mating using either HSR or SAND as bait and Aire or ATF7ip domain 2(D2) as prey. Each mating was performed in duplicate as indicated by arrows. (d) Plasmids expressing c-Myc-Aire and either Flag-MBD1 1-312 or Flag-MBD1 1-161 were transiently transfected into HEK 293 cells and Co-IP was performed with an irrelevant IgG or c-Myc antibody. TATA-binding protein (TBP) is included as a loading control. Data are representative of two experiments (c,d).

Supplementary Figure 2 A cell line stably expressing Aire recapitulates Aire-dependent gene expression.

(a) Immunofluorescence of HEK 293 cells stably expressing Flag tagged Aire. The left panel shows Aire staining in red, the center panel shows Flag (green), the right panel shows the overlay (yellow). Blue indicates nuclear DAPI staining. (b) Relative expression of the Aire-dependent genes S100A8, KRT14, and ALOX12 in the Aire-stable cell line compared to a cell line expressing vector only. (c) Western blot showing the efficiency of knockdown by plasmids expressing a scrambled shRNA (shNeg), an ATF7ip shRNA (shATF7ip), or an MBD1 shRNA (shMBD1). TATA-binding protein (TBP) is included as a loading control. (d) Aire and MBD1-VP16 do not induce the non Aire-regulated gene S100A10. Relative expression of S100A10 after transient transfection with plasmids expressing Flag only (Vector), Aire-Flag (Aire), Flag-MBD1-VP16 (MBD1-VP16), or Flag-MBD1-VP16-R22A (R22A). (e) Western blot showing the expression of Flag only (Vector), Aire-Flag (Aire), Flag-MBD1-VP16 (MBD1-VP16), or Flag-MBD1-VP16-R22A (R22A) in HEK 293 cells. TATA-binding protein (TBP) is included as a loading control. Data are representative of three experiments (mean and s.e.m of pooled data from three biological replicates in b,d). Data are representative of two experiments (a,c,e).

Supplementary Figure 3 Aire and MBD1-VP16 share many target genes.

HEK 293 cells were transfected in triplicate with Flag only (Vector), Aire-Flag (Aire), or Flag-MBD1-VP16 (MBD1-VP16) and microarray analysis was performed on isolated RNA. (a) Comparison of effects of Aire and MBD1-VP16 on transcript levels (each dot represents a single gene). (b) qPCR confirmation of microarray analysis on three additional transcripts induced by both Aire and MBD1-VP16 as shown in (a). Data are representative of three experiments (a,b). Fold induction is calculated relative vector only.

Supplementary Figure 4 Mbd1−/− mice have normal thymocyte populations.

(a) Representative FACS plots of CD4 and CD8 thymocytes from 4 month old Mbd1+/+ and Mbd1−/− mice. Numbers represent the percentage of cells in each gate. (b) Representative FACS plots of thymic Tregs (CD4+/CD25+/Foxp3+) from 4month old Mbd1+/+ and Mbd1−/− mice. Numbers represent the percentage of cells in each gate. (c) Graphs show the percentage of CD4, CD8, double positive (DP), and thymic Tregs from three mice of each genotype. NS = not statistically different. Each circle or square represents one mouse.

Supplementary Figure 5 Aire specifically targets repressed TSA-encoding loci by targeting the MBD1-ATF7ip-ESET protein complex.

(a) Model shows the MBD1-ATF7ip-ESET complex interacting with methylated CpGs via MBD1 and creating the repressive histone mark H3K9me3. Data presented here indicates that this complex preferentially targets TSA genes for repression. (b) Aire binding to domain 2 (D2) of ATF7ip and to the CXXC domains of MBD1 targets Aire to the repressive MBD1-ATF7ip-ESET complex. Aire's binding to this complex specifically targets Aire to repressed TSA loci and promotes Aire's exquisite specificity for distinct TSA gene loci located throughout the genome. Aire's targeting of the MBD1-ATF7ip-ESET protein complex likely works in conjunction with Aire's interaction with H3K4me0 which may also be enriched at repressed TSA loci.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Table 1 (PDF 328 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waterfield, M., Khan, I., Cortez, J. et al. The transcriptional regulator Aire coopts the repressive ATF7ip-MBD1 complex for the induction of immunotolerance. Nat Immunol 15, 258–265 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2820

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2820

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing