Abstract
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is central to research in molecular, cell and developmental biology, but nearly all of this research has been conducted on a single strain of C. elegans. Little is known about the population genomic and evolutionary history of this species. We characterized C. elegans genetic variation using high-throughput selective sequencing of a worldwide collection of 200 wild strains and identified 41,188 SNPs. Notably, C. elegans genome variation is dominated by a set of commonly shared haplotypes on four of its six chromosomes, each spanning many megabases. Population genetic modeling showed that this pattern was generated by chromosome-scale selective sweeps that have reduced variation worldwide; at least one of these sweeps probably occurred in the last few hundred years. These sweeps, which we hypothesize to be a result of human activity, have drastically reshaped the global C. elegans population in the recent past.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Accession codes
References
Félix, M.A. & Braendle, C. The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 20, R965–R969 (2010).
Riddle, D.L., Blumenthal, T., Meyer, B.J. & Priess, J.R. C. Elegans II, xvii, 1222 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York, USA, 1997).
Barrière, A. & Felix, M.A. High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr. Biol. 15, 1176–1184 (2005).
Barrière, A. & Felix, M.A. Temporal dynamics and linkage disequilibrium in natural Caenorhabditis elegans populations. Genetics 176, 999–1011 (2007).
Cutter, A.D. & Payseur, B.A. Selection at linked sites in the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 665–673 (2003).
Cutter, A.D. Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 172, 171–184 (2006).
Cutter, A.D., Baird, S.E. & Charlesworth, D. High nucleotide polymorphism and rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of Caenorhabditis remanei. Genetics 174, 901–913 (2006).
Cutter, A.D., Felix, M.A., Barriere, A. & Charlesworth, D. Patterns of nucleotide polymorphism distinguish temperate and tropical wild isolates of Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genetics 173, 2021–2031 (2006).
Denver, D.R., Morris, K. & Thomas, W.K. Phylogenetics in Caenorhabditis elegans: an analysis of divergence and outcrossing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 393–400 (2003).
Dolgin, E.S., Felix, M.A. & Cutter, A.D. Hakuna nematoda: genetic and phenotypic diversity in African isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. Heredity 100, 304–315 (2008).
Graustein, A., Gaspar, J.M., Walters, J.R. & Palopoli, M.F. Levels of DNA polymorphism vary with mating system in the nematode genus Caenorhabditis. Genetics 161, 99–107 (2002).
Haber, M. et al. Evolutionary history of Caenorhabditis elegans inferred from microsatellites: evidence for spatial and temporal genetic differentiation and the occurrence of outbreeding. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 160–173 (2005).
Sivasundar, A. & Hey, J. Population genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans: the paradox of low polymorphism in a widespread species. Genetics 163, 147–157 (2003).
Sivasundar, A. & Hey, J. Sampling from natural populations with RNAi reveals high outcrossing and population structure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 15, 1598–1602 (2005).
Rockman, M.V., Skrovanek, S.S. & Kruglyak, L. Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans. Science 330, 372–376 (2010).
Swan, K.A. et al. High-throughput gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 12, 1100–1105 (2002).
Rockman, M.V. & Kruglyak, L. Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000419 (2009).
Baird, N.A. et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3, e3376 (2008).
McGrath, P.T. et al. Quantitative mapping of a digenic behavioral trait implicates globin variation in C. elegans sensory behaviors. Neuron 61, 692–699 (2009).
Hudson, R.R. Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics 159, 1805–1817 (2001).
Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587 (2003).
Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).
Cully, D.F. et al. Cloning of an avermectin-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channel from Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 371, 707–711 (1994).
Koch, R., van Luenen, H.G., van der Horst, M., Thijssen, K.L. & Plasterk, R.H. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in wild isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 10, 1690–1696 (2000).
Hillier, L.W. et al. Whole-genome sequencing and variant discovery in C. elegans. Nat. Methods 5, 183–188 (2008).
Gusev, A. et al. Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness. Genome Res. 19, 318–326 (2009).
Sabeti, P.C. et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419, 832–837 (2002).
Cutter, A.D. Divergence times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila inferred from direct estimates of the neutral mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 778–786 (2008).
Phillips, P.C. One perfect worm. Trends Genet. 22, 405–407 (2006).
Khan, A., Taylor, S., Ajioka, J.W., Rosenthal, B.M. & Sibley, L.D. Selection at a single locus leads to widespread expansion of Toxoplasma gondii lineages that are virulent in mice. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000404 (2009).
Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
Kiontke, K. et al. Caenorhabditis phylogeny predicts convergence of hermaphroditism and extensive intron loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9003–9008 (2004).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Roberts, A. et al. Inferring missing genotypes in large SNP panels using fast nearest-neighbor searches over sliding windows. Bioinformatics 23, i401–i407 (2007).
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).
Patterson, N. et al. Methods for high-density admixture mapping of disease genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 979–1000 (2004).
Kang, H.M. et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178, 1709–1723 (2008).
Reddy, K.C., Andersen, E.C., Kruglyak, L. & Kim, D.H. A polymorphism in npr-1 is a behavioral determinant of pathogen susceptibility in C. elegans. Science 323, 382–384 (2009).
Tan, M.W., Mahajan-Miklos, S. & Ausubel, F.M. Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Pseudomonas aeruginosa used to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 715–720 (1999).
Achaz, G. Frequency spectrum neutrality tests: one for all and all for one. Genetics 183, 249–258 (2009).
Achaz, G. Testing for neutrality in samples with sequencing errors. Genetics 179, 1409–1424 (2008).
Ewing, G. & Hermisson, J. MSMS: a coalescent simulation program including recombination, demographic structure and selection at a single locus. Bioinformatics 26, 2064–2065 (2010).
Denver, D.R., Morris, K., Lynch, M. & Thomas, W.K. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 430, 679–682 (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank all the contributors who provided strains to make this study possible, including M. Ailion (University of Washington), A. Cutter (University of Toronto), D. Denver (Oregon State University), S. Estes (Portland State University), J. Hodgkin (University of Oxford), J. Kammenga (Wageningen University), P. McGrath (Rockefeller University), M. Rockman (New York University) and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center. We also thank the Waksman Genomics Core Facility and the Lewis-Sigler Institute Microarray Facility for the Illumina sequencing. We also thank P. Andolfatto, M. Rockman, H. Seidel, R. Tanny and the members of the Kruglyak laboratory for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by a US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (E.C.A.), the Merck Fellowship of the Life Science Research Foundation (J.P.G.), a National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship (J.S.B.), a James S. McDonnell Foundation Centennial Fellowship, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and NIH grants R01-HG004321, R37-MH59520 (L.K.) and P50-GM071508 to the Center for Quantitative Biology at the Lewis-Sigler Institute of Princeton University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.C.A. and J.P.G. conceived of and carried out the experiments and data analyses. J.A.S. conceived of and carried out the data processing, simulations and analysis. J.R.C. assisted with DNA preparations. R.G. performed the abamectin sensitivity assays. J.S.B. analyzed and plotted the LD data. M.-A.F. provided the unpublished wild strains. L.K. supervised all aspects of the study. The manuscript was written by E.C.A., J.P.G., J.A.S. and L.K.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–9 and Supplementary Table 2 (PDF 5274 kb)
Supplementary Table 1
C. elegans strains used in our study (XLSX 62 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, E., Gerke, J., Shapiro, J. et al. Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat Genet 44, 285–290 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1050
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1050
This article is cited by
-
Why do plants need the ZMM crossover pathway? A snapshot of meiotic recombination from the perspective of interhomolog polymorphism
Plant Reproduction (2023)
-
A role for worm cutl-24 in background- and parent-of-origin-dependent ER stress resistance
BMC Genomics (2022)
-
The impact of species-wide gene expression variation on Caenorhabditis elegans complex traits
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Evolution of Reproductive Efficiency in Caenorhabditis elegans Under Obligatory Outcrossing
Evolutionary Biology (2022)
-
C. elegans: out on an evolutionary limb
Immunogenetics (2022)