This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rose EA et al. for the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group (2001) Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345: 1435–1443
Park SJ et al. (2005) Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129: 9–17
Lietz K et al. (2007) Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation 116: 497–505
Miller LW et al. for the HeartMate II Clinical Investigators (2007) Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 357: 885–896
Houghton P (2006) Living with the Jarvik 2000: a five-plus year experience. Artif Organs 30: 322–323
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Alexandra King, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S. Can a pulsatile left ventricular assist device provide destination therapy for patients with severe heart failure?. Nat Rev Cardiol 5, 82–83 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1088
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1088