Article | Open

Realization of ground-state artificial skyrmion lattices at room temperature

  • Nature Communications 6, Article number: 8462 (2015)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms9462
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

The topological nature of magnetic skyrmions leads to extraordinary properties that provide new insights into fundamental problems of magnetism and exciting potentials for novel magnetic technologies. Prerequisite are systems exhibiting skyrmion lattices at ambient conditions, which have been elusive so far. Here, we demonstrate the realization of artificial Bloch skyrmion lattices over extended areas in their ground state at room temperature by patterning asymmetric magnetic nanodots with controlled circularity on an underlayer with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). Polarity is controlled by a tailored magnetic field sequence and demonstrated in magnetometry measurements. The vortex structure is imprinted from the dots into the interfacial region of the underlayer via suppression of the PMA by a critical ion-irradiation step. The imprinted skyrmion lattices are identified directly with polarized neutron reflectometry and confirmed by magnetoresistance measurements. Our results demonstrate an exciting platform to explore room-temperature ground-state skyrmion lattices.

Introduction

The unique spin texture in magnetic skyrmions leads to a host of fascinating phenomena due to the topologically protected quantum state1,2,3,4,5,6 and emergent electromagnetic field7,8,9, offering great potential for novel concepts in low-dissipation magnetic information storage or skyrmionics5,7,10,11,12. For example, the recent experimental observation that current-driven skyrmion crystal motion only requires current densities that are several orders of magnitude smaller than that necessary for typical current-driven domain wall motion, has sparked intense interest in the field13.

The Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction is a common mechanism to generate magnetic skyrmions in certain non-centrosymmetric magnets such as MnSi(Fe,Co), (Mn,Fe)Ge, Cu2OSeO3 and La2Cu0.97Li0.03O4, which are usually limited to low temperatures and in finite magnetic fields3,6,7,14,15,16,17. Artificial structures such as thin films have been shown to extend the skyrmion phase space18. Frustrated exchange interactions19 and four-spin exchange interactions4 have also been shown to lead to atomic-sized skyrmions at low temperatures. Prerequisite, however, for systematic studies of the unique properties and the technological exploitation of magnetic skyrmions is a ground state, which establishes itself at ambient conditions.

In systems with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), the competition between PMA and dipolar interactions results in the formation of magnetic bubbles20,21, some of which are actually magnetic skyrmions with topological characteristics22. In conjunction with interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, breaking the mirror symmetry4,11,23,24, such PMA systems show potential for room temperature control of skyrmions. However, as the formation and stabilization of bubbles in PMA systems generally require the application of an external magnetic field, the subsequent skyrmion state is not the ground state in zero field.

Recent theoretical work has suggested that skyrmions may be artificially created through nanopatterning25; regular arrays of skyrmions then form a skyrmion lattice (SL). By fabricating vortex-state nanodots26 on a PMA film, the exchange interaction is proposed to imprint a Bloch SL into the underlying film27: the region underneath the dots have in-plane winding of the magnetization (known as chirality or circularity, with the former preserving a handedness)28,29, coupled with out-of-plane (OOP) magnetization in the middle (polarity of the core) and at outer boundaries of the in-plane magnetization, but in opposite directions. The integrated solid angles spanned by the moments in these skyrmions are ±4π, yielding a skyrmion number7 of , where n(x,y) is the normalized magnetization field at location (x,y). These artificial SLs are expected to be stable and accessible over wide temperature and field ranges and in the absence of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction.

However, there are key open challenges in using such artificial SLs towards room-temperature skyrmionics: imprinting the vortex configuration from the patterned dots into the PMA underlayer, and polarity and circularity control. At the interface between the dot and the underlayer, the PMA will be in direct competition with the magnetostatic interaction, which differentiates an SL versus a vortex lattice (VL) on top of a PMA underlayer. Although earlier studies on artificial skyrmions have shown encouraging results30,31, so far there has been no report of direct evidence of the imprinted skyrmions. In addition, controlling vortex core polarity in the hybrid structure over the entire array to be (anti-)parallel to the PMA underlayer magnetization is critical in setting the skyrmion number Q to be 0 or ±1. Finally, controlling the in-plane vortex circulation direction of all dots in the lattice is important. In individual skyrmions, the opposite chiralities of the in-plane vortex texture are topologically equivalent30; however, in extended SLs, circulation control may affect skyrmion interactions.

Here, we present direct experimental evidence of artificial SLs with a stable ground state at room temperature. Our approach is to pattern vortex-state Co nanodots in hexagonal arrays via electron-beam lithography on top of a Co/Pd thin film with PMA and prepare the skyrmion state using a specific magnetic field sequence. These hybrid structures exhibit circularity and polarity control over the entire lattice, and the vortex structure of the nanodots is imprinted into the PMA underlayer to form SLs. They offer a convenient and powerful platform to explore skyrmion physics and topological phenomena, even at room temperature and in the absence of any magnetic field.

Results

Experimental design

Hybrid structures of asymmetric Co nanodot arrays with in-plane magnetic easy axis grown on Co/Pd thin film underlayers with PMA, illustrated in Fig. 1a, were fabricated by a three-step process: a Co/Pd film was first sputter deposited, and subsequently spin-coated with a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) film; arrays of asymmetric edge-cut anti-dots were patterned into this polymer layer by e-beam lithography. Next, the film was irradiated with energetic Ar+ ions, thus modifying the multilayer structure in the exposed dot areas and tilting their easy axis in-plane32. Lastly, Co was sputtered over the irradiated anti-dot arrays, forming edge-cut Co dots after a lift-off process. The Co/Pd films exhibit (111) texture and the Co dots are polycrystalline, respectively, as reported in previous studies33. The skyrmion texture was then prepared by a designed field sequence, as detailed in Methods: the Co/Pd underlayer was first saturated in the positive perpendicular direction; then the perpendicular field was removed and a much smaller in-plane field was applied to saturate the Co dots parallel to their flat edge; lastly, a negative perpendicular field was applied as the in-plane field was removed to set the polarity, and finally the perpendicular field was removed.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the artificial skyrmion lattices and measured magnetic hysteresis loops.
Figure 1

(a) The hybrid structure consists of Co dots (red) on top of Co/Pd PMA underlayer (grey) where the in-plane spin texture of the Co dots (purple arrows) is imprinted into an irradiated Co/Pd region (light blue) underneath the dots (tilted blue arrows). Green and yellow arrows indicate the moments in the Co/Pd underlayer and the core region of the (imprinted) vortex, respectively. Major in-plane (open symbols) and perpendicular (solid symbols) hysteresis loops are shown for (b) the Co/Pd underlayer as grown, (c) the irradiated Co/Pd witness sample and (d) the hybrid Co+Co/Pd sample.

Hysteresis loops for a Co/Pd thin-film reference sample before and after Ar+ irradiation, and those for the hybrid sample are shown in Fig. 1b–d, respectively. The as-grown Co/Pd films exhibit strong PMA with an OOP remanence of essentially unity and a coercivity of μoΗC=320 mT (Fig. 1b). In contrast, for the Co/Pd film irradiated by Ar+ over the entire area, the in-plane and perpendicular hysteresis loops are nearly identical (Fig. 1c), confirming that the PMA has been successfully suppressed. The hybrid sample in the perpendicular geometry retains the characteristics of the unirradiated Co/Pd film (Fig. 1d), illustrating that the processing did not damage the perpendicular layer other than as designed; in the in-plane geometry the loop exhibits a pinched shape, typical of magnetic vortex reversal34, with nucleation and annihilation fields of 10 and 60 mT, respectively. These results demonstrate that indeed the hybrid sample has realized the designed magnetic configurations, that is, the Co/Pd underlayer is perpendicularly magnetized in a single domain state, while the Co dots are in an in-plane vortex state. After the artificial skyrmions are set by the aforementioned magnetic field sequence, they are expected to be stable over wide magnetic field and temperature (persist to near the Co/Pd Curie temperature) ranges.

To confirm the SL, we demonstrate in the following circularity and polarity control in the vortex region (Co dots), and an imprinting of the vortex structure from the dot into the underlayer.

Circularity control

Circularity control of the hybrid sample is illustrated in first-order reversal curves (FORCs)35,36,37 measured in the in-plane geometry, shown in Fig. 2a, where the applied field is parallel to the flat edge of the dots. Specifically, FORCs approaching positive saturation reveal essentially two discrete vortex annihilation fields, as highlighted in Fig. 2b, depending on their reversal fields. FORCs reversing near the negative saturation conform onto the major loop, delineated by the outer boundaries of the family of FORCs; in contrast, those reversing sooner, particularly with reversal fields in the first quadrant, reveal a smaller vortex annihilation field. These discrete annihilation fields are manifestations of circularity controlled vortices being annihilated from the flat versus rounded edge of the dots, as shown previously26,38. Remanent-state magnetic imaging performed with magnetic force microscopy (MFM) and scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA), after aforementioned SL-setting field sequence, provide direct evidence of circularity control over the dot arrays, as shown in Fig. 2c,d, respectively. This is further confirmed by magnetic transmission X-ray microscopy (MTXM)29 study of similar samples (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Note 1).

Figure 2: Circularity control.
Figure 2

(a) Family of FORCs of the hybrid sample measured in the in-plane geometry. The zoomed-in view in (b) illustrates essentially two discrete vortex annihilation fields. Remanent-state (c) MFM and (d) SEMPA (superimposed onto a scanning electron microscopy image of the dots) images, after saturating the dots in an in-plane field parallel to the flat edge of the dots to the right, indicate circularity control. Scale bar, 2 μm. A key to the magnetization winding direction is shown in the insets.

Polarity control

The large sample area (1 cm2) allows us to distinguish magnetometry signatures of the SL to confirm polarity control. The SL is prepared with the core polarity opposite to the underlayer magnetization by applying a perpendicular bias field as the vortex is nucleated. Similarly, by instead applying a perpendicular bias parallel to the underlayer magnetization the polarity can be aligned with the underlayer. The resultant structure is not an SL, since the phase shift of the perpendicular magnetization across this structure will be 0, representing just a VL on top of a PMA underlayer (Q=0 in Co/Pd). The SL and VL will have different perpendicular remanent magnetizations as a result of the vortex core orientation. In addition, the bias field can be removed entirely during the vortex nucleation in the Co dots, resulting in a random distribution of the core polarity. This mixed lattice (ML) is expected to have a remanence between the cases with ordered polarity, and a reversal behaviour indicative of both features.

Remanent state of the hybrid structure is configured into the SL, VL and ML, respectively (procedures described in Methods). As the perpendicular field was swept from 0 to negative saturation, the magnetization curves reveal clear differences, as shown in Fig. 3a (1 μemu=1 nA m2), with the difference between SL and VL highlighted in Fig. 3b. In the early stage of the magnetization reversal, illustrated in Fig. 3c, the case of parallel alignment between the core and underlayer (VL) exhibits the largest magnetization, while anti-parallel alignment (SL) shows the smallest, and random alignment (ML) midway in between the VL and SL curves. The magnetization difference between the VL and SL configurations divided by the number of dots corresponds to a region with perpendicular moment of 30 nm radius within each dot. This value is an upper limit of the core size, since the surrounding region of the core and imprinted skyrmions also contribute to the signal. This difference remains almost constant along the field sweep until the underlayer’s reversal field at −0.3 T, indicating the stability of the skyrmions. As the Co/Pd underlayer starts its reversal, highlighted in Fig. 3d, the abrupt magnetization drop occurs first in the SL configuration and last in the VL. This difference arises because in the SL the oppositely oriented cores will facilitate the nucleation of reversal domains, whereas in the VL the parallel cores will not. The difference in the nucleation field for SL versus VL is indicative of the topological effect on the nucleation process of Co/Pd reversal domains. The ML configuration shows a mixed reversal, evolving from tracking the VL to the SL. This behaviour is consistent with the presence of both types of pole configurations with opposite polarities. The magnetization difference near remanence and the field sweep thus clearly demonstrates the polarity control.

Figure 3: Polarity control.
Figure 3

Top row shows schematic illustrations of the SL, VL and ML states. The yellow arrows mark the core direction in the vortex and the imprinted region, while the other arrows represent the magnetic moments in other parts of the structure. (a) Magnetization curves, with the field sweeping from zero to negative saturation, for the hybrid structure prepared into the SL (red), VL (black) and ML (blue) states at remanence. (b) The image highlights the magnetization difference between the VL and SL, and zoomed-in views of the magnetization curves in dashed boxes are shown in (c) near zero field and (d) 320 mT where the Co/Pd underlayer starts its reversal, respectively.

Imprinted structure

To demonstrate the SL, we have used polarized neutron reflectometry (PNR) to confirm that the chiral texture in the vortex-state Co dots is imprinted into the Co/Pd underlayer, as PNR is sensitive to structural and magnetic depth profiles of thin films and multilayers39,40. The hybrid structure was first prepared into the SL state at remanence. By using a position-sensitive area detector, both specular and off-specular scattering (unpolarized) were first captured, as shown in Fig. 4a. PNR measurements were then performed with a perpendicular guide field of 6 mT, placing in-plane magnetic contrast in the spin-flip channel and nuclear contrast in the non-spin-flip channel, as discussed in Methods. Precise scans along qz isolate the specular reflection and off-specular scattering from the first-order rod, which is parallel to the specular reflection, shown as symbols in Fig. 4b,c, respectively. The specular reflection (qx=0) identifies strictly the nuclear and magnetic depth profile of the hybrid structure while the off-specular reflection, shown at qx=3.6 μm−1, includes in-plane contributions from the periodic dot and SL.

Figure 4: Polarized neutron reflectometry.
Figure 4

(a) Position-sensitive area-detector image of the (qx, qz) unpolarized neutron scattering, with polarized traces along (b) the specular (qx=0) and (c) the first off-specular (qx=3.6 μm−1) reflections. The fitted depth-dependent nuclear (ρΝ, solid black and dashed blue curves) and magnetic (ρΜ, solid red and dashed green curves) scattering densities from the specular measurement are shown in (d), over the protected film (dashed curves) and the vortex region (solid curves). On top of the Si substrate (yellow region), at increasing depth, the film structure corresponds to the Pd seed (grey), Co/Pd underlayer (pink), Co dot (blue), Ta cap (green) and air (white). The calculated reflectivity from these depth profiles are shown as solid lines in (b). The Born-simulated reflectometry patterns from the OOMMF simulations are shown as dashed lines in (b) and (c). Error bars in qz identify machine precision; error bars in normalized reflectivity are defined by the s.d. and scale with the square root of the number of measurements.

The specular reflectivity shows clear oscillations in both the spin-flip and non-spin-flip channels. Since the coherence of the neutron beam in the transverse direction is smaller than the dot diameter, the model used to fit the data was an incoherent sum of scattering from different regions of the dot array. The fitted nuclear and magnetic depth profiles (χ2=0.70) are shown in Fig. 4d, and the calculated scattering is shown in Fig. 4b as solid lines. The nuclear depth profile matches the designed structure very well. Depth profile of the in-plane magnetization captures not only the entire thickness of the Co dot but also extends into the Co/Pd underlayer by 3 nm (solid red curve), indicating an imprinted interfacial layer. The thickness of the imprinted layer is consistent with thickness of the ion-irradiated region estimated from simulations (Supplementary Fig. 2)41. It is this layer that separates the singularities at the top and bottom interfaces and provides the topological protection of the skyrmions, as shown by the magnetization measurements in Fig. 3. The PNR-measured in-plane moment in the interfacial layer is slightly larger than that of the Co dot, likely resulting from the local lateral exchange coupling of the irradiated Co/Pd region to the surrounding unirradiated Co/Pd. Since specular PNR is insensitive to perpendicular magnetization, no net in-plane magnetization is detected from PNR underneath the imprinted interfacial layer or in Co/Pd regions between the irradiated dots, consistent with the PMA in unirradiated Co/Pd.

As confirmation of the model fit for the PNR, the off-specular reflectivity was also simulated using the depth profile from the specular fit. Specifically, a model was constructed in the object-oriented micromagnetic framework (OOMMF) simulation platform (Supplementary Fig. 3) with a structural and magnetic depth profile matching that obtained from the specular measurement. Using a plane-wave Born-approximation model, the reflectometry pattern was then simulated for both the specular and off-specular reflections. Born-OOMMF simulations are shown as dashed lines in Fig. 4b,c. Unfortunately, Born approximation simulations cannot capture dynamic scattering at low q such as the critical edge (Fig. 4b; qz<0.1 nm−1) in the specular reflectivity or refraction effects when the incident or scattered beam is parallel to the sample surface. Our model results, however, show a clear consistency with the experimental data in the period and relative height of the oscillations. Since the off-specular reflection is sensitive to the in-plane magnetic and structural details, the ability to directly reconstruct these details using a feedback-type approach is strong evidence for the accuracy of the model.

PNR data were also collected for an in-plane guide field (not shown). In this geometry, components of the in-plane magnetization parallel and perpendicular to the field scatter separately into the non-spin-flip and spin-flip channels, respectively; the fit again converged for the same nuclear and magnetic structure shown in Fig. 4d, giving further verification of the depth-dependent model. The neutron scattering presents the crucial piece of evidence that artificial skyrmions are indeed imprinted by the vortex-state Co dot into the Co/Pd underlayer. For samples without the irradiated underlayers, it is likely that the imprinting does not extend as far (or is absent altogether). The smooth variation of the magnetization through the interface between the dot and underlayer reveals that the imprinted structures reflect the chiral structure from the vortex dots, which have been shown to have chiral and polar ordering. Traversing across the centre of each Co/Pd dot structure at the imprinted interface constitutes a 360° rotation of the spin orientation, corresponding to a skyrmion number of Q=1, as shown schematically in Fig. 3 for the SL. The imprinted chiral structure over the entire sample is indeed a Bloch SL.

Magnetoresistance

It has been previously shown that, due to their complex spin configurations, magneto-transport behaviour in skyrmion materials presents particular opportunities12,13,42,43. Magneto-transport measurements are shown in Fig. 5, showing (panel a) perpendicular and (panel b) transverse anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR). The perpendicular AMR shows an expected magnetic field dependence, with the AMR peak positions coinciding with the coercive fields of the Co/Pd underlayer perpendicular loop (Fig. 5a) and R(θ)=RTR cos2θ, where resistance R depends on the angle θ between the applied field and current direction, and RT is the resistance when θ=90°. The signal is small because much of the current is shunted through the Pd seed layer. With the field applied in-plane but perpendicular to the current, the transverse AMR shows a sensitivity to the vortex nucleation and annihilation events. At large fields, the dots are in the single domain configuration, with their moment perpendicular to the current path. On nucleation the vortex forms a flux-closure structure, which can be approximated as four orthogonally configured magnetic regions, thus roughly half of the vortex remains perpendicular to the current and half becomes parallel, and the latter contributes to a larger resistance R//=RTR as θ=0. The transverse AMR peak positions coincide with the coercivities of the in-plane loop of the Co dots (Fig. 5b) where the parallel components are at the maximum. The discrete nature of the Co dots suggests that the AMR signal should come from spin textures in the Co/Pd underlayer. The correlation between the transverse AMR and the in-plane vortex structure of the Co dots indicates a strong coupling between the dots and the underlayer, which is further evidence of the imprinted SL.

Figure 5: Anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR).
Figure 5

(a) Perpendicular AMR, and (b) transverse AMR results (black and red curves for descending and ascending field sweeps, respectively), superimposed with (a) perpendicular hysteresis loop of the Co/Pd and (b) in-plane loop of the Co dots (blue curves), respectively, showing the AMR sensitivity to the imprinted spin texture in the Co/Pd underlayer.

Discussion

We have successfully achieved room-temperature artificial SLs in the ground state over extended areas, thus defining a platform for exploring the properties and behaviours as well as the use of SL in novel technological concepts. The system is constructed by fabricating circularity controlled Co nanodots on a Co/Pd underlayer with PMA. Circularity control is imposed by the fabrication of asymmetric dots and confirmed by magnetometry and direct magnetic imaging. Polarity control is realized by the application of a perpendicular magnetic field during the vortex nucleation to achieve SL, VL and ML, as confirmed by remanent magnetization and topology-dependent magnetization reversal of the underlayer. The vortex structure in the Co dots is imprinted into the Co/Pd underlayer through reduction of the interfacial PMA via ion irradiation. This is a critical step that allowed the realization of the SL at the interfacial region of the underlayer, with imprinted spin textures embedded in the matrix of unirradiated Co/Pd. The imprinted SL in the Co/Pd is directly confirmed by PNR, and is also manifested in the AMR measurements and micromagnetic simulations. These artificially constructed SLs are stable at room temperature and in the absence of magnetic field, controlled by the exchange interaction and magnetostatic energies, in contrast to the skyrmion phase in conventional systems, which tend to exist in limited temperature-magnetic field parameter space3,6,7,14,15,16,17. These foundational results present a new path in skyrmion research on the mesoscale, at and above room temperature.

Methods

Sample fabrication

Samples were prepared by a three-step process. In step one, PMA thin films with a nominal structure of [Co (0.5 nm)/Pd (1 nm)]10 were grown on naturally oxidized Si substrates with a Pd seed layer by DC magnetron sputtering in a 0.67-Pa Ar atmosphere (base pressure 1.2 × 10−6 Pa). In the second step, following a standard e-beam lithography procedure, hexagonal arrays of edge-cut asymmetric holes with diameter of 560 nm and centre-to-centre spacing of 1 μm were patterned into a 400-nm thick PMMA polymer layer, which was spin-coated onto the Co/Pd film. After development, the exposed Co/Pd was irradiated by 1 keV Ar+ plasma (with a fluence of 200 mA cm−2) for 3 s. Using the stopping range in matter (SRIM) simulation platform41, calculations suggest damage to the multilayer structure up to a 4-nm depth (Supplementary Fig. 2; Supplementary Note 2); the PMMA sufficiently protects the undeveloped regions. During the third step, 32 nm thick asymmetric Co dots were grown over the irradiated regions following a standard lift-off procedure, as illustrated in Figs 1a and 2. The entire patterned area was 1 cm2. Layer thicknesses were confirmed from witness samples made at the same time and measured by X-ray reflectivity; lateral dimensions were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy.

Setting the skyrmion state

Once the samples were fabricated, an appropriate magnetic field sequence was applied at room temperature to prepare the skyrmion state. First, the Co/Pd underlayer was saturated in the positive OOP direction (μoHOOP=1.5 T). Then, a static field was applied in the negative OOP direction (μoHOOP=−100 mT), which was much weaker than the reversal field of the underlayer and the Co/Pd remained positively saturated. A moderate in-plane field was then applied parallel to the flat edge of the asymmetric Co dots, driving them to a saturated state (μoHOOP=−100 mT, μoHIP=100 mT). Removing this field facilitated the nucleation of a vortex in each of the dots with a well-defined circularity26,44; the static perpendicular field biased the vortex core polarity at the nucleation event to be opposite to the Co/Pd underlayer; by irradiating the Co/Pd region underneath the Co vortex dots, the competition between the underlayer’s PMA and the dot’s magnetostatic energy was circumvented, allowing imprinting of the vortex structure and ensuring that the underlayer orientation does not influence the core polarity. For comparison, a VL was formed by applying the static perpendicular field parallel to the underlayer. Finally, an ML was prepared in the absence of a guide field and is expected to have a random polarity distribution.

Characterizations

Characterizations were all done at room temperature. Magnetometry was measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer in both the perpendicular and in-plane geometries. In the in-plane case the field was applied parallel to the flat edge of the dots. FORCs were measured following prior procedures35,36,37 where the sample was first positively saturated, then brought to progressively more negative reversal fields, and the magnetization was measured under increasing applied field back to positive saturation. Magnetic imaging was performed using SEMPA at the Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology at NIST, and MTXM29 at the Advanced Light Source. MFM was also performed. Magneto-transport measurements were performed using a pulsed bipolar current supply (±5 mA), measured on a nanovoltmeter.

Polarized neutron reflectivity was performed at the NIST Center for Neutron Research on the MAGIK reflectometer with λ=0.5 nm neutrons. Measurements are presented as a function of wave vector transfer magnitude, qx, y, z, with qz indicating the OOP direction. The spin polarization of the neutrons was selected to be up (+) or down (−) before and after scattering from the sample using supermirror polarizers and Al-coil spin flippers, allowing measurement of the spin-flip (Rincident scattered: R+− and R−+) and non-spin-flip (R++ and R−−) signals. A perpendicular guide field of 6 mT was used to set the neutron spin direction perpendicular to the film plane. For specular measurements, with a perpendicular guide field, the magnetic and nuclear scattering are separated into the spin-flip and non-spin-flip channels, respectively. The spin-flip scattering originates from the component of the magnetization perpendicular to the neutron spin. It is only sensitive to the in-plane magnetic moments and thus originates from the dot and imprinted structures. The specular reflectometry was fitted using the Refl1d software package45. The Refl1d calculation by default uses a coherent summation scheme for modelling the depth-dependent scattering length density—meaning the neutron wave function is assumed to be laterally larger than the features and thus the scattering is treated as the in-plane average. In this work the features of the sample are comparable to the neutron’s lateral distribution, and thus the net signal is a weighted sum of several models corresponding to different regions of the sample—referred to as an incoherent sum (Supplementary Figs 4 and 5; Supplementary Note 3).

Simulations

Simulations of the irradiation penetration were performed using the SRIM simulation platform41 modelling 1 keV Ar+ normally incident on a film with the same structure as the experimental underlayer. The results suggest that irradiation damages the top three bilayers, corresponding to 4 nm. OOMMF simulations were used to model the magnetic structure of the hybrid structure. Simulations were performed using the bulk values for the saturation magnetization (MS (Co)=1.40 × 106 A m−3, MS (unirradiated Co/Pd, irradiated CoPd)=3.02 × 105 A m−3), magneto-crystalline anisotropy (KU (Co, irradiated CoPd)=0 J m−3, KU (unirradiated Co/Pd)=8 × 105 J m−3) and exchange stiffness (A (Co)=3.0 × 10−11 J m−1, A (unirradiated Co/Pd and irradiated CoPd)=5 × 10−12 J m−1) with a rectangular mesh of 4 × 4 × 2 nm; the irradiated region was treated as an embedded uniform cylinder located under the dot with a thickness of 4 nm, consistent with the SRIM simulations and PNR results, and having the same saturation magnetization and exchange stiffness as the unirradiated underlayer, but with KU=0. Simulations show that with the polarity setting field, the chiral structure and core structure are imprinted into the underlayer; in contrast, without the conditioning field the hybrid structure is not in the skyrmion state (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Gilbert, D. A. et al. Realization of ground-state artificial skyrmion lattices at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 6:8462 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9462 (2015).

References

  1. 1.

    , & Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442, 797–801 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

  3. 3.

    et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).

  4. 4.

    et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7, 713–718 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341, 636–639 (2013).

  6. 6.

    , , & Observation of skyrmions in a multiferroic material. Science 336, 198–201 (2012).

  7. 7.

    & Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013).

  8. 8.

    & Emergent electromagnetism in solids. Phys. Scr. 2012, T146 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , & Gauge fields in real and momentum spaces in magnets: monopoles and skyrmions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 5806–5819 (2012).

  10. 10.

    , , & Chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films: new objects for magnetic storage technologies? J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 44, 392001 (2011).

  11. 11.

    , & Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152–156 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839–844 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities. Science 330, 1648–1651 (2010).

  14. 14.

    & Skyrmion in a real magnetic film. Phys. Rev. B 58, R8889 (1998).

  15. 15.

    , , , & Skyrmion lattice in a two-dimensional chiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094429 (2010).

  16. 16.

    et al. Discrete helicoidal states in chiral magnetic thin films. Phys. Rev. B 88, 214420 (2013).

  17. 17.

    et al. Skyrmions in a doped antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 227206 (2011).

  18. 18.

    & Extended skyrmion phase in epitaxial FeGe (111) thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 267201 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , & Multiple-q states and the skyrmion lattice of the triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet under magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017206 (2012).

  20. 20.

    , & Bubble domains in magnetostatically coupled garnet films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 485–487 (1973).

  21. 21.

    & Magnetic Domain Walls in Bubble Materials 306–314Academic Press (1979).

  22. 22.

    et al. Magnetic stripes and skyrmions with helicity reversals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8856–8860 (2012).

  23. 23.

    et al. Chiral magnetic order at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry. Nature 447, 190–193 (2007).

  24. 24.

    et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Science 349, 283–286 (2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Creating an artificial two-dimensional skyrmion crystal by nanopatterning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167201 (2013).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Angular dependence of vortex-annihilation fields in asymmetric cobalt dots. Phys. Rev. B 80, 014416 (2009).

  27. 27.

    et al. Manipulating topological states by imprinting non-collinear spin textures. Sci. Rep. 5, 8787 (2015).

  28. 28.

    , & Patterned nanomagnets. Phys. Today 60, 40–45 (2007).

  29. 29.

    et al. Dynamic switching of the spin circulation in tapered magnetic nanodisks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 341–346 (2013).

  30. 30.

    et al. Tailoring the topology of an artificial magnetic skyrmion. Nat. Commun. 5, 4704 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. Experimental realization of two-dimensional artificial skyrmion crystals at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174411 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Tuning perpendicular anisotropy gradient in Co/Pd multilayers by ion irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 072401 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Deposition order dependent magnetization reversal in pressure graded Co/Pd films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 152401 (2014).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Single-domain circular nanomagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1042–1045 (1999).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Temperature induced single domain-vortex state transition in sub-100 nm Fe nanodots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 202501 (2007).

  36. 36.

    et al. Magnetization reversal of Co/Pt multilayers: microscopic origin of high-field magnetic irreversibility. Phys. Rev. B 70, 224434 (2004).

  37. 37.

    et al. Quantitative decoding of interactions in tunable nanomagnet arrays using first order reversal curves. Sci. Rep. 4, 4204 (2014).

  38. 38.

    , , & Chirality control via double vortices in asymmetric Co dots. Phys. Rev. B 83, 060415 (2011).

  39. 39.

    Polarized neutron reflectometry. Phys. B 173, 75–88 (1991).

  40. 40.

    , & in Neutron Scattering From Magnetic Materials (ed. T. Chatterji) Ch. 9, (Elsevier Science (2005).

  41. 41.

    The Stopping and Ranges of Ions in Matter Pergamon Press Inc., Maxwell House (1977).

  42. 42.

    , , & Skyrmions and anomalous Hall effect in a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya spiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B 80, 054416 (2009).

  43. 43.

    , , & Dynamics of skyrmion crystals in metallic thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 136804 (2011).

  44. 44.

    et al. Stochastic formation of magnetic vortex structures in asymmetric disks triggered by chaotic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 5, 5620 (2014).

  45. 45.

    et al. Phase-sensitive specular neutron reflectometry for imaging the nanometer scale composition depth profile of thin-film materials. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 17, 44–53 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NSF (DMR-1008791 and ECCS-1232275). D.A.G. acknowledges support from the NRC Research Associateship Program. A.L.B. acknowledges support under the Cooperative Research Agreement between the University of Maryland and the NIST Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology (Award 70NANB10H193) through the University of Maryland. P.F. acknowledges support by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 and the Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program (Grant no. 2012K1A4A3053565) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA

    • Dustin A. Gilbert
    •  & Kai Liu
  2. NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA

    • Dustin A. Gilbert
    • , Brian B. Maranville
    • , Brian J. Kirby
    •  & Julie A. Borchers
  3. Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA

    • Andrew L. Balk
    • , Daniel T. Pierce
    •  & John Unguris
  4. Maryland Nanocenter, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

    • Andrew L. Balk
  5. Center for X-Ray Optics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Peter Fischer
  6. Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 94056, USA

    • Peter Fischer

Authors

  1. Search for Dustin A. Gilbert in:

  2. Search for Brian B. Maranville in:

  3. Search for Andrew L. Balk in:

  4. Search for Brian J. Kirby in:

  5. Search for Peter Fischer in:

  6. Search for Daniel T. Pierce in:

  7. Search for John Unguris in:

  8. Search for Julie A. Borchers in:

  9. Search for Kai Liu in:

Contributions

D.A.G. and K.L. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. D.A.G. synthesized the samples, performed magnetometry and transport measurements. D.A.G., B.B.M., B.J.K. and J.A.B. carried out PNR studies and OOMMF simulations. A.L.B., D.T.P. and J.U. performed SEMPA investigations. P.F. and D.A.G. did MTXM measurements. K.L. coordinated the project. All authors contributed to the discussion and manuscript revision.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Liu.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-5, Supplementary Notes 1-3 and Supplementary Reference

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/