Roles of dental development and adaptation in rodent evolution

  • Nature Communications 4, Article number: 2504 (2013)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms3504
  • Download Citation
Published online:


In paleontology, many changes affecting morphology, such as tooth shape in mammals, are interpreted as ecological adaptations that reflect important selective events. Despite continuing studies, the identification of the genetic bases and key ecological drivers of specific mammalian dental morphologies remains elusive. Here we focus on the genetic and functional bases of stephanodonty, a pattern characterized by longitudinal crests on molars that arose in parallel during the diversification of murine rodents. We find that overexpression of Eda or Edar is sufficient to produce the longitudinal crests defining stephanodonty in transgenic laboratory mice. Whereas our dental microwear analyses show that stephanodonty likely represents an adaptation to highly fibrous diet, the initial and parallel appearance of stephanodonty may have been facilitated by developmental processes, without being necessarily under positive selection. This study demonstrates how combining development and function can help to evaluate adaptive scenarios in the evolution of new morphologies.


Over the past 200 My, the diversification of the masticatory apparatus in mammals has facilitated exploitation of a wider range of foods than in their ancestors1, including more plant material. In this evolutionary process, mammals have acquired more heterogeneous dentitions, including fewer but more complex teeth2. Today, murine rodents, the Old World mice and rats, are one of the most successful living examples of mammalian radiation, which can partly be explained by the evolution of novel dental morphologies contributing to the colonization of numerous environments and habitats. Although possessing only one ever-growing incisor and three molars per dental quadrant, murines have one of the most derived mammalian dental patterns, typically characterized by numerous cusps arranged in transverse chevrons3. Although most murine rodents have omnivorous feeding habits4, less than a quarter of species have developed distinct dental adaptations for plant consumption, such as enlarged, complex or high-crowned teeth5,6,7. The fossil record of murine rodents is essential for providing a broad spectrum of pre-existing dental phenotypes. It is also important for documenting successive morphological changes in a temporal framework in relation to feeding adaptations. As understanding the developmental bases of ecologically relevant features is useful in evaluating the adaptive significance of parallel acquisition of similar dental features, both paleontological and developmental data have to be considered in such evolutionary contexts.

Stephanodonty is a dental innovation arising independently in more than ten lineages of European and African murine rodents during the last 10 My8. The key characteristic of this phenotype was defined as the connection in a garland-like fashion of the five posterior main cusps in first and second upper molars9 (M1–M2). The extinct Stephanomys genus presents the most advanced stage with the above mentioned garland connected to the anterior chevron via lateral longitudinal crests8 (Fig. 1a). On lower molars (M1–M2), the stephanodont pattern corresponds to the occurrence of a single longitudinal central crest. The stephanodont pattern is variable within murine rodents8. In the European Stephanomys lineage, it is weakly expressed in the basal species Progonomys hispanicus, basic in Occitanomys, and then fully expressed in Stephanomys species (Fig. 1b,c). In the Apodemus lineage, currently represented by Old World wood and field mice, this pattern is absent in stem species, such as Progonomys cathalai and Progonomys castilloae, whereas the garland is present in Apodemus species (for example, Apodemus sylvaticus, Fig. 1b,c). Such a garland is also present in a few extant and extinct African genera8 from the Arvicanthini tribe (for example, Paraethomys, Aethomys, Grammomys, Hybomys, Thallomys and Oenomys, which has a fully expressed stephanodont pattern).

Figure 1: Dental morphologies observed in Apodemus and Stephanomys lineages.
Figure 1

(a) Diagrams depicting the stephanodont condition compared with the basal condition. The red dotted line on the diagram indicates the basic stephanodont pattern (1) corresponding to the garland of cusps resulting from the addition of the crest depicted in red colour. Yellow lines represent anterior additional crests indicating the most advanced stage (2). (b) Upper first molars imaged by using X-ray conventional microtomographic three-dimensional renderings. White lines indicate phylogenetic relationships with main dental variations. (c) Dental diagrams showing additional cusps and crests in red dots and red lines, which are characteristic of each species. Dark lines indicate phylogenetic relationships. Not to scale. †: extinct species.

Even though this dental pattern has been interpreted as a specialization to an abrasive diet10, little is actually known about the factors contributing to the parallel occurrences of stephanodonty over the course of murine evolution, especially the putative function of additional longitudinal crests during food processing. Moreover, the genetic aetiology and the underlying mechanisms involved in the formation of crests remain undescribed, inasmuch as most studies have mainly focused on cusp appearance and development11,12,13,14. The ectodysplasin (Eda) signalling pathway is required for normal development of organs of ectodermal origin, such as hair, exocrine glands and teeth15,16,17,18. It has been shown that gain or loss of function of implicated genes (Eda and Edar) cause defects in the dentition, affecting the size and number of both teeth and cusps11,19,20,21. Interestingly, experimental overexpressions of the Eda pathway genes in the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) have previously been described to produce a number of changes in the murine dentition, and longitudinal crests can be observed11,14,21,22.

Here we compare the dental morphology of Eda and Edar transgenic mice together with those of the well-documented Apodemus and Stephanomys lineages. These extinct and extant lineages are of interest, as they enable a documentation of the successive stages of stephanodonty through time, as well as the associated variations of crown morphologies. Overexpressing Eda and Edar mice show that the parallel appearance of stephanodonty in different murine lineages may have been facilitated by a relatively simple developmental modification producing longitudinal crests. Using dental microwear analyses, we propose that stephanodonty represents an adaptation to fibrous foods, rather than solely abrasive foods, a dietary shift often related to climatic and environmental changes. However, basic stephanodonty may have been selectively neutral, and only the more advanced stage could have been under positive selection associated with opening up of environments during the Late Miocene.


Eda or Edar increase generates stephanodont crests

After examination of mice with increased signalling as a result of overexpression of the ligand (K14-Eda) or carrying a high copy number of its receptor (EdarTg951), we observe many dental variations compared with wild-type (WT) mice (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Dental measurements performed on the whole samples showed that homozygous K14-Eda and EdarTg951/Tg951 generally have shorter molars than controls (except M1, Fig. 2), and tend to have wider molars (M1, M1 and M2; Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). A supernumerary tooth can be frequently observed in front of M1 (70.4%) in K14-Eda mice and occasionally in front of M1 (6.9%; Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1). This anomaly is far less frequent in EdarTg951/Tg951 (3.3% for M1 and 1.7% for M1) and is absent in heterozygous EdarTg951. The length reduction of first molars in these transgenic mice can be explained by the occurrence of vestigial dental buds in front of first molars in mouse13, which facilitates the development of a fourth premolar-like tooth, as observed in some mutant mice, especially Eda, Edar and Sprouty 2 losses of function20,23.

Figure 2: Main dental characters observed in Eda and Edar transgenic mice.
Figure 2

(a) Upper first molars imaged by using X-ray conventional and synchrotron microtomographic three-dimensional renderings, and main dental variations. (b) Dental diagrams showing additional crests. Colours indicate the frequencies of each morphotype observed: occasional (1–35%), widespread (70–100%). WT, wild type.

Figure 3: Most frequent morphotypes observed in transgenic mice and stephanodont species.
Figure 3

(a,c,d) X-ray synchrotron microtomographic three-dimensional renderings of upper and lower cheek tooth rows. (b,e,f) X-ray conventional microtomographic three-dimensional renderings of upper and lower cheek tooth rows. Scale bars, 1 mm. WT, wild type.

The presence of more or less marked longitudinal crests interconnecting chevrons is unusual in the mouse. Nonetheless, the derived stage involving the garland and the lateral anterior crests occurs in Eda and Edar homozygous transgenic mice (Fig. 2). On lower molars, a central crest, typical of the derived stephanodont pattern, generally appears between chevrons (Fig. 3). As a result, most morphotypes observed in the upper and lower molars of both transgenic animals mirror the canonical features of the derived stephanodont pattern (Fig. 3). However, the posterior insertion of anterior crests is slightly different between transgenic mice and Stephanomys. In transgenic mice, anterior crests directly link lateral cusps, whereas in Stephanomys these longitudinal crests are connected to transverse crests. A slight variation is also observed for the central crest in lower molars with a mesial insertion on the vestibular cusp instead of the lingual (Fig. 3). Previous studies on comparable overexpressing transgenic mice also showed that the double transgenic K14-Eda;K14-Edar displayed a vestibular cingulid (63% of specimens) on lower molars, with a cusp on M1 (ref. 14). These characters are also observed in most stephanodont species (Fig. 3). Dental widening, albeit slight in transgenic mice, is another common trend shared with several extinct stephanodont species (Figs 1 and 2, for example, Occitanomys and Stephanomys) even if it is not considered as a general trend, because it does not occur in all species having the garland (for example, Apodemus and Oenomys). To our knowledge, generation of such longitudinal crests has never been reported in other mutant or transgenic mice.

Trends in dental shape related to longitudinal crests

Previous studies have shown that variations in dental outline were associated with stephanodonty24,25,26. Using this quantitative method of description of the overall tooth shape, we wanted to check more precisely whether a common signal related to stephanodonty could be registered on the dental outline of both transgenic lines and species from the Apodemus and Stephanomys lineages (excluding high-crowned Stephanomys species, which are too derived; see Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Fig. S2). Therefore, we evaluated the impact of the morphological changes potentially associated to the addition of longitudinal crests on the M1 overall shapes, especially on lateral cusps.

Each species from the Apodemus and Stephanomys lineages strongly diverge from Mus species and transgenic mice on the first axis of each analysis (Fig. 4). This first-order signal corresponds to phylogenetic differences leading to idiosyncratic morphologies for each species. For instance, Mus and Progonomys show different global shapes, nevertheless sharing an absent to weak stephanodont pattern. Stephanomys species, especially the more recent forms, differ from the basal murine dental pattern in having enlarged cusps and much wider teeth24 (Fig. 4b) and Apodemus bears an additional disto-lingual cusp. Nonetheless, a parallel trend possibly related to increased stephanodonty is observed on the second axis of each analysis (Fig. 4). These shared modifications are related to variations of cusp size and location. For instance, a mesial location of the disto-vestibular cusp [t9] appears in Apodemus, Stephanomys and transgenic species, and this is obviously related to the development of the garland. The more distal location of the mesio-lingual cusp [t1] allows the development of a mesio-lingual crest, a character that is similarly observed in transgenic mice and in Stephanomys (Fig. 4b), but not in Apodemus (Fig. 4a). These stephanodont phenotypes are more pronounced in K14-Eda than in EdarTg951/Tg951 (Fig. 4), which agrees with the higher frequency of longitudinal crests in K14-Eda than in EdarTg951/Tg951 (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 4: Comparisons of M1 outlines between stephanodont and transgenic forms.
Figure 4

(a) Morphological space including the representatives of the Apodemus lineage, and WT and transgenic mice. (b) Morphological space including the Stephanomys lineage (early part), and WT and transgenic mice. Transgenic specimens with P4 were not included here. Symbols represent the mean value of each sample and are associated to a species, whereas ellipses characterize the s.d. Open ellipses are associated to the absence of dental crest, filled ellipses with a clear colour are associated to basic to not fully developed stephanodont pattern, filled ellipses with a dark colour are associated to fully developed longitudinal crests. Dental outlines visualize shape changes associated to stephanodonty in several ways: extreme values along the second axis and superimposition of couples of non- or basic stephanodont versus full stephanodont in the murine lineages and in transgenic lines (blue correspond to non- or basic stephanodont pattern, red and violet to more derived stephanodont pattern). †, extinct species; Dal, Dalhem (Belgium); Dio, Dionay (France); KS, Las Casiones (Spain); MBB, Masia del Barbo (Spain); Mtp, Montpellier (France); Mur, Murcia (Spain); PerD, Peralejos D (Spain); PM, Puente Minero (Spain); Rom4, La Roma 4 (Spain); ToA, Tortajada A (Spain); Vdc3, Valdecebro 3 (Spain).

Abrasive and tough intakes in stephanodont species

Dental microwear analyses revealed that all the investigated fossil and extant murine species display microwear patterns involving high number of fine scratches, pointing to a significant component of abrasive and tough intakes in the diet (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table S4). These particular physical properties may be related to the fragmentation and grinding down of herbaceous plants, such as grasses involving a high proportion of hard silica phytoliths, or of a co-ingestion of dust or grit frequently coating open environment plants27,28. Occitanomys and Stephanomys species have been expected to be grass eaters because of the dental enlargement trend coupled to the addition of longitudinal crests. However, Progonomys species as well as the extinct Apodemus atavus present a microwear pattern close to grass-dominated feeders (Fig. 5 and Table 1), whereas they present a weak or complete garland, respectively. Consequently, the hypothesis of an ancestral omnivorous condition for both lineages is disputed (Fig. 6). Results on extant Apodemus sylvaticus concur with previous observations of the stomach contents, indicating an omnivorous condition29, and emphasize its opportunistic behaviour because of the variations noticed from a forested to a slightly more open and dry area (that is, Belgium versus Spain; Table 1 and Supplementary Table S5). Species from the Stephanomys lineage do not show any significant difference with grass-dominated feeders (Fig. 5 and Table 1) and present the highest number of fine scratches (>19; Supplementary Table S4).

Figure 5: Graphical comparisons of dental microwear patterns in stephanodont lineages.
Figure 5

The principal component analysis was carried out on the tree variables (Nfs, number of fine scratches; Nws, number of wide scratches; Nlp, number of large pits). Dietary categories are based on the extant MUROIDEA database28. Cross-hair lines represent s.d. of the samples considered here, and coloured ellipses the s.d. of the three main ecological groups of the database. ADF, animal-dominated feeders; FDF, fruit-dominated feeders; GDF, grass-dominated feeders; †, extinct species; Cuc, Cucalón (Spain); Dal, Dalhem (Belgium); MBB, Masia del Barbo (Spain); Mur, Murcia (Spain).

Table 1: Pairwise comparison tests performed on dental microwear data.
Figure 6: Evolution of dietary habits in stephanodont lineages.
Figure 6

Vertical boxes represent the stratigraphic range of each species with colour corresponding to the results of dental microwear analyses. Dental diagrams display hypothesized diet based on dental pattern (before the present study). Empty boxes represent species, which have only been studied for outline analyses. Brown signifies an omnivorous condition, and green an herbivorous condition with a significant abrasive and fibrous component (for example, grasses). Filled ellipses correspond to pictures of dental microwear (scale bar, 100 μm). The δ180 record characterizes the trend of high-latitude temperatures48,49, whereas the green and yellow box represent the gradient from closed and humid to open and arid environments is southwestern Europe derived from hypsodonty-based estimates of paleoprecipitations31.


The morphological changes observed in Eda and Edar transgenic mice, which quantitatively affect the overall dental structure depending on the gene dosage, emphasize the potential involvement of the Eda pathway in the evolution of crests. In other words, our data show that longitudinal crests can originate from a relatively simple genetic and developmental change. Observations of global dental morphologies associated to quantification of dental outlines also show that the occurrence of longitudinal crests is coupled to the migration of certain cusps in upper molars of both the studied transgenic mice and stephanodont species. Shifts in cusp positions seem closely linked to the evolution of stephanodonty. Any differences in insertion of crests could be related to shapes inherited from diverse ancestral morphologies and to small variations in cusp locations. Indeed, crest insertions are also known to differ in some stephanodont species. For instance, the extinct Anthracomys has the distal part of an anterior longitudinal crest connected to the central cusp instead of the lingual in first upper molars8. Taken together, details of cusp locations may constrain and bias the development and location of crests.

Results of our dental microwear analyses support the idea that well-developed stephanodonty, together with swollen cusps, wide and high-crowned teeth, is likely an adaptation to grass consumption. This complex dental morphology, as very high-crowned teeth in some mammals, has been linked to the spread of grassland30, accompanied by the opening up of environments and aridification during the Late Miocene31 (Fig. 6). High-crowned teeth represent a genuine adaptation to abrasive matter, providing dental longevity in the face of rapid wear due to abrasive intakes. In all murine rodents, the cusp rows of each tooth simply slide in the gutter delimited by the cusp rows of the opposite tooth during antero-posterior chewing motions of the murine rasp3. In stephanodont species, the more the tooth is worn, the more the occlusal surface is enlarged without being extremely flat, which permits efficient shearing and grinding of food particles. The stephanodont pattern cannot be considered in itself as an adaptation to withstand intense wear induced by abrasive items, especially when it is not coupled to high-crown teeth. Longitudinal crests, as well as wider teeth32, can only enable a more efficient fragmentation and size reduction of herbaceous plants by increasing the occlusal surface, especially for highly fibrous plants such as grasses. Some extant African stephanodont species, such as Hybomys or Thallomys, do not frequently consume abrasive plants, whereas they occasionally ingest fibrous materials4. Therefore, the stephanodont pattern, especially in its basic form, should be interpreted as an efficient murine rasp necessary for processing fibrous rather than abrasive materials.

A longstanding question in evolutionary biology research has been identifying factors promoting parallel and repeated morphological evolution. Basal murines, including Progonomys species, had highly variable dental morphologies, including occasionally new crests, as in P. hispanicus, or frequently supplementary cusps, as observed in the related P. clauzoni (ref. 33). Our analyses show that comparable phenotypic variations can be observed in Edar heterozygous and homozygous transgenic mice regarding the occurrence of longitudinal crests. The Progonomys variants could have represented similarly simple developmental modifications with no immediate selective advantage, but which were later co-opted considering future environmental changes. In lineages leading to stephanodont species, the complete garland morphotype could have been positively selected as a means to enable a higher consumption of fibrous plants (Fig. 6). Subsequently, directional selective events could have occurred in the Stephanomys lineage, which tended to have wider and high-crowned teeth, coupled to a derived stage of stephanodonty. Their dental characteristics were likely related to diet specialization and the expansion of open environments involving grasslands, as suggested for Paraethomys (refs 26, 34). Interestingly, the highly specialized dentition of Stephanomys did not enable this rodent to accommodate the frequent modifications of environments through the extreme climate variations of the Pleistocene interglacial–glacial periods, leading to its extinction 2 My ago24. In contrast, stabilizing selection could have prevailed in most other lineages having basic stephanodonty, such as Apodemus, which may have survived because of its broad tolerance to different environments and climates as shown by its present-day wide latitudinal distribution ranging from Scandinavia to North Africa24. The differences observed in the diet of A. sylvaticus between different regions (Belgium versus Spain) are another evidence for ecological flexibility of Apodemus.

It is also possible that the basic stephanodonty represents an adaptively neutral phenotype evolving through pleiotropy, because natural selection operated on another, but genetically linked character. For example, a non-synonymous single-nucleotide variant, encoding EDAR370A, enhances the EDAR activity in humans17,35 and underwent strong positive selection in Pleistocene East Asian human populations35,36. This variant also induces similar phenotypes in humans to those observed in EdarTg951/Tg951 transgenic mice, such as thicker hair37 and altered cutaneous glands17,18, which has recently been confirmed by the investigation of Edar370A knock-in mice38. In humans, the EDAR370A variant also contributes to the sinodont dental pattern characterized by enlarged teeth and shovelling of the incisors39,40. The dental phenotypes of East Asian humans and transgenic mice are likely to be dissimilar because of the differences in human and mouse dentitions, preventing the development of the stephanodont pattern in humans and the sinodont pattern in rodents. As Eda signalling affects multiple epithelial organs, it remains unclear what phenotypic characters have been under selection in individuals carrying the EDAR370A variant. Possibilities include hair and glands18,37, and the incisor shovelling may have been a byproduct of selection because of the unclear functional significance of this dental feature39. Interestingly, we note that the basic stephanodont murine, Apodemus sylvaticus, has significantly thicker fur than Mus musculus41. However, the pleiotropic effects of Eda signaling in extant murine species remains to be investigated.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the longitudinal crests mimicking the stephanodont pattern can be easily obtained in the mouse with only minor genetic modifications. This relatively simple developmental modification can explain the multiple parallel appearances of this phenotype over the course of murine evolution. Whereas in advanced stages, stephanodonty is clearly associated with dietary adaptations to tough foods, basic stephanodonty may have also been selectively neutral, and potentially arisen through pleiotropy following positive selection upon a non-dental trait. This work demonstrates that integrating the study of developmental mechanisms together with that of function of novel morphologies aids in the evaluation of scenarios underlying their evolutionary origin.


Dental morphology

We studied the dental morphology of transgenic lines corresponding to FVB/N mice (Mus musculus) with increased Eda expression under the heterologous keratin-14 promoter22 and with increased copy number of Edar under its endogenous regulatory elements17. For the K14-Eda mice all procedures were performed under the University of Helsinki and governmental licences, and for the EdarTg951 line all procedures were performed under a UK Government Home Office licence. The statistical sets of specimens encompass homozygous 29 K14-Eda, 30 homozygous EdarTg951/Tg951 and 10 heterozygous EdarTg951 mice compared with two sets of six and nine strain-matched controls (WT). Both males and females older than 1 month and having a fully erupted dentition were studied. Dental rows were digitized using a stereomicroscope (Leica M165C) connected to a spot CCD camera (Leica DFC420) and then measured using the LAS Core software (Leica).


High-quality images of homozygous transgenic and WT mice dentitions were obtained at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France), beamline ID19, with monochromatic X-ray beams at energy of 25 keV and using a cubic voxel of 5.06 μm. This method has been proven to be very efficient for very precise imaging of small elements42, including rodent teeth43. Other dentitions were imaged using a GE phoenix nanotom 180 at energy of 100 keV with a cubic voxel of 2.73 or 2.51 μm for heterozygous transgenic mice, of 3.48 or 4.95 μm for Apodemus sylvaticus, and of 5.20 μm for Stephanomys donnezani. Three-dimensional renderings were then performed using VGStudio Max 2.0 software.

Outline analyses

Quantifications of two-dimensional dental outline of M1 were performed on transgenic, WT mice and a database involving extant and extinct murine rodents24,26 (Supplementary Table S3), most of them being stephanodont to various degrees. Dental outline analysis was performed by means of radial Fourier transform44. This method allows the description of complex outlines approximating them by a sum of trigonometric functions of decreasing wavelength (that is, harmonics). We retained the first nine harmonics for M1, which represent an efficient compromise between measurement error and information content for these murine molars34. Each harmonic is described by two coefficients. As a result, the 18 coefficients were used as multivariate shape variables to perform canonical analyses, which permit visualization of the main patterns of morphological differentiation between groups.

Dental microwear analyses

Dental microwear patterns were investigated by using transmitted light stereomicroscopy with a protocol adapted to the small dentition of rodents45. This method permits reconstruction of the last diet items ingested by an animal before death46,47. Seven extant and extinct species from Stephanomys and Apodemus lineages were compared with a database (that is, MUROIDEA) based on extant rodents28 (Supplementary Table S3). A principal component analysis was performed on three variables, the numbers of fine scratches (Nfs), wide scratches (Nws) and large pits (Nlp), used to infer the main dietary component of stephanodont species. Multiple mean comparison tests, the Fischer’s least significant difference test and the more conservative Tukey’s honestly significant difference test were used to determine the source of variations between dietary groups and stephanodont species.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Gomes Rodrigues, H. et al. Roles of dental development and adaptation in rodent evolution. Nat. Commun. 4:2504 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3504 (2013).


  1. 1.

    Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature 450, 1011–1019 (2007).

  2. 2.

    & Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: evolving with the same signals. Development 139, 3487–3497 (2012).

  3. 3.

    et al. Mosaic convergence of rodent dentitions. Plos One 3, e3607 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Walker’s Mammals of the World Vol. II, 6th ed. Johns Hopkins University Press (1999).

  5. 5.

    Sénégas F. inAfrican Small Mammals eds Denys C., Granjon L., Poulet A. 151–160 (2001).

  6. 6.

    , , & High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents. Nature 445, 78–81 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Diversity of hypsodont teeth in mammalian dentitions—construction and classification. Palaeontographica Abt. A 294, 63–94 (2011).

  8. 8.

    African and Indo-Australian Muridae, evolutionary trends. Ann. Mus. R. Afriq. Central. Terv. 172, 1–219 (1969).

  9. 9.

    Tertiäre und Quartäre Murinae. Abhandlungen des Schweizerischen paläontologische Gesellschaft 61, 1–38 (1938).

  10. 10.

    inModalités, Rythmes et Mécanismes de l'évolution biologique ed Chaline J. 195–200 (1983).

  11. 11.

    , , & Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 432, 211–214 (2004).

  12. 12.

    et al. Modulation of Fgf3 dosage in mouse and men mirrors evolution of mammalian dentition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 22364–22368 (2009).

  13. 13.

    et al. Patterning by heritage in mouse molar row development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 15497–15502 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. On the difficulty of increasing dental complexity. Nature 483, 324–328 (2012).

  15. 15.

    The Tabby Syndrome in the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 179, 139–156 (1971).

  16. 16.

    et al. Edar/Eda interactions regulate enamel knot formation in tooth morphogenesis. Development 127, 4691–4700 (2000).

  17. 17.

    et al. Enhanced ectodysplasin-A receptor (EDAR) signaling alters multiple fiber characteristics to produce the East Asian hair form. Hum. Mutat. 29, 1405–1411 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , & Enhanced Edar signaling has pleiotropic effects on craniofacial and cutaneous glands. PLoS One 4, e7591 (2009).

  19. 19.

    , , & The supernumerary cheek tooth in tabby/Eda mice—a reminiscence of the premolar in mouse ancestors. Arch. Oral. Biol. 50, 219–225 (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Distinct impacts of Eda and Edar loss of function on the mouse dentition. Plos One 4, e4985 (2009).

  21. 21.

    , , , & The activation level of the TNF family receptor, Edar, determines cusp number and tooth number during tooth development. Dev. Biol. 268, 185–194 (2004).

  22. 22.

    et al. Stimulation of ectodermal organ development by Ectodysplasin-A1. Dev. Biol. 259, 123–136 (2003).

  23. 23.

    et al. Sprouty genes control diastema tooth development via bidirectional antagonism of epithelial-mesenchymal FGF signaling. Dev. Cell 11, 181–190 (2006).

  24. 24.

    et al. Morphological evolution, ecological diversification and climate change in rodents. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 609–617 (2005).

  25. 25.

    , & Conserved phenotypic variation patterns, evolution along lines of least resistance, and departure due to selection in fossil rodents. Evolution 60, 1701–1717 (2006).

  26. 26.

    & The direction of main phenotypic variance as a channel to morphological evolution: case studies in murine rodents. Hystrix 24, (2013) doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6296.

  27. 27.

    , , , & Teasing apart the contributions of hard dietary items on 3D dental microtextures in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 63, 85–98 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , & Expansion of open landscapes in Northern China during the Oligocene induced by dramatic climate changes: Paleoecological evidence. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 358-360, 62–71 (2012).

  29. 29.

    & Intrapopulation variation in the diet of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus. J. Zool. 222, 641–651 (1990).

  30. 30.

    Evolution of grasses and grassland ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 39, 517–544 (2011).

  31. 31.

    et al. Late Miocene and Pliocene large lands mammals and climatic changes in Eurasia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 238, 219–227 (2006).

  32. 32.

    The small mammals from the upper Miocene of the Teruel-Alfambra region (Spain): paleobiology and paleoclimatic reconstructions. Geol. Ultra. 156, 1–204 (2007).

  33. 33.

    , & Intraspecific variation and micro-macroevolution connection: illustration with the late Miocene genus Progonomys (Rodentia, Muridae). Paleobiology 36, 641–657 (2010).

  34. 34.

    , & Morphological evolution of the murine rodent Paraethomys in response to climatic variations (Mio-Pleistocene of North Africa). Paleobiology 25, 369–382 (1999).

  35. 35.

    et al. Positive selection in East Asians for an EDAR allele that enhances NF-κB activation. PLoS One 3, e2209 (2008).

  36. 36.

    et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 449, 913–918 (2007).

  37. 37.

    et al. A scan for genetic determinants of human hair morphology: EDAR is associated with Asian hair thickness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 835–843 (2008).

  38. 38.

    et al. Modeling recent human evolution in mice by expression of a selected EDAR variant. Cell 152, 691–702 (2013).

  39. 39.

    et al. A common variation in EDAR is a genetic determinant of shovel-shaped incisors. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 528–535 (2009).

  40. 40.

    et al. Effects of an Asian-specific nonsynonymous EDAR variant on multiple dental traits. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 508–514 (2012).

  41. 41.

    , , , & Atlas of Microscopic Structures of Fur Skins Vol. 1, Elsevier ((1989).

  42. 42.

    et al. Applications of X-ray synchrotron microtomography for non-destructive 3D studies of paleontological specimens. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 83, 195–202 (2006).

  43. 43.

    et al. Continuous dental replacement in a hyper-chisel tooth digging rodent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 17355–17359 (2011).

  44. 44.

    & Adaptive latitudinal trends in the mandible shape of Apodemus wood mice. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1617–1628 (2003).

  45. 45.

    , & Dental microwear patterns of extant and extinct Muridae (Rodentia, Mammalia): ecological implications. Naturwissenschaften 96, 537–542 (2009).

  46. 46.

    , & Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. Science 201, 908–910 (1978).

  47. 47.

    & In vivo and in vitro turnover in dental microwear. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 80, 447–460 (1989).

  48. 48.

    et al. Late Miocene decoupling of oceanic warmth and atmospheric carbon dioxid forcing. Nature 486, 97–100 (2012).

  49. 49.

    et al. Thresholds for Cenozoic bipolar glaciation. Nature 455, 652–657 (2008).

Download references


We acknowledge B. Marandat, S. Jiquel and A.-L. Charruault (ISEM, Université Montpellier 2), P. Mein and the curators A. Prieur and E. Robert (Université Lyon 1), and J.R. Michaux (CBGP, Montpellier, and Université de Liège), who allowed the access to rodent collections and the loan of fossil and present-day specimens. We also thank G. Merceron (Université Lyon 1/IPHEP Poitiers) for technical assistance and advices concerning dental microwear analyses. We also thank Marja Mikkola (Institute of Biotechnology, Helsinki) for providing K14-Eda mice. We are grateful to the ESRF (Grenoble) and the team of the beamline ID19 to have supported that research project by giving access to their experimental stations. Thanks to all the members of the team ‘Evo-Devo of Vertebrate Dentition’, including E. Maitre, and also to J. Burden and V. Laudet (IGFL, Lyon) for their help and advices. This work was supported by the ANR ‘Quenottes’ Program (S.R. and L.V.), CNRS and IFRO postdoctoral grants (H.G.R.) and BBSRC (D.H.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Yann Le Poul

    Present address: Laboratoire Origine, Structure et Evolution de la Biodiversité, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Bâtiment d’entomologie—CP50 45, rue Buffon F-75005 Paris, France

    • Floréal Solé

    Present address: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Direction Earth and History of Life, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium


  1. Team ‘Evo-Devo of Vertebrate Dentition’, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 32-34 avenue Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France

    • Helder Gomes Rodrigues
    • , Cyril Charles
    • , Yann Le Poul
    • , Floréal Solé
    •  & Laurent Viriot
  2. Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Bâtiment Mendel, Campus de la Doua, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France

    • Sabrina Renaud
  3. Laboratoire de Paléontologie, Institut des Sciences de l’Évolution, Université Montpellier 2, cc 064, Place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier, France

    • Jean-Pierre Aguilar
    •  & Jacques Michaux
  4. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), BP 220, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, F-38043 Grenoble, France

    • Paul Tafforeau
  5. The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK

    • Denis Headon
  6. Developmental Biology Program, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

    • Jukka Jernvall


  1. Search for Helder Gomes Rodrigues in:

  2. Search for Sabrina Renaud in:

  3. Search for Cyril Charles in:

  4. Search for Yann Le Poul in:

  5. Search for Floréal Solé in:

  6. Search for Jean-Pierre Aguilar in:

  7. Search for Jacques Michaux in:

  8. Search for Paul Tafforeau in:

  9. Search for Denis Headon in:

  10. Search for Jukka Jernvall in:

  11. Search for Laurent Viriot in:


H.G.R., S.R., C.C., Y.L.P., F.S., J.-P.A., J.M., P.T., D.H., J.J. and L.V. contributed in writing the main text. L.V. helped in project coordination. D.H. and J.J. provided the transgenic mice. H.G.R., S.R., Y.L.P. and F.S. helped in dental description, measurements and illustrations. S.R. performed dental outline analyses. H.G.R. performed dental microwear analyses. Y.L.P, P.T. and L.V. helped in ESRF data acquisition. H.G.R. and C.C. helped in microtomograph data acquisition.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helder Gomes Rodrigues.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures S1-S2 and Supplementary Tables S1-S5


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.