Article | Open | Published:

Enabling valley selective exciton scattering in monolayer WSe2 through upconversion

Nature Communications volume 8, Article number: 14927 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Excitons, Coulomb bound electron–hole pairs, are composite bosons and their interactions in traditional semiconductors lead to condensation and light amplification. The much stronger Coulomb interaction in transition metal dichalcogenides such as WSe2 monolayers combined with the presence of the valley degree of freedom is expected to provide new opportunities for controlling excitonic effects. But so far the bosonic character of exciton scattering processes remains largely unexplored in these two-dimensional materials. Here we show that scattering between B-excitons and A-excitons preferably happens within the same valley in momentum space. This leads to power dependent, negative polarization of the hot B-exciton emission. We use a selective upconversion technique for efficient generation of B-excitons in the presence of resonantly excited A-excitons at lower energy; we also observe the excited A-excitons state 2s. Detuning of the continuous wave, low-power laser excitation outside the A-exciton resonance (with a full width at half maximum of 4 meV) results in vanishing upconversion signal.

Introduction

In semiconductors the optical properties are governed by excitons, bound electron–hole pairs1,2,3,4,5,6 with certain analogies to the hydrogen atom. The exciton energy states and polarization selection rules need to be understood for designing optoelectronic applications which target efficient emission and strong light–matter interaction7. Excitons also provide a rich platform for fundamental physics experiments8,9,10,11,12,13. A real breakthrough for exciton physics in the solid state was to show that excitons behave like composite bosons14,15,16. The key effect is stimulated scattering: Bosons preferentially scatter to a quantum state that is already occupied. These pioneering works enabled studies into optical amplifiers based on excitons and also new fundamental research on exciton Bose–Einstein condensation, which are still ongoing17,18,19,20,21,22.

Our target in this work is to look for fingerprints of bosonic interactions in two-dimensional (2D) materials. Excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) monolayers (MLs) provide exciting new opportunities for applications and new frontiers in exciton physics for several reasons: First, with binding energies of several hundred meV (refs 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29), excitons dominate optical properties even at room temperature. The corresponding exciton Bohr radius is of the order of only 1 nm, leading to a limit for the Mott-transition at much higher densities than in conventional semiconductors, allowing to explore a wider exciton density regime. Second, the strong exciton oscillator strength leads to absorption of up to 20% per monolayer30,31, and third, the interband selection rules are valley selective. In combination with strong spin-orbit splittings this allows studying spin-valley physics32,33,34,35,36,37. These unique excitonic properties make ML TMDCs ideal systems for investigating exciton interactions38,39,40,41,42,43 and microcavity polariton physics44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54.

We introduce an original optical excitation scheme to study exciton scattering in the model 2D TMDC monolayer material WSe2. We provide a unique situation for efficient generation of B-excitons in the presence of resonantly excited A-excitons at lower energy. We resonantly excite the A-exciton with a low-power laser using an extremely high-quality sample with only 4 meV full width at half maximum (FWHM) transition linewidth. Surprisingly, we observe emission from the B-exciton, 430 meV above the A-exciton state and also of the excited A-exciton (2s) 130 meV above the fundamental, 1s, state, which we refer to for brevity as upconversion photoluminescence (PL). For circularly polarized excitation we show that the upconverted B-exciton emission is strongly cross-circularly polarized, the polarization degree increases with laser excitation power. This can be interpreted as a first fingerprint of boson scattering of 2D excitons14,15,16 that favours relaxation from the B- to A-excitons within the same valley in momentum space. Possible mechanisms of the upconversion in ML WSe2 are discussed55 and compared to upconversion reported for more traditional nanostructures such as InP/InAs heterojunctions, CdTe quantum wells and InAs quantum dots56,57,58,59,60.

Results

Upconversion emission 430 meV above excitation laser

We study WSe2 MLs encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)61. The aim is to eliminate detrimental surface effects43 and to provide a symmetric (top/bottom) dielectric environment to study excitons. The high-optical quality of the sample is demonstrated in Fig. 1c: here we show reflectivity spectra using a white light source for illumination. We detect the A exciton peak at 1.723 eV, with a linewidth of typically 4 meV, this main exciton transition is labelled 1s in analogy to the hydrogenic model. Although the A:1s energy in uncapped ML WSe2 on SiO2 is very similar at 1.75 eV, the impact of the change in dielectric environment through encapsulation is not yet well understood. Recent experiments62 suggest that although the exciton energies A:1s are similar in both types of samples, this might be the result of a decrease in exciton binding energy, that is almost entirely compensated by a decrease in the free carrier bandgap. About 133 meV above the A:1s we detect an excited exciton state, as demonstrated before for samples exfoliated onto SiO2 (refs 26, 27, 63, 64). The linewidth of this transition, which we tentatively ascribe to the 2s A exciton, is of the order of 5 meV. It is accompanied by a smaller peak about 25 meV at higher energy which could be related to the A:3s exciton. At 430 meV above the A:1s we detect the B-exciton transition, where the A–B separation is mainly given by the valence band spin-orbit splitting65.

Figure 1: Exciton resonances in linear spectroscopy and upconversion at T=4 K.
Figure 1

The sample consists of a WSe2 monolayer encapsulated in hBN (ref. 61). (a) Strongly bound electron–hole pairs, excitons, dominate optical properties of TMDC monolayers such as WSe2. In WSe2 there exist two different exciton series. The B-exciton is about 400 meV above the A-exciton due to spin-obit splitting of the valence band. (b) Excitons have a binding energy EB, defined as the difference between the free particle bandgap and the optical bandgap observed in photoluminescence (PL) emission. EB is of the order of 500 meV, the first excited state n=2 is about 130 meV above the n=1 state, marked as A:2s and A:1s, respectively, throughout this manuscript. (c) We have performed reflectivity with a white light source to identify the A- and B-exciton at T=4 K. In addition we observe an excited states of the A-exciton labelled A:2s. (d) In photoluminescence we observe neutral A-exciton and trion emission (T), in addition we see hot luminescence of the A:2s state. This is the only spectrum obtained using a pulsed laser in this work, to reach the energy of the B:1s, see Methods. (e) We also demonstrate upconversion PL: the laser is tuned to the A:1s-exciton resonance and strong emission from B:1s and A:2s at much higher energy is recorded, in addition to the trion emission (T) at lower energy. (f) optical microscope image of the studied van der Waals heterostructure, with scale-bar of 5 μm. (g) Scheme of the side view of the sample.

In addition to white light reflectivity, we have also performed PL experiments shown in Fig. 1d. Using an excitation laser energy resonant with the B-exciton transition, we observe in addition to the A:1s exciton emission (4 meV FWHM) and the trion (T) also the hot A:2s emission (5 meV FWHM), at very similar energies as the reflectivity results, indicating negligible Stokes shifts. It is a signature of the high-quality of our sample, since the absence of the Stokes shifts indicates only very weak localization of excitons, if any. The trion emission is detected in PL but not clearly in reflectivity, which indicates a lower resident electron concentration as compared to the neutral exciton66,67. In our samples the biexciton emission from a molecule-like two exciton complex with a characteristic superlinear intensity dependence on the incident laser power has not been observed. Hot PL of the A:2s is also observed for other laser energies such as 1.96 eV (HeNe Laser).

The optical spectra shown in Fig. 1e, introduce our upconversion scheme: excitation of the A:1s exciton (EL=1.723 eV) results in strong PL emission at higher energy of the A:2s (EL+133 meV) and B:1s exciton (EL+430 meV), as well as trion emission (labelled T) at lower energy EL−31 meV. This upconversion is achieved using a narrow linewidth, continuous wave laser and moderate excitation powers in the μW·μm−2 range, see Methods. Interestingly we also observe in WSe2 MLs directly exfoliated onto SiO2 (no hBN in the structure) this upconversion emission for A:2s and B:1s, see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1. These observations are very surprising and further experiments that aim to clarify the origin of this upconversion are shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2: Investigating the origin of the upconversion process.
Figure 2

Sample temperature T=4 K. (a) Left panel: contour plot of the upconversion PL intensity for A:2s and B:1s as a function of excitation energy, with a clear resonance at 1.723 eV, the A:1s exciton transition energy. Right panel: The resonance in upconversion PLE has a FWHM of only 4 meV. (b) We show power dependence of the upconversion PL intensity at resonance and compare with power dependence of the neutral exciton excited at the A:2s state in standard PL. Slopes in the range of 10-100 μW are for A:2s=1.1, B:1s=1.25 and A:1s=0.56 (c) Scenario for upconversion PL based on 2-photon absorption aided by a real intermediate state is presented. (d) Evolution of upconversion PL of A:2s for T=4 K up to room temperature; the excitation laser energy is indicated following the shift of the A:1s exciton resonance with temperature.

Investigating the origin of the upconversion signal

The observed upconversion is extremely energy dependent: only strictly resonant excitation of the A:1s exciton results in measurable upconversion luminescence. The FWHM of the observed resonance in upconversion PL excitation (PLE) is about 4 meV, as shown in Fig. 2a, see red data points. Resonant excitation 31 meV below the A:1s state at the trion energy for example55, does not result in emission at the A:2s and B:1s energies in our experiment. Emission at higher energy than the laser can have several origins56,57,58,59,60,68, here important information comes from the B-exciton emission: at 430 meV above the laser energy mechanisms purely based on phonon emission (that is, laser cooling69) are very unlikely at the sample temperature T=4 K. A more probable scenario is two photon absorption, made efficient by the A:1s as a real intermediate state. This idea is supported by the narrow resonance around the A:1s exciton (Fig. 2a) and also by analysis of the power dependence of the emission: the upconversion PL evolves with a slope roughly twice that of the exciton A:1s emission, see Fig. 2b. This indicates that two excitons resonantly excited by the laser combine to form a single excited state of the electron–hole pair, with the energy being the sum of exciton energies. As a plausible scenario we may suggest an Auger-like process, also referred to as exciton annihilation38,39,40,41. In this case the scattering of two existing excitons results in the transition of one electron forming an exciton to the valence band (that is, nonradiative recombination70), while the remaining electron absorbs the released energy and is promoted to the excited energy band denoted as a continuum in Fig. 2c. Subsequently, the excited electron–hole pairs loose energy via, for example, phonon emission and relax towards the radiating states, particularly, B:1s and A:2s. As a result, the upconversion intensity scales as , where NA:1s is the exciton occupancy created by the laser. The occupancy NA:1s is directly proportional to the intensity of the exciton emission from A:1s state, in agreement with experiment, see also the detailed discussion in Supplementary Note 2, using Supplementary Figs 5 and 6 and Supplementary Table 1. In addition we observe that upconversion PL in our sample is detectable for the A:2s state even at room temperature, see evolution as a function of temperature in Fig. 2d and more detail in Supplementary Fig. 4.

Possibility of boson scattering from B- to A-exciton levels

In our experiment we resonantly pump the A-exciton transition. As addressed above, presumably an additional photon is absorbed to create a second exciton and, ultimately, to generate an electron–hole pair in a high-energy continuum state. From there the electron–hole pairs relax towards the B-exciton, where we observe hot luminescence 430 meV above the A-exciton. Very surprisingly the B:1s emissions is strongly σ polarized following circularly polarized σ+ excitation, that is, counter-polarized with respect to the laser, Fig. 3a–c. A strong indication for the importance of scattering processes comes from power dependent measurements: for a laser excitation power of 5 μW we measure −2±2% PL polarization, for a stronger excitation power of 50 μW the negative polarization is about −14±2%, see Fig. 3a–c. Observing any polarization at all for these upconversion PL signals is extremely surprising, as it is expected that absorption at high-energy continuum states as well as Auger-type processes are not governed by strict polarization selection rules. In this context we have verified that linearly polarized excitation and circularly polarized excitation yield exactly the same intensity of the upconversion signal71.

Figure 3: Creating B- and A-excitons and first signatures of boson scattering.
Figure 3

The sample temperature is T=4 K, EL=1.723 eV, σ+ laser polarization. (a) B:1s upconversion PL detected in σ+ (black—co-polarized) and σ (red-cross-polarized) polarization for a laser power of 5 μW. (b) Same as (a), but for 10 μW. (c) Same as (a) but for 50 μW. The value of the circular polarization degree of the emission Pc= is indicated on the panel. As we increase the power, the emission becomes strongly cross-polarized with respect to the initial excitation, we generate a negative polarization Pc<0. (d) Laser excitation linearly (X) polarized, detection of upconverted PL at B:1s energy in linear X and Y basis. (e) Scheme to explain negative, power depedent polarization of hot B:1s PL emission observed in a–c based on boson scattering.

Next we aim to explain the strong, negative polarization of the B:1s emission. We proposed a scenario based on stimulated boson scattering14,15,16, as sketched in Fig. 3e. As a first step, we assume excitation creates an equal population of σ+ and σ excitons in the continuum , as chiral selection rules are relaxed. Subsequently the electron–hole pairs relax towards the B:1s state with the same rates for σ+ and σ. However, the relaxation from the B-excitons towards the ground, A:1s states is polarization-dependent as bosons preferentially scatter to a quantum state that is already occupied: the pump laser creates a majority of co-polarized A-excitons and since excitons are bosons, the scattering probability of σ+/σ polarized B:1s excitons towards A:1s excitons grows as (1+), where are the occupancies of correspondingly polarized A:1s-excitons (see ref. 16). As a result, co-polarized B-exciton states get depleted faster than counter-polarized B-excitons. This imbalance gives rise to hot B-exciton PL emission counter-polarized with respect to the excitation laser. Linearly polarized excitation of A:1s does not induce any linearly polarized upconversion emission of B:1s, see Fig. 3d. Linear polarization is linked to valley coherence34, which is too fragile to be maintained during the upconversion and energy relaxation processes.

Anti-Stokes Raman scattering

The upconversion PL of the A:2s transition on the other hand is strongly co-polarized with the excitation laser with Pc≈25%, here the dependence on excitation laser power is rather weak, as shown in Fig. 4a–c. We argue that the polarization of the A:2s is similar to the A:1s polarization as the exciton populations of the two states are coupled. First, the A:2s to A:1s separation is only 133 meV, compared to the B:1s to A:1s separation of 430 meV. Second, we observe anti-Stokes Raman scattering superimposed on the hot PL of the A:2s exciton, as can be seen in Fig. 4e; Supplementary Fig. 2. Previously, we have reported double resonant Stokes Raman scattering63, that showed efficient relaxation from the A:2s state to the A:1s state as they are separated by a phonon-multiple. Here the equivalent anti-Stokes process is visible in the experiments. Due to efficient phonon exchange between the A:1s and A:2s states the polarizations of the ground and excited states have the same sign. Note that we cannot probe the A:1s polarization directly in resonant excitation conditions (signal is obscured by scattered laser light). In these experiments at T=4 K the phonons can be generated by the relaxation following two photon absorption, for example, as well as due to the exciton to trion conversion through phonon emission55. Just as for the B:1 s upconversion, the experiments using linearly polarized lasers do not result in linearly polarized emission in Fig. 4d.

Figure 4: Photon emission 133 meV above the excitation laser at 4 Kelvin.
Figure 4

(a) T=4 K, EL=1.723 eV σ+ laser polarization. Upconversion PL of A:2s state detected in σ+ (black) and σ (red) polarization for a laser power of 5 μW. (b) Same as (a), but for 10 μW. (c) Same as (a) but for 50 μW. (d) Laser excitation linearly (X) polarized, detection of upconverted PL at A:2s energy in linear X and Y basis. (e) Contour plot of A:2s upconversion PL as a function of laser energy, a Raman feature moving with the laser energy is clearly visible, see Supplementary Figs 2 and 3 for water-fall style plot.

Discussion

In summary, we demonstrate upconversion photoluminescence in WSe2 monolayers at energies as high as 430 meV above the laser energy. The effect occurs for strictly resonant excitation of the ground A-exciton state 1s and is most probably related to two photon absorption enabled by a real intermediate state. Very surprisingly, the upconverted PL emission of the B-exciton is counter-circularly polarized with respect to the excitation laser, which provides a fingerprint of stimulated exciton scattering from B- to A-states, which efficiently depletes the co-polarized B-exciton state. In future experiments it would be interesting to see how the order of dark versus bright exciton states impacts this scattering mechanism, as for example in ML MoSe2 the lowest lying transition is the bright exciton, contrary to ML WSe2. We also show upconversion emission at an energy corresponding to the excited state of the A-exciton 2s. Here strong phonon effects are visible in the form of anti-Stokes emission which exactly shifts with the excitation laser energy EL as EL+133 meV.

Methods

Samples

The WSe2 ML flakes are prepared by micro-mechanical cleavage of a bulk crystal (from 2D Semiconductors) and deposited using a dry-stamping technique on hexagonal boron nitride61 on SiO2/Si substrates. Subsequently h-BN was deposited on top of the WSe2. Figure 1f shows an optical microsope image of the fabricated van der Waals heterostructure.

Experimental set-up

Low temperature PL and reflectance measurements were performed in a home build micro-spectroscopy set-up build around a closed-cycle, low vibration attoDry cryostat with a temperature controller (T=4–300 K). For PL at a fixed wavelength of 633 nm a HeNe laser was used, for PL experiments as a function of excitation laser wavelength we used a tunable, continuous wave Ti-Sa Laser SolsTis from M SQUARED allowing continuous tuning in the range of 700–1,000 nm. For wavelength below 700 nm in Fig. 1d the sample is excited by picosecond pulses generated by a tunable frequency-doubled optical parametric oscillator (OPO) synchronously pumped by a mode-locked Ti:Sa laser. The typical pulse and spectral width are 1.6 ps and 3 meV, respectively; the repetition rate is 80 MHz (ref. 72). The white light source for reflectivity is a halogen lamp with a stabilized power supply. The emitted and/or reflected light was dispersed in a spectrometer and detected by a Si-CCD camera. The excitation/detection spot diameter is ≈1 μm, that is, smaller than the typical ML diameter.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Manca, M. et al. Enabling valley selective exciton scattering in monolayer WSe2 through upconversion. Nat. Commun. 8, 14927 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14927 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    & The optical spectrum of the exciton. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 84, 471–474 (1952).

  2. 2.

    Theory of Excitons Vol. 5, (Academic Press (1963).

  3. 3.

    Rashba E., Sturge M. (eds). Excitons North-Holland (1982).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Giant Rydberg excitons in the copper oxide Cu2O. Nature 514, 343–347 (2014).

  5. 5.

    , , & The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons. Science 308, 838–841 (2005).

  6. 6.

    Semiconductor Optics Springer-Verlag (2006).

  7. 7.

    & Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors Vol. 5, (World Scientific (2004).

  8. 8.

    & Collective properties of excitons in semiconductors. Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 521–528 (1968).

  9. 9.

    & Bose-Einstein Condensation of Excitons and Biexcitons and Coherent Nonlinear Optics with Excitons Cambridge University Press (2000).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Long-range transport in excitonic dark states in coupled quantum wells. Nature 418, 754–757 (2002).

  11. 11.

    , & Macroscopically ordered state in an exciton system. Nature 418, 751–754 (2002).

  12. 12.

    & Large-scale coherence of the Bose condensate of spatially indirect excitons. JETP Lett. 84, 329–334 (2006).

  13. 13.

    et al. Valley-selective optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater. 14, 290–294 (2015).

  14. 14.

    & Exciton-exciton scattering dynamics in a semiconductor microcavity and stimulated scattering into polaritons. Phys. Rev. B 59, 10830–10842 (1999).

  15. 15.

    et al. Angle-resonant stimulated polariton amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1547–1550 (2000).

  16. 16.

    et al. Stimulated scattering of indirect excitons in coupled quantum wells: signature of a degenerate Bose-gas of excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5608–5611 (2001).

  17. 17.

    et al. Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons. Nature 443, 409–414 (2006).

  18. 18.

    et al. Polariton superfluids reveal quantum hydrodynamic solitons. Science 332, 1167–1170 (2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. Spontaneous coherence in a cold exciton gas. Nature 483, 584–588 (2012).

  20. 20.

    et al. Phase-controlled bistability of a dark soliton train in a polariton fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217401 (2016).

  21. 21.

    , & Physics and applications of exciton-polariton lasers. Nat. Mater. 15, 1049–1052 (2016).

  22. 22.

    & The road towards polaritonic devices. Nat. Mater. 15, 1061–1073 (2016).

  23. 23.

    et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014).

  24. 24.

    , & Exciton binding energy of monolayer WS2. Sci. Rep. 5, 9218 (2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Observation of giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 13, 1091–1095 (2014).

  26. 26.

    et al. Giant enhancement of the optical second-harmonic emission of WSe2 monolayers by laser excitation at exciton resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097403 (2015).

  27. 27.

    et al. Tightly bound excitons in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 026803 (2014).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Measurement of high exciton binding energy in the monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides WS2 and WSe2. Solid State Commun. 203, 16–20 (2015).

  29. 29.

    et al. Probing excitonic dark states in single-layer tungsten disulfide. Nature 513, 214–218 (2014).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 497–501 (2013).

  31. 31.

    et al. Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 90, 205422 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Valley-selective circular dichroism in MoS2. Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012).

  34. 34.

    et al. Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 634–638 (2013).

  35. 35.

    , , & The valley hall effect in MoS2 transistors. Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014).

  36. 36.

    et al. Long-lived nanosecond spin relaxation and spin coherence of electrons in monolayer MoS2 and WS2. Nat. Phys. 11, 830–834 (2015).

  37. 37.

    et al. Excitonic valley effects in monolayer WS2 under high magnetic fields. Nano Lett. 16, 7899–7904 (2016).

  38. 38.

    et al. Nonlinear photoluminescence in atomically thin layered WSe2 arising from diffusion-assisted exciton-exciton annihilation. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155449 (2014).

  39. 39.

    et al. Exciton-exciton annihilation in MoSe2 monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 89, 125427 (2014).

  40. 40.

    et al. Fundamental limits of exciton-exciton annihilation for light emission in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 93, 201111 (2016).

  41. 41.

    et al. Observation of rapid exciton-exciton annihilation in monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nano Lett. 14, 5625–5629 (2014).

  42. 42.

    et al. Intrinsic homogeneous linewidth and broadening mechanisms of excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Commun. 6, 8315 (2015).

  43. 43.

    et al. Near-unity photoluminescence quantum yield in MoS2. Science 350, 1065–1068 (2015).

  44. 44.

    et al. Strong light-matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nat. Photon. 9, 30–34 (2015).

  45. 45.

    et al. Room temperature Tamm-plasmon exciton-polaritons with a WSe2 monolayer. Nat. Commun. 7, 13328 (2016).

  46. 46.

    et al. Room-temperature exciton-polaritons with two-dimensional WS2. Sci. Rep. 6, 33134 (2016).

  47. 47.

    et al. Polaritons in layered two-dimensional materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 182–194 (2017).

  48. 48.

    & Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides Springer International Publishing (2016).

  49. 49.

    , & Optical valley hall effect based on transitional metal dichalcogenide cavity polaritons. Preprint at (2016).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Exciton polaritons in two-dimensional dichalcogenide layers placed in a planar microcavity: tunable interaction between two Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. B 92, 245435 (2015).

  51. 51.

    , & Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354, aag1992 (2016).

  52. 52.

    et al. Exciton-polaritons in van der Waals heterostructures embedded in tunable microcavities. Nat. Commun. 6, 8579 (2015).

  53. 53.

    et al. Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors. Nat. Phys. 13, 255–261 (2017).

  54. 54.

    , & High-temperature superfluidity with indirect excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 4555 (2014).

  55. 55.

    et al. Excitonic luminescence upconversion in a two-dimensional semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 12, 323–327 (2016).

  56. 56.

    , , , & High-efficiency energy up-conversion by an ‘Auger fountain’ at an InP-AlInAs type-II heterojunction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2356–2359 (1994).

  57. 57.

    et al. Low-temperature anti-stokes luminescence mediated by disorder in semiconductor quantum-well structures. Phys. Rev. B 51, 18053–18056 (1995).

  58. 58.

    , , & Anti-stokes photoluminescence in colloidal semiconductor quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 971–973 (1999).

  59. 59.

    et al. Photoluminescence up-conversion in InAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 812–814 (2000).

  60. 60.

    et al. Efficient upconversion of photoluminescence via two-photon absorption in bulk and nanorod ZnO. Appl. Phys. B 108, 919–924 (2012).

  61. 61.

    & Synthesis of high-purity boron nitride single crystals under high pressure by using Ba-Bn solvent. J. Cryst. Growth 303, 525–529 (2007).

  62. 62.

    , , , & Probing the influence of dielectric environment on excitons in monolayer WSe2: Insight from high magnetic fields. Nano Lett. 16, 7054–7060 (2016).

  63. 63.

    et al. Double resonant Raman scattering and valley coherence generation in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 117401 (2015).

  64. 64.

    et al. Resonant internal quantum transitions and femtosecond radiative decay of excitons in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Mater. 14, 889–893 (2015).

  65. 65.

    et al. k·p theory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. 2D Mater. 2, 022001 (2015).

  66. 66.

    et al. Optical method for the determination of carrier density in modulation-doped quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 65, 115310 (2002).

  67. 67.

    et al. Electrical tuning of exciton binding energies in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126802 (2015).

  68. 68.

    & Mechanism of summation of electronic excitations in activated crystals. JETP Lett. 3, 322–323 (1966).

  69. 69.

    , , , & Resolved-sideband Raman cooling of an optical phonon in semiconductor materials. Nat. Photon. 10, 600–605 (2016).

  70. 70.

    , & Nonradiative Recombination in Semiconductors North Holland (1991).

  71. 71.

    Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures Alpha Science (2005).

  72. 72.

    et al. Carrier and polarization dynamics in monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 047401 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank ERC grant no. 306719, ITN Spin-NANO Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 676108, ANR MoS2ValleyControl, Programme Investissements d Avenir ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02, reference ANR-10- LABX-0037-NEXT and LIA CNRS-Ioffe RAS ILNACS for financial support. X.M. also acknowledges the Institut Universitaire de France. M.M.G. is grateful to RFBR, Russian Federation President grant MD-1555.2017.2, and Dynasty Foundation for partial support. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP26248061,JP15K21722 and JP25106006. We thank Alexey Chernikov and E.L. Ivchenko for very fruitful discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Université de Toulouse, INSA-CNRS-UPS, LPCNO, 135 Av. Rangueil, Toulouse 31077, France

    • M. Manca
    • , C. Robert
    • , F. Cadiz
    • , E. Courtade
    • , T. Amand
    • , P. Renucci
    • , X. Marie
    • , G. Wang
    •  & B. Urbaszek
  2. Ioffe Institute, St Petersburg 194021, Russia

    • M. M. Glazov
  3. National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan

    • T. Taniguchi
    •  & K. Watanabe

Authors

  1. Search for M. Manca in:

  2. Search for M. M. Glazov in:

  3. Search for C. Robert in:

  4. Search for F. Cadiz in:

  5. Search for T. Taniguchi in:

  6. Search for K. Watanabe in:

  7. Search for E. Courtade in:

  8. Search for T. Amand in:

  9. Search for P. Renucci in:

  10. Search for X. Marie in:

  11. Search for G. Wang in:

  12. Search for B. Urbaszek in:

Contributions

M.M., G.W., F.C. and E.C. performed the measurements. K.W. and T.T. grew the hBN. C.R. and P.R. fabricated and tested the van der Waals heterostructures. M.M.G, T.A., X.M. and B.U. interpreted the data, B.U., G.W. and M.M.G. wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. M. Glazov or G. Wang or B. Urbaszek.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

  2. 2.

    Peer Review File

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14927

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.