Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Publication outcomes of neonatology abstracts presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting

Abstract

Objective:

To examine publication outcomes of neonatology abstracts presented at Pediatric Academic Society (PAS) meeting, and to analyze variables affecting publication.

Study Design:

All neonatology studies accepted for presentation (oral or poster) at 2008 PAS meeting were identified. A biphasic manual PubMed search of published articles was performed using a pre-designed algorithm.

Results:

A total of 1078 neonatology abstracts were presented at the meeting, among them 481 (44.62%) published by 2016. Abstracts presented orally versus posters (56.11 versus 42.32%; P<0.001) and basic science versus clinical abstracts (53.08 versus 40.2%; P<0.001) were more likely to be published. Positive or negative results of a study or its sample size did not predict rates of publication.

Conclusions:

Less than half of the abstracts presented at the PAS meeting were published within 8 years. Oral presentations were more likely to be published than posters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E . Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 272 (2): 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG et al. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (6): 1258–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinsella SD, Menge TJ, Anderson AF, Spindler KP . Publication rates of podium versus poster presentations at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine meetings: 2006–2010. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (5): 1255–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suñé P, Suñé JM, Montoro JB . Positive outcomes influence the rate and time to publication, but not the impact factor of publications of clinical trial results. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (1): e54583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14 (8): iii, ix–xi, 1–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marom R, Mimouni FB, Cohen S, Lubetzky R, Mandel D . Secular trends in impact factor of neonatology publications over a 10-year period. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101 (10): 1095–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Christakis DA . Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics 2003; 112 (6 Pt 1): 1238–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD . Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, english proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19 (8): 811–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salami K, Alkayed K . Publication bias in pediatric hematology and oncology: analysis of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2013; 30 (3): 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seglen PO . Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Brit Med J 1997; 314: 498–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA . Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003; 91: 42–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amarilyo G, Woo JM, Furst DE, Hoffman OL, Eyal R, Piao C et al. Publication outcomes of abstracts presented at an American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals annual scientific meeting. Arthritis Care Res 2013; 65 (4): 622–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amirhamzeh D, Moor MA, Baldwin K, Hosalkar HS . Publication rates of abstracts presented at pediatric orthopaedic society of North America meetings between 2002 and 2006. J Pediatr Orthop 2012; 32 (2): e6–e10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fosbøl EL, Fosbøl PL, Harrington RA, Eapen ZJ, Peterson ED . Conversion of cardiovascular conference abstracts to publications. Circulation 2012; 126 (24): 2819–2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abzug JM, Osterman M, Rivlin M, Paryavi E, Osterman AL . Current rates of publication for podium and poster presentations at the american society for surgery of the hand annual meetings. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2014; 2 (3): 199–202.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulson K, Saeed M, Mills J, Cuvelier GD, Kumar R, Raymond C et al. Publication bias is present in blood and marrow transplantation: an analysis of abstracts at an international meeting. Blood 2011; 118: 6698–6701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hackett PJ, Guirguis M, Sakai N, Sakai T . Fate of abstracts presented at the 2004–2008 International Liver Transplantation Society meetings. Liver Transpl 2014; 20 (3): 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnatz PF, Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O'Sullivan DM . North American Menopause Society. The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause 2008; 15 (5): 996–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan JW, Graham CA . Full text publication rates of studies presented at an International Emergency Medicine Scientific meeting. Emerg Med J 2011; 28 (9): 802–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Levinsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levinsky, Y., Berger, T., Brameli, A. et al. Publication outcomes of neonatology abstracts presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. J Perinatol 37, 881–885 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.46

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.46

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links