Abstract
Objective:
Randomized trials are essential for improving outcomes, but researchers can be hesitant about undertaking clinical trials in newborn babies because of perceived vulnerability of the baby and risk of increasing parental anxiety. There is a paucity of evidence about the parental experience. We investigated mothers’ experiences of having their newborn baby participate in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial soon after birth.
Study Design:
Eligible mothers had consented to their baby’s participation in the Sugar Babies Study. Mothers of potentially eligible babies were invited to join the study antenatally, but others were approached postnatally. Babies were enrolled in the study soon after birth and remained in the study for 48 h. After 2 weeks the birth mothers were interviewed by phone about their experience.
Result:
Four hundred and eighty-one mothers were enrolled, of whom 310 (64%) gave consent antenatally. All mothers were contacted and 477 (99%) were interviewed. The majority of mothers (458, 96%) reported they would consent to participating again, if they had another eligible baby, and 460 mothers (96%) reported they would recommend participation to family and friends. Nineteen mothers (4%) reported they did not like the heel lance blood tests, which were part of routine clinical care and not part of the trial protocol.
Conclusion:
Most mothers reported the experience of having their newborn baby participate in a clinical trial as positive. Most negative responses were related to aspects of routine care rather than the trial protocol.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Silverman WA . The future of clinical experimentation in neonatal medicine. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 932–938.
Liggins GC, Howie RN . A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 1972; 50: 515–525.
Jobe AH . Pulmonary surfactant therapy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 861–868.
Currie V, Jull A . Clinical trials in New Zealand—an update. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 22–29.
Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC . Clinical trials in children. Lancet 2004; 364: 803–811.
Caldwell PH, Butow PN, Craig JC . Pediatricians' attitudes toward randomized controlled trials involving children. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 798–803.
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379: 2162–2172.
Culbert A, Davis DJ . Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 721–726.
Mason SA, Allmark PJ . Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 2000; 356: 2045–2051.
Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H . Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F280–F285 discussion F5-6.
Stenson BJ, Becher JC, McIntosh N . Neonatal research: the parental perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F321–F323.
Morley C, Lau R, Davis P, Morse C . What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F225–F228.
Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D . Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1337–1355.
Snowdon C, Elbourne D, Garcia J . ‘It was a snap decision’: parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials. Social Sci Med 2006; 62: 2279–2290.
Ballard HO, Shook LA, Desai NS, Anand KJS . Neonatal research and the validity of informed consent obtained in the perinatal period. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 409–415.
Manning DJ . Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 249–253.
Eltorki M, Uleryk E, Freedman SB . Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 822–834.
Harris DL, Weston PJ, Signal M, Chase JG, Harding JE . Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382 (9910): 2077–2083.
Lantos JD . The ‘inclusion benefit’ in clinical trials. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 130–131.
Schmidt B, Gillie P, Caco C, Roberts J, Roberts R . Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial? J Pediatr 1999; 134: 151–155.
Albert SM, Sano M, Marder K, Jacobs DM, Brandt J, Albert M et al. Participation in clinical trials and long-term outcomes in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1997; 49: 38–43.
Castillo AG, Jandorf L, Thelemaque LD, King S, Duhamel K . Reported benefits of participation in a research study. J Community Health 2012; 37: 59–64.
Harris DL, Weston PJ, Harding JE . Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 787–791.
Miller FG, Rosenstein DL . The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1383–1386.
Harris DL, Weston PJ, Battin MR, Harding JE . Continuous glucose monitoring in newborn babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. J Pediatr 2010; 157: 198–202.
Korotchikova I, Boylan GB, Dempsey EM, Ryan CA . Presence of both parents during consent process in non-therapeutic neonatal research increases positive response. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99: 1484–1488.
Allmark P, Mason S . Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 439–443.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the families enrolled in the Sugar Babies Study and the staff at Waikato Women's Hospital, particularly research nurses Catherine McBride and Paula Middlemiss. The Sugar Babies Study was funded from the Waikato Medical Research Foundation, the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, the Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Rebecca Roberts Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, D., Weston, P. & Harding, J. Mothers of babies enrolled in a randomized trial immediately after birth report a positive experience. J Perinatol 34, 280–283 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.183
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.183
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Parental perspectives long term after neonatal clinical trial participation: a survey
Trials (2020)
-
Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology (2017)