Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, average BP level and carotid arterial stiffness in the elderly: a prospective study

Abstract

In a cross-sectional study, visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability was shown to be associated with artery remodelling. Here, we investigated the impact of visit-to-visit BP variability and average BP on the carotid artery remodelling progression in high-risk elderly according to different classes of antihypertension medication use/non-use. BP measurements and carotid ultrasound were performed in the common carotid artery in 164 subjects (mean age 79.7 years at baseline, 74.7% females) with one or more cardiovascular risk factors. Based on 12 visits (1 × /month for 1 year), we calculated visit-to-visit BP variability expressed as the standard deviation (s.d.), coefficient of variation (CV), maximum BP, minimum BP and delta (maximum−minimum) BP. We measured mean intima-media thickness (IMT) as well as stiffness parameter β were measured at baseline and at the mean 4.2-year follow-up. In a multiple regression analysis, the maximum, minimum, s.d. and average of systolic BP (SBP) were significantly associated with a change in β-values between the baseline and follow-up after adjustment for age, smoking, lower high-density lipoprotein level, baseline β-value and follow-up period. There were no significant associations between the visit-to-visit BP variability measures and the change in mean IMT. Significant associations of maximum, minimum, s.d. and average SBP were found with increased β-values in the subjects without calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and in the subjects using renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs). Thus, exaggerated visit-to-visit SBP variability and a high average SBP level were significant predictors of progression in carotid arterial stiffness in high-risk elderly without CCBs use and in those using a RASI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuffe R, Howard SC, Algra A, Warlow CP, Rothwell PM . Medium-term variability of blood pressure and potential underdiagnosis of hypertension in patients with previous transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2776–2783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlof B et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salonen JT, Salonen R . Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb 1991; 11: 1245–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr . Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirai T, Sasayama S, Kawasaki T, Yagi S . Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1989; 80: 78–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stork S, van den Beld AW, von Schacky C, Angermann CE, Lamberts SW, Grobbee DE et al. Carotid artery plaque burden, stiffness, and mortality risk in elderly men: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Circulation 2004; 110: 344–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagai M, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K . Visit-to-visit blood pressure variations: new independent determinants for carotid artery measures in the elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Hypertens 2011; 5: 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okada H, Fukui M, Tanaka M, Inada S, Mineoka Y, Nakanishi N et al. Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure is correlated with diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 2012; 220: 155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simbo D, Shea S, McClelland RL, Viera AJ, Mann D, Newman J et al. Associations of aortic distensibility and arterial elasticity with long-term visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Hypertens 2013; 26: 896–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb AJ, Fischer U, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM . Effects of antihypertensive-drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 375: 906–915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagai M, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K . Visit-to-visit blood pressure variations: new independent determinants for cognitive function in the elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. J Hypertens 2012; 30: 1556–1563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kario K, Hoshide S, Shimizu M, Yano Y, Eguchi K, Ishikawa J et al. Effect of dosing time of angiotensin II receptor blockade titrated by self-measured blood pressure recordings on cardiorenal protection in hypertensives: the Japan Morning Surge-Target Organ Protection (J-TOP) study. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 1574–1583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamasaki Y, Katakami N, Sakamoto K, Kaneto H, Matsuhisa M, Sato H et al. Combination of multiple genetic risk factors is synergistically associated with carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2445–2451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamasaki Y, Katakami N, Furukado S, Kitagawa K, Nagatsuka K, Kashiwagi A et al. Long-term effects of pioglitazone on carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes without a recent history of macrovascular morbidity. J Atheroscler Thromb 2010; 17: 1132–1140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emoto M, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Maekawa K, Hiura Y, Kanda H et al. Stiffness indexes beta of the common carotid and femoral arteries are associated with insulin resistance in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1178–1182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawasaki T, Sasayama S, Yagi S, Asakawa T, Hirai T . Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. Cardiovasc Res 1987; 21: 678–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee E, Emoto M, Teramura M, Tsuchikura S, Ueno H, Shinohara K et al. The combination of IMT and stiffness parameter beta is highly associated with concurrent coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. J Atheroscler Thromb 2009; 16: 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crouse JR, Goldbourt U, Evans G, Pinsky J, Sharrett AR, Sorlie P et al. Risk factors and segment specific carotid arterial enlargement in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort. Stroke 1996; 27: 69–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whisnant JP, Homer D, Ingall TJ, Baker HL, O'Fallon WM, Wiebers DO . Duration of cigarette smoking is the strongest predictor of severe extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. Stroke 1990; 21: 707–714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Szirmai IG, Kamondi A, Magyar H, Juhasz C . Relation of laboratory and clinical variables to the grade of carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 1993; 24: 1811–1816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhofer J, Winbeck K, Conrad B . Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis. A 3-year follow-up study. Circulation 2000; 102: 1536–1541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenz MW, Polak JF, Kavousi M, Mathiesen EB, Volzke H, Tuomainen TP et al. Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2012; 379: 2053–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Parati G, Zanchetti A . Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2012; 126: 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Sloten TT, Schram MT, van den Hurk K, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Henry RM et al. Local stiffness of carotid and femoral artery is associated with incident cardiovascular events and all cause mortality: the Hoorn study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1739–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1236–1241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Popele NM, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Asmar R, Topouchian J, Reneman RS et al. Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke 2001; 32: 454–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, Kannel WB et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 308–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ni Y, Wang H, Hu D, Zhang W . The relationship between pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure in Chinese patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 871–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pringle E, Phillips C, Thijs L, Davidson C, Staessen JA, de Leeuw PW et al. Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 2251–2257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ichihara A, Kaneshiro Y, Takemitsu T, Sakoda M . Effects of amlodipine and valsartan on vascular damage and ambulatory blood pressure in untreated hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2006; 20: 787–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rothwell PM . Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 938–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, Oparil S . The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: Findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension 2011; 57: 160–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Nagai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagai, M., Dote, K., Kato, M. et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, average BP level and carotid arterial stiffness in the elderly: a prospective study. J Hum Hypertens 31, 292–298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2016.77

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2016.77

Search

Quick links