Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Percentile distribution of blood pressure readings in 35683 men and women aged 18 to 99 years

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 28, pages 193–200 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The percentile distribution of blood pressure (BP) with regard to age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors is unknown. We aimed to provide epidemiological data for a comprehensive description of the BP distribution across a wide age-range. We used data from the German Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Project (GEMCAS), a cross-sectional study with 35 683 participants aged 18–99 years, conducted during October 2005 in 1511 randomly selected general practices in Germany. BP and waist circumference were measured, data on lifestyle, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and medication assessed. In men, we found even in the lowest percentile (5th) a gradual increase of the systolic BP from the lowest to the highest age group of 10 mm Hg, all other percentile groups an increase of 20 mm Hg. In women, this increase ranged from 15 mm Hg (5th percentile) to 40 mm Hg (95th percentile). In a subgroup of participants with no antihypertensive usage (n=22 550) and no CVD/CVD risk factors (n=13 297), we still observed a distinct age-related increase of BP readings. Our study provides detailed information on the population distribution of BP readings in both sexes and also among very old individuals. The results are useful in a public health context to plan gender- and age-specific prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, Wong ND, Leip EP, Kannel WB et al. Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2001; 103: 1245–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Acheson RM . Blood pressure in a national sample of U.S. adults: percentile distribution by age, sex and race. Int J Epidemiol 1973; 2: 293–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pobee JO, Larbi EB, Belcher DW, Wurapa FK, Dodu SR . Blood pressure distribution in a rural Ghanaian population. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1977; 71: 66–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim TO, Ding LM, Goh BL, Zaki M, Suleiman AB, Maimunah AH et al. Distribution of blood pressure in a national sample of Malaysian adults. Med J Malaysia 2000; 55: 90–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Madjid M, Rahmani M . Distribution of blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension in Tehran adult population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), 1999-2000. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 305–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright JD, Hughes JP, Ostchega Y, Yoon SS, Nwankwo T . Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults aged 18 and over in the United States, 2001–2008. Natl Health Stat Report 2011; 35: 1–22 24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moebus S, Hanisch J, Neuhaeuser M, Aidelsburger P, Wasem J, Jöckel KH . Assessing the prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome according to NCEP ATP III in Germany: feasibility and quality aspects of a two step approach in 1550 randomly selected primary health care practices. GMS Ger Med Sci 2006; 4: Doc07.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann W, Latza U, Terschüren C . Leitlinien und Empfehlungen zur Sicherung von Guter Epidemiologischer Praxis (GEP) - überarbeitete Fassung nach Evaluation. Gesundheitswesen 2005; 67: 217–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thamm M . Blutdruck in Deutschland- Zustandsbeschreibung und Trends. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61, Sonderheft 2 S90–S93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohler E, Ziese T . Telefonischer Gesundheitssurvey des Robert Koch-Instituts zu chronischen Krankheiten und ihren Bedingungen. Robert Koch-Institut: Berlin, Germany, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stang A, Moebus S, Möhlenkamp S, Dragano N, Schmermund A, Beck EM et al. Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 164: 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coe TR, Houghton K . Comparison of the automated Dinamap blood pressure monitor with the mercury sphygmomanometer for detecting hypertension in the day case pre-assessment clinic. Ambul Surg 2002; 10: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289: 2363–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franklin SS, Gustin W 4th, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, Kannel WB et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 308–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the physicians and their personnel involved in the study for their contribution. We are similarly indebted to all the study participants for their kind cooperation in examinations and interviews. The study was funded by an unrestricted educational research grant by Sanofi Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    C Balijepalli, C Lösch, K-H Jöckel & S Moebus

  2. Providence Health Care Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    C Balijepalli & K H Humphries

  3. Institut für Pharmakologie und präventive Medizin, Mahlow, Germany

    P Bramlage

  4. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany

    R Erbel

Authors
  1. C Balijepalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Lösch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P Bramlage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R Erbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K H Humphries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K-H Jöckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S Moebus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Moebus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balijepalli, C., Lösch, C., Bramlage, P. et al. Percentile distribution of blood pressure readings in 35683 men and women aged 18 to 99 years. J Hum Hypertens 28, 193–200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.85

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2013.85

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links